The Unexpected: In the time of Louis XII's heir

Hello. I finally publish a third version of my initial TL on Louis XII's posthomous heir.
If it takes so much time before rewriting the tale, it mainly because I decided months ago to publish this TL on the French Forum "Forum des Uchronies Francophones", mainly because it was easier for me to develop this TL, but also to allow me to learn how to handle this work without falling in my initial flaws, i.e systematic publishing.
The three (perhaps four) initials parts are very similar to the threads that have been published in the two first versions. However, the depiction of events will be a bit (or even more) different compared to the initial threads.
While my work in the French forum is not over yet when I wrote this message, it is more advanced than the initial work (currently the end of the 1530's and nearly forty written parts). Like the initial work, it is a synthetized depiction of an alternate reality (even if French context is a bit more depicted).
I will have the same approach of publication as in the French Forum : a new part each week (except for the three first parts as they are very similar to the two first versions). Each part will be a translated version of my work on "Forum des Uchronies Francophones" through Deepl.
I hope that those who had loved the first version would find themselves with this new and definite version of my TL.

Good reading !
 
November 1514-July 1515: Time of pregnancy
November 1514-July 1515: Time of pregnancy
In December 1514, Louis XII learned that his new wife, Mary of England, was pregnant. This was good news for him as he hoped to have an heir to succeed him on the throne after the death of his previous sons from his marriage to Anne of Brittany. Unfortunately, his frail health failed him in the last days of December and he died on 1 January 1515.
While awaiting the birth of his child, his presumptive heir, François d'Angoulême, became regent, as Mary was unable to assume this role due to her pregnancy. This was the second time that the kingdom of France had experienced a pregnancy regency since that of Clementia of Hungary in 1316.

Francis was now the most powerful man in France. Not only was he the presumptive heir, but he also controlled the Duchy of Valois by virtue of his status as heir and the Duchy of Brittany jure uxoris in the name of his wife, Claude de France, the daughter of Louis XII and Anne de Bretagne. This provoked protests from the Breton lords who denounced the non-respect of Anne of Brittany's marriage contract with the previous king since it stipulated that Renée de France, Claude's younger sister, was to inherit the duchy. These protests didn't last because of Francis' position of power and the possibility that Mary giving birth to a son could nullify this condition as it only applied if Claude of France became Queen of France.

During his regency, Francis ruled in order to strengthen his position and to prove to others that he would be a great king. And if Mary gives birth to a son, he will be powerful enough to be part of the regency, ideally in the same position, if not as an advisor. To achieve this, he confirmed the creation of the Parliament of Normandy, appointed his brother-in-law, Charles IV of Alencon, as governor of Normandy, and raised taxes or sell land to his relatives and friends to resolve debts arising from the Italian wars and aggravated by his predecessor's tax cuts. This also enabled him to strengthen his position through a network of allies. In the same vein, he appointed Antoine Duprat as chancellor.

On the diplomatic front, Francis adopted a moderate stance to reassure the various sovereigns, especially in Italy. The former members of the Holy League welcomed the news of Mary's pregnancy and the establishment of the regency in the kingdom of France with relief, as it stopped French ambitions in Italy for a time. All hoped for the birth of a son: this would mean a longer regency and less French influence in Italy. This respite was beneficial for Maximilian Sforza, Duke of Milan, as it allowed him to marry Bona Sforza, his cousin, to strengthen his legitimacy as Duke of Milan. For others, on the other hand, the French regency was a disaster, even if they hoped to see Francis become king : Venice and Navarre. Charles of Ghent sent representatives to ask the regent to recognise his claim to the Spanish crowns. The result was the Treaty of Paris which signed an alliance between Francis and Charles of Ghent, the former recognising the latter's claim to Spain, while Charles recognised Francis' claim to Milan if the latter became King of France.
Francis also confirmed the Treaty of London of August 1514 in order to maintain good relations with England. The English king, Henry VIII, watched the French situation with interest as his sister could give birth to the future king of France.
Francis allowed John II Stuart, Duke of Albany, to return to Scotland to take up his position as Regent for James V, as having an ally in Scotland was strategic for the heir apparent to the French crown, if only to maintain the Auld Alliance against England. He arrived in his native land in June 1515 and managed to fortify his position, despite Margaret Tudor's defiance of him, who took refuge in Stirling.​
 
Last edited:
I do wonder about Mary - will she scandalously remarry ITTL? Or will she remember that the queens of France do not remarry and remain a widow for her whole life?
 
I do wonder about Mary - will she scandalously remarry ITTL? Or will she remember that the queens of France do not remarry and remain a widow for her whole life?
It will be the latter for different reasons, some of them that are tackled in the second part (with a little easter egg to her OTL situation).
 
It will be the latter for different reasons, some of them that are tackled in the second part (with a little easter egg to her OTL situation).
Ooh, can't wait! This is a cool TL idea (my spin on it involved him marrying IOTL's Mary I, though, so....) and hopefully Claude has a longer and happier life ITTL
 
Honestly really interested in this, there's a scarcity of French TLs (non Napoleonic ones at least) so seeing something like this with a interesting pod sounds like it will be a great story, definitely watching this.
 
1515-1518: Birth of the heir and "Dual Regency"
1515-1518: Birth of the heir and "Dual Regency"
Mary gave birth to a son in late July 1515 at the castle of Blois. He was named Charles in honour of Louis XII's father, although some malicious tongues suggest that it was in honour of Charles Brandon, Duke of Suffolk, who had accompanied the young English princess to her wedding and for whom she had had some affectionate feelings. Because of the circumstances of his birth, the young son of Louis XII was first known as Charles the Posthumous, Dieudonné or the Miraculous. As the heir of Louis XII, he is Charles IX of France. The infant king was christened at Easter 1516 in Rheims Cathedral. His godfathers were Francis of Angouleme and Henry VIII of England, while Anne of Beaujeu, Charles VIII's sister and former regent, was his godmother. His official christening was one of the major events of the decade as the christening of a new king was something exceptional. Many French lords, but also representatives of neighbouring kingdoms, attended.
The birth of Charles IX meant that François of Angouleme remained presumptive heir to the crown, which contributed to his and his mother's frustration. Francis became jure uxoris Francis III of Brittany and set about developing his links with the Breton lords.​

Francis III of Brittany remained regent for the first few months after the birth of Charles IX, taking advantage of the dowager queen's weak influence, her lack of preparation for royal responsibilities and the fact that Louis XII had appointed him regent on his deathbed. In the months following the birth of the king, the regent continued to pursue the policy he had established since the death of Louis XII.
However, the birth of her son forced Mary to take an interest in her political responsibilities. She is encouraged to do so by her brother through his ambassador, Thomas Boleyn. She was helped to learn about her responsibilities by meeting Charles of Bourbon-Montpensier and his wife Suzanne of Bourbon, who brought her into contact with Anne of Beaujeu, Suzanne's mother. The exchanges with the latter allowed her to obtain political advice. These meetings, which took place in the last months of 1515, enabled her to build up a network of allies, all the more precious as the Bourbons were very vigilant with regard to the ambitions of the Valois-Angouleme clan. This development of influence was partly hindered by the return of his English ladies-in-waiting, notably Lady Guildford, as some members of the royal court did not look kindly on the arrival of Englishmen.
At the beginning of 1516, Mary confronted Francis III to obtain the regency of her son. Important discussions ensued, as the presumptive heir was unwilling to easily give up the position , considering himself legitimate for the position. Refusing to give in because of her independent character, the young dowager queen threatened to appeal to the General Estates to obtain the position of regent. The confrontation between the two main figures of the kingdom was described by contemporaries as the "Regents Dispute". As the solemn baptism of Charles IX approached, the dispute became much more heated, while Mary received the support of her brother, even if this support was rather symbolic. A compromise was reached between the two: Mary became regent after the baptism of her son. In return, Francis continued to play an important role in the regency and was confirmed as Duke of Valois, the title he had held as presumptive heir to Louis XII. In this compromise, the royal council as Francis had established it during his regency was maintained, allowing Antoine Duprat in particular to remain chancellor of the kingdom.
After the christening of Charles IX at Easter 1516, Mary officially became regent and recognised in this position by the Parliament of Paris in April 1516. In doing so, she also had responsibility for Renée de France, her daughter-in-law. Her first years as regent were difficult, as she had to deal with Francis, whose influence and charisma allowed him to have a leading role at court. This regency was nicknamed the "Dual Regency" by contemporaries and saw the development of rivalry between the two most important figures in the kingdom. Her minor position as regent forced Mary to develop her network of allies at court, seeking out all those who were defiant against the Valois-Angouleme House. She could count on the support of the Bourbons, who were wary of the influence and ambition of the Valois-Angouleme, especially of Louise of Savoy's claims to the duchy of Bourbonnais. Nevertheless, the position of the Bourbons was strenghtened with the birth of three children between 1516 and 1518: Peter, who died in infancy, Mary and Louis.
The dowager queen also developed an important correspondence with Anne of Beaujeu, whose advice and influence enabled her to develop the skills necessary for the regency. She was also able to draw on the support of her brother's representatives, even if this aroused the hostility of some members of the royal court who tended to join the Valois-Angouleme clan. Beyond the court, Mary developed relationships through her allies among lords, clerics and notables. The development of her influence and the strengthening of her position as regent contributed to fuel the rivalry with Francis III of Brittany. The opposition was aggravated by Mary of England's distrust of Louise of Savoy because of the latter's strong ambition.
In addition to her position as regent, which she had to consolidate, Mary was concerned for her son and wanted him to grow up, instructing the king's first physician, William Cop, to ensure his good health.

The rivalry between Mary and Francis was expressed in various fields, but mainly in the cultural life of the court, as both had a great appreciation of art. The dowager queen and the presumptive heir to the throne were to engage in a competition, each seeking to develop their influence through the patronage of important painters, sculptors, musicians and thinkers. Although the royal court benefited from Italian influence as a result of the Italian wars between 1494 and 1514, the rivalry between the dowager queen and the presumptive heir to the throne contributed to the prestige and dynamism of French culture by establishing specific characteristics in painting, architecture, music and sculpture. Marie's singing and dancing skills earned her the nickname of "Trouvere Queen". In addition to this, there are the inspirations used to develop their styles: Francis drew a lot of inspiration from Italian culture, while Mary developed a style that mixed English and French influences while taking advantage of the Italian influence. These styles and influences are reflected in the official portraits and the decoration of the palaces and castles occupied by the two people. Thus, Mary renovated and decorated the Louvre, Blois or Fontainebleau, which became her main residence, while Francis began to renovate the family castle of Cognac, but also the Castle of the Dukes of Brittany in Nantes, although in the latter case, this renovation was also aimed at gaining the support and loyalty of the Breton vassals.

The rivalry between Francis III of Brittany and Mary was however less strong in the financial field. Mary retained many of the decisions taken by Francis, particularly concerning the increase in taxes. She however abandoned the sale of lands as she did not want to further despoil the royal estate. Although she had to deal with the more protectionist views supported by Antoine Duprat and Francis, the dowager queen sought to assert herself and was inspired in particular by the policies of her father, Henry VII. She thus promoted support for trade and the application of the Morton's Fork: a charity tax that played on the fact that a person could afford benevolence both if they lived modestly because they were 'saving' and if they lived extravagantly and therefore had the financial means to show benevolence. The Morton's Fork approach is endorsed as a form of practical application of Christian charity to the Christian sovereign . Mary's support of trade was more difficult to implement, although the memory of Charles VII's policy was refered to justify the approach. On the one hand, Antoine Duprat favoured a protectionist policy and was supported by Francis. On the other hand, the dowager queen and the presumptive heir strongly disagreed on the main trading partner: Mary favoured trade with England and Flanders, while Francis defended trade with the Italian peninsula, as this would allow France to retain some influence in the region. Mary had to deal with the considerable influence of Francis III of Brittany, which led to a certain protectionism being maintained. Nevertheless, trade with neighbouring territories was gradually enhanced, not least because of the regent's growing influence in the following years. The development of trade policy led to the regency granting privileges to cities that would contribute to trade. This also led to the foundation of Le Havre in the autumn of 1517, as Harfleur was becoming increasingly silted up. The foundation of the new port also allowed the strategic use of the Seine estuary. The development of trade led to the development of the French merchant fleet, especially in the Channel, in order to trade with England.

The rivalry between the dowager queen and the presumptive heir to the crown was also expressed in the diplomatic field, although it was also complex in its expression.
Francis and Mary agreed that the alliance with Henry VIII of England should be maintained, as Charles IX's birth consolidating it. This was reflected in the choice of Henry VIII as godfather to the newborn child, but also in Mary's support for the policy of her brother and of Thomas Wolsey, namely the search for the establishment of perpetual peace between the different sovereigns of Christendom. These combined efforts culminated in the signing of the Treaty of London in September 1517. On this occasion, Henry VIII returned Tournai to the kingdom of France, although he had taken it during the war of the League of Cambrai in 1513.
On the other hand, the dowager queen and the presumptive heir to the crown were in deep disagreement over Scotland. Francis defended Albany's right to be regent because he had been chosen by his peers, and the need to honour the Auld Alliance. Mary is more cautious: while she recognises the importance of the Auld Alliance, she does not want to see the relationship with England being soured by the alliance, which might suggest that France and Scotland are trying to encircle her brother's kingdom. She is also more sensitive to her sister's claims as they are in similar situations. Her sister's situation makes her aware of the risks she runs if she allows her emotions to sway her when she should be looking after her son's interests. The Treaty of London of September 1517 partly solved the problem, while the Treaty of Calais signed in November 1517 established peaceful relations between the kingdoms of France, England and Scotland.
With regard to Italy, Mary will pursue a policy of conciliation in order to reassure the Italian states and the papacy after the years of wars in the Peninsula. While Francis was aware that a new war in Italy was not available in the short term, he supported the idea of maintaining influence over Milan and Genoa and finding an ally and partner with Venice. While his views on the subject were dominant in the first two years of the regency, they somewhat daded as Mary learned to emancipate her regency from his influence. By 1518, the regency had developed its relations with Genoa and found an ally and economic partner in Venice. Relations with the Duchy of Milan improved, especially with the recognition of Maximilian Sforza as legitimate duke in March 1516 with the Treaty of Carpentras which formalised the end of war of the League of Cambrai. The regency also developed relations with the duchy of Savoy, as Duke Charles III felt less threatened by the dowager queen than by the presumptive heir whose mother, Louise of Savoy, was a pretender to his title as his half-sister.
The relationship between the French regency and the papacy was more ambiguous. On the one hand, the end of the war of the League of Cambrai and the weakening of French influence in the peninsula allowed for an improvement in relations, confirmed by the treaty of Carpentras. But on the other hand, a dispute existed between the two powers with the decisions of the fifth Council of Lateran, completed in 1516. This council denounced the Pragmatic Sanction of Bourges and demanded its abolition, reaffirming moreover the superiority of the pope over the council in religious matters. During the first years of the regency, the question of the Pragmatic Sanction of Bourges was dodged, because of the strong opposition of the parliaments to its abrogation. The parliaments and the so-called Gallican clergy also demanded a better application of the Pragmatic Sanction. In order to secure her position and strengthen her influence, Mary agreed to a better application of the Pragmatic Sanction, which aroused the anger of Leo X. Negotiations however continued in order to find a compromise that would satisfy both parties.
The regency also renewed ties with the Swiss cantons, particularly those in the west, although these ties were mainly diplomatic and economic due to the absence of war and the important influence of the Cardinal and Prince-Bishop of Sion, Matthias Schiner, who remained rather hostile to the French.
With regard to relations with the Habsburgs, Mary applied the same policy as Francis III of Brittany, preferring to maintain good relations with Charles of Ghent and Maximilian I of Habsburg. This approach was reinforced by the death of Ferdinand II of Arago in January 1516, which saw Charles of Ghent becoming Charles I in March of the same year. In the same vein, the regent agreed to sign a treaty of alliance in 1516 with Charles and Maximilian, officially intended against the Turks. Finally, with the Treaty of London in 1517, Mary recognised the Spanish claim to Naples and their domination of Upper Navarre.
 
This was the second time that the kingdom of France had experienced a pregnancy regency since that of Clementia of Hungary in 1316.
Technically third, as the last child of Charles IV also was posthumous, but the second one when regent remained regent after birth of a child.
 
Technically third, as the last child of Charles IV also was posthumous, but the second one when regent remained regent after birth of a child.
True, I have forgotten Charles IV's daughter and Philippe Valois's regency in 1528. Thank you for the reminder.
 
Honestly, another good chapter, the implementation of Morton's Fork and deeper comercial relationships not only with Italy but also england and Flanders will do wonders for french finances (which already were well developed and organized), also pretty smart to recognize certain claims as well as making better relationships with other powers.

I also really enjoyed the effect Mary and Francis are having on the arts, with them focusing on certain styles that have effects on how they're produced, I really hope I can see more of it.
 
1515-1518: The new political balance in Christendom
1515-1518: The new political balance in Christendom
The birth of Charles IX and the regency of Mary had an impact on the political balance of Christendom. The fragile balance that had been established with the end of the confrontations of the War of the League of Cambrai in 1514 was reinforced with the extension of the French regency.

The Habsburgs were among those who benefited most from the French situation, as they had no serious rivals for at least a decade or two. This allowed them to consolidate their power and influence in Europe, especially in Italy and Spain when Charles of Ghent became King of Arago and Castile in the spring of 1516. Maximilian I took advantage of the situation to strengthen his position in Verona, a place he had taken from Venice in 1509. He created the Duchy of Verona in February 1518, which allowed him to establish a foothold in the Italian peninsula. It also enabled him to achieve several political successes on the matrimonial front : at the Congress of Vienna in July 1515, the emperor succeeded in obtaining the engagement of Mary of Habsburg to Louis II of Hungary, while Anne, the Hungarian king's sister, was destined for Charles of Ghent or his brother Ferdinand. And in September 1518, his niece, Susanna of Bavaria, married Sigismund I of Poland and Lithuania. The emperor also supported Pope Leo X's plan for an expedition against the Ottoman Empire, and in 1518 he was preparing a military campaign to seize Constantinople.
Charles of Ghent strengthened his ties with France, but also followed the advice of his aunt, Margaret of Austria, and built up ties with England. His diplomatic efforts culminated in the Treaty of Dover in February 1518, which was a continuation of the Treaty of Eternal Peace signed in London the previous autumn. The treaty saw him become an ally of the French regency and Henry VIII, while a promise of betrothal between him and Renee of France was accepted. His position was strengthened when he succeeded his grandfather Ferdinand II of Aragon in March 1516, although officially he did so jointly with his mother, Joanna the Mad. As he consolidated his position, he strengthened his diplomatic relations through the Treaty of London and the various alliance treaties signed with Maximilian I, the French regency and Henry VIII between 1516 and 1518. He also supported Pope Leo X's plan for a military expedition against the Turks and began to prepare a campaign against Sultan Selim I with Maximilian I in 1518.
Before his death, Ferdinand II of Arago benefited from the French succession, which gave him the opportunity to force the Navarrese to recognise his control of Upper Navarre. The death of Catherine I of Navarre in February 1517 and the arrival on the throne of Henry II helped to create a new dynamic between Navarre and France : Henry II forged links with Francis III of Brittany in order to develop influence in the court of the regent, which he hoped would enable him to find in the dowager queen or Charles IX a valuable ally that would enable him to recover Upper Navarre in the future.

In England, the birth of Charles IX was greeted by Henry VIII with joy and envy: he was pleased to see his favourite sister having a son as King of France, but it reminded him that he had no heir despite his wife's four pregnancies since their marriage in 1509. The birth of Charles IX affected his plans as the existence of a nephew at the head of the French kingdom further weakened his dreams of military glory on the continent. The birth of his daughter Marie in February 1516 somewhat eased his bitterness and jealousy, even though he still had no male heir. The fact that he was chosen to be one of the godparents of the young French king led him to travel to France, becoming the first English king to be in Reims. He took great pride in this, proud to have managed to go to one of the high places of French royalty unlike his predecessors, especially Henry VI who had come so close to becoming King of France. It also allowed him to meet his sister again and to strengthen the new ties between the two kingdoms and to use the trip to display all his prestige with pomp.
In the following years, the English king strengthened his ties with France and relied on his new chancellor, Thomas Wolsey, to achieve this, especially as the man had had a central role in the composition of the Treaty of London 1514. The English king and his chancellor also decided to champion a diplomatic path that valued peace between countries and prevented wars. Their approach was supported by the Regent of France and resulted in the Treaty of Eternal Peace signed in London in September 1517 between the major territories of Christendom, including England, France, Spain, the Holy Roman Empire and the Papacy. The treaty that was finally signed was a non-aggression pact between the signatories, but also a military alliance in which the signatories undertook to intervene in the event of aggression by one of their own. The treaty also helps to solve problems that had persisted since 1514, such as the return of Tournai from England to France or the recognition of Maximilian Sforza by the French regency. This diplomatic policy contributed to make England once again a major player in the politics of Christendom, all the more so when its neighbour and former rival was in regency. The Treaty of London also led to Wolsey's appointment as papal legate to England. Alongside this policy of diplomacy, Henry VIII sought to develop influence in the French court through his sister and her ambassadors.
1517 saw London hit by a violent riot on Evil May Day and although Thomas More's efforts brought peace to the areas affected by the unrest, several of the ringleaders were executed, as Henry VIII did not want unrest to threaten the negotiations to establish Eternal Peace.

The news of Charles IX's birth reached Scotland in the autumn of 1515. This caused difficulties for the French party, as the birth of the king raised questions about the continuity of the French alliance. While Albany and his allies faced this dilemma, they were still supported by the French regent. The dowager queen of Scotland, Margaret Tudor, was in no better position as only her family supported her in regaining the position of regent and she only learned of the birth of her royal French nephew after his arrival in England in September 1515, preventing her from taking advantage of it. The change in the French regency in April 1516 further complicated the situation as Albany did not know whether the dowager queen of France would support him as she was Margaret's sister.
The two parties were at an impasse and only a joint mediation by Henry VIII and the French regent in the autumn of 1516 allowed them to reach a compromise : Albany remained regent, but a regency council was created in which Margaret could contribute. However, this solution brought new difficulties: each side tried to become the dominant force in the regency ; Margaret and her husband sought to consolidate their position while Albany tried to strengthen his position as regent and renew the Auld Alliance with France. Using the diplomatic approach to consolidate his position, the regent decides to renew the Auld Alliance with France while developing relations with England. This led to discussions taking place during 1517. These were first answered in the Treaty of London in September 1517, where Albany was one of the signatories, and then materialised in the Treaty of Calais in November 1517. This treaty created an alliance between the Kingdom of Scotland, the Kingdom of France and the Kingdom of England and confirmed Margaret's role in the regency council while a promise of betrothal between a French princess and James V was suggested. In the same treaty, the idea of a promise of marriage between Henry VIII's daughter and a French prince is mentioned, although the Queen Dowager of France and Thomas Wolsey agree to wait until the birth of Francis' first heir before deciding on this point. The treaty was dubbed the 'Tudor Triumvirate' by contemporaries because the dowager queens of the French and Scottish kingdoms were Henry VIII's sisters. The treaty brought a certain appeasement among the Scottish nobility, although noble and ancestral rivalries continued to affect the regency.

In Italy, a new political balance was established during the period. With the weakening of French influence in the peninsula, the Habsburgs and the Pope consolidated and extended their influence over the other city states. Another actor benefited from the situation: the cantons of the Swiss Confederation. Since they had contributed to the defeat of the French in 1512-1513, they became an important player in the north of the peninsula, especially in the Duchy of Milan. Duke Maximilian Sforza had to repay the payments he owed them and relied on the cantons to consolidate his position in the duchy. In addition, the Swiss influenced his political actions and controlled several strategic valleys in the duchy, notably Valtellina. The Duchy of Milan became a de facto Swiss protectorate. The Swiss influence created resentment among the Milanese population, who saw them less and less as allies and more and more as invading foreigners similar to the French. As the French threat weakened, Maximilian Sforza worked to establish new relations with his neighbours and allies over the years 1516-1517. Through the influence of the Cardinal of Sion, Matthias Schiner, this led to the Treaty of Bergamo in May 1517. In this treaty, an alliance was recognised between the duchy and the Swiss cantons, which provided protection for the duchy in exchange for a financial pension. Although this treaty affected his financial resources, it allowed Maximilian Sforza to ensure his duchy's independence from the great neighbouring powers. This allowed him to rebuild his duchy and bring back a certain prosperity, notably by relying on artists. His power was strengthened, especially as in 1518 he had two children with his wife Bona : Beatrice born in May 1516 and Francesco born in June 1517.
The rise of the Swiss Confederation also contributed to strengthening the links between the different cantons and with the three alliances of the League. The Swiss also strengthened their ties with the papacy through the work of Cardinal Matthias Schiner, the head of the alliance with the Papal States. The Cardinal of Sion became one of the key figures of the Swiss Confederation thanks to his successful diplomatic actions in the war of the League of Cambrai (1). During the years 1515-1518, the cardinal met Erasmus in Basel in 1515, exchanging views with him on the need for church reforms. He also developed a correspondence with Ulrich Zwingli, a priest from Glarus whom he had known since the 1512 battles against the French. While the two men disagreed on the issue of the mercenary policy of their compatriots, Zwingli being opposed to the principle of this policy, both men had in common their support for the papal alliance and the need to reform the Catholic Church. Through letters they developed a strong friendship. This correspondence continued as Zwingli became chaplain at Einsiedeln Abbey following the growing hostility of some of his parishioners to his austerity and some of his ideas.
Charles III of Savoy benefited from the birth of Charles IX, as it lessened the French threat to his duchy, especially as the mother of Francis III of Brittany, Louise of Savoy, was his half-sister and claimed the duchy. However, in 1516 he lost the support of Leo X with the death of his brother-in-law, Julien de Medici. This forced him to rely on the Swiss, allowing them to develop their influence on his duchy and on the small republic of Geneva, with which he had been in latent conflict since 1513 with his choice to appoint his cousin John as bishop of the city.
Pope Leo X took advantage of the French withdrawal from Italy to strengthen his position in Italy, but also as head of the Church. Thus, he took advantage of his predecessor's actions to keep the duchy of Modena and Reggio and recovered Parma in 1518 through the Treaty of Bergamo in which he helped the duchy of Milan and the Swiss Confederation to reach an agreement. This allowed him to promote his project against the Turks. During the years 1515-1516, a first draft of the project began to take shape with Matthias Schiner among the key figures of the expedition. The death of Ferdinand II of Arago made it necessary to relaunch diplomatic efforts, particularly in the context of a Eternal Peace treaty project. The Pope thus supported the diplomatic efforts of Henry VIII and his chancellor, which led to the Treaty of London. Leo X welcomed the treaty as a crucial step in setting up an expedition against the Turks, especially as the latter had seized Mamluk-controlled Egypt in early 1517. Leo X's efforts seemed to bear fruit in 1518 when Maximilian I, Charles I of Spain and Manuel I of Portugal joined him in preparing a military campaign against Selim I, leading to an even greater demand for indulgences in Christendom. However, this project was hampered by the absence of France due to its regency and the complicated relations between the Pope and the dowager Queen because of the question of the Pragmatic Sanction of Bourges, condemned by the Lateran Council completed in 1516.
At the same time, Leo X was confronted with the revelation of Martin Luther. The German monk of the Augustinian order denounced the abuse of the system of indulgences through his 95 theses in October 1517. Although the pope considered Luther's message to be an imperial matter, he wanted to meet with the monk to discuss the various controversial elements of his theses, particularly those he considered to be erroneous. Luther's refusal to meet with him led the pope to send Cardinal de Cajetan to meet the monk in Augsburg in October 1518. The meeting did not go well, as Martin Luther refused to retract any of the points that he considered false or erroneous in his ideas, despite the cardinal's arguments. Even the papal bull recalling the legitimacy of the pope's right to grant indulgences did not make the Augustinian monk bend.
The Republic of Genoa benefited from the peace that was established thanks to Ottaviano Fregoso's government as doge. During his governance, he managed to modernise the port of Genoa and to gain the support of many patricians and inhabitants thanks to his magnanimity. He allowed the return of his cousin, Giano II di Campofregoso. Although the doge made his city prosper during the years 1515-1516, the perpetuation of peace led to the return of the patrician rivalries of the Albergo family, particularly the Adorno family. To counter these threats, Ottaviano Fregoso strengthened his ties with the papacy and the Habsburgs. The doge also took advantage of the weakening of the powerful neighbouring kingdom due to his regency and the state of dependence of the Duchy of Milan on the Swiss to consolidate his position, relying on his cousin and Admiral Andrea Doria to be able to impose a more stable governance. To strengthen the prosperity of his city, he finally established commercial links with his neighbours, notably the kingdom of France.
Venice had to acknowledge the loss of the territory of Verona to Maximilian I and found itself diplomatically isolated. To counter the threat of the Habsburgs and the growing influence of the Papacy, Venice turned to France. The policy of the French regency enabled the maritime republic to become a very important trading partner and a key ally from 1517 onwards.

(1) His main success was to persuade the Swiss cantons to switch sides in 1509 in favour of the pope, Jules II. It earned him the position of cardinal in 1511.
During the Fourth Italian War, Henry VIII joined the Holy League against Louis XII in the hope of conquering land at the expense of the French kingdom. Although his armies defeated the French at the "Battle of the Spurs" in the summer of 1513 and conquered Tournai, the cost of the expeditions and the lack of support from his allies, especially Ferdinand II of Aragon, led Henry VIII to abandon his plans, favouring the diplomatic route. Thus he signed the Treaty of London in the summer of 1514, which brought peace between his kingdom and that of France, as well as an alliance symbolised by the marriage of his sister Mary of England to Louis XII (information taken from Georges Minois's biography of Henry VIII).
 
Interesting, with a treaty of peace between the major European powers and them focusing their energy against the Ottomans, it'll make for some interesting ramifications regarding their interactions and the like, although with some like Venice getting together with France and the swiss basically getting control over Milan as well as influence in savoy, it means that if another war breaks out, it won't be pretty.
 
Interesting, with a treaty of peace between the major European powers and them focusing their energy against the Ottomans, it'll make for some interesting ramifications regarding their interactions and the like, although with some like Venice getting together with France and the swiss basically getting control over Milan as well as influence in savoy, it means that if another war breaks out, it won't be pretty.
This treaty existed IOTL, though it was ratified in October 1518.
 
1519-1520: Changes in the political landscape of Christendom
1519-1520: Changes in the political landscape of Christendom
In January 1519, Maximilian I of Habsburg died. His death led to an imperial election by the seven Great Electors to choose his successor. The main candidates were Henry VIII and Charles I of Spain, although some of the prince electors tried to persuade Prince Frederick III of Saxony to be a candidate. In June 1528, having no serious opponent, Charles was elected emperor, becoming Charles V. His election made him the most powerful ruler in Christendom as he now ruled the Holy Roman Empire, the Duchy of Burgundy through Flanders and Franche-Comté, the Duchy of Verona, the hereditary lands of Austria, the kingdoms of Castile and Arago and was represented in the kingdoms of Naples and Sicily. The Habsburg ruler was confirmed in his new title with his coronation as King of the Romans in Aachen in October 1520.

The election of Charles V upset the political balance established since 1514 and confirmed by the Treaty of London of 1517. The considerable power of the Habsburgs aroused apprehension and hesitation among some of their neighbours, particularly the kingdom of France and the papacy, the former worried that the Habsburgs would threaten its integrity because of Charles V's claims to Burgundy or the fact that his lands encircled the kingdom, the latter worried that its influence in the Italian peninsula would be threatened.

In France, the imperial election was followed with caution and interest. While Mary secretly supported her brother, Francis III of Brittany supported Charles because the Habsburg's success would mean greater pressure on the regent and could help him regain the strong position he had occupied in the early years of the regency. The election of Charles V meant that the influence of the presumptive heir to the crown was strengthened, although his positions on relations with the Habsburgs were similar to those of the regent, both of whom were aware of the significant threat posed by the emperor to the kingdom. Only the ways in which the two great figures of the kingdom dealt with this threat differed: for the Queen Regent, it was mainly a question of maintaining cordial relations with Charles V while strengthening ties with the kingdom of England, while for Francis it was a question of strengthening the alliance with England and developing relations in the Italian peninsula, particularly with the papacy.
These differences did not, however, hinder the consolidation of ties between the kingdoms of France and England, facilitated by the fact that both kingdoms saw the emperor as a threat, Mary to the integrity of her son's kingdom and Henry VIII to the influence he currently wielded on the continent through his alliance with his sister. The two rulers found the opportunity to meet near Ardres in June 1520, during which the alliance between the two kingdoms was renewed and concretised by the betrothal of Henry VIII's daughter Mary to Francis III of Brittany's eldest son Francis. While Mary of England renewed the Treaty of Dover with Charles V during the Tournai encounter at the end of June 1520, she did not renew the promise of betrothal between Renée of France and him, preferring to offer her ward to her nephew, James V of Scotland during the Treaty of Rouen signed with Albany in October 1520 which renewed the alliance between the two kingdoms.

The election of the Emperor created some turmoil in Scotland as a new alternative to the alliance with England and France emerged. This rose tensions among the Scottish lords, as some did not like the current status quo and did not trust the partnership with England. Although renewed by the Treaty of Rouen, the Calais Compromise of 1517 began to weaken as rivalries between John Stuart of Albany and Archibald Douglas grew stronger. At the same time, some Scottish lords decided to contact Christian III of Denmark, hoping that he would act as an intermediary between them and Charles V, the latter being the Danish king's brother-in-law.

The death of Maximilian I cut short the development of the expedition against the Ottoman Empire as it approached the stage of practical execution. In the months leading up to the imperial election, Pope Leo X was looking for an ideal candidate to support in order to avoid Charles I of Spain obtaining the imperial office, as this would make him very powerful and threaten the influence and power of the papacy in the Italian peninsula.
However, in May 1519, his nephew, Lorenzo II died of syphilis. His death deprived Florence of a duke from the house of Medici and led the Pope to send his legate and cousin, Giulio de Medici, to take up the position of Gran Maestro of Florence. The death of Lorenzo II precipitated a revolt in Urbino in early June 1519, as the city had never accepted the duke since he had been imposed by force in March 1516 at the expense of Francis Mary I Della Rovere. The riot drove out the soldiers of the former Medici Duke and forced Leo X to hastily recruit an army to put down the revolt and prevent Francis Mary from returning. The latter, exiled in Mantua, tried to take advantage of the opportunity: he returned to Urbino at the end of June, welcomed fervently by the inhabitants and tried to recruit an army. In July 1519, the Pope commissioned the condottiere Francesco Del Monte to retake the city with the forces mobilised in Romagna. The condottiere reached Urbino at the end of July and began the siege of the city. Despite the fierce defence of the city's inhabitants and its geographical position, Francesco Del Monte's military experience and the isolation of Urbino enabled him to take it at the end of September 1519. Urbino was fiercely repressed by the papal armies, while Francis Mary was forced to flee the city and go into exile in Mantua.
Preoccupied by the conflict in Urbino, Leo X observed the election of Charles V as a spectator. Although he eventually triumphed over Francis Mary, the conflict affected his reputation and his ability to support an expedition against the Ottoman Empire. The papal treasury had incurred significant expenses to ensure the payment of the soldiers charged with recapturing Urbino.
The Urbino conflict also helped to exacerbate the development of Martin Luther's ideas : the German monk continued to refuse to recant, and took advantage of the conflict to denounce the pope's interference in matters that he should not if he were a man of God. This strengthened Leo X's resolve to have the monk recant and, when the latter refused, he condemned his ideas in the bull Exsurge Domine in June 1520. He also asked Charles V to take drastic measures against the Augustinian monk, all the more so when the latter publicly burned the papal bull in Württemberg in December 1520, formalising his break with Rome.
In parallel to these tensions, Leo X reworked the project of an expedition against the Ottoman Turks with the new emperor, but was also concerned to preserve the influence of the papacy in the face of the imposing power of Charles V. This led him to seek better relations with the French regency and to strengthen his ties with the kingdom of England, especially as he awarded Henry VIII the title of 'defender of the faith' for his theological treatise against Martin Luther. The death of Sultan Selim I led the Pope to suspend the expedition project, believing that the threat was less strong with the new Sultan, Suleiman.

The year 1519 saw some tensions in the Duchy of Milan. On the one hand, the imperial election aroused Maximilian Sforza's apprehension and curiosity, as the election of Charles V meant both another contender for the ducal title, but also a potentially powerful protector to safeguard his duchy against other claims and to limit the influence of the Swiss cantons on his lands, while his subjects continued to have some resentment against the Swiss. The presence of his brother Francesco at the imperial court led him to develop relations with the new emperor.

The Swiss paid little attention to the imperial election, having been free of allegiance to the emperor since the 1499 Basel Treaty with Maximilian I. However, Cardinal Matthias Schiner supported Charles I of Spain as a powerful ally on whom he could rely to preserve the new status quo. The election of the Habsburg ruler enabled the Prince-Bishop of Sion to consolidate his ties with the new emperor.
A serious incident in 1519 involved some Swiss cantons : the Geneva crisis. In February 1519, the Grand Council of Geneva decided to form an alliance with Fribourg. In response, Charles III of Savoy invaded the small territory. The Duke of Savoy also asked Fribourg to renounce their alliance treaty with Geneva. The Swiss cantons, especially Fribourg and Bern, however, developed close ties with Geneva during the years 1515-1518 and supported Philippe Berthelier, an ardent Genevan patriot who opposed the ambitions of the Duke of Savoy in his country. The various Swiss cantons also strengthened their ties and developed a certain influence in northern Italy through their alliance with the Pope and the Duchy of Milan. The breaking of the treaty and the execution of Philippe Berthelier for treason in August 1519 aggravated tensions, with the cantons of Bern and Fribourg denouncing Savoyard interference in Geneva politics. The maintenance of Savoyard troops in the Geneva republic contributed to the tensions. The mediation of Leo X through Cardinal Matthias Schiner made it possible to appease the Swiss cantons, but contributed to the development of a rivalry between the cantons and the duchy of Savoy, the former considering the duke more and more as a danger for the durability of the republic of Geneva whereas Charles III considered the Swiss as a danger for his duchy. Because of the proximity of the pope to the Swiss cantons and the link that seems to be developing between Charles V and Cardinal Matthias Schiner, he decides to move closer to the kingdom of France, considering that the French regency will not represent a threat to his territory and will be able to support him against his rivals.
At the beginning of 1519, Ulrich Zwingli became stipendiary priest of Zurich. He again exchanged letters with Matthew Schiner, debating with him the urgent need to reform the church. In 1520 he gave up his pontifical pension and began to develop his own theological positions, although these remained somewhat unofficial because of the strong links between the Swiss cantons and the papacy.

During the years 1519-1520, the Republic of Genoa experienced important events. In April 1519, a fleet commanded by Andrea Doria destroyed the Bizerte fleet of Barbary pirates near Pianosa, destroying Bizerte's ability to raid the eastern Mediterranean and strengthening Genoa's ability to strike at the Barbary coast. Following the imperial election of Charles V, the doge of the Republic of Genoa, Ottaviano Fregoso, undertook to get closer to the latter, considering the latter to have a powerful ally to protect his territory and enable him to stand up to the other Albergo whose rivalry had become intense again in Genoa. But in September 1520, Ottaviano Fregoso was forced to resign from the position of doge under pressure from the allies of Antoniotto II Adorno, who became doge again after 1512. Following his return to power, the new doge forced the Fregosos into exile, as had been the case in 1510. In order to stabilise his position and face his rivals, Antoniotto II Adorno approached the French regency, having once been an ally of Louis XII during the war of the League of Cambrai.
 
Interesting, France and England move closer alongside various Italians states because they're all in fear of Charles V. Hopefully we'll see the effects of Suleiman on here, no french alliance will make stuff more difficult and make them take different actions.
 
Interesting, France and England move closer alongside various Italians states because they're all in fear of Charles V. Hopefully we'll see the effects of Suleiman on here, no french alliance will make stuff more difficult and make them take different actions.
You'll see in the next thread the impact of Suleiman and the first huge divergence from the OTL, even though the birth of Charles IX has already prevented Francis's campaign to take the duchy of Milan (thus preventing the battle of Marignan).
Concerning the relations between the different realms and territories, I tried to be as plausible as possible concerning the evolution of the ties between the different lands in this alternate reality, especially since there were changing relation between territories (for example, the fact that in the first stage of the League of Cambrai War, France and the Papacy were allied against Venice, while in the second part, the papacy was against France).
I tried to take into account the impact of the new context and its evolution on the relation between kingdoms, but also the dynastic dynamics, even if the latter can be affected by the interests of each countries.
All these aspects are depicted in the following threads, even how the events or the internal evolution of each territory affect the diplomatic relations and its evolution.
 
1521-1523: Holy League War, genesis and beginnings
1521-1523: Holy League War, genesis and beginnings
Following a diplomatic incident in 1520 (1), war was declared between the Ottoman Empire and the Kingdom of Hungary. In 1521, the Ottoman Sultan, Suleiman, led a campaign against the southern part of the kingdom, seizing the fortress of Belgrade in August 1521.
The fall of the fortress stunned all of Christendom and helped to revive and consolidate the idea of a military alliance against the Turks. Based on the Treaty of London, Pope Leo X urged the various sovereigns to fight the Turks, arguing that Hungary's aggression implied the support of the other signatories of the treaty. Charles V and his brother Ferdinand, who became Archduke of Austria in April 1521, were the first to respond to the Pope's appeal. A military alliance treaty was signed in Parma between the three leaders in November 1521. During the negotiations that led to the treaty, Charles V was recognised by the Pope as King of Naples. During the same period, the Habsburgs strengthened their ties with Louis II of Hungary, notably through the marriages of Louis II to Mary of Habsburg and of Ferdinand of Habsburg to the Hungarian ruler's sister, Anne Jagellon.
The other rulers of Christendom, however, were not so determined to join the military alliance against the Turks. The French regency was somewhat reluctant to participate, as Mary had little desire to see the Habsburgs' influence increase further. Only the determination and desire for glory of Francis III of Brittany led her to qualify her position. On the English side, Henry VIII was initially very keen on military glory, but his insatiable and volatile character helped to evaporate this desire quite quickly. This was also reinforced by the English aristocracy's lack of interest in fighting the Turks, as the project did not correspond to their interests. As for Venice, the maritime republic did not want to see its commercial privileges with the Ottoman Empire threatened.

During the same period, various sovereigns were visited by Villiers de l'Isle-Adam, Grand Master of the Hospitaller Order since January 1521. He tried to warn the Christian sovereigns of the Turkish threat to the island of Rhodes and sought volunteers to strengthen the island's defence. The Pope and the Emperor were particularly attentive to his appeals for help. Following the fall of Belgrade, Charles V decided to support the Hospitallers by preparing an expedition to send reinforcements to Rhodes against the Turkish threat. The emperor and the pope urged the other sovereigns to support them in this endeavour. The death of Leo X in December 1521 created hesitation in the process. As for Villiers de l'Isle-Adam, he returned to Rhodes in early 1522 with volunteers and prepared the defence of the island.

During 1522, Ferdinand of Habsburg sent soldiers to support the Hungarians in Slavonia, while Charles V urged the German princes to support the military campaign against the Turks at the Diet of Nuremberg held in the spring of 1522. Some of them, notably William IV of Bavaria, approved of the emperor's request, while others, such as Elector Frederick III of Saxony, were more reserved, uninterested in getting involved in a conflict outside the borders of the Holy Roman Empire and more concerned about the controversies resulting from the Diet of Worms.

At the beginning of March 1522, Charles V sent the fleet from Barcelona to transport reinforcements to the island of Rhodes. The fleet, commanded by Hugo de Moncada, reached Messina at the end of April 1522, where it was supplemented by other ships. The Spanish-Italian fleet consisted of about thirty ships, including six galleys that protected the ships carrying the reinforcements. A total of about three thousand soldiers were transported to Rhodes. Despite the constraints resulting from the distance and the lack of support from Venice, which had several territories in the vicinity of Rhodes, the Italo-Spanish fleet managed to reach the island in early June 1522. The arrival of reinforcements boosted the morale of the Hospitaller knights and their determination to defend the island against the Turks. While most of the reinforcements joined the island's defenders, others moved to the fortress on the nearby island of Chálki. In order not to clog up the port of Rhodes, part of the Italian-Spanish fleet remained on the island, while the rest was distributed among the various islands controlled by the Knights Hospitallers, particularly Lango (2). The defence of the island was prepared and organised by Villiers de l'Isle-Adam and Hugo de Moncada. There was a certain amount of tension between the Spanish commander and the Hospitallers, the latter reproaching him for not having honoured his commitment to the order.
On 24th June 1522, the Turkish fleet arrived in front of Rhodes and set up a blockade to prevent the island from being supplied. On 18th July, Suleiman reached the region with his army and the siege of the city began on 28th July. Faced with the seventy-five thousand men of the Turkish sultan, nearly eleven thousand defenders were determined to defend themselves.
During August 1522, the siege was mainly marked by artillery games and sapping and counter-sapping actions. On the one hand, the Turks sought to collapse one of the walls or bastions of Rhodes to open a breach that would allow them to take possession of the city. On the other hand, the defenders sought to prevent their opponents from achieving their aims, advised by Gabriel Tadini de Martinengo, a Venetian engineer who was an expert in counter-sapping. On some occasions, this led to terrible underground battles between the sappers of the two sides. In parallel to these tests of strength, the Turks carried out daily assaults to test the defenders and hope to overwhelm them with numbers. In addition to these assaults, the defenders, mainly Italo-Spanish, did not hesitate to carry out raids on the opposing camp from time to time. These attacks and the beginning of an epidemic of dysentery contributed to undermining the morale of the Turks. The situation changed somewhat when, on 4th September 1522, the bastion of England was breached, leading to a major Turkish assault on it. The confrontation raged throughout the day, with the attackers being driven back by the defenders. The latter received some support from the other Dodecanese islands thanks to the ships of the fleet sent by Charles V.

During the same period, Pope Leo X's successor, Paul III, sought to organise a more substantial military alliance against the Ottoman Empire, particularly in response to calls for help from the Knights of the Hospitaller Order in Rhodes, who feared that the Turks would seek to take the island as they had done in 1480. Informed of the start of the siege of Rhodes in July 1522, the Pope urged the Christian rulers to take action to prevent the Turks from seizing the island. The announcement of the siege of Rhodes contributed to the success of the Pope's negotiations, leading to the creation of the Holy League in September 1522. This alliance included Charles V, Ferdinand of Habsburg, the Pope, King John III of Portugal, the Duchy of Milan, the Republic of Genoa, the Republic of Venice, the Duchy of Florence, the Swiss Confederation, the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of France.

Charles V was the first to respond to Paul III's appeal. He was all the more determined because he had received the news of the success of the March naval expedition. At the end of July 1522, he sent a new fleet of about twenty ships to support the defenders with food and reinforcements. This was accompanied by Andrea Doria's personal fleet, who had offered his services to the emperor for this new expedition. The squadron reached Rhodes in September 1522 and managed to get past the blockade to send supplies and almost two thousand men. This reinforcement strengthened the determination of the defenders, who had suffered the assault of 4th September against the English stronghold. The hope of help from the Christian nations in the west strengthened the resolve of the Hospitallers and their allies to hold out. This determination was crucial when, on 24th September 1522, the Ottomans attacked the bastions of Spain, England, Provence and Italy. Violent clashes raged throughout the day, especially at the bastion of Spain. The Turks repeatedly failed to capture it, but the defenders defended themselves fiercely. Among them, Ignatius of Loyola distinguished himself by fighting in hand-to-hand combat against several janissaries. The final failure of the assault led Suleiman to remove Mustapha Pasha from the responsibility of commander of the armed forces besieging the siege and give it to Ahmed Pasha, the commander of the janissaries. The siege then stalled, with the Turkish army suffering greatly from attrition and dysentery, while the defenders were strengthened in their determination to preserve Rhodes.
On Rhodes, the siege continued to rage through November as the Turks were determined to bring down one of the strongholds weakened by their undermining operations as quickly as possible. As the winter season arrived, Suleiman was forced to bring in food and ammunition to continue the siege, while his army's morale worsened as the siege continued and casualties increased both from the city's defenders and from dysentery. On the side of the defenders, determination remained strong even if some deplored the fact that only Emperor Charles V supported them. The support of ships from Lango kept the morale of the defenders up, especially when they learned of the creation of the Holy League. The appearance of a Venetian fleet in November rekindled the will to fight of the defenders, who now knew that the Christian powers of the West were united in their support against the Turks. On 21st November 1522, the bastion of Spain collapsed, while other bastions were weakened, making the situation of the defenders complicated. Although they repelled a new Ottoman assault at the end of November, the latter were divided on what to do next. While Hugo de Moncada and Villiers de l'Isle-Adam were determined to continue the fight, other members of the Knights Hospitallers and the inhabitants of Rhodes began to consider surrender preferable. In early December 1522, a serious incident occurred : a servant of André d'Amaral was caught sending a message to the Turkish camp. Tortured, he confessed to having acted on his master's orders. Despite his denials, the prior was executed a few days later. This incident contributed to increasing tensions between those determined to continue defending themselves and those who began to think that surrender was the only possible outcome. The presence of Hugo de Moncada and his men enabled Villiers de l'Isle-Adam to maintain a strong position on the subject.

In December 1522, the Turkish army was very weakened by the siege. Failed assaults, dysentery and the forced wintering on the island all contributed to undermining the morale of the soldiers, while their opponents seemed as determined as ever. The more frequent arrival of ships supplying the defenders helped to lower the morale of the Ottomans, who realised the weakness of their blockade and the risk of imminent reinforcements for their opponents. This situation led Suleiman to call for an intensification of the blockade and to concentrate artillery fire on what remained of the bastions of Spain and England in order to collapse them and attempt a new assault to break the defenders. On 13rd December, what remained of the bastion of Spain collapsed while the bastion of England was almost in ruins. While this led to increased pressure from the inhabitants of Rhodes on the defenders to call a truce, the Turks launched an assault on 18th December quite similar to that of 24th September. The ruined state of the bastions of Spain and England made the task of the defenders more difficult and the two towers changed possession three times during the course of the confrontation. Losses were heavy on both sides and it was not until nightfall that the fighting stopped. At the end of the battle, both sides were at the end of their tether, although the defenders were hopeful of getting help from the Christian powers, mainly Charles V.
During October and November, Charles V built up a third fleet to support Rhodes. His fleet was made up of the ships sent in August and reinforced by Portuguese ships and Genoese galleys, consisting of almost one hundred ships, including twenty galleys, carrying about eight thousand men. Leaving Messina during November 1522, the fleet faced the bad season and reached Candia (3) at the beginning of December before reaching Rhodes around Christmas 1522. Their arrival led to a violent naval clash between the Turkish and Holy League ships, but most of the ships reached Rhodes. The arrival of the reinforcements relieved the defenders and further damaged the morale of the Ottomans, who saw the success of the siege slipping away despite the increasing number of breaches in the fortifications. Despite pressure from some of his commanders and advisers, Suleiman decided to lift the siege in early January 1523, not wanting to lose more forces unnecessarily when the defenders were well reinforced and could receive further reinforcements. During the month of January, he evacuated his demoralised army, weakened by the wear and tear of the siege and dysentery. The defenders took advantage of this to multiply their raids against the Turkish camp. The departure of the last Ottoman soldiers on 17th January 1523 marked the official end of the siege of Rhodes. Nearly eight thousand men were killed or wounded during the siege on the defenders' side, while on the Turks' side, thirty thousand men were killed, wounded or sick. In addition to these losses, the Hospitallers and their allies lost about twenty ships and their opponents about the same number.

The outcome of the siege of Rhodes was celebrated in Christendom, notably by the Papacy and the Emperor who saw it as a sign from heaven to drive out the Turkish threat. Conversely, the failure of the siege of Rhodes contributed to the reawakening of doubts and divisions among the Ottomans, whereas Suleiman had carried out this project with the aim of uniting his subjects against a common enemy. It also led to the fall of several of the viziers who had supported and prepared the project, notably Piri Ahmed. The failure of Rhodes also led Suleiman to renew the alliance that his father had built with Khayr Ad-Din Barbarossa, the beylerbey of Algiers, in order to get the Barbary pirates. He sent more than five thousand janissaries to support the Barbary corsair in the summer of 1523. This reinforcement enabled Khayr Ad-Dîn to lead an attack against his rival, Sidi Ahmed or el Kadhi, Sultan of Koukou, who had taken possession of Algiers in 1520. The latter remained master of the city, but found himself in difficulty against the barbarians and their Turkish allies.

During 1523, Charles V and Paul III collaborated to develop the project of an expedition against the Ottoman Empire and to concretise the project of the late Leo X. Inspired in part by the project conceived in 1518 by his predecessor and grandfather, Maximilian I, Charles V intended to implement an ambitious project with three axes of progression: one through Hungary for the armies of the Holy Roman Empire and his brother Ferdinand; one through Italy and Durres for the French, Neapolitan and Papal armies; and one through North Africa for the Spanish army supported by its fleet and the Portuguese fleet. In order to implement this project, the emperor negotiated with the various allies of the Holy League in order to persuade them to participate in the expedition. Paul III was in favour of the project, supporting the emperor in his approach. His brother Ferdinand was easy to convince, as the latter was already supporting their brother-in-law Louis II of Hungary to protect his kingdom from the Turks. John III of Portugal also joined him, honouring the alliance that had been established between the rulers of the House of Aviz and those of the lines of Castile and Aragon. As for the German princes, the third Diet of Nuremberg saw a division among them between those who were in favour of supporting the emperor in his project and those who were more reticent. As for the kingdom of France, if the regent was hesitant, the emperor could have the support of the presumptive heir for his project. He also obtained the support of the Republic of Venice during the same year. In the autumn of 1523, at the meeting in Cambrai, the emperor drew up a plan with his allies for a campaign against the Turks and their allies. All the members of the Holy League seemed willing to support the project, leading the emperor to believe that the fight against the Ottoman Empire would bring the Christian powers closer together in view of the universal empire he sought to resurrect.

(1) In 1520, Suleiman sent an ambassador to ask Louis II of Hungary for tribute in the framework of the truce signed in 1519. Louis II insulted the ambassador and refused to honour the tribute.
(2) Lango is the island of Kos, one of the Dodecanese islands near Rhodes.
(3) The current island of Crete.
 
So it seems that the Ottomans failed to get Rhodes TTL as well as getting a weaker position because of the cost and Suleiman dismissing many people. I wonder how this will affect his image instead of being known as the Great, he'll just be another sultan
 
So it seems that the Ottomans failed to get Rhodes TTL as well as getting a weaker position because of the cost and Suleiman dismissing many people. I wonder how this will affect his image instead of being known as the Great, he'll just be another sultan
Future threads will depict a mixed period of 1520's for the Ottoman Empire in which Suleiman won't earn his title of Magnificent in Christendom (but his turkish title of "Reformer" might stil exist, I won't spoil much on this matter).
Concerning the costs, I adapted the OTL casualties in taking into account the length of the siege and the number of defenders (OTL, it is estimated that there were around seven thousand defenders at the least). With more defenders and reinforcements for the Hospitaller Knights, it affects the strenght of Suleiman's army (IOTL, he has to spend nearly seven months before obtaining the surrender of the defenders and Rhodes, forcing him to make wintering, something that is unusual for Ottoman armies at the time).
 
1521-1523: French regency under Angoulême influence
1521-1523: French regency under Angoulême influence
In 1521, Marie's regency flourished and allowed the implementation of policies that contributed to the economic prosperity of the kingdom of France. Many cities and merchants prospered, especially the ports in the north of the kingdom or the cities near the Italian peninsula. For example, the Lyon fair, which appeared in 1520, benefited from the prosperity and trade. Manufacturers and craftsmen also benefited from the trade and prosperity to develop in the kingdom. Although agriculture benefited from the years of peace, it underwent a crisis in the years 1521-1522, as did other kingdoms, which led to several food shortages. This crisis caused some tensions which contributed to the reawakening of hostility among certain sections of the population towards the regent, who was held responsible for the return of certain taxes and was guilty of being English. Although the food shortages were resolved during 1523, the tensions they had caused did not disappear completely, as some lords close to the Valois-Angoulême clan or hostile to the regent did not hesitate to fuel hostility towards her.

In April 1521, Suzanne de Bourbon died, bequeathing the Duchy of Bourbonnais to her two and a half year old son, Louis III. This forced Susanna's widower, Charles de Bourbon-Montpensier, to take on the responsibility of regency for his son. The death of Suzanne de Bourbon and Charles' reduced presence diminished the influence of the Bourbons at court. This allowed François III of Brittany to strengthen his influence at court and in the royal council, taking advantage of his proximity to Antoine Duprat. This return to power of the Valois-Angoulême faction contributed to reinforcing the rivalry between Mary of England and the presumptive heir to the French crown, the dowager queen determined to preserve her position as regent even if she had to deal with the Duke of Brittany again.
This rivalry now extends beyond the royal court: the Valois-Angouleme faction, also known as the Breton party, was now firmly established in Brittany, Normandy, Valois and the lands of Angouleme, while the dowager queen's party, derisively known as the "English party", was represented by the lands of Bourbonnais, the French capital, was represented by the lands of Bourbonnais, Montpensier, Vendôme and Languedoc, as well as Paris, where the dowager queen allied herself with the representatives of the parliament to counterbalance the important power of the presumptive heir. Among the lesser nobility or clergy, support for the queen dowager or the crown prince also grew, some supporting the former to counter the strong influence of the duke of Brittany, the latter out of loyalty or a desire to support demands to restrict royal power.

In 1522, the dowager queen supported the publication of her brother's theological treatise against Martin Luther. She was close to her brother and tended to adopt his position on the theological question. The regent did not look favourably on the development of the German monk's ideas, not so much out of religious conviction as out of fear of the unrest they would cause in the kingdom and the fact that they would call into question the Pragmatic Sanction of Bourges. For the same reasons, it supported the University of Paris in its fight against Lutheran ideas and all those that appeared heretical. Her position contributed to her rivalry with Francis III of Brittany, the presumptive heir becoming sensitive to the devotio moderna practised by his sister, Margaret. Nevertheless, the dowager queen also supported Guillaume de Briçonnet, bishop of Meaux, whose reformist positions were close to those of Pope Paul III, thus imitating the same policy as her brother Henry VIII between conservatism and specific reformist support.

During these early years of the 1520s, Charles IX began his training as a king under Guillaume Budé. Budé, who had become an important figure at court, advised the regent to promote belles-lettres and philology. The latter, inspired by the presence of Thomas More at her brother's court, relied on the thinker and contributed to the flourishing of humanist thought within the court. This development also resulted from the rivalry with Francis III of Brittany, as the dowager queen did not wish to be overshadowed by the presumptive heir in the cultural and artistic field. The early 1520s thus saw the development of artistic styles promoted by the queen dowager and the heir apparent to the crown: the "Francis" or Breton style played on Italian influences, while the Marian style was based more on English and Flemish influences. The rivalry between the dowager queen and the presumptive heir to the throne allowed the French court to gain in prestige and cultural life. Added to this rivalry was the regency's desire not to allow the French court to be supplanted by the prestige of the imperial court of Charles V.

On the diplomatic front, the French regency was in a special situation. With Pope Leo X's call for an expedition against the Turks, the rivalry between Mary and Francis was again expressed. On the one hand, Mary was anxious to give her son a solid and prosperous kingdom and did not see the point of a military expedition against the Turks. On the other hand, François III of Brittany defended the project, less out of concern for the defence of the Christian faith than out of a desire to realise his dreams of military glory that the birth of Charles IX had prevented in 1515. This opposition grew in 1522 when Leo X's successor, Paul III, asked the various Christian sovereigns to unite against the Ottomans: Mary was more than hesitant to contribute, whereas Francis was more determined than ever, arguing that it was necessary for the kingdom of France to join the fight against the Turks in defence of the faith and above all not to see the Habsburgs supplant the French royalty on the chessboard of Christianity. The Pope's appeals to help Rhodes, Francis' arguments and the latter's dominant position in the royal council led Mary to agree, bringing the kingdom of France into the Holy League in September 1522. The regent nevertheless refrained from sending aid to Rhodes, unwilling to see the fleet that was developing in the Mediterranean dispersed while she was unable to provide substantial support to the Hospitallers.
In parallel with the Holy League, the regent continued to maintain strong relations with her native kingdom, but Francis' once again dominant influence in the royal council also led to the return of a certain Italian policy. The latter, which had begun with the alliance with the Republic of Venice in 1517, was reinforced with the support for Charles III of Savoy after the Geneva crisis of 1519. In 1521, the new doge of the Republic of Genoa, Antoniotto II Adorno, wished to renew the relationship with the kingdom of France, especially as protector of the maritime republic against its rivals. Although the regent was reluctant to renew the partnership that had existed under her husband, she was led to accept on the advice of Francis, who recalled the links that had existed between the Genoese Republic and the kingdom of France since the last century and the fact that each new partner and ally would help to consolidate the kingdom's influence against that of the Habsburgs. An alliance was signed between the regent and the doge of Genoa in May 1521, ensuring the support of the French regency to the doge. Finally, during the negotiations for the creation of the Holy League, the regent invited the doge to join the alliance so as not to be at odds with the Habsburgs.
The death of Leo X and the accession of his successor Paul III led to a change in relations between the kingdom of France and the papacy. Although the new pope developed relations with the French regency, particularly in the context of the creation of the Holy League, and welcomed the dowager queen's support in the fight against Martin Luther's ideas, he nevertheless showed a certain preference for Charles V. Paul III and Mary also had some important disagreements, notably over the maintenance of the Pragmatic Sanction of Bourges, the Pope wanting to see a new agreement that would allow the Papacy to have a say while helping to reform practices within the clergy, while the Regent was reluctant to make a decision on the issue so as not to alienate the support of the clergy and parliaments. Negotiations did, however, develop to reach a satisfactory compromise between the French crown and the papacy.
The diplomatic relationship between the dowager queen and Charles V was complicated. On the one hand, Mary preserved the cordial relations established since the treaties of 1516 and joined the Holy League alliance in which Charles V was the dominant figure. On the other hand, she sought to maintain her distance from the emperor, unwilling to see her son's kingdom fall under Habsburg influence. This need for distance is all the stronger because the dowager queen had an offer of marriage from the emperor which she preferred to postpone, unwilling to find herself in the situation of her sister Margaret. This led her to strengthen her ties with England, but also with some of the Italian states who were apprehensive about the omnipotence of the Habsburgs. Francis III's position was somewhat different: using the Holy League and the planned military expedition against the Turks as a pretext, he drew closer to Charles V in order to consolidate his own influence vis-à-vis the regent.
Relations with Scotland fuelled the rivalry between Mary and Francis. On the one hand, the two leading figures in the kingdom were aware of the need to maintain an alliance with the northern kingdom, mainly as part of a network of links that allowed them to maintain a fairly strong influence against the Habsburgs. On the other hand, Mary had growing difficulties with Albany, seeing him as an ally of Francis. The Scottish regent's visits to France, particularly to secure the support of the French regency, contributed to this impression, with the Scottish lord often turning to Francis and his relatives.

One of the most important political actions of the French regency concerned exploration and the search for commercial opportunities. In December 1522, Mary was visited by Antonio Pigafetta, who gave her a manuscript containing a first version of the logbook he had kept during Magellan's expedition. The visit of the Italian sailor and the receipt of the manuscript of his account aroused a deep interest in the French royal court in the explorations and the New World. This interest was reinforced at the beginning of 1523 when Giovanni Verrazzano proposed an expedition to discover a northwest passage to Asia. The queen dowager agreed, aware that the royal treasury could finance an expedition and eager to develop the kingdom's trade towards other horizons without depending on merchants from the East or Spain. She was all the more supportive of the project as it was backed by François III of Brittany, the presumptive heir seeing the expedition project as an opportunity to develop his duchy. Even though there was some reluctance, particularly due to the question of compliance with the Treaty of Tordesillas, the decision to finance an expedition to the New World was supported, particularly in order to be able to break away from the influence of the Habsburgs.
With royal support, Giovanni Verrazzano left Dieppe in July 1523 with four ships and headed west. The Italian navigator stopped in Madeira in August 1523 before heading west again. He reached the northern sides of Florida in October 1523. As he sailed up the coast, he thought he saw the Pacific Ocean behind a narrow strip of land (1), named one of the areas he landed Arcadia (2) before reaching a bay he named Terre d'Orléans (3) in November 1523. The arrival of winter forced him and his crew to winter, bringing them into contact with the natives, the Leni Lenape. The first contacts were friendly and full of curiosity, even if incidents punctuated the exchanges between the two groups. The wintering allowed Giovanni Verrazzano to discover the surroundings of Terre d'Orléans, guided by the natives.

(1) In reality, the Outer Banks separating the Atlantic Ocean from the Pamlico Bay lagoon.
(2) Name given to the present-day region of Virginia and Maryland.
(3) OTL New York Bay.
 
Top