Would 19th century China have fared differently under an ethnically Han dynasty?

The story of late Qing is most frequently remembered as the epitome of a nation which relied on outdated notions of its superiority as well as a corrupt upperclass unable to adjust to modernity, but less immediately talked about is how China's internal problems and large scale rebellions were caused by hatred for the foreign ruling class and its imposition of Manchu customs onto the natives, meaning there was little incentive to stand by the Empire as it was picked apart by foreign powers. I want to discuss however another consequence of the Qing being non-Chinese and from a culture rooted in the nomadic lifestyles of the north. I've lately come to believe the downfall of the Qing didn't start just with Baron Macaulay's expedition but ironically enough with the conquests pursued under its earlier emperors (yes, even Kangxi). Looking at Chinese history through a pattern of dynasties, a difference is noticeable in how each regime handled foreign relations, with Han states centering heavily around the notions of a tributary system rooted in cultural and hegemonic power over the surrounding states, with this sense of centrality being what kept imperial China a unified ideal, while barbarian run states tended to keep the warmongering and steppe expansion which initially gained them a large imperial state (The exception of course is Tang, with the the expenses of northwestern militarism and entanglements with the Gokturks leading to the rebellions that destabilized the dynasty.). Under the Qing this contrast reached its zenoth with not only the total imposition of non-Chinese customs onto the Han, but also the total conquest and subjugation of the Turkic peoples to the west of traditional boundaries. Say however, the Qing had failed to the Shun or Wu Zhou had led a successful bid fro the throne and kept tributary policies similar to the Ming; how would the court and general population react differently to European incursions? Would this alternative China have been able to command greater respect from its subordinates and more unified effort at modernization? Most likely the imperial regime would still fall due to cultural posturing as well as the rapid sevelopments of Europe and America, but I imagine there would be quicker transition between two Chinas, with musch shorter period of rule by warlords, with the newer China becoming a state aligned with western influenced ideologies.

TLDR: How would the collapse of the Chinese Empire have played out differently had the Qing been eliminated in favor of a native dynasty?
 
Given how much European technology and science progressed starting from the 17th century onwards, it could be possible for a Chinese dynasty to adopt European technology and science if China keeps a eye on how Europeans are behaving in Asia.
 
Were the Qing really that different from the Han Chinese dynasties? I mean, other than their dress and unusual hairstyle, didn't they adopt most Chinese customs and traditions in an attempt to legitimise themselves as rulers of China under the "Mandate of Heaven"?
 
Were the Qing really that different from the Han Chinese dynasties? I mean, other than their dress and unusual hairstyle, didn't they adopt most Chinese customs and traditions in an attempt to legitimise themselves as rulers of China under the "Mandate of Heaven"?

They even abandoned their native language pretty quickly and already by mid-19th century if not even earlier they were pretty effectively forgotten Manchu language and spoke Mandarin Chinese.

And Ming Dynasty was too very isolationist. But I don't know would Han Chinese dynasty be so much against reforms as non-Han one.
 
They even abandoned their native language pretty quickly and already by mid-19th century if not even earlier they were pretty effectively forgotten Manchu language and spoke Mandarin Chinese.

And Ming Dynasty was too very isolationist. But I don't know would Han Chinese dynasty be so much against reforms as non-Han one.
Early part of the Ming Dynasty yes, but after the 1500s, the Ming Dynasty more or less opened up to foreign trade etc, and there was a massive effort to coopt merchants/smugglers into the ruler class. There was also quite a number of prominent Christian converts amongst the scholar elite. The Confucian scholar elite during that period was also thrilled with anything from the West. After the Manchu takeover however, trade became far more restricted again, limited to only a few ports before limited almost exclusively to Canton. The Manchus also completely gutted the coastal community by using fairly arbitrarily methods during their early rule by killing or expelling all coastal communities alongside the coast in an effort to deny resources to the Zhengs of Taiwan. All of this meant that the Chinese elite once again became less communicative with the West.
 
Last edited:
Given how Chinese settlement of Taiwan only really came about after the Dutch and the Spanish came along, and the Manchu only banned Chinese marine settlement along the coast because they did not want support of the Zhengs of Taiwan, who kicked out the Europeans, a good point of divergence is the Europeans never settle on Taiwan to begin with.
 
Given how Chinese settlement of Taiwan only really came about after the Dutch and the Spanish came along, and the Manchu only banned Chinese marine settlement along the coast because they did not want support of the Zhengs of Taiwan, who kicked out the Europeans, a good point of divergence is the Europeans never settle on Taiwan to begin with.
Better way to go would be to have the Zheng Zhilong not being an idiot to surrender Fujian. That way the Zhengs have the entirety of Fujian and could rally support for the Longwu emperor to counterattack the Manchus. The Zhengs most likely takesover the empire eventually and focuses on maritime trade.
 
Top