The Gold Rose: An Edward of Angoulême timeline

English invasion of Scotland of 1385
  • English invasion of Scotland of 1385
    The English invasion of Scotland of 1385 was the first military campaign led by King Edward V of England. The invasion was launched in retaliation to Scottish raids, which had grown more frequent and more destructive in the early 1380s. The campaign ran from 6 August to 16 September 1385, culminating in the Battle of Arkinholm.

    Background
    In the early 1290s, King Edward I of England was invited to arbitrate a dispute regarding the succession to the Scottish throne. Edward used the opportunity to assert his overlordship of Scotland before declaring John Balliol, lord of Galloway, to be King John of Scotland. Edward was an oppressive overlord. He reversed several rulings made by John, which provoked a rebellion by Scottish lords. The rebels found support in France, outraging Edward and prompting his invasion of Scotland in 1296. John was forced to abdicate as Edward attempted to annex Scotland outright, kicking off a decades-long war for control of the kingdom. The Scots rallied to Robert the Bruce, who was crowned King Robert I of Scotland. They threw the English out of the country and secured English recognition of Scottish independence in the 1328 Treaty of Northampton, bringing the First Anglo-Scottish War to an end.

    Second Anglo-Scottish War
    Robert I died in 1329. He was succeeded by his five-year-old son, King David II of Scotland. The following year, King Edward III of England staged a countercoup against Roger Mortimer, 1st earl of March, and took control of his own government. Edward blasted the Treaty of Northampton as a "shameful peace" soon after coming to power. He claimed that the treaty had been forced upon him by Mortimer and, as such, declared that he could not be held to its terms. This led to war again in 1332.

    Edward III initially prosecuted his war against Scotland through the person of Edward Balliol, King John's son, who Edward III secretly supported in a campaign for the Scottish crown before he joined in hostilities directly in 1333. The two Edwards dominated the conflict with the Bruce loyalists, which ultimately brought France into the war in support of their ally, the young David II. The conflict between England and France became part of a larger set of issues between the two kingdoms, leading to the Hundred Years War.

    In 1346, David II was captured in the Battle of Neville's Cross. He was held as a prisoner for more than a decade before being ransomed for 100,000 marks (£66,667). David struggled to pay his debt and, in 1369, agreed to a 15-year truce with England that included paying 4,000 marks annually toward his ransom. As a consequence of the truce, England's control of several key positions in Scotland was set to be unchallenged until 1384. David died suddenly in 1371, though, having only ever paid about half of his ransom.

    Stewart dynasty
    David II died childless and was succeeded by his nephew, Robert Stewart. The new King Robert II of Scotland was almost an old man by the standards of the day, taking the throne at age 55. He was more interested in securing his new dynasty than warring with England and agreed to honor David II's deal with the English, paying 4,000 marks per annum to keep the truce in effect through 1384. There were outbreaks of violence on the border occasionally, but these were generally small and local events. Robert discontinued payments to the English after the death of Edward III in 1377. That same year, George Dunbar, 10th earl of Dunbar, massacred the town of Roxburgh in one of the most remarkable outbreaks of border violence that decade.

    In 1379, a small band of Scots burrowed into the wine cellar of Berwick Castle, surprising the small garrison there and briefly taking control of the fortress. The incident was deeply embarrassing for the English and it demonstrated just how much they had neglected border defenses after having renewed war with France. Scottish marcher lords took note and raids into English territory increased in the early 1380s. This was the same time that John Stewart, earl of Carrick, who was Robert II's eldest son and heir, was named lieutenant of the marches.

    Carrick was the only one of Robert II's sons with major territorial interests south of the Forth and he acted as the crown's representative on the border long before he was made lieutenant. The marcher lords had been reluctant to accept the new Stewart dynasty upon Robert's succession, but Carrick won them over with marriage alliances and years of hard work. In time, Carrick's position became a double-edged sword. The marcher lords were more loyal to Carrick than to Robert, and Carrick was an ambitious man who was deeply uncomfortable being the middle-aged heir to an elderly king. His connections with the marcher lords made him hawkish in his dealings with the English and his father's truce with England became a dead letter.

    In summer 1383, the Scots captured and partially demolished Wark on Tweed Castle. Lochmaben Castle was razed to the ground just months later. In early 1384, the English launched a punitive expedition led by Edmund of Langley, 1st duke of Aumale, and Thomas of Woodstock, 1st duke of Gloucester, to salvage the rapidly deteriorating situation. The dukes failed to bring the Scots to battle or take any major position. The expedition was costly, though, as a number of Englishmen died from exposure in a sudden cold snap.

    England and France agreed to a six-month truce in summer 1383, just as hostilities broke out on the border between England and Scotland. The disconnect between French and Scottish policy was a sign of how far apart the two former allies had drifted over the course of Scotland's long truce with England, as Robert II repeatedly refused calls to join the war in the 1370s. The French found a new ally in Owain Lawgoch, the last male-line descendant of Llywelyn the Great, to threaten England from Wales, but Lawgoch was captured and killed fighting for the French in Gascony in 1377. The events of 1383 brought France and Scotland back together, as the two renewed their alliance. The Anglo-French truce was extended in early 1384, this time to include Scotland, which paused the conflict on the Anglo-Scottish border soon after the dukes of Aumale and Gloucester limped back to England.

    The marcher lords abided by the new truce for a time, but they rebuked Robert II when the truce was extended to July 1385. Sir Archibald Douglas raided deep into Northumberland in open defiance of the Anglo-French treaty to which Scotland was now a party. French ambassadors at Robert's court followed news of the Douglas raid closely. They reported back to Paris that the English were ill-prepared to defend themselves and that Robert had little control over the marcher lords. Carrick, having already surpassed his father as the most influential figure on the border, soon supplanted Robert in dealings with the French as well, and plans got underway for a Franco-Scottish invasion of England upon the expiration of the truce.

    In late summer, the dukes of Aumale and Gloucester arrived in Calais ahead of a long-planned conference with Jean, duke of Berry, and Philippe II, duke of Burgundy, at Leulinghem. This was supposed to be the highest-ranking set of talks since the Congress of Arras in 1375, but it never came to be. The French, already resolved to renewing hostilities the following year, dragged out negotiations on minor issues for several weeks. Aumale and Gloucester returned to England without ever meeting with Berry or Burgundy.

    Preparations for war
    On 29 September 1384, the English parliament assembled at Westminster Palace. Withering criticism of the regency council that had governed the kingdom in recent years led King Edward V of England to take over the government of the realm. He was 19 years old, past an age where he was expected to lead. His first major act was to reassert England's claims abroad, including its overlordship of Scotland. He declared he would lead a campaign north to bring the Scots to heel. The Commons agreed to grant taxation for the first time since 1380 to support the king's cause.

    On 10 November, the Scottish parliament assembled at Holyrood Palace. A French offer to send 1,000 men-at-arms to support an invasion of England had widespread support, but Robert II was skeptical that France would actually follow through. He preferred to negotiate another truce with the English, but terribly misjudged the mood of the Scottish political establishment. James Douglas, 2nd earl of Douglas, moved to appoint Robert's son, Carrick, as lieutenant of the realm, vesting all diplomatic and judicial power in the heir to the throne. Parliament agreed. In addition to the military power he already wielded as lieutenant of the marches, the new position effectively made Carrick king in all but name.

    Carrick wasted no time in making the new reality apparent to the English. The Scottish marcher lords were let off the leash, with devastating effects for northern England. Small towns and villages were burned and looted. Major positions were no better off. The English were not expecting war for more than half a year, which left the defenders of Berwick Castle unprepared for attack. The castle was taken by the Douglases before year's end.

    French plan of attack
    On 20 March 1385, King Charles VI of France assembled a war council to hash out the details of the coming invasion. A two-prong operation was envisioned. Jean de Vienne, admiral of France, would take an army to Scotland in the spring. He would join Carrick and the Scots in a campaign to take smaller positions on the border and harry the north of England. Olivier V de Clisson, constable of France, would bring a second, larger army to attack southern England in mid to late summer. Their hope was to draw the English north, denuding southern England of defenders and leaving the country open to Clisson.

    The duke of Burgundy, who was the driving force behind the invasion, opened an entirely different line of attack in the run-up to the campaign. As count of Flanders jure uxoris, he instituted a boycott on English goods as he tightened his grip on the county. The results were immediately devastating. Royal revenue depended on the wool trade. The freefall in the wool staple offset the expected revenue from the grant of taxation.

    Edward V, who had only reluctantly stepped up to lead in the parliament of 1384, proved to be a calm and confident leader through the unfolding crisis. He shrugged off the more reactionary members of his council as reports of Scottish raids flooded in. He would not be drawn into the war in the north before he was ready to fight. Instead, he responded to Carrick's violations of the truce in kind. England's northern powerhouses like the Cliffords, Nevilles and Umfravilles were given free rein against the Scots. Henry Percy, 4th baron Percy and warden of the eastern march, was ordered to retake Berwick before the king arrived for the summer campaign. No town on either side of the border was safe.

    Edward was more aggressive and creative when it came to dealing with the duke of Burgundy. He refused to treat with Burgundy to save England's crumbling economy and instead did an end run around the duke. Sir Michael de la Pole was sent to strike a new trade agreement with Middelburg, a port city in Zeeland, that would keep English goods moving into the Low Countries and beyond. The city had both collaborated with and competed against the great trade cities of Flanders over the past century, and it had a vested interest in keeping English goods moving. This put Middelburg's wealthy townsmen at odds with their lord's regent, as Albrecht I, duke of Bavaria-Straubing, wanted closer relations with Burgundy and France, and even had a double marriage between his and Burgundy's children in 1384. From Middelburg, de la Pole traveled to Arnhem to bring the house of Jülich into an alliance against Burgundy. The Jülichs had supported the English in the past and, as one of the greatest families in the Low Countries, they felt threatened by Burgundy's increasing dominance of the region.

    As de la Pole moved through the Low Countries, Edward received an embassy from the city of Ghent, where a 1379 revolt had led to uprisings across the whole of Flanders before being beaten back by the French crown in 1382. Ghent was, by 1385, the final holdout of the near-revolution. Edward sent the city's ambassadors home with 300 archers and 100 men-at-arms at their backs.

    The duke of Burgundy carefully followed England's moves in the Low Countries, but he did not overly concern himself with them. Burgundy was an old diplomatic hand and he knew when his opponent was bluffing. The movement of English fighters into Ghent was an unwelcome development, but just 400 men could not save the city in the long run. The alliance with the Jülichs was also unwelcome, but the dukes of Jülich, Guelders and Berg were in no position to move against Flanders before July, when the second army was set to sail for England. Burgundy believed that, once the French invasion was underway and England was reduced to ash, the Jülichs would be compelled to reconsider their alliance with England.

    On 25 May, Jean de Vienne landed at Leith with around 1,600 fighting men, plus hundreds—perhaps as many as 1,000—more in support staff. He also landed with 50,000 livres (£8,333), which he deposited into the Scottish treasury. Most of this was spread around to the Scottish lords who had turned out to support the French, but the rest was given over to Robert II to keep him quiet while Carrick and the French managed an invasion through Robert's kingdom without his input.

    English plan of attack
    On 4 June, Edward summoned a great council at Reading Abbey. The choice of location demonstrated the seriousness with which he was considering the coming campaign. The abbey was situated just 15 miles southeast of Wallingford, which had become his mother's favorite residence in her old age. Edward acknowledged that he may die on campaign in Scotland and had wanted to see his mother once more before he did. It was the second meeting of the Lords that year, another sign that the king had no illusions regarding the dangers he faced, and a demonstration of his commitment to rule with their support.

    Edward issued a feudal levy for the campaign, calling on the magnates to muster at Newcastle on 14 July. In this, he exercised an ancient right of kings that had been all but forgotten. His grandfather, Edward III, had issued the last such levy in 1327 ahead of the Weardale campaign, which Roger Mortimer led in all but name and ended in a humiliating defeat by the Scots. The summons called upon every knight in the realm who held land to perform service in defense of the realm or to pay a fine in lieu of service. Edward V refused pleas to forgo the fine. He was thus able to outsource the cost of the campaign to the nobility by pointing to Burgundy's boycott and the strain that it had put on the English crown as his reason for doing so.

    Edward named his 12-year-old cousin, Edward of Norwich, guardian of the realm for the duration of the campaign. It was a purely ceremonial position meant to note the person inside the kingdom who was the highest in the line of succession during the king's time abroad. Actual power was vested in a council led by Simon Sudbury, archbishop of Canterbury. Sir Thomas Holland, the king's half-brother, was charged with the defense of the realm in the king's absence. Holland was a highly competent figure who had served in many minor commands, but this was a major task. He ordered positions along the coast to make any necessary repairs and every coastal community from Cornwall to Norfolk to set up coast guards and place warning beacons on hilltops. Holland himself took up residence at Dover Castle with 600 men and fast horses, hoping that from there he could respond to calls for help.

    On 23 July, Edward reached Newcastle. The response to the king's summons was overwhelming, as more than 14,000 men turned out to fight, supported by many thousands more attendants, pages, and servants. The king's royal uncles had the largest retinues, as John of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster, had roughly 3,000 men in his service while the dukes of Aumale and Gloucester had around 1,000 each. Gaunt's son, Sir Henry of Bolingbroke, had his own retinue in addition to his father's. Edward's brother, Sir Richard of Bordeaux, had the smallest retinue of the royal family, but he had neither a great estate nor a wealthy heiress to support him, as his uncles and cousin did. About 1,000 men came in the service of two royal cousins by marriage, Edmund Mortimer, 3rd earl of March, and Robert de Vere, 9th earl of Oxford. More than 300 came under Thomas Beauchamp, 12th earl of Warwick, whose retinue was the largest from outside the royal family.

    Scottish invasion of England
    On 8 July, Carrick and Vienne led the Franco-Scottish army south from Edinburgh. The truce was not set to expire for another week, but it was still a later start to the campaign than either had wanted. Weeks were wasted by arguments between their captains, who disagreed as to how they should make war on the English. The French wanted to target major walled towns and small castles, but the Scots feared being bogged down by a siege and exposed to attack by the English, preferring to ride hard and fast across the country to inflict maximum damage and grow rich from cattle rustling. A compromise was eventually settled upon and sealed in an agreement between Carrick and Vienne, but the delay irritated leaders in both camps and the men in their armies grew to resent one another.

    The Franco-Scottish army numbered about 4,600 men, of which nearly two-thirds were Scots. Its roster was almost as spectacular as that of the English army at Newcastle. Nine of Robert II's sons were a part of the campaign. Carrick led the army. He was joined by his most powerful brother, Robert Stewart, earl of Fife, their legitimate half-brothers David Stewart, earl of Strathearn, and Walter Stewart, earl of Atholl, plus five bastard half-brothers. The two great lords of the marches, George Dunbar, 10th earl of Dunbar, and James Douglas, 2nd earl of Douglas, were there as well, along with John Dunbar, 1st earl of Moray, and Archibald Douglas, lord of Galloway.

    Carrick and Vienne led their men across the Tweed in the hopes of taking Roxburgh Castle, but found it too well defended. They moved on to Wark on Tweed Castle, which the English had retaken since its capture and partial demolition by the Scots two years earlier. Animosities that had been birthed by the delay in Edinburgh flared up during debate over the value of the castle. The French insisted on taking the position, but the Scots declared it worthless and refused to help. The French captured the castle on their own, as the Scots continued east along the march and massacred stragglers who had not yet fled the area.

    The Siege of Wark was a major breach of trust for the French, who did not try to hide their hostility toward the Scots when they returned to the area. French captains declared that the Scots were "savages" lacking decency and honor. Vienne was more diplomatic in his dealings with the Scots, but his letters back to Paris were filled with a number of similar sentiments. The Scots were indignant. Five of the seven earls who had set out from Edinburgh with the French quit the campaign in protest, leaving only Carrick and his powerful ally, the earl of Douglas, behind.

    Carrick and Vienne moved further east to attack Cornhill Castle and Ford Castle, but the English then began to move north from Newcastle. The Franco-Scottish army, which now had fewer than 3,000 men, retreated west before moving south to attack Carlisle instead.

    French invasion of England
    On 17 July, Charles VI wed Isabeau of Bavaria at Amiens. At Sluys, some 15,000 men were waiting to set sail for England. An embarkation date for the French invasion was set for 1 August. The great men of the realm were to move from Amiens to Sluys after the wedding festivities and lead the greatest invasion of England since Louis the Lion in 1216. Instead, the invasion was canceled the day after the celebration.

    Frans Ackerman and Pieter van den Bossche, the last remaining leaders of the once-great Revolt of Ghent, used the occasion of the king's wedding to launch a surprise attack on nearby Damme. Supported by Sir John Bourchier, who led the 400 Englishmen sent to Ghent earlier in the year, they found the city was practically undefended. The captain of Damme was away organizing materials for the invasion and the leaderless garrison was completely unprepared for an attack. The Anglo-Ghentian force slaughtered the would-be defenders and the local population.

    The loss of Damme immediately upset French preparations for war. The city's position on the canal system cut Sluys off from Bruges, stopping the flow of food and materials needed to survive while on campaign. On 18 July, Burgundy ordered the men at Sluys to move to Damme and retake the city. The siege stretched into late August before the Anglo-Ghentians abandoned the city and fled back to Ghent in the dark of night. By then, the French had eaten through too much of their food supplies to consider launching an invasion of England. Despite dire warnings from Vienne regarding his men falling out with the Scots, the admiral's expeditionary army was on its own.

    English invasion of Scotland
    The royal standard of King Edward V of England
    On 30 July, Edward led the English army out of Newcastle. He ordered his banners unfurled as they crossed the Scottish border on 6 August, revealing the Saint George's Cross and a crowned lion between six gold roses. The gold rose was a device first deployed in England by his great-great-grandfather, Edward I, a century prior. Its connection to the famed Hammer of the Scots made it a powerful symbol of Edward V's ambitions in Scotland.

    The Scots offered no resistance to the English. Robert II fled Edinburgh for the Highlands while the earls and other lords who'd quit the campaign in England dispersed to their own safe havens. What remained of the Franco-Scottish army slunk off toward the western march. Common Scots fled the English on their move north, taking everything of value with them. Edward marched the English on a six-mile front, destroying crops, homes, and whatever else they found. Even churches and monasteries were burned, the consequence of Scotland's obedience to the pope in Avignon.

    Reaching Edinburgh without opposition on 11 August, Edward had the city razed to the ground. The defenders of the castle looked down helplessly as the royal palace burned. The king assembled a war council as Edinburgh was turned to ash. The lords could offer him no clear answer as to what he should attempt to do next. Edward had learned from the failure of his uncles Aumale and Gloucester in 1384 and ensured that the army was supplied by sea, meaning he could continue on campaign for weeks more if they remained close to the coast. A siege of Edinburgh Castle was considered, but the king's uncle, Gaunt, then recalled his disastrous experience besieging León on Lancaster's Crusade. He instead suggested moving north to cross the Forth. The English did not know the details of the French invasion plan, including their intended landing place, and news of Damme had not reached the army in Scotland. Gaunt thought the second French army may be intended for Scotland as well, and thus was suggesting they cross the Forth and put the Scottish coast to the torch all the way to the Firth of Tay so as to deny the French a port of entry. Gloucester disagreed, insisting that they move south to confront Carrick and Vienne, who were thought to be moving through Ettrick Forest. This drew sharp objections from the king's brother, Richard, who feared the Scots could be lying in wait in the forest.

    According to the French chronicler Jean Froissart, Edward recalled the "Prophecy of the Six Kings" when choosing a course of action. It said that the sixth king that followed King John of England—i.e., Edward V—would be a cowardly mole whose line would be dispossessed of the crown. Among the forces that would bring down the sixth king was "a dragon from the north," which Edward believed symbolized the Scots. Edward, wanting to prove that he was not the coward that Merlin had foreseen, declared that he would go to meet Carrick and Vienne in battle, as Gloucester had suggested. He saw the strategic value of Gaunt's suggestion, though, and so decided to split the army.

    The English army was divided three ways. Edward's uncles Gaunt and Aumale would lead the first division of about 4,000 men from Edinburgh to Sterling, destroy the town and round the Forth to lay waste to the whole coastline. The king's other uncle, Gloucester, would lead the second division of 4,000 down to Norham Castle, along with the earls of Arundel, March and Warwick and the marcher lords Neville and Percy. Together, they would sweep the marches from east to west and flush the French and Scots north. The king himself would lead the main army, about 6,000 strong, south through Ettrick Forest to attack the Scots or drive them east toward Gloucester's army.

    The mission that Edward gave himself was the most dangerous of the three assignments by far. The fears that his brother, Richard, had voiced were not unfounded. English reports on the Franco-Scottish army's movements were sketchy at best, so it was certainly possible that Carrick and Vienne were luring the English into a trap. Ultimately, these fears were unfounded.

    The French and Scots had crossed into Cumberland in mid August. Carrick and Vienne had agreed to make an attack on Carlisle before they arrived, but the French were again left to their own devices when the time came. The Scots made their way through Cumberland and into Westmorland, where Scottish raiders had not been seen in some time, promising rich booty for the Scots. The French launched their own attacks on Carlisle, but were twice repulsed with heavy casualties. The Scots later rejoined the French, but plans for a coordinated assault were abandoned when word arrived that Neville and Percy were approaching. Carrick and Vienne made a hasty retreat north, heading back the way they had come.

    Battle of Arkinholm
    On 7 September, the English and Franco-Scottish armies spotted one another near the village of Arkinholm in Dumfriesshire. Edward's men were hungry and tired. They had marched more than 70 miles through the hills and forest to cut off Carrick and Vienne's retreat north. It was hard terrain and moved the army away from the seaborne supply train, forcing them to survive on rations of salted meat and foraged food on their way.

    Carrick and Vienne understood that they had been caught in a trap. Edward's army cut off their escape into the hills as Neville and Percy moved in from the east. Edward had twice as many men as the French and Scots, but the English were exhausted and the king was a green knight who had never fought a battle. French and Scottish captains agreed that their best course of action was to give battle, fearing that they would be overrun if Neville and Percy caught up to them and believing that the young king's inexperience could be his undoing.

    The two armies arranged into battle formations. It was the first major battle between the English and either the French or Scots in many years. Edward, fearing that some overeager captain may break ranks and ruin the day, issued orders that any man who broke the line and survived would be hanged. In the end, it was the French who could not be controlled. Disagreements between the French and the Scots on battle tactics, and even between groups of Scots who wanted to organize traditional schiltrons and those who believed such a compact body of men would be easy targets for English archers, confused the men in the joint army. Either misunderstanding the plan or simply disregarding it, the French charged the English line before the Scots were ready. The disorderly French attack broke against the English line. Carrick, hoping to salvage the situation, ordered his men forward to support the French. The rush of Scots only added to the chaos, resulting in heavy casualties.

    Edward ordered a counterattack, looking to crush his opponents before French or Scottish commanders had the opportunity to impose any sort of order. Sir Henry Percy, eldest son and heir of the baron Percy, cut his way through the French line and charged toward the Scots, personally clashing swords with Carrick. The earl of Douglas saw the battle was turning into a rout and ordered his men to retreat. Carrick was knocked from his horse in the mayhem that followed, breaking his knee. Englishmen began seizing French knights and taking them as prisoners. Most Scots fled, but Sir Thomas Erskine and Sir William Cunningham fought to defend their injured lord, Carrick, until he finally ordered them to lay down their swords and surrender. Around 500 French and Scottish men were killed, compared to fewer than 100 Englishmen.

    Aftermath
    Edward moved south from Arkinholm with his prisoners, which included Carrick, Vienne, and at least 250 others. He rested for a night at Carlisle, where the locals rejoiced at their change of fortune after having fended off Vienne just weeks earlier. Edward issued a summons for parliament to meet at York before making for Chester, imprisoning the heir to the Scottish throne far from the border.

    Gaunt and Aumale devastated Scotland for more than a month after leaving Edinburgh in mid August. Their appearance north of the Forth caught many by surprise. It was the furthest that an English army had gone into Scotland in several decades. They returned to England on 16 September, having inflicted yet more destruction on Lothian as they returned south. Word of their kingly nephew's victory at Arkinholm and his summons for parliament likely reached the two dukes just as they returned to England.

    The French and Scots were forced to suffer further humiliation before year's end. In mid September, a storm swept through the Channel as the great French armada at Sluys slowly dispersed, driving a dozen ships to shore near Calais. The English garrison there set upon the crews, taking some 500 men as prisoners and seizing their ships. Meanwhile, Carrick's allies organized a retaliatory campaign as English forces withdrew from Scotland. Some 200 Scots descended on Redesdale early in the morning of 4 October, but Sir Thomas Umfraville and his son, also named Thomas, led a spirited defense of the town, killing or capturing several dozen Scotsmen. Thomas the Younger was knighted by the king himself at parliament just weeks later.

    On 27 October, parliament assembled at York. Edward was greeted with roars of approval from the Lords and Commons. He put Carrick and Vienne, his two highest-profile prisoners, on display. On his arm for the first time was his young wife, Giovanna of Naples, who had landed in England that summer, as Edward was crossing the border to Scotland. Swept up in the excitement of the king's victory, the Commons readily agreed to another grant of taxation to meet the threat of a possible French invasion in 1386.

    The mood was far less celebratory when the Scottish parliament assembled on 8 November. It met at Scone as a result of the destruction of Edinburgh and Holyrood. The mood was sober. Carrick's lieutenancy of the realm had lasted less than a year and it had brought the greatest disaster upon the land since Edward III's Burnt Candlemas campaign of 1356. Many looked to Robert II's second son, Robert, earl of Fife, for leadership. Fife was no less ambitious than Carrick, and possibly moreso, but he had the good sense to reject calls for him to take up the mantle of lieutenant, not wanting to be associated with the unpopular decisions that would need to be made to clean up Carrick's mess. This led the aged Robert II, who was broadly unpopular for his appeasement of the English and his negligence in administering justice at home, to make the most unlikely comeback. Robert arranged for the French who had escaped capture at Arkinholm to return home before securing a six-month truce with England, which was set to run from New Years to 1 July 1386. Progress toward Carrick's release was slow, though, and the truce was soon extended until summer 1387. The marcher lords could hardly object to a pause in hostilities after Edward's punishing campaign.

    Edward gladly welcomed Robert's offer of a truce, evidenced by the fact that it was negotiated in only a matter of weeks and put into force at the start of the new year. England had only narrowly avoided its own devastation at the hands of the French and Edward needed peace with the Scots to turn his attention to the threat he faced from across the Channel.

    The French were undeterred by the failures of 1385. They believed that the loss at Arkinholm was the fault of the Scots, as Vienne's letters had predisposed them to the notion that their allies were simple brutes and brigands. They thought, as a result, that victory over the Scots had not required much skill on Edward's part, writing off his victory. The French likewise attributed the temporary loss of Damme to Ghent's rebel leaders, believing the English investment of arms too small to be significant. Such blatant disregard for England's achievements in 1385 left the French uncritical of themselves. As a result, they did not consider any strategic changes regarding the war with England, simply deferring invasion plans for a year.

    One of the only areas in which French policy changed was in Flanders. The capture of Damme had exposed the risk that the rebels of Ghent posed, leading the duke of Burgundy to adopt a new, conciliatory approach in his dealing with them. Burgundy conceded to many of the city's demands for new rights and privileges, and even offered the rebels the protection of a royal pardon as a demonstration of his goodwill. The rebels, knowing that they could not hold out against the French forever and having been unimpressed that Edward sent them just 400 men under a knight of little renown, accepted the offer.

    The alliance between France and Scotland was hugely strained by the failure of their joint campaign. The two countries remained allies on paper, but grew further apart than ever before. Their differences were not limited to matters of policy, as they had been in the 1370s. French knights who fought in Scotland painted a picture of a poor land full of backwards people. It became the conventional wisdom in Paris that the power of the Scots had been very seriously overestimated and that their inclusion in the 1385 invasion plan had only complicated matters. The French reevaluation of the Scots led to heated diplomatic exchanges when, in 1386, Robert II argued that the agreement that Carrick and Vienne had signed in Edinburgh had made Carrick a retainer of Charles VI, thus obligating the king of France to pay Carrick's ransom.

    Impact
    The 1385 English invasion of Scotland was much celebrated by contemporary English writers, but received only passing mentions in French sources. This reflects its relative importance on the war efforts of the two kingdoms. As historian Nigel Saul noted in his biography of Edward V, the English had achieved a major goal in relieving pressure on their northern border, but this "hardly affected the balance of power between England and France." The French had dominated the English during the long Anglo-Scottish truce, having reconquered most of Aquitaine, resubjugated Brittany, and dispossessed the king of Navarre of his lands in France in the 1370s and early 1380s. The French thus had no reason to believe that Scotland exiting the war again in 1386 would significantly impact their own war effort.

    The invasion rewrote the politics of England and Scotland, though. The nascent peace party that had formed in the English Commons immediately disappeared while Scottish war hawks fell silent for a time. Marcher lords on both sides of the border remained hostile to one another, but outbreaks of violence became infrequent and, except for a major confrontation in 1388, were much smaller in scale.

    The finances of the English crown were transformed at a stroke. Edward borrowed a substantial sum from his uncle, Gaunt, who had returned from Lancaster's Crusade flush with cash, to buy the rights to ransom nearly every one of the men captured at Arkinholm. This quickly put money in the pockets of the English who had taken prisoners in battle while positioning the crown to make a windfall by negotiating more than 200 ransoms. That a disproportionate number of those captured were French, who typically brought higher sums than Scottish captives, made the haul of prisoners especially lucrative. Vienne brought 100,000 francs (£16,667) to the English treasury on his own, owing to his position as admiral of France. Carrick, as heir to the throne of Scotland, was the greatest prize, though.

    Negotiations over Carrick's ransom dominated Anglo-Scottish relations in the mid to late 1380s. Robert II had an extraordinarily weak hand in talks. The old king turned 70 when talks for his eldest son and heir's release began in spring 1386, putting enormous pressure on the Scots to get a deal quickly for fear that Robert would die with Carrick still in English custody. At the same time, though, the Scottish treasury was unable to meet the demands being made by England. This led Robert to assert that Carrick had fought on retainer for Charles VI in an attempt to put the financial burden of Carrick's release on the French. This was not well-received in Paris, but the French did eventually agree to send another installment of 50,000 livres (£8,333) to Robert II in order to avoid a more serious breakdown in Franco-Scottish relations. In 1389, his ransom was finally agreed for 60,000 marks (£40,000), plus the 32,000 marks (£21,333) still outstanding from David II's ransom.

    The campaign also had a profound impact on the English nobility. It was a coming of age for a whole new generation of young men. Edward V, aged 20 at the time of the battle, was still technically a year shy of his majority, but had stepped into his own power. At his side at Arkinholm were Sir Henry of Bolingbroke and Sir Henry Percy, who would become two of the greatest heroes of Edward's generation, and many more. The speed with which Percy smashed through the French line and charged Carrick became the subject of a popular bard's song, earning Percy the nickname "Hotspur." In 1386, Edward established a new chivalric order for his "brothers in arms," the Order of the Bath, which was kept exclusively for men who had fought with the king in battle. Upon its founding, that included only those who had been at Arkinholm and the 1386 Battle of Écluse.
     
    Last edited:
    Joan of Kent
  • Joan of Kent
    Joan of Kent (29 September 1327 - 3 April 1386), known as the Fair Maid of Kent, was queen consort of England from June to September 1377 as the wife of King Edward IV. She was 4th countess of Kent and 5th baroness Wake of Liddell in her own right from 1352 to 1386. She was the mother of King Edward V.

    Early life
    Joan was born on 29 September 1327. She was the daughter of Edmund of Woodstock, 1st earl of Kent, and Margaret Wake, suo jure 3rd baroness Wake of Liddell. Edmund was the third surviving son of King Edward I of England and was born of the king's second marriage to Margaret of France. Joan was thus a half-niece of King Edward II and a half-first cousin of King Edward III.

    Edward II was deposed and murdered by his wife, Queen Isabella, and her lover, Roger Mortimer, 1st earl of March, in 1327. Mortimer and Isabella took control of the government in the name of Edward and Isabella's eldest son, who was crowned Edward III. Edmund remained loyal to his half-brother, Edward II, and was tricked into believing that Edward II was still alive. In 1330, Edmund planned to find Edward II and restore him to the throne. These plans were enough for Mortimer and Isabella to declare Edmund guilty of treason against Edward III and execute him. Edmund's widow and their four children, including Joan, were arrested, their household was disbanded, their property seized, and their titles forfeited. The children were threatened with placement in religious establishments, but Edward III brought down Mortimer and Isabella's regency and took control of the government just months later, restoring his Kent cousins to good graces.

    The execution of Joan's father and the near destruction of the Kent family had an enormous effect on Joan's life. Her mother grew obsessed with the management of the family estates and left her children to be raised in the royal household. Joan received a royal education and was surrounded by her peers, but never had a place to call home. The royal nursery traveled with Edward III's wife, Queen Philippa, who was on the move almost constantly, as she insisted on going with her husband on campaign. The instability in Joan's early life, from her father's execution to her mother's absence and the itinerant nature of her life as part of the royal household, left Joan without a strong chaperone and ultimately led her into one of medieval England's greatest scandals.

    First marriages
    Joan married Sir Thomas Holland in 1340. She was just 13 and went through with the marriage without the consent of her family. Holland joined Edward III's campaign to the continent later that same year. Either unaware of the marriage or under the impression that Holland had died on campaign, Joan's mother arranged for Joan to marry William Montagu, then-heir to the earldom of Salisbury, in 1341. Joan's first marriage was not revealed until Holland returned in 1348, by which time Montagu had succeeded as 2nd earl of Salisbury and become one of the most powerful figures in the realm. Salisbury would not allow Joan to go to Holland or accept that his marriage was invalid until Pope Clement VI intervened. Joan's marriage to Salisbury was annulled. She and Holland were remarried to ensure the validity of their union.

    Holland, the second son of a Lancastrian knight who became a minor baron, was an unusual match for a woman of Joan's rank. Their clandestine marriage and the bigamy scandal that erupted because of it made them social pariahs. Joan was not allowed to attend her brother's wedding and her mother pushed her away entirely, believing that Joan had brought shame upon the whole Kent family. Joan was isolated even from her husband, as the war with France repeatedly took him to the continent. It was a remarkably lonely existence for the granddaughter of a king.

    In 1352, Joan's brother died childless. She inherited the Kent estates and was transformed into one of the wealthiest and most influential women in England.

    Countess, princess, queen
    Holland had little interest in estate management and continued regular service in France even after he became earl of Kent jure uxoris. Joan took advantage of her change in circumstances, though, and began joining her husband on campaign so that they could be together more often. Their family grew rapidly, but in 1360 Holland died.

    In 1361, Edward of Woodstock, prince of Wales, known as the Black Prince, took an interest in Joan, who was a widow in her early 30s. It was a controversial match for the Black Prince, who was Joan's first cousin once removed and who, as the victor of the Battle of Poitiers and heir to the English throne, could have most any foreign princess of his choosing. They entered into a marriage contract without the consent of the king, but Edward III appears to have not been upset by this, as he helped them secure the four dispensations required for them to legally wed.

    Joan became princess of Wales and of Aquitaine through her marriage to the Black Prince. The marriage was an immediate boon for Joan's children from her first marriage, as the Black Prince was childless at the time of his marriage to Joan and had to use his Holland stepchildren to make the sorts of marriage alliances typical for the great men of the era. Joan and the Black Prince moved to Gascony in 1362 and stayed there for nine years. They had two sons, including future King Edward V, before moving back to England in 1371. The Black Prince was seriously ill by this time and would remain so for most of the rest of his life.

    Edward III died in June 1377. He was succeeded by the Black Prince as King Edward IV, but the new king's health was extremely poor and he died just 100 days later, which brought his and Joan's eldest son to the throne as Edward V. This became known as the Year of the Three Edwards. Joan's consortship is the second-shortest in English history, longer only than that of Świętosława of Poland, the uncrowned queen of the Danish King Sweyn Forkbeard, who conquered England and ruled over it for just over a month before he died suddenly.

    The queen's great matter
    The succession of Edward V put Joan in a difficult position. England had seen just two other minorities since the Norman Conquest and neither had left Joan a template to follow as the mother of a young king. In 1220, Isabella of Angoulême remarried, returned to France, and left her young son, King Henry III, in the custody of his councilors. In the late 1320s, Isabella of France rebelled against her own husband and co-ruled the kingdom in the name of her teenage son, Edward III, alongside her lover. The legacy of Isabella of France was especially difficult for Joan, as her father had been a victim of the Mortimer regency. Joan only wanted to arrange a good marriage for Edward V and then retire from public life, avoiding politics for fear of drawing comparisons to Isabella of France.

    Joan's involvement in Edward's marriage was unremarkable at first. She had helped arrange all of her other children's marriages and was a calm, quiet figure with a gift for bringing people together, which made her a natural negotiator. Her complicated and controversial marital history made her aware of the difficulties that personal scandal could bring, which predisposed her toward staunchly traditional matches for each of her children. For Edward, this meant a foreign princess. Involving herself in negotiations with foreign powers, however, brought Joan into politics in a way that she had hoped to avoid.

    King Charles V of France twice offered his daughters as prospective brides. First, his daughter Marie was proposed as part of a far-reaching deal to end the war between England and France. The English were initially open to peace talks, but Charles's terms were unacceptable and then Marie died in late 1377. Charles tried again in 1378 with his other daughter, Isabella, but the English had lost interest in peace negotiations. Joan approved of the possible French marriage, but she would not push back against the English political establishment as it became more hawkish. The chance for such a match vanished when Isabella then died young as well.

    English missions to Hainaut and the Holy Roman Empire in 1378 came back empty-handed. King Robert II of Scotland offered his daughter, Egidia, who was said to be the most beautiful girl in Scotland, but the English thought there was little diplomatic gain to be had. Bernabò Visconti, lord of Milan, offered an enormous dowry for his daughter, Catarina, but it came too late. In summer 1378, England negotiated an alliance with Navarre that included Edward's betrothal to one of the daughters of King Charles II of Navarre.

    Joan strongly supported a Navarrese marriage. Charles of Navarre was a king in his own right, had a claim to the French crown, and his wife, who had died years earlier, was a daughter of the first Valois king. Their daughters were thus descended from the fleur-de-lis on both sides, a remarkably prestigious background. The marriage arrangement was soon rendered moot, though, as the French captured Château de Breteuil, the home of Charles's young children, and made his daughters prisoners of the French crown later that year.

    As uncertainty over the Anglo-Navarrese alliance grew, Joan lobbied John of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster and lord regent of England, to reopen the search for a bride. Gaunt belatedly responded to the Milanese offer, but this drew the attention of Pope Urban VI, who had come into conflict with the Visconti family. Urban pushed England to open talks with the Empire, hoping that he could bring together his two greatest supporters in the midst of the Western Schism. An imperial princess was the most prestigious possible marriage that Edward could make, which brought Joan's strong support. Talks began to wed Edward and Anna of Bohemia, daughter of the late Emperor Karel IV and half-sister of King Václav IV of Bohemia, who had already been elected king of the Romans in hopes of being crowned emperor.

    Preliminary negotiations between England and the Empire went smoothly in 1380 and advanced in 1381. A series of talks were set to conclude in London in summer 1381 when the Revolt of the Towns broke out. Its events delayed the imperial delegation until fall, by which time parliament had assembled to deal with the fallout from the revolt. The Commons was shocked to hear that the arrangement included no word of a dowry and refused to raise taxes to provide for a new queen. Anglo-imperial talks were reopened, but it was soon clear that Václav was in no position to provide a dowry. An embassy to Prague in 1382 reported doubts that Václav would even honor the proposed treaty's provisions against France, as he feared that upsetting the French would lead them to support a noble rebellion against him in Bohemia. The delegation was recalled to London and the Anglo-imperial alliance was abandoned.

    Joan grew distressed by her son's continued bachelorhood. She threw herself into talks about Edward's marriage with such urgency that the French chronicler Jean Froissant dubbed it "the queen's great matter." She began corresponding with Pietro Pileo di Prata, cardinal-archbishop of Ravenna, who had played a role in Anglo-imperial negotiations as papal legate to the Empire, a position he left when Václav moved closer to France. Upon his return to Italy, Prata wrote to Joan that Urban VI had a new favorite.

    King Carlo III of Naples had come to power as a result of the first Urbanist Crusade, toppling his cousin, Queen Giovanna I of Naples, with the pope's blessing. At the invitation of the archbishop of Ravenna, an English delegation was sent to Rome to forge an alliance with the new king. Edward was contracted to wed Carlo's daughter, also named Giovanna, on 10 October 1383 with a dowry of 300,000 florins (£45,000).

    It was nearly two years before Giovanna traveled to England, arriving in summer 1385. Edward was on campaign in Scotland when she arrived, and it was left to Joan to organize the girl's travel from Dover to Westminster and personally welcome her. Joan likely helped Giovanna set up her household, as many of the knights and clerks in Joan's employ ended up in the new queen's service, but details of this are scarce, as Joan played a much more discreet role in affairs once the issue of her son's marriage was settled.

    Later years and death
    Joan, who Froissant called "the most beautiful woman in all the realm of England" in her youth, grew enormously fat in her later years. The chronicler Thomas Walsinham wrote that Joan had grown obese because she was overly "used to luxury," leading her to often be portrayed as gluttonous or slothful. This may have been a partisan account, though. Walsingham was cynical of the great figures of his era and he wrote about women with particular scorn. Joan's involvement in Edward's marriage negotiations could have put Joan even lower in Walsingham's standing. Based on other contemporary accounts, historians speculate that Joan developed dropsy, which causes a build-up of fluid in the body's tissue.

    Joan retired to Wallingford Castle after Edward and Giovanna's marriage, though she continued to play a role as conciliator behind the scenes. Her son Sir John Holland had earned a fair amount of respect for his service on Lancaster's Crusade, but remained more famous for fits of rage and fondness of women than for his service abroad. In 1385, John's charms landed him in a major scandal, as he fathered a son with Isabella of Castile, duchess of Aumale. Joan helped John reconcile with Isabella's husband, Edmund of Langley, 1st duke of Aumale. She was less successful in reconciling her other son, Sir Richard of Bordeaux, with his uncle John of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster. The two fell out when Gaunt endorsed King João of Portugal instead of trying to salvage Richard's betrothal to Beatriz of Portugal, who had a rival claim to the Portuguese throne.

    Despite remaining an active member of the royal family behind the scenes, Joan appeared in public only once more before her death on 3 April 1386. She was buried alongside her first husband, Thomas Holland, despite Edward IV having built a crypt for her at Canterbury Cathedral, where he had been laid to rest.

    Joan's titles were inherited by her eldest son, also named Thomas Holland, who became 5th earl of Kent and 6th baron Wake of Liddell. The dower lands left to her by Edward IV were returned to the crown. Joan had closely guarded her estates in her later life, just as her mother had done after Edmund of Woodstock's death. Joan was unable to manage such a large portfolio, though. The Kent estate was one of the largest in the realm and would have been difficult to oversee on its own, but Edward IV granted Joan the largest dower ever received by an English queen, which included estates in two dozen English and three Welsh counties. Her son Thomas thus received a messy inheritance, which took several years to return to good standing. Edward V took a special interest in managing Joan's dower lands that returned to the crown before he awarded parts of them to his own wife. Joan left several of her jewels and 500 marks to Richard of Bordeaux, asking in her will that Edward take special care of him.

    Marriage and issue
    In 1340, Joan wed Sir Thomas Holland, had issue:
    • Thomas Holland, 5th earl of Kent (born 1350), who married Alice Fitzalan, daughter of Richard Fitzalan, 4th earl of Arundel and 8th earl of Surrey
    • John Holland, 1st earl of Huntingdon (born 1352), who married Lucia Visconti, daughter of Bernabò Visconti, lord of Milan
    • Edmund Holland (born 1354) died young
    • Maud Holland (born 1355), who married (1) Sir Hugh Courtenay, grandson and heir of Hugh de Courtenay, 2nd earl of Devon; and (2) Waleran III, count of Saint-Pol
    • Joan Holland (born 1356), who married Jean IV, duke of Brittany
    In 1361, Joan wed King Edward IV of England, had issue:
    • King Edward V (born 1365), who married Giovanna of Naples, daughter of King Carlo III of Naples
    • Richard of Bordeaux, duke of Clarence (born 1367), who married (1) Anna of Bohemia, daughter of Emperor Karel IV, and (2) Joana of Aragon, daughter of King Joan of Aragon
     
    Last edited:
    Gaston's Rebellion
  • Gaston's Rebellion
    Gaston's Rebellion was a revolt against Gaston III, count of Foix, by his only legitimate son and heir, also named Gaston, who was supported by Jean III, count of Armagnac. The revolt failed in under a year and Gaston the Younger fled into exile while his father continued to rule as the preeminent lord in the Pyrenees.

    Background
    Gaston III, count of Foix, popularly known as Gaston Fébus, ruled over a noncontiguous string of lands along the Pyrenees since 1343. The county of Foix and viscounty of Béarn were his greatest possessions, but they sat at the eastern and western edges of his patchwork of territories, respectively, and their distance created major logistical problems. Fébus would dedicate his life to consolidating his territories across the northern Pyrenees, repeatedly bringing him into conflict with the house of Armagnac.

    Fébus bested the Armagnacs on three major occasions. First, in 1362, his forces routed the Armagnac army at the Battle of Launac, capturing both Jean I, count of Armagnac, and his principal allies, the lord of Albret and the count of Comminges. Then, in the mid to late 70s, Fébus fought Jean II, count of Armagnac, over control of the young heiress of Comminges and, though the girl ultimately married Armagnac's son, Fébus won several key fortresses in Comminges that closed the distance between Béarn and Foix. Then, in 1382, Fuxéen forces ambushed and slaughtered an Armagnac army at the Battle of Rabastens, which effectively neutered Armagnac and allowed Fébus to take control of several more positions in Comminges. Jean II of Armagnac died two years later and was succeeded by his son, Jean III.

    Fébus had four sons, but only one was legitimate, as Fébus had repudiated his wife, Agnès of Navarre, back in 1362 as a result of the nonpayment of her dowry. The boy, Gaston, had been a pawn in Fébus's schemes throughout his life. Betrothed to an Armagnac girl at the end of the Comminges War, he was ultimately wed to Joana of Aragon, eldest daughter of the heir to the throne of Aragon. The pair were a glamorous couple. Gaston was athletic and strikingly handsome while Joana was charming and fashionable. Gaston built up a large retinue of knights around himself, drawn heavily from the number of routier companies that were under contract with his father at all times. Even the youngest of these men had seen action, given the situation in southern France and the Iberian peninsula. Gaston had never seen action, though, and railed against his father's prohibition on tournaments. He struggled to maintain his lifestyle, complaining that he had been provided with too modest an allowance for a prince. Relations between father and son soured.

    In 1385, Jean III, count of Armagnac, was made lieutenant governor of Languedoc when the duke of Berry was recalled north to Paris. Upon the death of his father the year prior, Armagnac had sought peace with Fébus, but he secretly planned to avenge three generations of Armagnac humiliation at Fébus's hands. Armagnac's wife was Marguerite, suo jure countess of Comminges, and the lands that Fébus had taken there in the late 1370s and early 1380s were hers by right. By this time, Gaston the Younger was 24 and anxious to break free of his father's control. In late August, Armagnac and Gaston clandestinely forged an alliance in which Armagnac promised to help bring Gaston to power in Foix in exchange for his returning those lands that Fébus had taken in Comminges and elsewhere.

    Revolt
    In October 1385, Armagnac began a tour of provincial assemblies across Languedoc to raise funds for an army of routiers, which he intended to deploy against Fébus. His pleas for loans and taxes were met with skepticism, as he could not admit publicly that he planned to use the funds for a personal war with Foix. Despite this, Armagnac won over enough support that money began flowing into his coffers. He began signing contracts with routier companies in Languedoc and its neighboring provinces in spring 1386.

    Fébus suspected that he was the target of Armagnac's army early on. As lieutenant governor, Armagnac had command of 700 men-at-arms paid for by the crown. In early 1386, Armagnac moved these men into key positions on Languedoc's border with Foix and into Armagnac's own lands around Bigorre, over which the houses of Armagnac and Foix had been fighting for generations. These early movements tipped Armagnac's hand months before he was ready to move against Fébus.

    On 5 April 1386, Gaston appeared outside Thuriès, an imposing fortress on the River Viaur. Fébus had captured it from Armagnac's father in the early 1380s and held it ever since. Gaston's appearance with a small cadre of knights confused the Fuxéen garrison, who were eventually compelled to open the gates for their lord's son and heir. Gaston turned the place over to Armagnac's forces, who had been hidden a short distance away.

    Fébus was caught off guard by the sudden loss of Thuriès. The great castle was less than 40 miles from his viscounty of Lautrec, which was the heart of his northern lands and from which he projected power across much of the Albigeois. He was shocked to learn of his son's role in its capture. It was, however, the high water mark of the revolt, as Armagnac and Gaston's scheme began to fall apart as soon as it had begun.

    Armagnac's plans for a great routier army came to naught. He signed contracts with several companies and made down payments for their services, gaining commitments for them to vacate their positions across the south of France and join him on campaign upon the receipt of a second installment. The money he raised from the provincial assemblies had already been exhausted, though, and he could not afford the second installment he had promised. What's more, the count was already losing interest in the scheme, as the French were now planning to launch a massive invasion of England, which Armagnac wanted to join. In default on his contracts, the routiers simply pocketed the cash they had given as down payment and then returned to raiding the southern French countryside.

    As Armagnac's routier scheme fell apart, Gaston's bastard half-brother, Yvain de Foix, led an army north to retake Thuriès. Gaston, abandoned by his ally and unprepared for a siege, fled the castle, bringing his short-lived rebellion to an ignominious end.

    Aftermath
    Gaston's Rebellion had little impact on the political situation in southern France in the short term. Fébus was the greatest lord in southern France before it began and remained so after it ended. Armagnac continued to dream of ways to claw back the parts of his wife's inheritance that Fébus had captured in previous conflicts. The duke of Berry continued as an absent governor and the routiers remained a scourge on the area. The rebellion had major long-term repercussions, though.

    Gaston was forced to flee north from Thuriès, as he could not reach the courts of his uncle, King Charles II of Navarre, or father-in-law, Joan of Aragon, duke of Girona, without crossing his father's lands or venturing into the hostile territory of English Gascony. Instead, he made his way to Paris, where he joined the growing number of young nobles at the court of King Charles VI of France. He became a fixture at the French court, where his cousin, Charles of Navarre's son and heir, was a prisoner in name only, and in reality a guest of honor.

    In 1389, Gaston swore an oath of fealty to Charles VI, imperiling Fébus's work to carve out his lands as an independent principality. Gaston had always been a disappointment to Fébus, who preferred his bastard sons to his legitimate one, but this was the final straw. Fébus disinherited Gaston and tried to legitimize Yvain so that his favorite son could inherit his lands. By this time, though, Gaston's father-in-law had succeeded to the crown of Aragon and used his influence with the pope in Avignon to obstruct Yvain's legitimization. The issue dragged on at the papal court and was still unsettled when Fébus died in 1391, setting off the War of the Fuxéen Succession.
     
    Last edited:
    Channel campaign of 1386
  • Channel campaign of 1386
    The Channel campaign of 1386 consisted of a series of raids conducted by the kingdom of England on the northern ports of and trade vessels from the kingdom of France and the county of Flanders. It ran through the summer and fall of 1386, culminating in the Battle of Écluse.

    Background
    Cross-Channel raids were a regular feature of the Hundred Years War. French naval supremacy left mainland England vulnerable to attack in the early years of the war, but the balance of naval power was tipped toward the English in the 1340 Battle of Sluys. This remained the case through the Edwardian War, which ended in 1360. The outbreak of the Caroline War in 1369 saw the kingdom of Castile join France in a new conflict against England. Castile was the greatest naval power in western Europe and struck a devastating blow against the English in the 1372 Battle of La Rochelle.

    The decline of English naval power is well-documented. At the height of English naval supremacy in the Edwardian War, King Edward III of England was able to gather more than 700 vessels to move his armies across the Channel in 1346. By 1378, it took a major requisitioning effort to assemble just 150 vessels. The crown directly owned 21 ships and barges in 1369, including five high-tonnage vessels. That was reduced to just eight after the Battle of La Rochelle and to one by the late 1370s as a result of decay. The crown's final vessel was sold in the early 1380s to cover its debts. French naval power, on the other hand, significantly grew through the 1360s and 70s. King Charles V of France invested heavily in the construction of a new fleet while the French knight Jean de Vienne, admiral of France, reorganized the navy and also tightly regulated the building and selling of commercial ships.

    John of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster, was among the first figures in England to speak out on the overwhelming might of the Franco-Castilian alliance. In the early 1380s, he launched a crusade against Castile to install himself as king. He failed to take the Castilian crown, but succeeded in breaking Castile's alliance with France, which was a major victory for the English. Unfortunately, the death of Louis II, count of Flanders, brought one of the great naval powers of northern Europe under more direct French control and offset the gains England won on Lancaster's Crusade.

    By the mid 1380s, England was faced with the threat of invasion from France in the south and Scotland in the north. King Edward V of England reasoned that an attack on Scotland was necessary, as the cost to defend the northern border was unsustainable in the long term. The 1385 English invasion of Scotland resulted in the devastation of Lothian and the capture of the heir to the Scottish throne in battle. This overwhelming victory restored peace to the north of England and allowed Edward to turn his attention toward France.

    Diplomatic interlude
    Talks between England and France had been purely bilateral since 1378. The Catholic Church had been the primary arbiter of disputes between the two countries through the early stages of the Hundred Years War, but the Western Schism had robbed the church of its authority, as the two countries supported different popes. Emperor Karel IV's death soon after the onset of the schism took the only secular figure who could bring England and France together off the political stage. King Václav IV of Bohemia, who was Karel's eldest son and successor, was too weak to bring the warring parties together or resolve the schism.

    Over the winter of 1385-6, King Levon V of Armenia stepped into the diplomatic vacuum created by the schism in the church and the weakness of the Empire. Levon had lost his kingdom to Mamluk conquest in the mid 1370s. He spent the better part of a decade as a prisoner in Cairo before finally gaining his freedom thanks to the charity of King Juan of Castile, an intensely pious figure who was moved by stories of Levon's plight. Levon was showered with lordships by Juan, but Levon fled Castile for France after his benefactor's murder and the collapse of the Trastámaran dynasty. He joined the court of the French king in June 1385.

    Levon's personal charms and his firsthand knowledge of the political situation in the east quickly drew many admirers in Paris. Chief among them were the young King Charles VI of France and the king's regent and uncle, Philippe II, duke of Burgundy. Stories of Levon's life made their way across the Channel and he gained an invitation to celebrate Christmas in England as a guest of Edward V.

    Charles and Edward were both moved by Levon's calls for peace between Christians and for a new crusade to recover Armenia. A peace conference was hastily arranged at Leulinghem. By the time that peace talks were underway in March, though, war hawks on both sides had pressed the two young kings into taking positions that made peace impossible. The English would not accept a simple truce, even a long-term one, and demanded land and money to bring the war to an end once and for all. The French would only consider a truce, determined to avoid the enormous financial burden that would come with buying out English claims to Aquitaine. Negotiations foundered in just a few weeks and the conference broke up on 19 March 1386.

    Preparations for war
    On 28 March 1386, the terms of a defensive pact between England and Portugal were read out to Edward V at Saint George's Chapel in Windsor Castle. It committed the two countries to come to one another's aid in the event of an invasion, a significant concern for both at the time, as King João of Portugal feared that a border dispute with his much more powerful neighbor, King Bernardo of Castile, could spiral into an all-out war. João was so worried that he offered to send a fleet of 10 war galleys to support English naval action in the Channel that summer just to sweeten the deal. The fleet, its officers, and a full contingent of Portuguese crossbowmen were to be paid for at João's expense. A week later, on 4 April, Edward convened a great council at Westminster. The terms of the new treaty were read out to the lords, emboldening them to consider taking preemptive action against the French.

    On 24 April, the French gathered their own war council around the 17-year-old Charles VI. Burgundy, who led the council as regent, had become the kingdom's most prominent war hawk in recent years. He was determined to strike a crushing blow to the English on their own soil and the council quickly agreed to invasion plans that had been made the previous year, but on a much larger scale. Charles proposed to command the expedition himself and wanted his three uncles at his side on campaign. As this was to be Charles's first time leading an army abroad, the council agreed that 20,000 fighting men were to be raised and another 10,000 likely needed to support the army on campaign. At 30,000 men total, it was twice the size of the force that the French had gathered ahead of their abortive attempt to invade England in 1385.

    France's extraordinary plans could not be kept secret for long, as not even the combined might of the French and Flemish fleets could move such a force. French officials fanned out across Europe to charter additional ships for Charles's grand invasion. The English could not miss that French commissioners had appeared everywhere from Castile to Genoa to Germany to Scotland in search of any available vessel.

    In England, Edward gave responsibility for the coming campaign to Richard Fitzalan, 4th earl of Arundel, and Philip Darcy, 4th baron Darcy de Knayth, as admirals of the west and north, respectively. Arundel had gained fame as admiral in 1378, leading a cruise along northern France that devastated towns and villages along the coast from Harfleur to Berck before launching a daring raid on Sluys. The campaign brought the earl fame, but it achieved nothing strategically and created major logistical problems for an expedition to Brittany that Arundel was supposed to be helping launch. Arundel's thirst for glory would come back to complicate matters for the English again in 1386.

    Early action
    Arundel put to sea in late May with two dozen cogs, far fewer than the 50-60 ships he had been expected to assemble. Recognizing that he had far too small a force to attack any significant military target, he satisfied himself with simple piracy. The fleet cruised the coast of Flanders for more than two months, attacking any ships that were thought to be carrying French or Flemish goods. A substantial fortune was made in booty, but Arundel's loose oversight of his men triggered a major diplomatic incident.

    In July, three Castilian ships taken on Arundel's campaign drew the attention of officials at Westminster. The king's uncle, Gaunt, feared that attacks on Castilian shipping violated the treaty he had negotiated with the king of Castile and warned that they may draw the country back into the war. Edward demanded a closer accounting of the loot Arundel's campaign had brought in and discovered that the earl had stolen about as much from Castile and other neutral countries as it had from France and Flanders. Outraged, Edward called a great council to deal with the matter.

    On 8 August, the lords met at Oxford, barely four months after their meeting at Westminster. Arundel was ordered to compensate the Casilians whose ships he had boarded and loot he had stolen. In a remarkable rebuke from the young king, Arundel and Darcy were then dismissed from their positions. It was humiliating for Arundel, who was the wealthiest and most powerful man in the kingdom outside of the royal family. The earl likely expected that he would keep his position until his term in office expired, but his removal sent a clear message that rank alone could not guarantee a role in Edward V's government. The king's half-brothers, Thomas Holland, 5th earl of Kent, and Sir John Holland, were then named admirals of the north and west, respectively.

    French armada
    In early July, France began mustering troops for its grand invasion. The effort drew men from across the whole of the kingdom and beyond, as government records note companies from Lorraine and Savoy. The response was overwhelming. The embarkation date had been set at 27 August, but some 9,000 men were assembled at Arras as early as 19 July. Their number swelled to 15,000 by the first week of August. Local officials were unprepared to host such a large number of men for so long and begged the king's financial officers for help.

    On 18 August, Charles VI arrived in Arras. A thousand transport vessels were anchored at Sluys, waiting to take the king and his army across the sea, but it was not enough. Military organizers guessed that another 200 ships were still needed to carry the king's huge army. The embarkation date was pushed back to late September. The delay created new logistical problems, as food stores meant for the campaign would need to be tapped to tide the army over until its new embarkation date, and then they would need to be restocked.

    On 21 August, the leaders of Arras convinced the king to move on from the town, much to the relief of the local population. Charles led the army on to Lille, where the problems that had been present at Arras soon repeated themselves. The men, many already waiting for weeks, were bored and drank heavily to pass the time. Captains struggled to control the drunken masses, who fought with and robbed from the locals almost as much as they did one another.

    On 27 August, Charles led the army to Bruges in hopes that his presence there would hurry along efforts at the outlying port of Sluys. Local officials at Bruges, having heard of the problems at Arras and Lille, barred the gates behind the king. They refused to allow anyone from outside his household, including even the duke of Berry and his entourage, to enter the town for fear of a breakdown in law and order.

    On 2 September, French military organizers reported to the king that the additional vessels had been procured more quickly than expected. It would take a week to move the army, including the horses and supplies needed for the campaign, onto the ships. This seemed to surprise the king's council and many began to lose their nerve, understanding that if a week was needed to embark, then a week was likely needed to disembark in England. This was a long period of time in which the French forces would be exposed to attack by the English.

    One of the king's uncles, Jean, duke of Berry, was among the men who feared that the long disembarkation period put the army at serious risk. In particular, Berry was worried that Charles himself could be captured by the English before the full might of the French army could land. Giving voice to these concerns set off days of bitter arguments. The new sail date, 9 September, was missed. On 13 September, the French council met in the presence of the king to discuss these concerns. Charles himself ordered that the campaign move forward. The sail date was set for 25 September.

    Battle of Écluse
    Edward V's Holland half-brothers proved to be a highly effective duo at managing the English response to the French threat. Kent was a particularly competent man. He had decades of experience in Castile and France and had led the defense of England when it faced the threat of French invasion the previous year. As admiral in 1386, he managed the requisitioning of ships while his hot-headed younger brother, John, recruited men with fiery calls to action. In this, John Holland was incredibly successful. The king's victory at Arkinholm in 1385 had inspired a whole new generation of English warriors, who rushed to sign up for service in the campaign. As a result, the 5,000 men who volunteered to fight were not the typical lowborn wretches forced into naval service by press gangs, but men-at-arms largely drawn from the lower nobility.

    By 10 September, more than 150 ships, including 10 Portuguese war galleys, were assembled at Sandwich. Squadrons of ships were running reconnaissance missions, making regular cruises to Middelburg to spot activity around Sluys, but there seemed little to report. The embarkation had not yet begun and large numbers of men and horses could not be kept on ships for prolonged periods of time. The ships were generally undermanned as a result. The French armada was vulnerable to attack. Edward ordered the English fleet put to sea at once.

    On 19 September, the English descended upon Sluys. The French had known of England's naval buildup, but had not expected a direct assault. The embarkation effort had only just begun, moving horses onto broad barges and equipment and provisions onto ships. The men were unarmed and unarmored so as to avoid overheating in the late summer sun. They were easy prey for the English.

    The range of England's longbowmen put the French at an early disadvantage, causing chaos in the French fleet. The highly maneuverable Portuguese war galleys quickly exploited this, taking a number of enemy vessels early in the fighting. The Anglo-Portuguese fleet captured more than 100 French and Flemish vessels—upward of 200 by one account's reckoning—in just the initial stage of the battle. At least three dozen more were damaged or sunk.

    Jan Buuc, admiral of Flanders, who was leading the French armada as Jean de Vienne, admiral of France, was still being held prisoner by the English, organized a counterattack once the French and Flemish had recovered from the initial shock of the attack. The English, already having struck a massive blow to the French, had begun to withdraw. Buuc pursued at the head of some 300 ships. The English fleet, now swollen by the large number of ships they had captured, turned to attack. The second stage of the battle was noted for its intense fighting and brutality. French prisoners taken during the initial assault joined in the fighting on John Holland's ship. The hot-tempered Holland decried the dishonor and began executing his prisoners. Buuc himself was taken as a hostage elsewhere in the fighting, as the better-armed English eventually prevailed.

    The French armada was devastated. More than 250 ships were captured by the English. The total number damaged or sunk is unknown, but was at least in the dozens. It is estimated that more than 6,000 Frenchmen were captured or killed. English and Portuguese casualties are estimated around 600. Charles VI was given a full report on the losses on 25 September, the day on which he had expected to sail to England. The king had no choice but to call off the campaign, disbanding the greatest army that France had assembled since the Crécy campaign.

    Later action
    The Battle of Écluse, as it came to be known by its French name, only whetted John Holland's appetite for destruction. Just weeks later, he packed more than 2,000 men onto 50 ships and set sail to kick the French while they were down. He led a reckless attack on the island of Cadzand, which sat just 10 miles off the coast from Sluys, but was repulsed. He then sailed to the continent and razed the village of Sint Anna ter Muiden to the ground, barely a mile and a half from Sluys. They raided other coastal villages, taking many valuable prisoners and capturing several more ships before heading back across the Channel.

    English raids on French and Flemish commercial shipping through the fall and winter brought fresh financial pain to the French king and his uncle, Burgundy. Combined with the massive costs that the failed invasion had incurred, the French pressed for a new round of talks under the mediation of Levon V.

    Aftermath
    On 25 September, Edward returned to London as a hero. The English had largely been spared the terrors of the war, but several contemporary accounts attest to the fears and paranoia of the people of London in the run-up to the failed French invasion. The buildings outside London's walls were demolished so that they could not be used by the enemy during a siege and levies from inland towns were called in to help defend the city. The news that the king had crushed the threat was hugely celebrated. The anonymous author of the Westminster Chronicle recalled that the celebrations in London upon Edward's return were so extraordinary that "had the Lord Jesus Christ himself arrived, he could not have been greeted with more pleasure by the people."

    On 29 September, the feast day of Saint Michael the Archangel, to whom Edward was intensely devoted, the king himself celebrated his victory over the French by staging an unusual second coronation to mark his having attained his majority earlier in the year. It was a double coronation with his young queen, Giovanna of Naples. Among the victuals captured at Écluse was more than 8,000 tuns of wine, much of which Edward ordered flow free through London's fountains for the coronation. The rest was gifted to coastal towns similarly terrorized by the prospect of French invasion.

    In the parliament that followed Edward's coronation, an exuberant Commons granted taxation for a third straight year. Combined with the sales of the many ships captured on campaign, the English crown began servicing its monumental debts and began to emerge from a financial crisis that had been running since the early 1380s.

    In late November, the English received the French offer to negotiate under the mediation of Levon V. Edward had already shown support for Levon's calls to crusade and was quick to accept. The political establishment generally supported this, recognizing that the king was in an excellent negotiating position after victories at Arkinholm in 1385 and Écluse in 1386. The decision was not universally popular, though. Edward's uncle Thomas of Woodstock, 1st duke of Gloucester, was among those who disapproved, advocating for the king to strike while the iron was hot and crush the French.

    The Battle of Écluse was nothing short of a disaster for the French. Decades of investment in the French fleet had been lost in a single day, as the French could no longer claim supremacy over the Channel. The cost of the aborted invasion was staggering and the crown sank into debt, despite having raised more than one extraordinary tax earlier in the year.

    The government of the uncles began to break down as a result of the failure to launch the invasion. The duke of Berry was made a convenient scapegoat, blamed by many for sewing doubts in the campaign and causing the delays that led to its failure. The duke of Burgundy became a target of major criticism for the first time since the duke of Anjou's departure four years earlier. Uncoincidentally, supporters of the late duke of Anjou had come to Paris to air their grievances for having been left to rot on Anjou's failed expedition to Naples. Fiercely loyal to Anjou even in death, they openly accused Burgundy of using the regency to advance his own interests in the Low Countries. The king himself turned cold toward his uncles. He was more interested in the accusations of rape that Jean de Carrouges had levied against Jacques le Gris and the two knights' duel of justice, which was scheduled to take place between Christmas and New Years.

    Levon of Armenia's attempts to broker a peace over the winter of 1386-7 failed for exactly the same reasons as his attempts a year prior. English ambassadors pushed for a permanent resolution to the war as French ambassadors pushed instead for a long truce. Edward V and Charles VI were both disappointed with the result.

    Despite the failures of 1385 and 1386, the French again turned to the idea of invading England after Levon's diplomatic mission came to naught. Their ambitions were significantly smaller for 1387. Neither the king nor his uncles planned to participate, as something more to the scale of Jean de Vienne's 1377 campaign was envisioned. Plans for an invasion of 3,000-4,000 were drawn up, but did not progress far, as a pair of crises in Brittany and the Low Countries derailed the campaign.

    English naval efforts in the Channel returned to commercial raiding after the pause brought on by Levon's diplomatic mission. French maritime strategy was in total disarray with both the admirals of France and Flanders in English custody. Trading vessels proved to be softer targets for the newly robust English fleet. According to royal accounts, another 68 French and Flemish vessels were captured in the Channel over the course of 1387.
     
    Last edited:
    Coronation Parliament
  • Coronation Parliament
    The Coronation Parliament is the name traditionally given to the English parliament of 1386, which was assembled after the second coronation of King Edward V of England. It sat at Westminster Palace from 30 September to 27 November 1386.

    Background
    King Edward V of England succeeded to the throne on the death of his father, Edward IV, in 1377, but the government of the realm was led by his eldest uncle, John of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster, while Edward, who was only 12 at the time, was raised far from the halls of power. Edward was expected to play a larger role in his government as he aged, but he was a quiet and self-conscious boy who preferred hunting, praying and studying to the heavy burden of kingship. This created major dysfunction when Gaunt left for Lancaster's Crusade in 1382, as the council that was established to govern the realm in his absence lacked a clear leader and soon broke down into petty personal squabbles. Edward's disinterest in government was criticized in the parliament of 1384, leading him to take control of affairs for the first time. The regency council was not dissolved at this time, though it became effectively powerless as the king took personal control of government. Gaunt returned to England in 1385. He was still lord regent, at least on paper, but also had no real power. He signed papers only as duke of Lancaster and lord high steward of England, an office which he had held since the 1360s.

    In 1385, Edward led an expedition to Scotland and captured John Stewart, earl of Carrick, who was heir to the Scottish throne, at the Battle of Arkinholm. He returned to England and wed Giovanna of Naples, the daughter of King Carlo III of Naples, after an almost two-year betrothal. The two made their first public appearance at a parliament in York that fall. On 27 January 1386, Edward turned 21, which was the legal age of majority, and he formally dissolved the regency at a great council of the lords. On 3 April, his mother, the dowager Queen Joan, died. The elderly Simon Sudbury, archbishop of Canterbury, passed away soon thereafter. Joan had been a major behind-the-scenes player through Edward's reign and Sudbury had been the most influential man in the regency council era. The king's victory over the Scots, his marriage to Giovanna, his reaching his majority, and the deaths of Joan and Sudbury all in under a year ushered in a new era of Edward's reign.

    On 19 September, Edward led an attack on the Flemish port of Sluys, where a French armada had been gathered ahead of a planned invasion of England. The English and their Portuguese allies took the French by surprise, capturing more than 250 ships, damaging or sinking dozens more, and killing or capturing 6,000 Frenchmen in the process. The Battle of Écluse, as it came to be known by its French name, won Edward the overwhelming support of Londoners, over whom the threat of invasion had hung over for months. Edward chose to celebrate his victory and sanctify his majority with a second coronation.

    Second coronations were unusual in English history. King Eadgar the Peaceable, who came to the throne as a boy in 959, commemorated his majority with a second coronation in 973. King Henry III, another boy king, was hastily crowned at Gloucester in 1216 as a result of the Barons War and then crowned again in more splendor at the traditional coronation site of Westminster in 1220. Edward's second coronation in 1386 was timed to coincide with a parliament, summons for which had been sent over the summer, before Écluse, and was scheduled to meet on 29 September, the feast day of Saint Michael the Archangel.

    Order of the Bath
    On 28 September, Edward led a procession of 46 knights from the Tower to Westminster Palace. He rode on a great war horse, towering over the people who lined the streets to see him. At Westminster, the king and his companions shared a small meal before dusk and baths were drawn in wooden tubs lined with white cloth. The men disrobed and were blessed by Thomas Arundel, bishop of Ely, who marked their shoulders with the sign of the cross before they entered the warm water. They bathed in silence, dried themselves, and dressed in coarse robes before being led to Saint Stephen's Chapel, where they sat in a vigil through the night. Their vigil ended at dawn the following morning, 29 September, and the men gave confession.

    Robert de Vere, 9th earl of Oxford, appeared as lord chamberlain to read out what was expected of any man who joined the king in this new Order of the Bath. The men, already knowing what was being asked of them and having purified themselves physically and spiritually in preparation for it, agreed to swear on holy relics to demonstrate their commitment. Arundel presented the arm of Saint Edmund the Martyr, an Anglo-Saxon king who had died fighting against the Great Heathen Army. The knights swore to defend one another and the king above all, to honor God and guard the church, and to protect those serving under them. After the oath-swearing, the king and his companions heard mass before finally getting some rest.

    Knights of the bath were nothing new. Bathing ceremonies had once prominently featured in the creation of new knights, but had fallen out of fashion and been replaced by simpler dubbing ceremonies. The idea to resurrect the custom for a group of established knights as the basis for a new chivalric order was likely inspired by the king's love of history. The order was dedicated to Saint Michael the Archangel, to whom Edward was intensely devoted. As a boy, Edward had contracted the plague and nearly died. His health began to rebound on Michaelmas 1370 and his recovery was credited to the protection of Saint Michael.

    The Order of the Bath was a much more serious institution than King Edward III's Order of the Garter. In lieu of great tournaments that acted out Arthurian legends, the Order of the Bath was an almost holy dedication to the crown and companion knights. This illustrated one of the major differences between Edward III and Edward V. Edward III delighted in the chivalric tradition and approached war as a grand adventure. Edward V saw kingship as a duty and war as an obligation, taking no pleasure in its pursuit.

    The Order of the Bath was restricted to those who had fought with the king in battle. Upon its founding, this meant that only men who fought at the Battle of Arkinholm or Battle of Écluse were eligible. This created tight bonds of camaraderie and the order's members were considered "brothers in arms." In surviving correspondence from 1386 onwards, Edward addresses or refers to Bath knights as his "dear brothers." Beginning in 1387, Bath knights were given precedence on the feast day of Saint Michael the Archangel. This created some ill feelings, as the order being kept exclusively to Edward's brothers in arms meant that many of the great men of the realm—including all three of his royal uncles and his younger brother, none of whom were at Arkinholm or Écluse—sat further from the king at Michaelmas celebrations despite their being more highly ranked than many members of the order.

    Second coronation
    On 29 September, just hours after founding the Order of the Bath, Edward began the ceremonies for his second coronation. He allowed himself some hours of sleep after his overnight vigil, but he refused to eat and continued a fast throughout the day. The monks of Canterbury brought holy water and incense into his royal chamber to purify him before leading him outside. Edward and Giovanna emerged from Westminster Palace barefoot and wrapped in gauze, imitating the same display of Christian humility that his father and mother had made at their double coronation in 1377. They walked barefoot from the palace to the abbey, mobbed by a crowd that had come to cheer on their hero king and his young wife. A procession formed, arranged by strict protocol, to lead them into the abbey. Once inside, William Courtenay, archbishop of Canterbury, greeted them and formally asked the lords to acclaim Edward as their king, to which they bellowed "yes!" Courtenay read out the coronation oath, which Edward swore to uphold, then anointed Edward and Giovanna with holy oil, dressed them in gold cloth and purple silk, and formally crowned the young couple. A High Mass was heard. The king brought the coronation's holy relics to the shrine of Saint Edward the Confessor before proceeding back to Westminster Palace.

    The traditional intermission separated the coronation ceremony from the feast. Edward and Giovanna were enthroned in the Painted Chamber as the lords were brought forward to pay homage. Eight knights were then raised to the rank of earl in the largest expansion of the peerage in English history.
    • Edward's eldest half-brother, Sir Thomas Holland, who had succeeded their mother to her lands and titles, was confirmed in his inheritance and formally belted as 5th earl of Kent.
    • Edward's other half-brother, Sir John Holland, was created 1st earl of Huntingdon. He was awarded lordship over the Isle of Wight and castles and manors in six counties to support his new rank.
    • Edward's younger brother, Sir Richard of Bordeaux, was awarded the lands of their attainted former brother-in-law, John IV, duke of Brittany, and created 1st earl of Richmond.
    • Edward's cousin, Sir Henry of Bolingbroke, who had been using his father's earldom of Derby as a courtesy title for many years, was formally ennobled as 3rd earl of Derby. He was not awarded any lands from the crown, as being heir to the great Lancastrian estate and husband of Mary de Bohun, suo jure 3rd countess of Northampton, was more than enough to support his rank.
    • Edward's more distant cousin, John de Mowbray, 5th baron Mowbray, was raised to the rank of 1st earl of Nottingham. He was awarded no new lands from the crown, as he already had lands that were valued at about £1,400 per annum and his holdings were expected to grow substantially, considering that he was co-heir to the great Norfolk estate.
    • John Neville, 3rd baron Neville, was recognized for his extraordinary leadership in Aquitaine through the late 1370s and early 1380s, and made 1st earl of Cumberland. He was awarded no new lands from the crown, as his wife was suo jure 5th baroness Latimer and their combined estates could support such a rank.
    • Henry Percy, 4th baron Percy, was raised to 1st earl of Northumberland. He too was awarded no lands from the crown, as his wife was suo jure 5th baroness Lucy and they could already support their new rank as well.
    • Sir Michael de la Pole was awarded the Ufford estates that had reverted to the crown in 1382 and created 1st earl of Suffolk. It was a controversial move, as he was not of noble origin, but from a family of merchants and royal financiers. Edward saw this as a boon, though, as de la Pole had consistently provided advice that was not bogged down by decades of chivalric competition or the personal grudges that had grown up between the English and French over the course of the war.
    Five of the eight new earls—Kent, Huntingdon, Derby, Nottingham, and Suffolk—were members of the Order of the Bath. Derby, Nottingham and Suffolk had all fought at Arkinholm while Kent and Huntingdon were at Écluse as admirals of the north and west, respectively. Northumberland's eldest son and heir was a Bath knight as well, having fought with distinction at Arkinholm.

    The coronation feast was held after the belting ceremony for the new earls, as the king finally broke the fast that he had been holding since the previous day.

    Parliament
    On 30 September, Edward presided as the Lords and Commons gathered for the opening of parliament. The archbishop of Canterbury led the assembly in a prayer to give thanks to God for the king's victory at Écluse, which had been fought just a week and a half prior. The lord chancellor, Sir Hugh Segrave, rose to report that the French had disbanded the vast army assembled at Sluys following Edward's attack on the French armada. Parliament roared with approval. According to one account, the applause went on for more than a quarter-hour. Segrave further reported that an attack on English-controlled Saint-Malo had been held off, drawing yet more cheers. A report on royal finances was far less happy, though.

    Finances
    On 1 October, the Commons met in the Chapter House and elected Sir Richard Waldegrave as speaker. The crown's finances were an immediate concern.

    England had managed a debt of about £100,000 through most of Gaunt's regency, but this quickly ballooned in his final year in office and through the years of the regency council that followed. In early 1382, the crown secured a loan of £20,000 to help fund Lancaster's Crusade so as to avoid a military disaster by the bishop of Norwich, who had declared himself head of any English crusade against the adherents of Avignon. The crown piled up further debts from 1382 to 1384, as parliament was reluctant to grant taxation after the 1381 tax revolt and as the Commons disapproved of the dysfunctional regency council that governed the kingdom through these years. Starved of funds, the regency council negotiated a truce with France in summer 1383. Debts continued to mount, though, as the cost of defending the Scottish border exploded in the run-up to renewed war in the north.

    Gaunt returned to England in spring 1385, having failed to take the Castilian crown. Soon after his return, he learned that English ambassadors had formally recognized King Carlo III of Naples as count of Provence as part of their negotiations to wed Edward and Giovanna. Gaunt held a rival claim to Provence through his great-great-grandmother, Eleanor of Provence, co-heiress to the last Barcelonian count of Provence. Eleanor objected to Provence passing in its entirety to one of her younger sisters and willed her claim to the county to her second son, Edmund, 1st earl of Lancaster, which Gaunt had inherited with his marriage to Blanche of Lancaster three generations later. The crown, looking to quickly smooth over the matter before Edward's bride arrived in England, agreed to buy out Gaunt's claim to Provence by taking on some £20,000 of debt that the duke had racked up on his crusade.

    Parliament had granted taxes in late 1384 and again in 1385, ahead of campaigns to Scotland and Sluys, but a Flemish embargo on English goods devastated royal revenue. A trade deal was arranged with the townsmen of Middelburg, a port city in Zeeland, to keep English wool flowing into Brabant's rival cloth industry, but it took time for its details to be worked out and for money to begin flowing as it had before. Ultimately, the cost of Lancaster's Crusade and the Scottish march, combined with a lack of tax revenue from 1382-1384 and the Flemish embargo, had sent the crown's debt soaring to a staggering £220,000.

    The Commons, swept up in the celebrations that followed the king's victory over the French armada, quickly agreed to another grant of taxation. It would be the third such grant in three years, but it was a drop in the bucket compared to the total size of the king's debts. The crown had a number of assets at its disposal, though, namely hundreds of prisoners taken in battle at Arkinholm and Sluys and ships captured from the French armada. A commission was established to oversee the ransoming of the prisoners and selling of the ships.

    Government reform
    Now sanctified in his majority, Edward began to remake royal government. Sir Hugh Segrave, who had been named lord chancellor on an interim basis following the death of Simon Sudbury in 1385, but had ended up serving more than a year in office, was finally replaced by the better-qualified Thomas Arundel, bishop of Ely. The supremely competent Thomas de Brantingham, bishop of Exeter, who had been lord treasurer since 1376, was entering old age and stepped down in favor of John Waltham, dean of York, who had a flawless record as a longtime member of the royal chancery and would prove to be one of the king's best administrators in years to come. The acceptable, but unremarkable, Walter Skirlaw, newly-made bishop of Bath and Wells, resigned his office as lord privy seal to take control of his new see. He was replaced by the more energetic John Gilbert, bishop of Hereford, who had been a spiritual advisor of the king's father and was one of England's most experienced diplomats.

    Edward also recalled John Fordham, bishop of Durham, to royal service. Fordham had served Edward's father in various administrative roles and had been lord privy seal during Edward IV's brief reign and in the early years of Edward V's reign. He resigned the office upon appointment to Durham in 1381 and seemed to prefer life outside of royal government, making his return something of a surprise. He would become a sort of general counselor, taking on various duties as needed and creating a clearinghouse for royal business that could otherwise fall between the cracks of government.

    As part of a reorganization of the kingdom's military leadership, Edward followed the French fashion of making lifetime appointments to high office. His two half-brothers, the new earls of Kent and Huntingdon, who earlier in the year had been made the admirals of the north and west, respectively, had their terms in office extended for life. In addition, Kent was named captain of Calais and constable of Dover Castle while Huntingdon was made constable of the Channel Islands fortresses and captain of Cherbourg. This set up a pair of joint commands to oversee the east and the west of the Channel, respectively.

    Even more dramatic administrative and military reforms came in the north. Edward took his claim to the overlordship of Scotland very seriously. He viewed the elderly King Robert II of Scotland and Robert's son and heir, John Stewart, earl of Carrick, who Edward took as a prisoner at Arkinholm, more as rebels than as royal in their own right. Edward tasked his uncle, Gaunt, with ending what he called the "Stewart rebellion." Gaunt was named lieutenant of Scotland and the wardens of the marches were subordinated to this new lieutenancy, to which the king delegated all diplomatic and military authority in the north. England and Scotland were bound by a truce until the summer of 1387, but Edward's rhetoric represented a massive escalation in the war of words that the two sides were fighting in negotiations for Carrick's release.

    In the midst of the flurry of new appointments and creation of new offices, arguably the greatest change to royal government came as a result of a petition from Roger Blickling, a squire from Norfolk. Blickling was in the service of Margaret of Norfolk, suo jure 2nd countess of Norfolk, who for years had lobbied to be named earl marshal, a hereditary office that had once been held by her father. Margaret had long been denied the office as a result of her gender, but Edward rejected Blickling's petition on entirely different grounds. The king claimed that royal officers were servants of the crown and declared kings had the right to appoint whoever they desired to hold office, effectively ending hereditary succession to royal offices.

    Plan of attack
    The main concern of the Lords, who met in the Painted Chamber once parliament divided into houses, was the war effort. There was debate, as always, over the pursuit of a northern or southern strategy, but the king was more concerned with England's diplomatic isolation.

    Philippe II, duke of Burgundy, who acted as regent for the 18-year-old King Charles VI of France, had peeled away England's allies through the mid 1380s. Waleran III, count of Saint-Pol, was Edward V's brother-in-law, but was one of Burgundy's protégés. Jean IV, duke of Brittany, was an on-again, off-again English ally who had been bought off by Burgundy and even launched an attack on English-held Saint-Malo in summer 1386. King Charles II of Navarre still believed himself to be the rightful king of France and loathed the Valois for the indignities he had suffered, but he was a shadow of his former self. Once a cunning and dangerous man, he had grown old and terribly ill, and his position had been badly undercut by his eldest son and heir, who had surrendered himself to the French in 1383 and become one of Burgundy's closest allies. It seemed only a matter of time before the old king died and his successor moved Navarre firmly into the Francosphere.

    By the fall of 1386, England's only continental allies were Portugal, whose position on the Atlantic largely isolated it from the war with France, and Guelders, which was seeking a one-year truce after raiding deep into French-allied Brabant. Bereft of allies and drowning in debt, Edward hoped to use his victory at Écluse to negotiate a pause in hostilities and launch a diplomatic offensive to find new support abroad. Edward's uncle, Thomas of Woodstock, 1st duke of Gloucester, opposed a peace conference and hoped to seize England's momentum by launching a new campaign to the continent, but the king shot him down. Building an anti-French coalition was Edward's top priority.

    The first member of this new coalition was Milan. Gian Galeazzo Visconti, lord of Milan, had come to power in spring 1385 after deposing his uncle, Bernabò. Only months later, Jean III, count of Armagnac, began buying the support of routier companies across southern France. Armagnac's sister was married to Bernabò's son, Carlo, and Gian Galeazzo feared that Armagnac was planning an invasion to restore Bernabò or install Carlo as lord. Milanese ambassadors arrived in England in spring 1386 in hopes of securing an alliance against this perceived French aggression. On 26 October 1386, Edward agreed to Milan's terms for a defensive pact, committing the two to defend one another from French invasion. John Holland, Edward's half-brother and newly-created earl of Huntingdon, was wed to Gian Galeazzo's cousin, Lucia Visconti, as part of the deal.

    Edward took a carrot-and-stick approach to moving his former brother-in-law, the duke of Brittany, away from the French. He used the stick first. Jean de Blois, who held a rival claim to the ducal throne, had been held as an English prisoner for more than three decades. His ransom had not been in England's interest when Brittany was allied with England or neutral in the war. Now that Brittany had allied itself with the French crown, it was in England's interest to destabilize the duke's regime. Blois was released for 60,000 francs (£10,000). The carrot was Edward's uncle, Woodstock, who was made lord lieutenant of Brittany and given control over all English positions on the peninsula. Woodstock was Brittany's loudest cheerleader in the late 1370s. His appearance at Brest soon after Blois's ransom helped to thaw relations between the two sides.

    Another royal relation, Edward's cousin, Henry of Bolingbroke, newly-created earl of Derby, was made lord lieutenant of Aquitaine as part of a planned diplomatic mission to Navarre. Bolingbroke's sister was married to the king of Navarre's son and heir, and though the two were residing in Paris at the time, it was still hoped that Bolingbroke could bring the Navarrese back to the English fold.

    Aftermath
    The Coronation Parliament was a major turning point in the reign of Edward V. According to the anonymous author of the Westminster Chronicle, popular support for the king after Écluse was such that "had the Lord Jesus Christ himself arrived, he could not have been greeted with more pleasure by the people." This was an exaggeration, but it may not have been much of one. Edward passed out awards, honors, offices, and titles at an unprecedented rate in the parliament of 1386. He brought a whole new generation of English nobles to prominence in his Order of the Bath. He showed a willingness to disregard the great men of his realm, like his uncle Woodstock, in pursuit of his own policies. He filled his government with clergymen in a time of war. These actions might have exposed Edward to charges of favoritism or maladministration, but there is no record of dissent for any of his decisions. He was far too popular for anyone to question him.

    Edward's reforms sent a clear and powerful message that rank alone did not guarantee the great lords a role in royal government and that the king wanted men with proven skill to oversee the affairs of state. The favor shown toward his half-brothers, Kent and Huntingdon, after their short but remarkable time as admirals of the north and west demonstrated that perfectly.

    Kent was a highly competent figure who had already served in a number of minor commands in his life, but his lifetime appointment as admiral of the north was unprecedented. His new captaincy of Calais gave him control of the country's only standing army to boot. These would have put him among the most influential men in England even without his inheritance of the Kent estate. Huntingdon had gained even more. As the second son, he inherited nothing, but had received both an earldom and a major command as a result of his service. In addition, his marriage to Lucia Visconti had brought him a dowry of 70,000 florins (£11,667), a major fortune with which he could begin building up his new estates.

    Edward focused his energies on England heading into the new year, his attention having been dominated by the war in 1385 and 1386. The king and queen celebrated Christmas with Edward's brother, the new earl of Richmond, and two of the king's uncles, Gaunt and Edmund of Langley, 1st duke of Aumale, as the bishop of Durham's guests at the bishop's luxurious London manor house. After New Years, the king embarked on a tour of the midlands before hosting the annual Garter celebrations at Windsor Castle in April. He resumed his tour of the midlands in the summer, ending with a lengthy stay at Shrewsbury in August. Giovanna was at the king's side throughout 1387 and was reportedly quite smitten with her dashing young husband.

    Edward's hopes for a ceasefire came to naught. He approved a mission to Leulinghem, but talks held there under the auspices of King Levon V of Armenia failed just as quickly as they had in Levon's last diplomatic conference. Fighting was still limited in 1387, though, as the French were distracted by a crisis in Brittany. This gave Edward the breathing room he needed to pursue his planned diplomatic offensive. He hosted Willem I, duke of Guelders, in the spring, renewing their alliance and planning joint action in 1388. As the two were making plans, they were joined by an embassy from Prague, leading to a three-way alliance with Luxembourg that set the stage for the Guelders War. The earl of Derby's diplomatic mission to Pamplona was less successful, as the king of Navarre died gruesomely shortly before the earl landed in Bordeaux.
     
    Last edited:
    Royal Inferno
  • Royal Inferno
    The death of King Charles II of Navarre occurred on 1 January 1387 in Pamplona. Charles had been ill for more than a year when his sick bed was accidentally set ablaze by a spark from a nearby fire in mid December 1386. He suffered severe burns and lingered near death for several weeks before passing. The gruesome details of his death quickly became a favorite topic for moralistic writers both in its own time and in later centuries. The horrific story was especially popular in France, where it became known more commonly as the Enfer Royal (Royal Inferno).

    Background
    King Charles II of Navarre was the eldest surviving son of Philippe, count of Évreux, and Queen Jeanne II of Navarre. Jeanne was the only surviving child of King Louis X of France, but she was just four years old at the time of his death and France had no precedent for a queen regnant. Her uncle quickly usurped the throne and crowned himself King Philippe V. Jeanne was supposed to inherit the wealthy counties of Brie and Champagne, but her uncle took these too. She was given the much poorer county of Angoulême and a stipend from the crown as compensation, but she was denied even these later in her life. Charles thus inherited only the small Pyrenean kingdom of Navarre upon her death in 1349. Through his father, he inherited the counties of Évreux and Mortain in Normandy. His younger brother, Philippe of Navarre, inherited their father's county of Longueville.

    Charles believed himself to be the rightful king of France and resented the years of mistreatment to which he and his mother had been subjected. He artfully played the kingdoms of England and France off each other to advance his own interests in the early years of the Hundred Years War. His schemes were far less effective once the two sides made peace in 1360, though. The extinction of the Capetian house of Burgundy in 1361 made Charles heir to the duchy of Burgundy, but he was denied this great inheritance and was also denied the county of Longueville when his younger brother died without legitimate issue. In 1364, Charles went to war with the French crown for control of Burgundy, but was crushed. He was made to give up most of the lands that made up the county of Évreux as a result.

    In the late 1360s and early 1370s, Charles plotted his revenge against the Valois kings of France. He tried to play England and France against one another again as they went back to war in 1369, but attempts to ally with England in 1370 and 1373 came to nothing. The two finally sealed an alliance in 1378, but the king of Navarre found that the French would no longer tolerate his schemes. He was quickly stripped of his remaining lands in France, which resulted in his younger children being taken hostage by the French. Navarre itself was then threatened with an invasion by France's chief ally, the kingdom of Castile, but an Anglo-Navarrese army scored an upset victory at the Battle of Estella and saved Navarre from Castilian conquest. Navarre was dependent on the continued goodwill of the English following the battle, putting the small kingdom in a precarious position as its king approached old age.

    England and France
    The Anglo-Navarrese victory at Estella in 1380 was the beginning of major English interest in the Iberian peninsula. John of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster, had claimed to be the rightful king of Castile by right of his wife, Constanza of Castile, since 1371. As lord regent for King Edward V of England in the early 1380s, Gaunt was in a position to seriously press that claim. Charles of Navarre had his eldest son and heir's unhappy marriage to a Castilian princess annulled in order to secure an alliance with Gaunt at this time. On 24 June 1380, the heir to the Navarrese throne, who was also named Charles, was betrothed to one of Gaunt's daughters, Elizabeth of Lancaster. Gaunt insisted that his future son-in-law be appropriately endowed, leading the king of Navarre to bestow upon his son the rents from the town of Viana and to grant him the title prince of Viana in imitation of the title that English kings gave their heirs.

    Gaunt launched a crusade for Castile in 1382. He quickly conquered Galicia and moved on to León in the first months of 1383. Gaunt's invasion gave Charles of Navarre the opportunity to expand his position on the Navarrese marches, but Gaunt's decision to invade through Galicia left Navarre on the periphery of the greater war effort and severely limited what the Navarrese might expect to win from a Lancastrian conquest. This did not escape the notice of Philippe II, duke of Burgundy, who served as regent for his young nephew, King Charles VI of France, and who was under serious pressure from Gaunt's rival and France's top ally, King Juan of Castile, for military support. The French were in no position to launch a campaign to Castile in 1383, though, as they were struggling with a major financial crisis and various revolts. Burgundy instead opted for a diplomatic approach to ease pressure on Castile.

    In spring 1383, a French delegation led by Jean III, count of Sancerre, arrived in Pamplona. Sancerre showered Charles of Navarre with gifts and floated an offer to release the king's younger children from French custody in exchange for breaking the Anglo-Navarrese alliance and ending attacks on Castilian positions in the Navarrese marches.

    Charles was an embittered man. He gladly accepted Sancerre's gifts, but he would not sell his allegiance so cheaply. Gaunt had conquered Galicia without breaking a sweat and news of a Lancastrian victory at the Siege of Benevente arrived in Pamplona shortly after the French delegation. Charles knew that the crown of France was out of his reach, even if he still considered it his by right, but he thought Gaunt's victories put him in a position to squeeze Sancerre until the French acquiesced to the restoration of Charles's lands and titles in Normandy. He badly overplayed his hand, as he had many times before. Sancerre would not entertain any discussion of Évreux or Mortain. Charles lost the chance to free his younger children and Sancerre left Pamplona.

    Sancerre traveled south toward Aragon, which offered him safe passage through the Pyrenees and back into France, but he was stopped at Tudela by a squire in the service of the prince of Viana. The prince's younger siblings had been prisoners of the French crown for nearly five years by this time and, though they lived comfortably as guests of their uncle, the duke of Burgundy, two of the prince's younger sisters had already died in France. His sister Blanche had died in an outbreak of plague in 1382. His other sister, Bonne, had died shortly before Sancerre's mission left France in early 1383. The prince would not allow the opportunity to secure the release of the surviving infantes to slip by and offered to make himself a prisoner of the French in exchange for his brother and sisters' release. As heir to Navarre, he was a significantly more valuable prisoner than they were. Talks for an exchange of hostages proceeded secretly.

    On 14 October, the prince of Viana surrendered himself to the French at Tarazona, an Aragonese town on the border with Navarre. His surviving sisters, Jeanne and Marie, were handed over to men loyal to the prince and escorted back to Pamplona. Their brother, Pierre, chose to remain in Paris. The prince of Viana's wife, Elizabeth of Lancaster, was not informed of the prince's plans until after the prisoner exchange had happened. She was likely left behind because she was pregnant at the time and the journey was deemed too difficult in her state. She gave birth to a short-lived daughter, named Jeanne, early in 1384. Elizabeth refused to join her husband in Paris after she recovered from the childbirth, viewing his actions as a betrayal of Navarre's alliance with her father. The young couple became estranged for a time.

    The king of Navarre was left reeling by his son's move. His alliance with the English frayed, as Gaunt feared for his daughter's position in Pamplona, and the French lost interest in Charles as his young heir fell into the duke of Burgundy's orbit. The prince lived grandiosely as a "prisoner" in France. He was given a mansion in Paris, a generous stipend from the French crown, and was encouraged to build up his own retinue, creating a rival Navarrese court around the prince. He became famous across the kingdom for having given up his own freedom for that of his siblings, which became a celebrated act of chivalry. French writers dubbed him "Charles the Good" and contrasted him most favorably with his conniving, dastardly father, who they derided as "Charles the Bad."

    The king of Navarre's position was made all the worse with the implosion of Lancaster's Crusade shortly after the prince of Viana's defection. Gaunt lost thousands of men to disease during the disastrous Siege of León, which ended with a withdrawal of Portuguese forces from Gaunt's army and the onset of the War of the Portuguese Succession. Gaunt, fuming that his daughter had seemingly been abandoned by her husband, cut the Navarrese out of peace talks with Castile. In early 1385, the Treaty of Bayonne was formally sealed, bringing Lancaster's Crusade to an end. It made no mention of Navarre.

    Brittany, Castile and Foix
    The king of Navarre found himself dangerously isolated as Gaunt moved toward peace with Castile. His alliance with the English was a dead letter, he was still on the outs with France, and he shared borders with the count of Foix, his brother-in-law and one of his oldest enemies, and Castile, where the recent regime change resulting from the collapse of the Trastámaran dynasty had made things dangerously unpredictable. Charles of Navarre needed allies, and quickly.

    In late 1384, word reached Pamplona that the prince of Viana had begun talks to wed one of his surviving sisters to Jean IV, duke of Brittany. This outraged the king of Navarre, who still resented that his eldest son had willingly given himself over to the French a year prior. Cut out of talks between Gaunt and Castile, Charles refused to be sidelined from negotiations for one of his daughter's marriages.

    A Navarrese embassy led by Guillermo de Plantarosa, master of the king's household, arrived at Nantes on 12 April 1385. He was backed up by the most experienced lawyers and negotiators that Navarre had to offer. Talks moved smoothly at first. An alliance between Brittany and Navarre was almost natural for the two parties, as the duke and king had each played England and France off one another for their own benefit at different times. Both men likely saw their potential alliance as a sort of third pole that could both stand apart from England and France, but that could also swing the balance of power towards one or the other as they saw fit.

    The duke of Brittany was eager to secure the marriage of a young bride, as both of his first two marriages had been childless and wedding one of the Navarrese princesses—who were first cousins of the French king and had close relationships with their uncle, Burgundy, as a result of their long "imprisonment" in France—would complete Jean IV's rehabilitation within the French nobility. Still, Jean was in a stronger negotiating position than Charles was, which the duke used to demand a large dowry of 200,000 francs. The Navarrese could not afford such a sum and, though the two sides continued to trade embassies, no real progress was made. Talks stalled.

    As the king of Navarre negotiated for a marriage alliance with Brittany, he tried to tip the balance of power closer to home. Gaston III, count of Foix, popularly known as Gaston Fébus, was the most powerful lord in the Pyrenees. Charles and Fébus had fallen out two decades earlier, after Fébus repudiated his wife, Agnès of Navarre, who was Charles's sister.

    Charles was close with his nephew, also named Gaston, who was the only child from Fébus and Agnès's marriage, and thus Fébus's heir. Fébus, on the other hand, had a terrible relationship with own son and heir. Gaston resented his father for the humiliation of his mother, for having kept him from holding any power in Foix, and for providing him with an allowance that he considered insufficient for a prince of his rank. Charles preyed upon their strained relationship and may even have been party to Gaston's plans to overthrow Fébus in the spring of 1385. Gaston's Rebellion was a sad, short-lived affair, though, and the young prince was forced to flee the Pyrenees. Unable to reach his uncle's court in Pamplona, though, Gaston joined his cousin, the prince of Viana, in Paris. The king of Navare could only watch as yet another relation fell into the French orbit.

    Death
    The walls were closing in on Charles the Bad as 1386 dawned. He had held on to his crown, but his small kingdom was surrounded by enemies on all sides. His claim to the French throne was a joke to everyone but himself. His lands in Normandy had been overrun by the French, with the lone exception of his great castle at Cherbourg, which was held by the English. Both of his sons, as well as his nephew, had allied themselves with the Valois, who were his most hated enemies. Charles dreamed of avenging himself upon his enemies, but had neither the political connections nor the energy to pursue such schemes. He had fallen into ill health, his account books showing a number of doctors were in his employ from the start of the new year. By October, it was clear that he was dying. An old enemy returned to lead Charles out of the political wilderness shortly before his health failed him entirely, though.

    In spring 1386, the duke of Burgundy breathed new life into moribund marriage talks between Brittany and Navarre. A massive French invasion of southern England was being prepared for that summer and Burgundy, who had seen a planned invasion fall apart a year prior, wanted to ensure that the flip-flopping duke of Brittany would not betray the French when their attention was turned elsewhere. The Navarrese had talked Jean down to a dowry of 120,000 francs, plus an annuity of 6,000 francs. It was still outside their ability to pay, though, and so Burgundy ordered the French treasury to cover the difference. The marriage of Jean IV and Marie of Navarre was contracted on 27 July, as the French crown made a one-time gift of 40,000 francs to the duke and provided him with a pension of 6,000 francs.

    Charles was still well enough to accompany his daughter on her journey across the Pyrenees in August and personally saw her off in Bayonne on 2 September. Just a month later, though, he was confined to a sick bed in the royal palace. Doctors had the king wrapped in a cloth soaked in brandy to ease his pain. In mid December, the ailing king was moved too close to a fire and a spark caught the cloth, which went up instantly as a result of the alcohol. He lingered in excruciating pain for weeks and then finally died on 1 January 1387.

    Aftermath
    Charles the Bad was succeeded by his eldest son and heir, Charles the Good, as King Charles III of Navarre. It is unclear exactly when the new king received word of his father's death. Passes through the Pyrenees were often blocked by heavy snows in the winter, making travel difficult. The journey would only have become more dangerous from there, as sea travel through the Bay of Biscay was treacherous that time of year and the land route through southern France was plagued by the routiers.

    Charles III remained a prisoner of the French crown, regardless of when he learned of his father's passing. The government of the realm was left to his younger sister, Jeanne, who served as regent. Jeanne had a sharp mind for numbers and politics, proving to be quite adept at managing Navarre in Charles's absence. She was faced with a sensitive diplomatic topic soon after her father's death, as an English delegation led by Henry of Bolingbroke, 3rd earl of Derby, arrived in Pamplona in spring 1387. Bolingbroke, who was Elizabeth of Lancaster's brother, had hoped to rekindle Navarre's interests in Normandy, but was instead met with the unexpected news of Charles the Bad's death. The English were disappointed to leave Navarre with nothing, despite Jeanne having become smitten with the earl.

    Elizabeth of Lancaster, the new queen of Navarre, was not in Pamplona when her brother arrived. She had moved to Paris in 1386 after a nearly three-year estrangement from her husband. The timing of her arrival, just as the French were preparing an invasion of her English homeland, raised suspicions, but the king of France welcomed her as an honored guest over the protests of his councilors.

    The court of Charles VI attracted a new generation of French nobles to Paris. They were young, wealthy and rowdy. Feasts were common, wine flowed liberally, musicians played through the night, and sexual escapades scandalized the prudish chroniclers of the day. Charles III had already sired a bastard son before his wife's arrival at the French court. Elizabeth, a cheerful and vivacious woman, fit in easily and became one of the French king's favorites. When she gave birth to a son, named Charles, in 1387, there were rumors that Charles VI was the child's true father, not Charles III. She gave birth to a second child, Blanche, in 1388.

    Charles III's brother, Pierre, was also a part of Charles VI's glittering young court. The friendships forged between the Navarrese princes and their French cousins did more to advance their positions in France than their father's scheming had ever done. In 1389, shortly after taking control of royal government, Charles VI granted Charles III the counties of Évreux and Longueville, restoring all the lands his family had once held in Upper Normandy, and also granted Pierre of Navarre the county of Mortain, along with all Charles the Bad's former lands in Lower Normandy. Later that year, Charles III was allowed to return to Pamplona without ransom, despite having been a prisoner of the French crown since 1383. Charles III's wife and their two children went with him, as did his cousin, Gaston of Foix.

    Navarre's position recovered soon after Charles III ascended to the throne. He shared none of his father's dynastic ambitions, which was a huge relief to the kingdom's treasury and overtaxed population. He was keen to invest in the development of the local economy and took an interest in local affairs. The close friendship between Charles III and Charles VI strengthened the king of Navarre's hand in talks with Castile, and issues stemming from his father's expansion in the Navarrese marches in the early 1380s were soon resolved.

    Charles III moved Navarre firmly into the Francosphere, backing the pope in Avignon, supporting France diplomatically, and even joining French armies with men from his Norman estates from time to time. His kingdom was too small and too exposed to attack from English Gascony to ever fully join the Hundred Years War on the French side, though, and he kept close diplomatic ties with England. He was also an important point of contact between Brittany and France, as relations between the two hit rock bottom in the early 1390s. New conflicts in and around the Pyrenees often kept him busy in Pamplona, though, as the Roussillon War broke out in 1390, followed by the War of the Fuxéen Succession in 1391. He did not return to France until the mid 1390s as a result.
     
    Last edited:
    Breton crisis of 1387
  • Breton crisis of 1387
    The Breton crisis of 1387 was a diplomatic standoff between King Charles VI of France and Jean IV, duke of Brittany, following Jean's arrest of Olivier V de Clisson, constable of France, in June 1387. The crisis brought France and Brittany to the brink of war, destabilized the regency government that had led France since 1382, and set off a series of events that would eventually bring the long-running Caroline War between England and France to a dramatic end.

    Background
    Jean of Montfort was the English candidate for the ducal throne in the War of the Breton Succession. His victory at the 1364 Battle of Auray included the death of his rival, Charles of Blois, which finally brought the war to an end after more than 20 years. Jeanne, suo jure countess of Penthièvre, who was Blois's widow, recognized her cousin, Jean, as Duke Jean IV in the First Treaty of Guérande in 1365. Many Blois-Penthièvre supporters would become prominent at the court of King Charles V of France in the years thereafter, which made Jean uneasy. He secretly negotiated a new Anglo-Breton alliance when England and France went to war again, but it was soon discovered and he was forced into exile by his former ally, Olivier V de Clisson, in 1373. A de facto regency government was established, allowing the duchy to continue running autonomously for several years. In 1378, though, Charles V attempted to end this awkward interregnum in ducal government by annexing Brittany to the French crown. This move was immediately and overwhelmingly unpopular. Jeanne of Penthièvre brought her and her cousin's adherents together in a revolt against the French crown in 1379. Breton nobles, united in the defense of local rights and privileges, threw out the French and invited Jean to reclaim the ducal throne. Opposition to the French annexation was so high that Jean had the full support of his nobility when he arranged a new English alliance in early 1380. The death of Charles V later that same year ended the threat of annexation, upending the political situation in Brittany once more.

    Charles V was succeeded by his eldest son, King Charles VI, who was just shy of his twelfth birthday at the time of his father's death. A regency government was established under Charles VI's eldest uncle, Louis I, duke of Anjou, who was Jeanne of Penthièvre's son-in-law. Anjou abandoned his brother's annexation project and sought a negotiated peace with Brittany. Jean betrayed his English allies and signed the Second Treaty of Guérande in late 1380. The new treaty was hugely popular in Brittany and Jean managed to hold the nobility together even without the threat of French annexation. The duchy was genuinely united behind a duke for the first time in 40 years.

    Anjou resigned as regent in 1382 to launch a crusade for Naples, but the new regency government led by his younger brother, Philippe II, duke of Burgundy, was equally friendly with Jean, who was a first cousin of Burgundy's wife. Jean even led a contingent of Breton men to Flanders to support Burgundy against the rebels of Ghent.

    Olivier V de Clisson
    In 1383, Bertrand du Guesclin died in Castile. The Breton knight was one of the greatest military minds of his generation and had served as constable of France for more than a decade. Burgundy felt compelled to name Olivier V de Clisson to the constableship. The appointment was controversial. Clisson was a Breton noble whose lands were concentrated on the border of Brittany and Poitou. His marriage to Catherine of Laval brought him lands in eastern Brittany and connections to both warring factions in Brittany's succession war. Clisson fought for Montfort in the 1350s and 60s, but switched sides in the 1370s. He was a brilliant military strategist who shot up the ranks and quickly became a favorite of the French king. Jean had never forgiven Clisson for changing his allegiance and he was far from Clisson's only enemy.

    Clisson had shrewdly managed his and his wife's estates, but he was unique among noblemen of the era for the way he invested the profits from his lands in commercial ventures, which were generally seen as ignoble. His investments in shipbuilding and sponsorships of trade missions had allowed him to rapidly grow his wealth, which he then reinvested by aggressively buying up land, bringing him into conflict with several powerful lords. Burgundy hated the upstart Clisson, but needed him. Clisson had a colossal cash fortune, which he had tapped to keep the French crown afloat during a debt crisis in the early 1380s. By 1383, Clisson was one of the government's top lenders. Consequently, Burgundy made him constable with the hope that the appointment would keep the cash flowing.

    Burgundy went to extraordinary lengths to ensure that Clisson's appointment did not push Jean back toward the English. Most notably, in 1386, he inserted himself into marriage talks between Brittany and Navarre, and even opened up the French treasury to partially cover the dowry for Jean's new wife, Marie of Navarre. It was a naked political bribe, but it worked. Jean agreed to join French preparations for war against England that summer.

    Siege of Saint-Malo
    The French were preparing a massive invasion of England in the summer of 1386. It was to be the young king's first campaign abroad and he was to be joined by all three of his ducal uncles. An army of 30,000 was being assembled in Flanders, hoping to wreak such havoc in southern England that the English would have no choice but to sue for peace. Jean had a different role in the summer campaign, though.

    The English controlled a number of positions in Brittany in the mid 1380s. In the west, they had held Brest against the French since the early 1370s. In 1378, they captured the great fortress of Saint-Malo on the duchy's northern shore, and in 1379, they exploited the confusion that resulted from the Revolt of the Breton League to expand their position in the west out from Brest to take control of effectively all Léon. Ironically, the English had done all this in the hope of eventually restoring Jean to the ducal throne, only for Jean to betray them in 1380. England had held these positions in opposition to him ever since and Jean's attempts to negotiate their return had been coldly received. By 1386, he was finally ready to complete his break from England and take them by force.

    On 20 June 1386, Jean led an army of 3,000 to the walls of Saint-Malo. The force was a mix of Breton and French forces, the latter of which had been brought to Brittany by Clisson to support the duke. The bay was blockaded by a French fleet, which was anchored and chained together to prevent any calls for help from reaching England or any resupply by sea from reaching the town. Construction began on a pair of bastides to aid in what was expected to be a lengthy siege. Canons were brought in to bring down the town's ramparts, the first recorded use of large guns in Brittany. Jean spent a fortnight preparing for the attack. The siege was hardly underway when, on 12 July, an English sortie burned one of the wooden bastides to the ground. French and Breton forces renewed their attack four days later.

    The Siege of Saint-Malo came to an anticlimactic end in late August. Charles VI's campaign to England had drawn such a huge army that the French needed to recall the fleet from Saint-Malo to support the invasion effort. The English defenders could now easily be resupplied by sea and, with more sorties further disrupting the duke's plan of attack, the siege was abruptly called off.

    Ransom of Jean of Blois
    Two years before the Siege of Saint-Malo, on 10 September 1384, Jeanne of Penthièvre died. Her lands and titles passed to her eldest son and heir, Jean of Blois—at least on paper. In reality, the great estate was broken apart and taken over by various figures from the late countess's household, as well as a younger son, Henri of Bois, and even Clisson. The administrative free-for-all was the result of Jean of Blois's absence from Brittany, as he was a prisoner of the English crown.

    Jean of Blois had been delivered to the English as a hostage in 1356 as surety for the ransom of his father, Charles of Blois, who had been taken prisoner nearly a decade prior. The elder Blois's debt was still unpaid when he was slain in the 1364 Battle of Auray, so his son remained an English prisoner even after the family's rival, Jean of Montfort, took to the ducal throne as Jean IV. England's on-again, off-again alliance with Jean IV kept Blois from being ransomed, though they seriously flirted with the idea following the duke's 1380 betrayal. The subject was considered again following Jean's 1386 attack on Saint-Malo. The cash-rich Clisson was quick to buy Blois's freedom. Indeed, he had been working to secure Blois's freedom for some time already.

    Clisson had begun pushing for Blois's release in late 1384, just months after Jeanne's death. A delegation to England was allowed to meet with Blois, who named Clisson as chief executor of his estates during his absence. At the same time, Blois's older sister, Marie of Blois, dowager duchess of Anjou, mortgaged her young son's estates in Anjou and Maine to Clisson, as she was desperately short of funds in the midst of a war for the county of Provence. Control of Penthièvre, Anjou, and Maine gave Clisson a string of lands that, when combined with his and wife's estates, encircled all the cities and major defensive positions in eastern Brittany. So, when Clisson agreed to pay half of Blois's ransom, putting up 60,000 francs of his own money to procure Blois's release as part of a deal that included Blois's marriage to one of Clisson's daughters, the duke of Brittany grew suspicious. In just a few short years, Clisson had come to control an incredible number of strategically important positions in and around Brittany and had then ransomed the duke's dynastic rival and wed him to Clisson's own daughter. It looked to Jean as if Clisson were set to resurrect Blois's claim to the ducal throne and install Blois as duke, thus making Clisson's daughter a duchess. The paranoid duke began plotting to bring Clisson down.

    Arrest of Olivier de Clisson
    On 25 June 1387, Jean IV hosted a grand banquet at Château de la Motte in Vannes to celebrate the end of a meeting of the Estates of Brittany. During the festivities, the duke invited Clisson to inspect the new Château de l’Hermine, which was being constructed at the southeastern gate to the city. Stroking the constable's ego, Jean called Clisson the greatest military mind in France and asked for his input on the castle's defenses. Clisson, susceptible to flattery, gladly accepted the offer. He was arrested immediately upon his arrival.

    The following day, 26 June, Clisson was charged with treason for conspiring to depose the duke. The accusations rocked the Breton court. Details of the late-night arrest were scarce, but word soon spread that he had been thrown into a bare cell and denied the luxuries typically afforded to noble prisoners. The evidence to back up Jean's charges was entirely speculative, but the duke declared that Clisson was to be executed the following day.

    Guy XII, lord of Laval, and Pierre of Navarre stayed up through the night to talk the duke down. Laval, who was Clisson's brother-in-law and one of the most powerful barons in Brittany, offered the duke the sobering prediction that Clisson's execution would reopen the wounds of the succession war, shattering the unity of the Breton nobility, which had stopped the French annexation, returned Jean to power and allowed the duchy to retain its autonomy. Pierre, who was Jean's brother-in-law and a guest at court, made a more emotional plea. Pierre pointed to his pregnant sister, Jean's wife, and asked what effect Jean's actions would have on the unborn child and thus the future of Jean's own dynasty, as a war with France seemed likely if the duke continued down this path.

    On 27 June, Marie of Navarre, pregnant with her and Jean's first child, made a tearful appearance before the ducal court and beseeched her husband to show Clisson mercy. It was a carefully choreographed piece of political theater that allowed the duke to back down without losing face. Jean commuted Clisson's sentence. Clisson was allowed to keep his head in exchange for the forfeiture of his Breton lands and a fine of 100,000 francs. Clisson was also forced to sign a written confession, the text of which implicated his new son-in-law, Blois, in his crimes, thus giving Jean the legal pretext to confiscate Blois's lands as well. Clisson was kept in prison as Jean's agents seized the constable's lands and made their moves against Blois.

    Diplomatic standoff
    Clisson's arrest sent shockwaves through France. It was the most brazen attack on a royal officer since the 1354 assassination of Charles de la Cerda, who was constable of France in his own time. Officials in Paris looked to the young king for leadership. Charles VI was 18 years old and just beginning to make his voice heard in the affairs of state. His response was immediate. He moved court from the capital to royal estates in Normandy to be closer to events in Brittany and sent messengers to the duke demanding the constable's release at once.

    The young king was able to take command of events as he did in no small part because his uncle and regent, the duke of Burgundy, was attending to business in Flanders at the time. Burgundy raced to join his nephew in Normandy, but found the royal court filled with Clisson supporters upon his arrival. Among them were Bureau de La Rivière, longtime chamberlain of Charles V, who had been chased from Paris in the opening weeks of the first government of the uncles, and Nicolas du Bosc, bishop of Bayeux, one of the clergy that Charles V had intended to take a leading role in the regency, but who was also brushed aside after the uncles came to power. Clisson's son-in-law, the recently-ransomed Jean of Blois, was there too, as were several members of the late duke of Anjou's household, who represented Marie, dowager duchess of Anjou, who was Blois's sister.

    Burgundy, who got on well with Jean IV and who hated Clisson, tried to sweep the matter under the rug when a copy of Clisson's forced confession arrived at the royal court. This, Burgundy said, proved that Clisson was a traitor and that Jean's actions were lawful. The cold reaction he received demonstrated Burgundy's weakened grip on power following the failure of the 1385 and 1386 invasions of England, neither of which ever actually made it across the Channel. The Breton crisis remained the crown's top issue and wild rumors drove the young king to take an even more aggressive position against Jean.

    The duke of Brittany's actions in the summer of 1387 were entirely his own, but Jean had been so closely associated with the English for so many years that rumors that he had acted at their behest were almost inevitable. Such rumors were easy to believe too, as Clisson had been preparing to lead an invasion of England later that summer, plans for which were abruptly canceled upon his arrest. Other rumors said that one of the king's uncles, Jean, duke of Berry, had conspired with the duke of Brittany to bring down Clisson, as Berry had repeatedly clashed with Clisson over lands in Poitou. This only further undermined the government of the uncles. The young king lapped up the conspiracy theories that were swirling around the court and encouraged Blois to take up arms against the duke of Brittany.

    On 1 October, as Blois and Clisson's allies were massing forces in the Breton marches, Jean released the long-imprisoned Clisson in hopes that the constable's freedom would keep Blois from invading. This was too little, too late. Clisson repudiated the confession that he had been made to sign under the threat of execution and joined the army that his son-in-law was gathering near Pontorson.

    On 12 October, Marie of Navarre gave birth. It was not the son for which Jean had long hoped, though. It was a daughter, who was named Jeanne, in honor of the many strong women in both Jean and Marie's families who had carried the name. Jean immediately declared the girl his heir presumptive, in open defiance of the First and Second Treaties of Guérande, both of which settled the ducal throne on the Blois-Penthièvre line in the event that Jean were to die without a son. Already facing the prospect of a war against Blois, though, Jean seemed to have little use for the treaties now. Officials in Paris took the news badly.

    Blois and Clisson invaded northern Brittany in early November, quickly retaking a number of castles that were rightfully Blois's as count of Penthièvre, but that Jean had seized during the summer. Their speed gave Jean flashbacks of the quick collapse of his regime in the early 1370s. At the same time, Jean's allies, the dukes of Berry and Burgundy, were pushing their kingly nephew to abandon the hard line he had taken against Brittany. They failed, and Charles dug in even more, taking the view that an attack on Clisson was an attack on the crown itself. He sent a delegation to Brittany to deliver an ultimatum to Jean.

    In late November, Bernard de la Tour, bishop of Langres, arrived at the ducal court as an ambassador of the king. The bishop was no friend to the duke of Brittany or the Breton nobility more generally. He was a harsh, moralizing man who detested Jean for his duplicity and perfidiousness, and had supported the late Charles V's attempt to annex the duchy, as he believed that the king was all-powerful in temporal matters. He was uncompromising in discussions with the duke.

    Tour declared the arrest of Clisson, as constable of France, an act of treason and further declared that the duke's violation of the 1380 Treaty of Guérande and naming of his newborn daughter heir to Brittany was nothing short of a declaration of war against Charles VI, who was party to the treaty. The bishop did not endorse Blois as the rightful duke of Brittany, but the threat was implicit. Jean railed against the bishop, noting that he did not arrest Clisson for crimes committed as a crown officer, but as his own vassal. The argument did not sway the bishop, nor did the fury with which the duke delivered it. Tour ordered Jean to restore Blois and Clisson's lands and to appear before the king in no more than six months' time, lest he be fined 100,000 francs. Jean agreed to these terms through gritted teeth.

    Aftermath
    In late December 1387, Jean met with Blois and Clisson as part of a peace ceremony that was carefully stage-managed by the bishop of Langres. The farcical event did nothing to cool tensions in the duchy or between its duke and the king.

    Blois had reconquered much of Penthièvre before Jean was made to return the rest of Blois and Clisson's lands to them by the bishop of Langres. His quick campaign was successful in no small part because the injustices that he and Clisson had suffered helped reactivate the old Blois-Penthièvre network, but their loyalties only extended as far as helping reclaim Blois and Clisson's lands. The role that the bishop of Langres had played in events badly split the Blois-Penthièvre faction, who viewed the French king's intervention in Breton affairs as an act tyranny just as bad, or worse, than the arrest of Clisson on trumped-up charges of treason. In short, Blois's supporters would defend him only as the count of Penthièvre and would not begin a civil war for his claim to Brittany in the face of French aggression. Either ignorant of the divisions within the Blois-Penthièvre camp or simply distrusting the loyalties of Blois's allies who swore to defend Brittany against France, Jean turned to England once more.

    In early January 1388, Jean made contact with an English squire who had once been in his service as earl of Richmond. The squire became Jean's go-between in secret talks with Thomas of Woodstock, 1st duke of Gloucester, who was the English king's uncle and the leader of English forces in Brittany. The two had been allies during Jean's 1370s exile in England, but Jean had abandoned Woodstock at the Siege of Nantes before returning to the French fold in 1380. This made Woodstock's campaign that year not only a professional humiliation, but a personal betrayal. This experience had not taught Woodstock caution, though, and talks moved quickly. A new Anglo-Breton alliance was sealed before the end of March. Jean would break this new alliance in record time.

    Jean was called to appear before the king in April, in accordance with his pledge to the bishop of Langres to make an appearance before the summer. Bolstered by his new alliance with England and fearing that the summons was a trap that would lead to his arrest, Jean simply skipped the event. The French king was not bothered by Jean's impertinence, though. His attention had already turned elsewhere.

    In early summer, the bellicose Willem I, duke of Guelders, routed a Burgundian-Brabantian army outside of the town of Ravenstein. He celebrated his victory by penning a mocking letter to Charles VI, deriding him as a false king and declaring Edward V the true king of France. Charles was apoplectic with rage, vowing to avenge himself upon Guelders for the insult. Plans were made for the king to lead a massive army to crush Guelders. Jean's enemies at the French court were unable to dissuade the king, who now simply wanted the Breton problem to go away so that he could march on Guelders without fear of English invasion through Brittany. The duke of Burgundy dispatched his ally and his protégé, King Charles III of Navarre, who was Jean's brother-in-law and a cousin and close friend of Charles VI, to facilitate talks between Brittany and France. An agreement was quickly reached.

    On 8 August, Jean appeared at Orléans with more than 1,000 Breton lords, bishops, and knights. It was a demonstration of Brittany's unity against the French. Jean was led into the city by the dukes of Berry and Burgundy, who had guaranteed Jean's safety. Jean came before the king and apologized for his action against Clisson the year prior, which he explained was not meant to offend the crown. The king formally accepted Jean's apology and pardoned him for his actions after Jean agreed to return the money that he had squeezed out of Clisson during the constable's imprisonment. A feast was held in celebration of the new peace, after which Charles moved to Montereau and took command of the army assembled there. The king launched the Guelders campaign in September. Jean returned to Brittany. He never repaid Clisson.

    Charles's campaign to Guelders would come to an anticlimactic end in the fall, but it was followed by a dramatic great council meeting in which the young king threw off his uncles and formally dissolved the regency government that they had led since the early 1380s. The king's personal rule saw several of Jean's enemies come into positions of power, including Clisson and the bishop of Langres. Indeed, the constable emerged as Charles's most influential advisor, sinking relations between king and duke to new lows. Jean was summoned before the king's court in 1389 to explain why he had not repaid Clisson, but he feigned illness to avoid appearing. He made the same excuse again in 1390, as he tried to forge yet another English alliance. By this time, though, Jean had completely alienated both the king of England and the king of France, and he was forced to take more drastic action to deal with his enemies.

    In 1392, an assassination attempt was made on Clisson. Jean was the most obvious suspect. Charles VI raised an army to bring the duke down once and for all. His campaign would bring the Caroline War between England and France to an explosive end.
     
    Last edited:
    Guelders War
  • Guelders War
    The Guelders War was a conflict between the duchy of Brabant and the duchy of Guelders that lasted from 1385 to 1390. The two duchies had gone to war twice in their recent histories and issues lingering from their earlier conflicts led to the renewal of hostilities. The war drew in both the kingdom of England and the kingdom of France, opening up a new theater of the Caroline War.

    Background
    Jean III, duke of Brabant, died without a direct male heir in 1355. He named his eldest daughter, Jeanne, as sole heiress to his lands while providing cash settlements for his two younger daughters. This sort of arrangement was allowed under Brabantian law, but it did not sit well with his younger sons-in-law and they repudiated the deal after his death. In 1356, Louis II, count of Flanders, and Reinoud III, duke of Guelders, declared war on their sister-in-law, Jeanne, now suo jure duchess of Brabant, to carve up Brabant and the duchy of Limburg between them, touching off the War of the Brabantian Succession.

    Jeanne was married to Václav I, duke of Luxembourg, who was a younger brother of Emperor Karel IV. The emperor was a powerful potential ally, but he withheld his support until Jeanne agreed to recognize that, as a woman, all her property was her husband's by right and that it should go to her husband's heir should she die childless. Jeanne agreed to this, signing a treaty with the emperor in early 1357. Just a few months later, though, Jeanne signed a separate treaty with the count of Flanders naming his wife, who was the elder Jeanne's two sisters, as Jeanne's sole heir in the event that she died childless. This brought hostilities between Brabant and Flanders to an end, but conflict between Brabant and Guelders continued intermittently through 1379.

    By 1385, Reinoud, Václav, and Louis were all dead, but the wars that they had fought in the decades prior had long-lasting repercussions. Václav and Jeanne's marriage had been childless, but Jeanne's treaties with the emperor and the count of Flanders set out contradictory lines of succession, leaving Václav's nephew, King Václav IV of Bohemia, and Jeanne's niece, Marguerite of Flanders, with claims to the duchy. At the same time, the ambitious and warlike Willem I, duke of Guelders, was eager to take back land that his father's duchy of Jülich had lost to Brabant in the 1370s. As these local rivalries were coming to a head, a new power was emerging in the region.

    Philippe II, duke of Burgundy, was lord of one of the great appanages in France. Burgundy was married to Jeanne's niece, Marguerite, who held the French counties of Artois, Flanders, Nevers, and Rethel as well as the imperial county of Burgundy in her own right. Burgundy also acted as regent for his nephew, King Charles VI of France, and was one of the wealthiest and most powerful men in all of Europe even before the possible inheritance of Brabant.

    Brabant was second only to Flanders in terms of wealth and prestige in the Low Countries, and Burgundy shamelessly used his position as regent of France to further his personal interests there. The resources of the French crown were deployed to curry favor with Jeanne and Brabantian lords. Jeanne, short of cash and fearing the ambitions of the young duke of Guelders, was open to Burgundy's bribes and confirmed Marguerite as her heiress.

    Václav was no less committed to seeing Jeanne honor the treaty she had made with his father. The great Luxembourg estate had been divided between members of the family upon Emperor Karel IV's death in 1378, leaving the emperor's eldest son and would-be successor, Václav, with far fewer resources and struggling to make ends meet. Bohemia was inarguably the jewel of the Luxembourg patrimony, but the silver mines that had enriched generations of its kings had begun to run dry, and there was no support to reform the kingdom's tax system. The rich duchy of Brabant thus presented Václav with a solution to his financial problems. Unable to compete for Jeanne's endorsement by making a bribe of his own, though, Václav looked to force Jeanne's hand in the matter.

    The rapid expansion of French power in the Low Countries spooked many local lords and townsmen, who enjoyed great autonomy in the largely decentralized Empire. The Germanic opposition to the Burgundian encroachment lacked a clear leader until Willem of Guelders reached his majority. Willem had inherited the duchy of Guelders from his mother as a child and he was set to inherit the duchy of Jülich from his father in the future. The young duke sealed an anti-Burgundian alliance with Václav in December 1383. Then, in 1384, he opened talks for the return of Gangelt, Millen, and Waldfeucht, which Brabant swiped from Jülich in the 1370s. Negotiations broke down in spring 1385, around which time Willem forged an alliance with England.

    Burgundy dispatched his ally Albrecht I, duke of Bavaria-Straubing, who was regent of and heir to the counties of Hainaut, Holland and Zeeland, to placate the young duke of Guelders and buy time. The French were planning to invade England in summer 1385 and Burgundy imagined that the duke of Guelders would be far less belligerent once England had been put to fire and sword. Burgundy had terribly misjudged his young rival.

    Local war
    Talks between Albrecht of Bavaria and Willem of Guelders began in May, but did not last long. Willem was too emboldened by his alliances with England and Luxembourg and too eager to win glory on the field of battle to seriously entertain talks at this late stage. He was at the head of his army before the end of the month.

    Willem moved quickly against 's-Hertogenbosch, Brabant's main defensive position against Guelders. The city held out long enough for Jan II, lord of Wittem, to bring a relief army and force the Guelderians to retreat. Willem regrouped and led a raid into Outre-Meuse. The raid was devastating to the local population and lined the pockets of Willem's men, but held no real strategic value, as Jan II, lord of Gronsveld, kept Willem from capturing any major Brabantian position. Willem withdrew after word of a counter-raid into his own lands reached him. He spent the rest of 1385 defending his own territory.

    On 24 June 1386, Willem ambushed Jeanne's forces outside 's-Hertogenbosch, capturing two of her top lieutenants, several knights, and food and supplies intended for her outlying defensive positions. It was the start of a new, more strategic campaign by the duke of Guelders. He passed on making a second attempt at the well-defended 's-Hertogenbosch after the previous year's failure, and instead picked off Jeanne's smaller defensive positions along the border. He took both Ammerzoden and Middelaar in the confusion that followed the ambush. He then turned his attention to Grave, whose position on the Meuse would give him the ability to strike deep into Brabantian territory. The lord of Wittem tried to save the city, but Willem arranged for his bastard daughter to wed the castellan's son and the city opened its gates to the Guelderians.

    Grave was a major loss for Brabant. Jeanne, an old woman by this time and largely removed from the administration of the duchy, moved her court to 's-Hertogenbosch to oversee the situation more closely. She sued for peace, but Willem refused to meet with her ambassadors when they arrived at Grave on 1 September. Then, on 14 September, he launched a raid deep into Brabant as a demonstration of his new power in the region.

    Willem's attacks on Brabant in 1385 and 1386 were timed to coincide with French preparations for an invasion of England. The 1385 invasion had been postponed after the town of Ghent breathed the last gasp in its long revolt in Flanders. The 1386 invasion, which was far larger in scale, was then canceled after the English launched a surprise attack on the French armada while it was anchored off Sluys. The news cut the Guelderian raid into Brabant short, as Willem feared that the duke of Burgundy would lead the remnants of France's massive army against Guelders. On 26 October, Brabant and Guelders agreed to a six-month truce. This was extended in March 1387 for another six months. Willem used the time to bring the English more directly into the war.

    Diplomatic interlude
    In spring 1387, Willem personally led a diplomatic mission to England. He was a guest of honor at the annual Garter ceremonies at Windsor Castle, where he directly negotiated for a closer alliance against France and Burgundy with King Edward V of England. The two had a great deal in common. They were the same age, had both already won accolades for their leadership on and off the battlefield, and shared an interest in crusade. They soon became friends as well as allies.

    Edward and Willem were later joined by Przemysław, duke of Cieszyn, one of Václav's closest allies and favorite ambassadors. It was not Przemysław's first trip to England. In 1381, he had led an embassy to London to negotiate Edward's marriage to Václav's sister, Anna. He had all but sealed their marriage contract when the English parliament objected to its lack of dowry, refusing to grant taxes to support a foreign queen in the wake of an anti-tax revolt. Negotiations fell apart in 1382 when it became clear that Václav could not afford a dowry and that he was making diplomatic overtures to France. Przemysław had a different arrangement in mind now, offering Anna's hand in marriage to Edward's younger brother, Richard of Bordeaux, earl of Richmond.

    Václav's financial position had not improved since the early 1380s, but he did not pretend that it had. In lieu of a cash dowry, Przemysław relayed Václav's intention to put 500 men-at-arms from Luxembourg at England's disposal for a full year and to hold Luxembourg against the French, disrupting the movement of men and materials between Flanders and the two Burgundies. In exchange, the English were asked to make no peace with France that did not include Václav's recognition as heir to Brabant.

    The framework for a three-way alliance between England, Guelders and Luxembourg was established by the end of the spring. Its details were filled in that summer. Edward sealed the treaty with Przemysław in September in Shrewsbury. Edward granted his brother, Richard, an annuity of 600 marks to compensate for the lack of dowry. Anna, who was waiting in Luxembourg for the treaty to be ratified, was finally called to England, but fears that she would be kidnapped in an attempt to wreck the new Anglo-imperial alliance created travel delays. She could not cross the Channel until 20 January 1388. She and Richard wed two days later. In the hours before the ceremony, Edward made Richard the duke of Clarence, a rank more befitting the brother of a king and brother-in-law of a would-be emperor.

    Proxy war
    Willem returned to the continent in summer 1387. He entered into negotiations with Brabant, as the truce was set to expire in the fall. This was done merely for appearances, as the duke had already drawn up a plan of attack with the English. Negotiations were dominated by Burgundians, who now controlled every major office in Brabant. Jeanne was still duchess in her own right, but she had effectively handed control of the duchy over to her nephew-in-law. The duke of Burgundy himself was back in Paris, though, dealing with a fresh crisis in Brittany. Willem, believing Brabant was vulnerable while Burgundy was distracted by events in France, withdrew from talks and launched a hastily-prepared campaign in August, two months before the truce was set to expire.

    Guelderian forces ravaged the land as far as Maasland, but Willem's overeagerness nearly proved to be his undoing. Burgundian reinforcements poured into the area, fortifying key positions and cutting off the young duke from his own lands. In early fall, Scheiffart von Merode, lord of Hemmersbach, ambushed Willem's forces in the night, capturing 30 knights and putting the rest of the Guelderian army to flight in such panic that they abandoned most of their loot. Among Merode's prisoners were several Englishmen who'd followed Willem back to the continent in the summer.

    In March and April 1388, Burgundy transferred 300 men-at-arms and half as many archers from Flanders to Brabant as the two sides prepared for campaign season. Renaud, lord of Fauquemont, and Hendrik II, lord of Boutersem, were made co-commanders of the Brabantian army. They began a siege of Grave at the start of June, but a direct attack was repulsed. They decided to starve the defenders out, but several attempts to cross the Meuse were thrown back and they were unable to fully encircle the town. The siege seemed futile as supplies continued to make their way into Grave. Brabantian morale sank.

    On 27 June, the Brabantians broke off the siege and moved north to Ravenstein. Willem led a small force of 300 elite fighters to the area, taking care to keep out of enemy sights. He allowed the Brabantians to begin moving across the bridge at Ravenstein before pouncing upon them. A panicked retreat led to chaos. The bridge was packed with men and horses, forcing scores of men to retreat across the river itself. Most of them drowned, weighed down by their armor or simply unable to swim. The Guelderians charged across the bridge in pursuit, scattering the Brabantians on the other side. A massacre followed.

    Willem celebrated his victory at Ravenstein by penning a mocking letter to Charles VI. In it, he declared that Edward V was the true king of France. Charles was outraged. Burgundy was delighted. Burgundy had been trying to bring France directly into the Guelders War for months, but his control over royal government had seriously weakened following the disastrous 1386 Battle of Écluse and 1387 Breton Crisis. Now, the duke of Guelders had pushed the French king to Burgundy's side.

    England
    On 27 July, Edward V sat on Dover with 5,200 archers and 1,800 men-at-arms. He was set to sail across the Channel in two days' time for his first continental campaign. He had pledged to do exactly this when the duke of Guelders visited England the year prior. The plan was to land in Calais and lead a Flemish uprising against the duke of Burgundy. The Flemish exile Pieter van den Bossche, a leader of the Ghent Revolt of 1379-1385, had convinced the English that anti-Burgundian sentiment ran so high that the king's arrival in Flanders would inspire the county to rally to him. This was absolute fiction, but the English were riding high after their victories at Arkinholm and Écluse, and so bought Bossche's story, hoping that the conquest of Flanders would end Burgundian dominance of the Low Countries and expose Brabant to attack from three sides. The French, it was believed, would be spread much too thin by threats from Brittany and Gascony to respond to a crisis in the Low Countries, allowing England, Guelders and Luxembourg to completely upend the balance of power in the region. The plan fell apart.

    On 1 August, three days after the king's sail date, Edward and his army were still in Dover, as an alarming series of reports had poured in Ireland, Mann, and Scotland. Raids across both the eastern and western marches were worrisome enough on their own. The property damage was said to be incredible and at least 400 Englishmen had been taken prisoner, with many more killed in the violence. Perhaps more worrying, though, were simultaneous attacks on the Isle of Mann and Ulster. Few could recall the Scots launching raids so well-coordinated or on such a scale. Despite this, it remained the majority opinion that the king should move on to the continent. Edward overruled his councilors, though. He called off the expedition to Flanders, dispatched the English fleet to the Irish Sea, and moved his army north.

    Guelders and Luxembourg were on their own for the year. Unfortunately for them, Willem's letter had so enraged the king of France that he sought peace with Brittany and summoned an army for an invasion of the Low Countries. These events moved quickly and news of them only reached the English after Edward had begun his move north to confront the Scots. By then, it was too late to turn back.

    France
    On 3 September, Charles arrived in Montereau with his uncles, the dukes of Berry and Bourbon. More than 16,000 men-at-arms were waiting for him there, along with 5,000 to 8,000 servants and attendants. The king made a ceremonial inspection of the army before leading the massive host toward Luxembourg. Jan, duke of Görlitz, who was Václav's younger half-brother, led the defense of Luxembourg. Awed by the size of the French army, though, local garrisons threatened to mutiny if ordered to fight. Jan sued for peace and ultimately allowed the French to pass through the area unmolested.

    On 22 September, the French entered the lands of Jülich. Heavy rains had been falling for two weeks and the roads had turned to mud. Ahead of them was the climb into the high, heavily forested hills of Schnee Eifel. It would have been a daunting journey for such an army in the best of weather, but with the roads washed out, it seemed a fool's errand. The French army sat for three days as its commanders bitterly argued over whether to proceed or turn back. Ultimately, it was decided to move ahead so as to spare Charles the embarrassment of calling off a second major campaign, after the aborted 1386 invasion of England. The journey was treacherous, as Willem had hired brigands to pick off foraging parties and his own men launched night raids on the French camp.

    On 8 October, Charles arrived outside Grave. The French army was in a sorry state. The rain had washed out roads and created mudslides that made it impossible for wagons to pass. Tons of food and supplies had been abandoned. Foraging for food had become too dangerous as a result of the brigands who lurked around every hilltop. What food men were able to carry was soaked and rotted. The hills were steep. It was so cold in some areas that the rain turned to snow. The army was exhausted, frostbitten, and starving. Still, the French vastly outnumbered the Guelderians at Grave.

    Willem personally led the defense of Grave. He had about 1,600 men under him. Charles had left France with between 20,000 and 25,000 men, and though he had suffered losses on his journey, Brabantian and Burgundian forces in and around the area could offer 5,000 to 8,000 more in reinforcements. Climate and geography had already almost broken the French, though, and Willem himself noted that food would only grow more scarce and the weather more inhospitable every day that passed. French commanders noted these same problems and urged the king to sue for peace.

    On 12 October, a mere four days after the French arrival, Charles received Willem in a ceremony that was designed to overawe the duke. The king sat enthroned on a raised platform in full armor, surrounded by his three surviving uncles—the dukes of Berry, Bourbon, and Burgundy—as well as the constable of France, considered one of the great military minds of his generation, and dozens of French lords and knights. Willem apologized to the king for the impertinence of his letter, but did not repudiate it entirely, limiting his apology strictly to the the letter's tone and not its contents. His recognition of Edward as the rightful king of France was glossed over entirely, though Willem did deliver his apology on bended knee. The duke would not even submit to Charles for arbitration of his dispute with Brabant, though he at least couched his refusal of the offer on the fact that Charles's regent, Burgundy, was allied with Brabant, so that Charles could save face. It was an absurd event designed to spare the teenage king from being completely humiliated. The French withdrew the following day.

    Aftermath
    Willem of Guelders emerged from the showdown at Grave as one the most famous men in Europe. The dramatic tale of the young duke standing strong against a king whose army outnumbered his own 15-fold made him a hero to people in the Germanic Low Countries. The details of the story faded as it spread, the broad strokes being all that was important as the David-and-Goliath tale reached far beyond the borders of France and the Empire. Charles, on the other hand, had to suffer yet more indignity.

    The French withdrawal from the Low Countries was chaotic. The Catholic Church was divided in two by the Western Schism. Arnold van Horne, the prince-bishop of Liège, was obedient to Pope Urban VI of Rome and had fought an Avignon pretender for a year before taking control of his prince-bishopric a decade prior. His brother, the lord of Horne, had a long-running dispute with the count of Hainaut, who was the duke of Burgundy's closest ally in the Low Countries. Liège was the quickest and easiest route from Grave to France, but the prince-bishop was naturally predisposed against allowing the French, who were obedient to Avignon and allied with his brother's rival, safe passage through his lands. Bridges were guarded, towns were shut, and food was emptied from the countryside. Heavy rains flooded rivers and prevented fording, which further complicated the French journey. Many attempted to cross the swollen rivers anyway and drowned for their efforts. The roads were no safer or easier, as the rains turned them to mud and the men were preyed upon by bandits and kidnappers in search of easy ransoms. The duke of Guelders and prince-bishop of Liège encouraged such attacks. Charles's army returned to France in the final days of October, badly broken and demoralized.

    On 3 November 1388, Charles VI presided over a great council at the archbishop's palace in Reims. The meeting was hastily-arranged, but attendance was remarkably high, given the large number of lords that had turned out for the Guelders campaign and then followed the king straight to Reims upon their return. Charles, still a month shy of his twentieth birthday, declared the regency government to be at an end in his opening remarks. His uncles were shocked. The French intervention in Guelders had cost Burgundy control of the government and he had not even won Brabant's safety, as the war continued on as a local conflict and the threat of English invasion remained. Ultimately, the war resolved itself barely a year later.

    Willem negotiated a ceasefire with Jeanne of Brabant soon after the French withdrawal. Unlike earlier truces, he actually honored this one. He even extended it to cover all of 1389 as the two sides opened serious peace talks for the first time. Grave, which Willem now claimed by conquest, became a serious sticking point, as Jeanne would not concede it and Willem would not return the town that had made him famous. In early 1390, Brabant and Guelders finally reached a peace deal. Willem returned Grave to the duchy of Brabant, but on the condition that it was enfeoffed to his ally, the lord of Cuijk. Jeanne conceded that the three towns over which the war was launched—Gangelt, Millen, and Waldfeucht—belonged to Jülich, but paid a cash settlement to keep control of these towns until her death. Willem was more interested in the cash than the towns in 1390, as he needed funds to go on crusade.

    England and Guelders remained allies, but England's priorities in its war with France shifted to Aquitaine in 1389 and to Brittany in the 1390s. Guelders was of little strategic value to these conflicts and Willem's interest had shifted entirely to crusade by this time, though he was party to peace talks between France and England.

    Václav's alliances with England and Guelders broke down. Luxembourg's capitulation to the French was an embarrassment that was made to look all the more pathetic by Willem's stand at Grave just a month later. Drunk and impoverished, Václav spent the 1390s fending off the upper Bohemian nobility just to keep his crown. His role in the Empire, never particularly strong, diminished even further and the dream to be formally crowned as emperor one day disappeared. Despite the military and political failures that the king represented as part of the three-way alliance, the marriage of his sister, Anna, and Edward's brother, Richard, was successful on a personal level.
     
    Battle of Newcastle
  • Battle of Newcastle
    The Battle of Newcastle was fought on 12 August 1388 between the kingdom of England and the kingdom of Scotland. It was the culmination of a major Scottish offensive that included attacks across both the eastern and western marches, as well as a naval campaign that ravaged Ulster and the Isle of Mann. The English were led in battle by Henry Percy, 1st earl of Northumberland, and the Scots led by James Douglas, 2nd earl of Douglas.

    Background
    King Robert II of Scotland was a cautious and conciliatory figure who dedicated his reign to securing his new Stewart dynasty. He had ascended the throne upon the death of his childless uncle, King David II, in 1371. Robert was 55 years old at the time, almost an old man by the standards of the day, and was hardly popular. David II's preferred heir was his other nephew, John of Sutherland, despite Sutherland being the son of David's younger sister when Robert was the son of David's older sister. Sutherland's death in an outbreak of the plague cleared Robert's path to the throne, but David's councilors still greeted Robert coolly when he rose to power.

    One of Robert's first acts as king was to renew his uncle's truce with England. Not only did Robert need the time that this peace bought him to tighten his shaky grip on power, but he had few connections with the marcher lords who drove the war effort and a poor understanding of the complex web of competing land claims and local rivalries that had kept England and Scotland from negotiating a permanent peace. David's truce had included a payment schedule of 4,000 marks per annum to the English crown, money which went toward David's still-unresolved ransom after his capture in battle decades prior. Remarkably, Robert agreed to continue making these payments despite the fact that his uncle was dead. He stopped only after the death of King Edward III of England in 1377, by which time Robert was secure on the throne.

    Robert had secured his kingship by establishing his sons as major regional powers and marrying family members into Scotland's most powerful families. By 1377, 11 of the kingdom's 14 earldoms were either held by one of Robert's sons, by a lord wed to one of his daughters or granddaughters, or by a Stewart cousin. The king's eldest son and heir, John Stewart, earl of Carrick, was the most prominent of these.

    The earl of Carrick was the only one of Robert's sons with major territorial interests south of the Forth. He became an ally of the marcher lords, a constituency with which Robert had always struggled. This was a double-edged sword, though, as the powerful border lords were more loyal to Carrick personally than to the crown or the Stewart dynasty more generally. Carrick was made lieutenant of the marches in 1381, just as the long truce between England and Scotland was beginning to break down. The new lieutenant did little to rein in the violence and, in fact, encouraged border raids as part of a broader policy to expand Scotland's position on the marches back to the lines that had been established in 1328.

    Carrick's belligerence toward the English put him at odds with his unwarlike father, but Carrick was an ambitious man who could not accept simply being the middle-aged heir to an elderly king. Robert, who had little influence over his southern lords at the best of times, lost control of them completely now. The king lost control of the north of his kingdom at the same time, as another of his sons, Alexander Stewart, earl of Buchan, terrorized the region to enrich himself. The situation came to a head in November 1384, as a coalition of northern and southern lords moved to make Carrick lieutenant of the realm, vesting in him all diplomatic and judicial power. It was effectively a coup, as Carrick was made king in all but name.

    Carrick quickly moved Scotland toward open warfare with the English. He let the marcher lords off the leash, with devastating effects for northern England. Small towns and villages were burned and looted. Major positions were no better off. The English were not expecting war for more than half a year, which left the defenders of Berwick Castle unprepared for attack. The castle was taken before year's end. France and Scotland drew up plans for a joint invasion of England the following year.

    King Edward V of England responded with overwhelming force. A 1385 English invasion of Scotland devastated Lothian, saw English raids north of the Forth for the first time in many decades, and ended with Edward's victory at the Battle of Arkinholm, at which Carrick was unhorsed, badly injured and taken prisoner.

    The Scots looked to Robert II's second son, Robert Stewart, earl of Fife, for leadership after Carrick's capture, but Fife initially refused to take up the mantle of lieutenant. Carrick's lieutenancy had brought greater destruction to the realm than anything since the 1356 Burnt Candlemas campaign, the north of the kingdom was still lawless, the Franco-Scottish alliance had gone sour, and the ransom of the heir to the throne would likely be staggering. Fife refused to be made responsible for the unpopular decisions that would be required as a result of his brother's failures. Rather unexpectedly, the aged, unpopular Robert II made a comeback as a result.

    Robert arranged for a new truce to take effect on 1 January 1386. The destruction to Lothian had been so severe that not even the hawkish marcher lords could object to a pause in hostilities. Negotiations for the earl of Carrick's release began in the spring. The English demanded 100,000 marks, plus the remaining 32,000 marks of David II's ransom, which Robert had committed to settling back in 1371. This was too much for the Scottish crown to bear, and so Robert argued that Carrick had fought at Arkinholm as a retainer of the French crown in an effort to put the financial burden on King Charles VI of France. This added new tensions to Franco-Scottish relations. Robert's truce with the English, initially negotiated for just six months, was extended for a full year and then again for a second year.

    Prelude to war
    On 26 October 1386, Edward V appointed his eldest surviving uncle, John of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster, lieutenant of Scotland. It was just one in a series of major administrative and military reforms that were announced in the Coronation Parliament. The wardens of marches, who had traditionally been the top officials on the border, were subordinated to the new lieutenancy, to which the king now delegated all diplomatic and military authority in the north.

    The English adopted a new diplomatic strategy as Gaunt stepped into his new position. Edward, who took his claim to the overlordship of Scotland seriously, began to more publicly antagonize the Scots. The king referred to the Anglo-Scottish war as a "Stewart rebellion" against his authority and even mused that his cousin, Philippa of Coucy, had a greater claim to the Scottish throne than the Stewarts, via her descent from Ada Balliol. Gaunt, meanwhile, suggested that the English would be willing to drastically cut their financial demands for Carrick's ransom in exchange for the acknowledgement that the king of England was the king of Scots' overlord, and for Robert II and Carrick's fealty and homage to Edward. The good cop, bad cop routine rattled Scottish negotiators.

    Henry Percy, 1st of Northumberland, struggled to adapt to this new power structure on the border. He was one of the greatest landholders in northern England and had established himself as the region's leading magnate through his family's near-constant control of one of the three marches. He was once one of Gaunt's allies, but resented that King Edward IV had dispatched Gaunt to Scotland to stop a local war between Northumberland and the earl of Dunbar in 1377. The following year, Northumberland forged a marriage alliance with another of Gaunt's rivals, Edmund Mortimer, 3rd earl of March, and had generally been a thorn in the duke's side through Gaunt's regency government of the late 1370s and early 1380s. Northumberland had no intention of burying the hatchet now.

    John Neville, 1st earl of Cumberland, was Northumberland's main local rival and had become a favorite of the duke's during the regency era. Cumberland's brother was Alexander Neville, archbishop of York, who was an irritable and pugnacious character. The archbishop was a political outsider. He played no major role in the government of the realm and rarely even attended parliament. He focused entirely on his archiepiscopal see, with generally terrible results. He trod over the privileges of local religious houses, fought bitterly with the powerful bishop of Durham, and managed to spark a riot during a visit to Beverly. His victims now found a champion in Northumberland. The politically-isolated archbishop had no allies of his own, but for his brother, who struggled to defend him. Local powerbrokers began calling for Gaunt to remove Cumberland from the wardenship of the western march, as Cumberland became tainted by his association with his brother. Gaunt, loyal to a fault, would hear nothing of the sort. The duke's heated defense of the Nevilles earned him the ire of the bishop of Durham, a critical player in the marches.

    The king of England was too busy elsewhere to shore up his uncle's political position. Edward toured the midlands through spring and summer 1387, launched a diplomatic mission to Navarre, and forged new alliances with Guelders and Luxembourg in preparation for a planned campaign in the Low Countries. With northern England gripped by political infighting and the country's military resources heading to the continent, the Scots saw an opportunity to both avenge Arkinholm and to end talk of English overlordship.

    On 28 February 1388, the Scottish parliament met at Glasgow. It was the tenth time that a general council or parliament had been called since Carrick's capture less than two and a half years prior. The king, only a few days shy of turning 72, had done little since his return to power. Robert had not reined in his third son, the earl of Buchan, and had even rewarded Buchan with the justiciarship north of the Forth. The move had outraged the church, as bishops were frequently extorted by the earl. Robert's policies were not any more popular in the south, with the marcher lords demanding that he end negotiations to extend the truce for a third year. Robert's second son, the earl of Fife, was again called to act as lieutenant of the realm. This time, Fife accepted. He dispatched his son, Murdoch, to bring the earl of Buchan to heel and turned his own attention to the war with England. He imagined a far greater campaign than the one that his brother had launched in 1385, and one that did not require any help from the French.

    Preparations for war
    Scottish plans for the summer of 1388 were the most ambitious in decades, calling for a three-prong assault on England across both the eastern and western marches and on the lordship of Ireland. Each had its own objective. The attack across the eastern march was meant to be purely punitive, no different from other Scottish raiding campaigns except in scale. The campaign across the western march would besiege and occupy Carlisle, which would then become a base for further action in Cumberland. The raids on Ireland were intended to confuse the English and draw resources away from the north.

    The occupation of Carlisle was the main strategic objective of the campaign. This marked a radical shift in the Scots' military thinking. Cross-border raids had been a favorite tactic of the Scots for many years, but while this method of warfare enriched the powerful marcher lords, it ultimately offered nothing that could be traded in talks with the English. Control of a major English stronghold, on the other hand, could give the Scots a chip to play in negotiations.

    Talks between England and Scotland continued into the spring, even as the Scots prepared for war. Fife hoped that stringing along discussions about another extension of the truce would lull the English into a false sense of security. The Scots finally withdrew from negotiations in late April. The English picked up on the scale of the Scots' coming campaign six weeks later. Royal officials raced to react.

    On 8 June, Gaunt issued commissions of array in Cumberland, Lancashire, Northumberland, Westmorland, and Yorkshire. The bishop of Durham, did the same in the county palatine. Gaunt beseeched the king for reinforcements from Cheshire, but it was already too late.

    Invasion
    On 29 June, Fife crossed the western march with George Dunbar, 10th earl of Dunbar, and 6,000 men at their backs. That same day, James Douglas, 2nd earl of Douglas, crossed the eastern march with John Dunbar, earl of Moray, and 3,000 men of their own. Unprecedented destruction was wrought by the campaign in the east. Hundreds were taken prisoner for ransom. Hundreds more were slaughtered in their homes. Crops were burned, churches were looted for their defiance of Avignon, cattle were rustled, and all moveable wealth was carted off. Meanwhile, at sea, Henry Sinclair, earl of Orkney and the admiral of Scotland, attacked Rathlin Island. The castle there was caught completely by surprise and fell quickly. Its capture was a point of pride for the Scots, as the castle had been a safe haven for King Robert I in 1306. From Rathlin, Sinclair launched a series of raids on Mann and Ulster.

    As Douglas's eastern campaign terrorized the English, Fife's western campaign collapsed. The Scots' old habits were hard to break and they spent a month raiding the English countryside before finally pitching camp outside Carlisle on 3 August. Back in 1385, the French had noted that the town's defenses had fallen into disrepair during the ill-fated Franco-Scottish campaign that year. The English had made little effort to shore up their position in the three years since. Carlisle was weak, but its saving grace was that the Scots had no practical experience in siege warfare. Fife scattered the badly outnumbered local levies, but his effort was doomed without siegecraft or expert under-miners. Sir Archibald Douglas, a cousin of the earl of Douglas, grew frustrated and left the fruitless siege to join his cousin in the east. Half Fife's army followed, forcing the earl to call off the western prong of the campaign and return to Scotland.

    The king of England had an army of 7,000 waiting to set sail for the continent in late July, as reports of the devastation in the north poured in. Edward pulled his captains together in a hastily-arranged war council to discuss the news. His youngest uncle, the duke of Gloucester, encouraged him to embark, believing that real war was with France. Sir Henry "Hotspur" Percy, who was the eldest son and heir to the earl of Northumberland, rejected this line of thought. Hotspur, who had fought at Edward's side at Arkinholm and was a captain in the army that had gathered for the planned Low Countries campaign, argued that the Scots would continue to fight, with or without French aid, until they were crushed. Edward agreed.

    On 1 August, Edward canceled the English expedition to the Low Countries and issued a flurry of new orders to turn back the Scots. He put 4,000 of the men gathered at Dover under the command of his two half-brothers, the earls of Kent and Huntingdon, for the defense of the seas. Huntingdon sailed to the Irish Sea to relieve Mann and Ulster, while Kent patrolled the Channel for fear that there may be some French attack coming that the English had somehow missed. Edward led the remaining 3,000 north to confront the Scots. He sent word to his uncle, Gaunt, to meet him at York with whatever men he could muster.

    News of the king's move north was not well received by Northumberland, who feared greater royal oversight of the marches and the decline of local powerhouses like the Percy family in dealings with Scotland. Northumberland had his own army at Newcastle and decided to confront the Scots himself, believing that victory over the earl of Douglas would prove that the marcher lords could manage the border without need for a royal lieutenant, thus returning the Percies to preeminence in the region.

    Battle
    The earl of Douglas had raided deep into England, crossing the Tyne and marching as far as Durham. He arranged his army in three broad lines of men-at-arms before the city walls in an ostentatious display of Scottish power before moving back north via the road to Newcastle, where at least 5,000 Englishmen were gathered under the command of the earl of Northumberland.

    Douglas knew that Northumberland had assembled a sizable English force behind the walls of Newcastle, but Douglas wanted to return home as soon as possible and the road past the city was the shortest route back to Scotland. According to the French chronicler Jean Froissart, Douglas had heard tell that Edward was moving north and that the earl wanted to avoid a showdown with the victor of Arkinholm. The Scots stopped eight miles south of Newcastle on 11 August and waited for nightfall, hoping to slip past the earl of Northumberland under cover of darkness. Shortly before dusk, an English scouting party led by Robert Umfraville launched a surprise attack, stealing several horses and loosing dozens more to create turmoil in the Scottish camp. The Scots spent hours rounding up the frightened animals in the dark. The earl of Douglas allowed his men a few hours of rest before a pre-dawn march.

    The Scots crossed the bridge over the Tyne just before daybreak on the morning of 12 August. The sun rose to reveal Northumberland's army arrayed in battle formation outside the walls of the city. The earl himself stood atop the mighty West Gate in full armor, an ax in one hand and his banner in the other. Douglas and his men had been caught. He ordered his men to form lines.

    The two armies were of similar size, with Douglas's forces having swollen to nearly 6,000 men after his cousin, Sir Archibald Douglas, led about half the earl of Fife's army away from the Siege of Carlisle. The English army drew from the Percy family's large network of northern retainers, but was also composed in no small part of the levies of Northumberland and Yorkshire. The men enlisted from the counties had poor arms and training. The Scottish army, on the other hand, was drawn almost entirely from the elite. Heavy arms, fine armor, and experience in war could have given the Scots a serious advantage had their men not been exhausted after a chaotic night with little sleep.

    The English were split into two divisions. Sir Thomas Percy, Northumberland's brother, led the first. Percy ordered a tightly-packed unit of longbowmen forward and volleys of arrows began to rain down upon the Scots. It was instant carnage, as the missiles ripped through those who could not afford the finest plate armor. The Scottish knight Sir John Swinton led 100 men-at-arms in a desperate charge to disperse the archers, but the arrows were only deadlier at a closer range and Swinton's unit was slaughtered before it even reached the English.

    Swinton's suicidal cavalry attack gave the remaining Scots time to form rectilinear schiltrons. This took an extraordinary level of discipline, demonstrating the high quality of the Scots on the field that day. A direct assault was ordered. Screams rang out as English arrows poured down, but the Scots would not relent. Sir David Lindsay, who led the Scottish right flank, broke through the hail of arrows and finally met the English infantry. The fighting was fierce, but the fresh English men-at-arms had a clear advantage over the badly battered Scots. The English shouted "Percy!" and "Saint George!" as the Scots shrank back in the opening exchanges of spear and sword. Northumberland, seeing the Scots fading early, ordered Sir Mathew Redmayne to take a small mounted force on a circuitous route and cut off any possible retreat.

    The earl of Douglas had no intention of retreating. The leading light of the Scottish nobility, he personally led the reserve force of dismounted cavalry into the thick of the fighting. Cries of "Douglas!" rang out as the earl struck down three English knights and rallied the Scots for a counterattack. The Scottish lines quickly reformed, showing the clear advantage that the Scots had in fielding an entirely professional force. The English line began to buckle as the Scots pushed forward. The enlisted men of the English army began to break. The earl of Northumberland rushed in to fill the gap that was emerging in the line. The fiercest fighting followed, with both earls being on the front lines. Northumberland took a blade in his left armpit, a weak point in plate armor. He fought on even as he began to bleed out. Events ground into a bloody stalemate until Redmayne, who had been sent to cut off a possible Scottish retreat, returned to attack the Scots in the rear. The confused and exhausted Scots were finally overwhelmed.

    The Scottish retreat was chaotic. Redmayne's force was small, but their mounts gave them a powerful advantage over the Scots, who were hundreds of yards from their own horses and easy pickings for the English horsemen. The earl of Moray fought his way out, but the earl of Douglas, his cousin Sir Archibald, and Sir David Lindsay, one of Robert II's sons-in-law, were all taken prisoner. More than 1,200 Scots lay dead on the field and at least 700 more surrendered to the English. Eighty of the prisoners hailed from Scotland's leading families on the marches.

    The Scots suffered further losses as they fled north. The English had reinforced Alnwick and Redesdale over the summer and were able to pick off hundreds of retreating Scots from these positions. Between Newcastle, Alnwick, and Redesdale, the Scots lost more than 2,500 of their finest fighting men to the English. Contemporary reports said that the English lost between 200 and 300 men, though this would not have included the likely large number of enlisted men who fell at Newcastle. By far, the most notable English casualty was the earl of Northumberland, who died shortly after the battle as a result of his wounds.

    Counter-invasion
    Edward V reached Newcastle on 18 August. He welcomed news of the English victory and recognized his friend and brother-in-arms, Sir Henry "Hotspur" Percy, as the 2nd earl of Northumberland. He wasted no time mourning the 1st earl's death, though. Edward had come from Dover with about 3,000 men and it was his intention to punish the Scots for their devastation of the north. His uncle, Gaunt, had at least 5,000 men waiting for him, drawn from the Lancastrian network of retainers and levies of Cumberland, Durham, Lancashire, and Westmorland. Perhaps another 2,000 were added from the men that the late earl of Northumberland had gathered in the area. So it was with probably around 10,000 men at his back that Edward launched a retaliatory campaign into Scotland. He targeted the now-defenseless lands of the earl of Dunbar in Roxburgh before visiting fresh destruction upon Lothian. Unlike his last campaign, the Scots were unprepared for an English invasion in 1388 and Edward's men grew rich pillaging the countryside, rustling cattle, and looting the wine cellars of Avignon-obedient abbeys.

    Edward's wrath did not stop with his devastation of southeastern Scotland. Once it was clear that there was no threat from France, Edward ordered his half-brother, the earl of Kent, to bring the might of the English navy to bear against Scotland. Kent wreaked havoc along the eastern coastline. Aberdeen suffered one of the worst attacks, as the city was burned, the surrounding area was pillaged, and the ships in its harbor, mostly stocked with barrels of salted fish, were stolen. The Orkney Islands received special attention from Kent in retaliation for the earl of Orkney's attack on Ireland in the summer. Orkney himself was killed in a naval battle against the earl of Huntingdon at Strangford Lough, ending Orkney's long career as admiral of Scotland.

    Aftermath
    The Battle of Newcastle was the greatest disaster for the Scots since the Battle of Neville's Cross nearly a half-century prior. Contemporary English writers had declared Edward V's victory at Arkinholm in 1385 a triumph, but while the capture of the heir to the Scottish throne was a major feat, the casualties of that battle were relatively low and had fallen most heavily on the French, and Scotland's ability to make war had not been much affected. Newcastle, on the other hand, gutted the southern Scottish nobility and left the country in a precarious position militarily, as Edward's counter-invasion demonstrated.

    The consequences of Newcastle did not stop with England's domination of Scotland on land and sea. The gutting of Scotland's southern nobility not only hollowed out the kingdom's defenses, but also left the earl of Carrick's political network in tatters. The triple marriage alliance between the Stewarts, the Douglases, and the Drummonds—three of the most influential families in southern Scotland—had provided Carrick a good base of support against his powerful and often troublesome younger brothers, particularly the earl of Fife. Now, there was nothing to hold Fife's ambitions in check.

    In late 1388 and 1389, Fife started installing his own allies into lordships once held by the Douglases. Fife claimed these men were only caretakers sent to guard the border from English attack, but Carrick's wife, Anabella Drummond, his sister, Isabel Stewart, who was Douglas's wife, and Isabel Douglas, who was Douglas's sister and Anabella's sister-in-law, suspected that Fife had plans to disinherit and dispossess their husbands. These three women formed the basis of a pro-Carrick, anti-Fife faction, but Fife's control of the lieutenancy, which was reconfirmed at a general council in December, and the simple fact that so many Carrick, Douglas and Drummond men were either dead or imprisoned in England, put Fife in the catbird seat.

    The English consolidated their position as the Scots divided against themselves. Edward V purchased the rights to ransom all the men captured in the battle and then refused to negotiate the release of his new prisoners until the matter of Carrick's ransom, and by extension the whole Anglo-Scottish war, was resolved. This meant that the Scottish march was effectively leaderless and critically undermanned, leaving Scotland dangerously exposed to further English incursions. It looked as though the English would be able to dictate terms in future negotiations with the Scots, but events on the continent soon brought them back to reality. The duke of Brittany betrayed England once again and made peace with France, the king of Bohemia proved to be a worthless ally, the duke of Guelders was quickly becoming more interested in crusade than continuing the war in the Low Countries, and the king of Naples died in Provence. In short, England had seen setbacks everywhere but Scotland. Edward's priority now became making peace with Scotland, and doing so quickly, so that he could turn his attention to the continent. His other priority was to strengthen England's position in Ireland following Scotland's raids on the island, and so installed his younger brother, Richard of Bordeaux, duke of Clarence, as lord lieutenant.

    On 20 January 1389, the English and Scots met in the first of a series of conferences at Melrose Abbey. It was mostly a ruin, having been destroyed in Edward's 1385 campaign, but had undergone some repairs. Its greatest advantage was its position, sitting between Roxburgh Castle, which the English controlled, and the lands of Roxburghshire that the Scots had reconquered in the late 1370s and 1380s. It thus allowed both the English and Scots to claim that they were negotiating on their own territory. The two sides picked up where they had left off a year prior, with England making huge financial demands and also offering to drastically cut these demands in exchange for Scotland's subordination to the English crown. Meetings went almost continuously through the spring, as messages flew back and forth to Holyrood and Westminster. A deal was struck on 25 June.

    On 2 August, the aged Robert II made a rare appearance on the Scottish marches to attend a ceremonial signing of a new peace. His second son and lieutenant, Fife, was there too. Edward V did not attend and instead sent his uncle, Gaunt, to represent him. The treaty that they sealed was not a permanent peace, as Edward had hoped, but a 20-year truce and financial settlement. Robert was forced to acknowledge that he had reneged on his 1371 agreement to settle the late David II's debts, which still stood at 32,000 marks (£21,333) in 1389. On top of this, Carrick's ransom was set at 60,000 marks (£40,000). The heir to the Scottish throne was to remain a prisoner until two-thirds of his ransom was paid, but payments to the English crown would not count Carrick's ransom until David's debts had been settled. The Scots agreed to pay 10,000 marks per annum for two years and to 4,000 marks per annum thereafter. A schedule for "march days" was set to hear cases of cross-border disputes and England was to keep its positions in southern Scotland until Scotland's financial obligations were met in full. The greater issue of Scottish sovereignty was kicked down the road.

    The Treaty of Melrose was a victory for both sides. The long truce secured England's northern border and promised to bring a fortune to the English crown just as it was moving the war with France back onto the continent. Indeed, Gaunt's son, Henry of Bolingbroke, earl of Derby, was already leading an army and marching into England and France's greatest showdown in more than three decades. At the same time, while the treaty inflicted major financial pain on the Scots, they had held onto their independence for the foreseeable future.

    The biggest winner at Melrose was neither Edward, who now had the freedom to make war on France, nor Robert, who had almost always preferred peace to war with England. It was Robert's second son, Fife. The payment schedule to which the Scots had agreed would keep Carrick in England for 15 more years and Fife, who was already secure in the lieutenancy, could only expect his influence to grow once their father, who was 73, inevitably passed away. Fife's only opposition was the faction led by Anabella, but her Douglas allies were themselves English prisoners, and they still had to negotiate and raise the funds for their own releases. Anabella would begin building up her and Carrick's sons as figureheads against Fife's rule in the 1390s, which would ultimately lead to the Stewart Civil War.
     
    Last edited:
    Second government of the uncles
  • Second government of the uncles
    The regency government of the kingdom of France of 1382 to 1388 managed the affairs of state during the later minority of King Charles VI of France. It is known as the second government of the uncles, as the kingdom was governed in Charles's name by three of his four uncles following the departure of Louis I, duke of Anjou, for Anjou's Crusade, which ended the first government of the uncles.

    The second government of the uncles was dominated by Philippe II, duke of Burgundy, who became the wealthiest man in France following his wife's inheritance of the county of Flanders. As regent of France, Burgundy deployed the crown's resources to further his own position in Flanders and the Low Countries. This was accepted by the political establishment for a time, but was the duke's undoing after the war with England began to turn against the French.

    Background
    Philippe II, duke of Burgundy, loyally served his brother, King Charles V of France, throughout his life. He provided advice and led campaigns when called upon to do so. He was a skilled diplomat and his kingly brother's favorite envoy to the English. The war was not the great project of the duke's life, though, as his wife, Marguerite of Flanders, was the greatest heiress of her generation. Burgundy would dedicate his life to acquiring Flanders and other lands that were set to come to her in time.

    The county of Flanders sat uneasily between England and France in the fourteenth century. On paper, it was a part of France, but it was highly autonomous and its people tended to view the kings of France more as hostile neighbors than as overlords. Flanders was one of the most densely urbanized parts of Europe, despite its lands being mostly infertile. Its large urban population had made it a commercial powerhouse, driven by a fantastically profitable cloth industry. It was dependent on England for wool to produce the cloth and on France for food to feed its people. Flemish noble and rebel leaders alike had aligned themselves with the English as a result of their economic ties, but Flanders was culturally, linguistically and politically distinct from both England and France.

    Marguerite's father, Louis II, count of Flanders, was a cunning man, despite his quick temper and tendency to hold grudges. He adhered to a strict policy of neutrality after the outbreak of the Caroline War in 1369. This kept Flanders peaceful and prosperous while England and France devastated each other, but it politically isolated the count. By the early 1380s, his only allies were his cousin, the duke of Brittany, and his son-in-law, Burgundy, who was his heir jure uxoris.

    The commercial power of Flanders generated extraordinary wealth, but it was highly concentrated in a small class of merchants and greater artisans, notably the weavers. These oligarchs monopolized power in the towns and worked closely with the local nobility. The oligarchs were constantly at odds with the lesser artisans, notably the fullers, and workers. The three great towns of Flanders—Bruges, Ghent, and Ypres—had seen riots break out at least eight times between 1359 and 1377 as a result of the class struggles. Economic anxiety made the situation even more volatile, as cloth prices plunged when new competition from Brabant, which had developed its own cloth industry, began to flood the market just as fashion trends among the elite began to shift toward Italian silk and velvet in the 1370s.

    Revolt of Ghent
    In 1379, the construction of a new canal between the Lys and Zwyn rivers would be the match that lit the powder keg of anxieties and resentments. The canal would allow river trade to bypass Ghent, which would hurt the town economically. Protests against its construction ran through the spring and into summer. In July, they turned violent when a group called the White Chaperons, who were named after the color and style of hoods they wore, attacked and killed several canal workers, then destroyed the work that had been done.

    Popular support for the Chaperons in Ghent was so great after the attack that the town's councilors were forced from power by an angry mob and the Chaperons were elected in their place. The count of Flanders sent a bailiff to Ghent in September to restore order, but the bailiff was lynched and the count's magnificent manor house was looted and burned. Comital officers were run out of town. Then, the Chaperons led the mob against the city's oligarchs.

    The revolt spread like wildfire. The town of Courtrai declared its support for the Chaperons before the end of the month. The lesser artisans of Ypres conspired with the Chaperons to overthrow their own oligarchs. All the smaller towns between Ghent and Ypres rose up once Ypres joined the revolt. Only Bruges remained loyal, though more out of its long-standing rivalry with Ghent than anything else. Towns in the Bruges orbit, like Damme and Sluys, were taken by force after the Chaperons organized a makeshift army. The oligarchs of Bruges then threw their lot in with Ghent, fearing they would be massacred if they held out any longer. Comital government had fallen. All of Flanders was under the control of the Chaperons.

    Burgundy mediated talks between the Chaperons and the count in late 1379. The count was forced to agree to abandon the canal project, devolve judicial power to the towns, lower taxes, and reconfirm town charters. It was a humiliating treaty that the count had no intention of honoring. In the new year, he sought aid from Charles V, but the king had no interest in a Flemish civil war or in supporting a man who had not supported him against England. The count waged his own war and retook control of much of Flanders, but Ghent itself held out.

    First government of the uncles
    Charles V died on 16 September 1380. His eldest brother, Louis I, duke of Anjou, became regent for the young King Charles VI of France, who was months shy of his twelfth birthday. The count of Flanders went back to Paris in hopes of gaining royal support for another campaign against Ghent in 1381, but Anjou was no more interested in supporting the count than his kingly brother had been. Over the course of the next year, Anjou steered France into a major financial crisis, northern France was left dangerously exposed, southern France was gripped by revolt, and the English conquered Saintonge. France was in crisis.

    On 7 January 1382, Anjou resigned the regency to launch his crusade for the kingdom of Naples. Jean, duke of Berry, was the next-most senior member of the royal family, but he possessed neither the skill nor the gravitas to lead the country. The regency thus fell to Burgundy, who immediately signaled his support for French intervention in Flanders. First, though, he had to confront the financial crisis left in Anjou's wake.

    Languedoïl
    Burgundy adopted a much more aggressive stance toward the Estates-General than Anjou had done. The administrators that the estates had appointed to collect taxes were dismissed and Burgundian officials were brought in to oversee tax collection. Towns and provincial assemblies, which had secured the right to assess their own taxes during Anjou's short time in office, were now informed by the crown as to what they were to collect and informed that royal officials would oversee the process. Local leaders had no time to react, as the collection was to begin on 1 March.

    On 24 February, orders for the reimposition of the aides reached Rouen. The reaction was immediate and extreme. Textile workers stormed the local administrative building and rang the tower bells to signal that the city was under threat. Two hundred armed men turned out to defend the town, chasing off local authorities in a demonstration of support for the workers. A meeting was called in the old market square, where the crowd grew drunk on wine stolen from local officials. The drunken mob elected the draper Jean le Gras "king." He declared an end to taxes, then reimposed them and abolished them again, over and over, drawing laughs from the crowd. The mood turned hostile as the farce continued, though. Anger toward the city's artisan leaders, who had grown enormously wealthy from shipbuilding in recent decades, exploded.

    The mob looted the homes of the bourgeoisie, breaking windows, carrying off gold and silver, destroying furniture and tapestries, and setting hotels ablaze. Their anger was not sated, though, and the mob turned next to royal officials. Administrators were killed and account books burned. Saint-Ouen Abbey was violated and those seeking its sanctuary were dragged onto the street and executed. The Jewish population was massacred in the county's latest pogrom.

    On 1 March, Burgundy led an army out of Paris toward Rouen. Just hours later, a Paris protest against the new regime grew heated and tax collectors were assaulted as they went to work. Hundreds of locals began pouring into the central marketplace, where the protests had begun, swelling the mob. The mass of people marched on the armory, which was only lightly guarded, and distributed mallets amongst themselves. The city had been denuded of defenders to support Burgundy's army, allowing the now-armed mob to go forth effectively unchallenged. A dispatch was sent recalling the duke to the city.

    Burgundy was already a half-day's ride from Paris when word reached him. By then, the registrar's office had been breached and its records destroyed, tax collectors had been cut down in the streets, and wealthy homes had been plundered. The Hôtel de Soissons, the duke of Anjou's personal residence, was turned into the headquarters of the most radical members of the mob. From there they planned a complete takeover of the city. The captain of Paris rallied the few men that remained under his command in hopes of holding off the mob until Burgundy could return, but he was overwhelmed. Other royal and local officials abandoned their posts.

    Burgundy camped his army outside Paris and heard the rebels' demands, which included the abolition of all taxes and a royal pardon for the city. He conceded nothing, the news of which led to further violence in the city. As the days passed, word of the uprising inspired revolts in Amiens, Caen, Orléans, and many more cities and towns. The movement, known as the Revolt of the Towns, did not budge Burgundy.

    On 29 March, Burgundy had the gates of Rouen battered down. A royal army entered the city with the young king himself at its head. Rebel leaders were rounded up and executed. Further bloodshed was averted only when the people of Rouen threw themselves at Charles's feet, accepting a gigantic fine of 100,000 francs and the revocation of the city's charter. Burgundy's demonstration of force brought smaller towns back into line. Cities and larger towns that held out were subjected to the same treatment, including Paris. On 1 June, Charles led his army into the capital. Rebel leaders who were told they did not need to fear punishment were arrested and executed on Burgundy's orders in a shocking double-cross. Charles V's administrative system was then rebuilt under Burgundian auspices.

    Tax revenue began to trickle in again over the summer, but it was slow. Burgundy needed to expand the tax base by reestablishing control over Languedoc, which had been in the grip of a larger and horribly violent uprising known as the Tuchin Revolt since the fall of 1381. The duke of Berry, who was the governor of Languedoc, had failed to restore order. Burgundy made plans to send Charles VI south, hoping the young king's presence at the head of the royal army would have the same effect that it had in Paris and Rouen. An army was assembled at Orléans, from where the king was supposed to lead it south to Languedoc. In September, though, the campaign was hastily called off, leaving Berry to his own devices.

    Flanders
    Burgundy may have hoped that his brutal repression of the revolts in northern France would cow Ghent into submission, but he would have badly misjudged the rebels of Flanders if he did. In early 1382, Ghent had elected Filips van Artevelde, son of the famed rebel of the 1330s and 40s, as its new leader. It signaled radical new aims for the revolt, as van Artevelde advocated for Ghent's full independence, hoping to establish Ghent as a city-state in northern Europe. In September, news arrived that van Artevelde had dispatched an embassy to Westminster. Alarmed, Burgundy abruptly canceled Charles VI's campaign to Languedoc and called the army that had been gathering at Orléans north.

    By 5 October, about 6,500 fighting men were gathered around Château de Vincennes, a royal fortress east of Paris. Charles led them north, arriving at Arras on 1 November. Another 3,500 men joined the army there over the next two weeks, more than half brought by Burgundy himself, bringing the army's total size to about 10,000. The count of Flanders raised his own army at Lille.

    The stakes of the campaign were enormously high, as the kingdom still simmered with popular anger. Both the highest-born nobility and the most lowly commoners followed news of the campaign closely, as it was widely believed that northern France would descend into chaos once more if the king failed in Flanders. Such expectations drove a high turnout from members of the nobility, who were eager to crush the lower classes. Most forewent raising levies, fearing that they would be betrayed by the common men in the field. This may have been a wise decision given that, in some areas, bands of peasants and townsmen worked to obstruct the movement of men and materials to Flanders. Most made it through, though, and the result was that that royal army was overwhelmingly made up of cavalry and professional soldiers.

    Ghent had the support of a number of towns, but that support was shaky. Still, the class divisions and popular anger that drove recruitment for the royal army worked for the rebels as well. Van Artevelde had about 35,000 men under his command, but his talks with England had come to little. Drowning in debt and led by a dysfunctional regency council as a result of Lancaster's Crusade, the English allowed van Artevelde to recruit volunteers in England but gave him no other support. As a result, his army was made up of raw, lowborn recruits who had no experience in war. Perhaps not understanding the disadvantage, as van Artevelde himself was no soldier, the rebels formed a field army and prepared for battle.

    Bertrand du Guesclin, constable of France, was advising Castile as it fought against Lancaster's Crusade. In his absence, another Breton lord, Olivier V de Clisson, had emerged as the crown's top military advisor. He sought a quick confrontation with the rebels, but discovered they had destroyed the bridge over the Lys at Comines. A small French force forded the river, dispersed the rebels on the other side, and repaired the bridge. The whole French army was across by 20 November.

    Rebel support evaporated once the royal army crossed the Lys. The townsmen of Ypres feared a sack and turned against the Chaperons, who were rounded up and arrested. The gates were thrown open to the royal army and the Chaperons, clapped in chains, were handed over to the king. He ordered their immediate executions.

    Ypres was spared for its quick return to royal authority. Other towns in the area were not so lucky. The royal army washed over the surrounding land, burning and looting as they went. Whole towns were razed to the ground and their people slaughtered for harboring the rebels of Ghent.

    On 27 November, van Artevelde made a desperate last stand near the village of Roosebeke. He had only about 60 English men-at-arms with him as volunteers, but he took their advice seriously. As a result, he took a defensive position atop a hill despite his huge numerical advantage over the French. It did not matter.

    Charles had the Oriflamme, France's holy war banner, unfurled. Clisson ordered a French infantry attack on the enemy center. The slow attack uphill gave van Artevelde false hope, but cavalry divisions outflanked the rebel army and surrounded it. A massacre followed, as the well-armed and armored French killed at least 28,000 of the 35,000 poorly-equipped rebels on the field that day. Van Artevelde was among them.

    The rebellion in Flanders collapsed overnight. Townsmen threw out any rebel leaders who had survived the battle. In just the first two days following the battle, 240 rebels were delivered to the king and the count of Flanders as symbols of towns' submissions. They were all executed, and more followed. Ghent was all alone by December, as the royal army surrounded the town. A sack was widely expected, but cold winter weather arrived early and forced the French to withdraw before taking the town. It would continue to resist until 1385, but it would never again draw significant Flemish support from beyond its own walls. As news of the massacre at Roosebeke spread, organized opposition to the crown disappeared from the towns of northern France. Burgundy had secured both his wife's inheritance and his grip on power in Paris.

    Languedoc
    The Battle of Roosebeke may have extinguished the last embers of the Revolt of the Towns in the north, but the south continued to resist royal authority. The duke of Berry failed to take any significant action against the Tuchins after the king's southern campaign was canceled in 1382. Lacking reinforcements from the crown and unable to draw on the resources of the south as a result of the revolt, Berry agreed to pursue talks with the Tuchins.

    Tuchin Revolt
    In early 1383, Simon de Cramaud, bishop of Agen, who was one of Berry's closest advisors, took the first steps toward opening a dialogue with key rebel leaders. In February and March, Cramaud convinced many Tuchins to lay down their arms and began reintegrating their communities into the natural order of society as it was seen at the time. He made two key concessions to buy peace with the Tuchins. First, the rebels were given freedom of movement for a time, allowing peasants and townsmen to choose where they wanted to settle before returning to medieval life. Second, the Tuchins were allowed to testify as to the state of the realm in the south and the reasons for their revolt.

    In May, the ducal court began hearings on some of the abuses that had driven the Tuchins to rebel in the first place. The former rebels testified that their local lords and crown officials had often acted no differently than the routiers, rustling cattle and shaking down peasants and townsmen for all their movable wealth. The duke of Berry was serious about punishing wrongdoers and the greatest offenders, like Gantonnet d'Abzac, lord of Montastruc, were to be stripped of their offices. This effort was mostly successful, but in the case of Abzac and some others, local lords rejected Berry's appeasement of the Tuchins and continued a private war against the former rebels for years.

    Lords like Abzac were not alone in rejecting the truce that Berry was working out. Some of the more radical members of the Tuchins elected Pierre de Brugère, a disaffected knight from Auvergne, as their leader. He organized country squires, peasants, and townsmen into a makeshift army and seized three royal castles in Languedoc and looted four more. Berry gave no response until he himself was attacked by Brugère's men in December 1383. The attackers made off with the duke's treasure and killed several men in his entourage. It was a sign of the impotency of Berry's governorship that not even he could safely travel through the region. A sparsely-attended assembly of the Estates-General of Languedoc was overseen by Gaston III, count of Foix, as a result of the attack and plans were made to crack down on those who did not abide by Berry's truce.

    Brugère was captured by ducal forces and executed in Auvergne on 27 May 1384. Radicals within the Tuchinate continued to fight on, but failed to learn from Filips van Artevelde's mistakes in Flanders. They organized an army of 4,000 local levies and met one of Berry's lieutenants, Armand V, viscount of Randon, in battle near the town of Mentières. Though Tuchins outnumbered Randon's forces by about three to one, the result was the same as it was at Roosebeke. Randon took no prisoners in the ensuing slaughter. The Tuchin Revolt was at an end, as its last leaders made peace with Berry's government.

    Armagnac and Foix
    In 1382, Jean II, count of Armagnac, watched his brother-in-law, Berry's, feckless rule with growing horror. The two men had become estranged after the Battle of Rabastens a year prior, at which the count of Foix's forces had ambushed and destroyed an Armagnac army. Effectively neutered, Armagnac was outraged that Berry did nothing to punish Foix for his surprise attack. Now the most powerful figure in southern France, Foix broke his truce with Armagnac.

    In June, Foix ended his son and heir's betrothal to Armagnac's daughter, then launched a guerilla war against his rival. Foix did not fear reprisal from Berry, who needed Foix to maintain order around Toulouse while royal forces fought the routiers and negotiated with the Tuchins in Auvergne. Armagnac's position grew desperate and, in 1383, the count called on his bastard half-brother, Bernard d'Armagnac, a routier captain and member of the Confederation of Carlat, for support.

    The Bastard of Armagnac's forces were battle-hardened professionals and they soon retook Saint-Antonin, an Armagnac town in Rouergue that had been captured by Foix's forces. The setback led Foix to alert the duke of Berry of the Bastard's arrival in the area. Royal forces were working to dislodge members of the Confederation of Carlat from Auvergne, so the count of Armagnac's employment of one of their members drew serious scorn. Berry ordered Armagnac to make peace with Foix, who agreed to a truce in June 1383, before any more of his gains could be reversed. Armagnac was so outraged by Berry's mistreatment that he quietly opened a channel to the English to discuss a switch of allegiance. Armagnac died on 26 May 1384, though, before such negotiations could proceed very far. Once a regional powerhouse, he spent the last year of his life nursing personal grudges in political isolation. His death was not widely mourned. The count's eldest son succeeded him as Jean III, count of Armagnac.

    The new count of Armagnac set about rebuilding the dynasty that his father had nearly destroyed. He sought peace with Foix, agreeing to cede a number of key positions in Comminges, and put himself at the disposal of his uncle, Berry, eager to help pacify the region. The young count quickly became his uncle's new favorite. In 1385, Berry was recalled to Paris ahead of a renewal of the war with England. He left young Armagnac as his lieutenant governor, a sign of the family's rebounding fortunes.

    Dominance
    On 20 January 1383, Burgundy restored all taxes that had been abolished by the Estates-General. He did so by royal fiat, disregarding his brother Anjou's concession to seek the estates' approval for new taxes. Burgundy simultaneously declared organized opposition to taxation to be a treasonable offense. The execution of a handful of protesters in Paris quickly established that he was not bluffing. By summer, the crown had significant revenues coming in for the first time in three years. The same summer, ambassadors from England began pressing for a truce. Burgundy welcomed talks, needing time to pay off the enormous debts that the crown had racked up since 1379 before he could turn his attention to the war with England.

    England's interest in a ceasefire came as a result of its political paralysis. The duke of Lancaster had served as regent of England since 1377, but he had effectively vacated the position to pursue the crown of Castile in 1382. A regency council was formed to manage royal government in his absence, but it lacked a clear leader and quickly broke down into petty personal conflicts. Burgundy sought a five-year truce, but settled for six months. This was extended twice, ultimately pausing hostilities until summer 1385. Burgundy, in total control of the French government, used this time much more effectively than his squabbling English counterparts.

    Diplomacy
    In spring 1383, Burgundy sought to reconcile the French crown with King Charles II of Navarre. This came to little, as Charles would not break from his English allies when Lancaster's Crusade was off to a strong start. Charles's eldest son and heir, also named Charles, was open to Burgundy's diplomatic overtures, though. Charles II's younger children had been prisoners of the French crown since 1378. One of the children, Blanche, had died in French custody during an outbreak of the plague in 1382. Another, Bonne, died in 1383. In a shocking move, Charles the Younger procured the release of his surviving siblings by handing himself over to the French.

    Burgundy gladly welcomed the prince. He had not quite managed to break the Anglo-Navarrese alliance, but he had massively confused the political situation in Pamplona and strained relations between the two allies. Charles the Younger lived in luxury as a "prisoner" in Paris. He was even given a stipend from the French crown and encouraged to surround himself with friends from Navarre, as Burgundy attempted to build up a rival Navarrese court around the prince in France. This proved all too easy. Trading his own freedom for that of his siblings was celebrated as a great chivalric act and earned the prince many admirers, including the young French king. It also earned him the nickname "Charles the Noble."

    Flemish inheritance
    On 30 January 1384, Louis II, count of Flanders, died. Burgundy's wife, Marguerite, inherited the French counties of Artois, Flanders, Nevers, and Rethel and the imperial county of Burgundy. The late count was honored with a lavish funeral. Burgundy and Marguerite then embarked on a grand tour of their new lands, which cost an estimated 100,000 francs (£16,667). The French royal treasury bore the cost of Burgundy's procession. A similar misappropriation of royal funds had created major scandal for the duke of Anjou in 1381, but Burgundy was indisputably the master of France by 1384, and no one dared to question him. French funds would continue to flow freely into Burgundian pockets as royal policy became increasingly intertwined with the duke's interests in the Low Countries moving forward.

    Burgundy began exploring ways to extend his influence further into the Low Countries almost as soon as his wife had succeeded to the county of Flanders. To the east of Flanders was the wealthy duchy of Brabant. It was held by Marguerite's childless aunt, but its line of inheritance was being disputed by King Václav IV of Bohemia. To the north and south of Flanders were the counties of Hainaut, Holland and Zeeland. The three counties were controlled by Albrecht I, duke of Bavaria-Straubing, who was heir to and regent of these lands as a result of his childless brother's madness. Albrecht was a member of the house of Wittelsbach, the main rival to the house of Luxembourg, from which Václav hailed, and was thus a potential ally for Burgundy. The two men traded embassies through 1384 and, on 12 April 1385, a double wedding was celebrated in which Burgundy's eldest son and heir, Jean, and one of his daughters, Marguerite, were married to Margarete of Bavaria and Wilhelm of Bavaria, one of Albrecht's daughters and his eldest son and heir. On 17 July, just three months after the double wedding, the Burgundian-Wittelsbach alliance was drawn even closer, as Charles VI married one of Albrecht's nieces, Isabeau of Bavaria, the daughter of Stephan III, duke of Bavaria-Ingolstadt, who hailed from a more senior branch of the family.

    As the Wittelsbach alliance was coming together, Burgundy pressed his wife's claim to Brabant. He sent two of his closest advisors to Brussels ahead of his own visit. He was escorted there by 89 knights and squires. His wife's aunt, Jeanne, suo jure duchess of Brabant, recognized Marguerite as heiress to the duchy and repudiated Václav's claims. Burgundy received the homage of 17 leading Brabantine nobles. Burgundy showered his new liege men with gifts and pensions, many of which were paid from the French treasury.

    Preparations for war
    The Flemish inheritance led to a rather dramatic reversal of French war policy. The English colony of Calais was a clear and present danger to Burgundy's holdings in the Low Countries and northern France. Calais itself was a part of the county of Artois, or so the French argued, and therefore one of Burgundy's many holdings. The English garrison of Calais had impoverished Artois with constant raids in the 1370s and 80s. Repeated attempts to conquer the town had failed, though Burgundy had come close in 1377. England still held eight outlying fortresses in the Pale of Calais, as well as a tower that guarded the harbor, and a field of brush and marshland further protected the English position. Mounting another attack on Calais seemed to be a fool's errand. A diplomatic transfer was impossible, as the English had flatly refused to surrender it through countless rounds of talks. In 1384, French ministers suggested that an invasion of the English mainland might force England to put Calais on the negotiating table. The idea immediately captured Burgundy's imagination. He soon emerged as its chief proponent and France's leading war hawk.

    In June 1384, Burgundy dispatched an embassy to Scotland. French ambassadors found the aged Scottish king's eldest son and heir, John Stewart, earl of Carrick, to be the dominant political figure in the realm and soon talked him into plans for a joint invasion of England. As Burgundy had set his mind to making war on England in the coming year, he skipped a major diplomatic conference with the English that summer.

    Burgundy turned next to Brittany. Jean IV, duke of Brittany, was an on-again, off-again English ally. The duke of Anjou had successfully cleaved the most recent Anglo-Breton alliance in 1380, but Burgundy wanted to pull the duke even closer into the Francosphere. Burgundy had reluctantly appointed one of the duke's fiercest rivals, Olivier de Clisson, as constable of France after Bertrand du Guesclin died of illness while in Castile in 1383. Burgundy hated Clisson almost as much as Jean, but Clisson had amassed a colossal cash fortune and was one of the French crown's chief lenders during the early-80s debt crisis. Burgundy thus felt compelled to name Clisson to the position despite his personal opinion of the man. Now, he had to ensure that the appointment did not push Jean back toward the English.

    Jean's wife, Joan Holland, who was a half-sister of the young king of England, died in October 1384. Their childless marriage left Jean without a direct heir. In just a couple of months, Burgundy connected his new protégé, Charles the Noble, with the newly-widowed Jean in hopes of building an alliance between them while drawing them both closer to the French crown and Burgundy himself.

    On 12 April 1385, representatives of the king of Navarre arrived at Nantes to formally offer Jean the hand of a Navarrese princess in marriage. By this time, Lancaster's Crusade was nearing an inglorious end and Charles II of Navarre was open to a rapprochement with France. His ambassadors picked up where Burgundy and Charles the Noble had left off, but talks were hung up on the size of the girl's dowry. After more than a year of talks, Burgundy made a naked attempt to buy Jean's loyalty, as the French crown paid part of the dowry to finalize the marriage arrangement. The bribe worked, leading Jean to lay siege to English-occupied Saint-Malo in 1386.

    Decline
    In 1385, plans for a joint Franco-Scottish invasion of England foundered. King Edward V of England turned back the northern arm of the invasion, defeating the Scots at the Battle of Arkinholm and taking the heir to the Scottish throne prisoner. The southern arm never materialized, as Ghent breathed its last gasp of revolt. In July, as the French celebrated their young king's marriage, rebels launched a surprise attack on Damme, disrupting the movement of supplies to the army gathering at Sluys. The invasion was postponed until the following year, and Burgundy finally agreed to negotiate a settlement with Ghent. He conceded to grant the town new rights and privileges, and even offered the rebels a royal pardon to demonstrate his goodwill. It was an embarrassing climbdown for Burgundy, who had refused talks since inheriting the county.

    The French were undeterred by the failure to launch the 1385 invasion. They believed that it took no great skill for the king of England to defeat the Scots, who they derided as simple brutes and brigands, and Ghent's submission had removed the only threat to launching an invasion from the south. Plans for the invasion were moved to 1386, but on a much larger scale. Charles himself insisted on leading the attack, with his uncles at his side. An army of 30,000 was gathered. Turnout was so high that it caused delays, as more ships were needed to ferry the army across the sea. The duke of Berry's concerns that the king would be exposed to attack in the long time needed to disembark such a force created even more delays, exposing the French armada to attack. On 19 September 1386, Edward V led a much smaller English fleet in a daring attack on Sluys, capturing hundreds of ships, destroying dozens more, and leaving some 6,000 Frenchmen dead. The invasion was called off and the king's enormous army disbanded. The Battle of Écluse was an enormous blow to French prestige, as all the crowned heads of Europe had been following the massive French military buildup through the course of the year.

    The second invasion's failure loosened Burgundy's grip on power. The costs of back-to-back campaigns in 1385 and 1386—neither of which had actually made it to England—had been staggering. Royal revenues could not keep up with expenses, as Burgundy had massively expanded the size of government to grant jobs and pensions to his and Berry's supporters. Debts began to pile up. Loans were forced upon cash-rich nobles and the church while the coinage was devalued to repay lenders, which was overwhelmingly unpopular. These moves brought Burgundy serious criticism for the first time since the duke of Anjou's departure. Charles himself was cold toward Burgundy and Berry. As the king was in his late teens by this time, his opinions carried greater weight and his seeming disregard for his uncles began to turn much of the court against them.

    Burgundy's position toward England began to soften after the failure of the 1386 campaign. This was partly a response to the criticism of his leadership in 1386 and 1387, but it was mostly as a result of the economic pain he had inflicted on himself by instituting a Flemish embargo on English goods in 1385. Burgundy expected that the financial hit to England would be greater than the one he took himself, but the English arranged a trade deal with the burghers of Middelburg, a port city in Zeeland, to keep English wool flowing into Brabant's rival cloth industry. Burgundy had succeeded only in hurting cloth producers in Flanders. Near the end of 1386, he approved a diplomatic mission led by King Levon V of Armenia to secure a truce while also dropping the embargo. The talks went nowhere and the English fought a war of piracy through 1387, capturing dozens of French and Flemish trade vessels.

    Crisis in Brittany
    As peace talks failed, the French prepared for another year of war in 1387. Plans for an invasion of England were drawn up yet again, this time on a much smaller scale, but were again canceled, this time because the campaign's leader, Clisson, was arrested by the duke of Brittany in June.

    Burgundy had bribed Jean IV into attacking English positions in Brittany by having the French crown cover part of Jean's new wife's dowry in 1386. After England's triumph over the French armada at Sluys, though, the English retaliated against the duke for his failed siege of Saint-Malo by finally releasing Jean de Blois after more than 30 years of captivity.

    Jean de Blois was the eldest son and heir of Jeanne de Penthièvre, Jean IV's niece and dynastic rival in the long-running War of the Breton Succession. Jeanne had died in 1384 and Clisson, a die-hard supporter of the Blois-Penthièvre faction, had been trying to ransom Jean de Blois since early 1385. The English had refused only to avoid direct confrontation with Jean IV, but his half-hearted siege of English-controlled Saint-Malo had forced the issue for them. Clisson paid the English 60,000 francs (£10,000) for Jean de Blois's release in early 1387 and then arranged for Blois to wed his (Clisson's) daughter, Marguerite. The duke of Brittany saw these actions as a prelude to rebellion and arrested Clisson after a meeting of the Breton nobility.

    The arrest of a royal official by a peer of the realm sent shockwaves through France. Clisson was one of the young king's favorites and Charles VI took a strong interest in the situation. Burgundy, who was in Flanders at the time, rushed to be at the king's side, but found the royal court filled with Clisson supporters upon his arrival.

    The Breton crisis was the first time since 1382 that Burgundy was not in total control of events. Charles was threatening to invade Brittany to secure Clisson's release. Burgundy eventually talked the king down, but was forced to take a much harder line against the duke of Brittany than he wanted. Jean released the constable and agreed to appear before the king in six months' time or pay a fine of 100,000 francs. Burgundy's efforts to draw Brittany closer to the French crown were entirely undone and Jean IV was dangerously isolated, having angered both the kings of England and France.

    War in the Low Countries
    In 1385, Willem I, duke of Guelders, a scion of the house of Jülich, agreed to an alliance with the English. Its terms were vague, but it was enough to bring the young, warlike, and intensely anti-French duke into a war with Brabant, which neighbored Guelders and was allied with Burgundy and France. Willem waited until 1386 to make his move, timing his attack to exploit France's preparations for an invasion of England. After the French invasion failed to launch, Guelders negotiated a one-year truce with Brabant, and Willem moved to England to make plans for a joint 1388 campaign. The king of Bohemia joined England and Guelders in an alliance to press his claim to Brabant, which had been set aside in favor of the Burgundian claim.

    In May 1388, the king's council met in Paris. The small council of 12 that the uncles had established in 1380 and whose membership they had fiercely guarded against outsiders for nearly eight years was now greatly expanded in size to include outside nobles and prelates, as criticism of the uncles had become much too intense for them to continue monopolizing power. Burgundy's diminished influence was immediately clear. The new three-way alliance between England, Guelders, and Luxembourg was a real threat to Burgundy's inheritance of Brabant, but he could no longer dictate royal priorities and the council was more interested in bringing the duke of Brittany before the king than in securing Burgundy's claim to Brabant. In a twist, though, Burgundy won the support of the king with an assist from the duke of Guelders himself. Willem penned an insulting letter to Charles VI, whom he addressed as the "so-called king of France," endorsing Edward's claim to the French throne. Charles declared that he would challenge Willem's dishonor, endorsing a campaign to Guelders.

    Even with the king's support, the royal army that Burgundy wanted to fight his war for him was delayed until the fall so that the Breton crisis could be resolved. Once Jean had formally apologized and been pardoned, an army was summoned. By fall, though, the threat to Brabant had already passed. Václav, upon learning the size of the army that the French were gathering, lost his nerve and broke his alliance with England and Guelders. At the same time, the English invasion was delayed by a renewal of hostilities with Scotland. The duke of Guelders, completely on his own, held out long enough for the French to fall to an unseasonably wet and chilly autumn. As thousands of men grew sick from the damp cold and soaked food stores began to rot, Charles was forced to withdraw. The anticlimactic end to such a large and expensive campaign drew many comparisons to the failed invasions of England and criticism of Burgundy's leadership became too loud to ignore. Charles disbanded the army and called his lords to a great council at Reims.

    War with the routiers
    Jean III, count of Armagnac, was appointed lieutenant governor of Languedoc in 1385, as the duke of Berry was called north ahead of the renewal of hostilities with England. The 1385 invasion of England failed to launch, but Berry remained in the north, as he was expected to take part in the 1386 invasion. It never materialized either, but still Berry remained in the north as the country was gripped first by the arrest of Clisson in 1387 and then the invasion of Guelders in 1388. As a result, he never returned to Languedoc before Charles VI reached his majority.

    Armagnac's top priority as lieutenant governor was the war with the routiers, but it seemed futile. Campaigns against the routiers only drove them from one area to another. Instead of fighting a never-ending war against the brigands, the young count decided to buy them all out. He embarked on a tour of provincial assemblies to raise funds for the plan, but raising taxes to commission the routiers was controversial to say the least. Still, the energetic young count won enough people over to begin doing just that. Through late 1385 and early 1386, he signed contracts with companies large and small.

    Armagnac's activity quickly aroused suspicions in Milan. Gian Galeazzo Visconti had only usurped his uncle, Bernbabò Visconti, and installed himself as lord of Milan months before Armagnac started buying up routier contracts. Considering that Armagnac's sister, Béatrix, was married to one of Bernabò's sons, Carlo, Gian Galeazzo feared that Armagnac may be planning an invasion to restore Bernbabò or to install Carlo as lord. Milanese embassies were dispatched to London and Paris, the beginning of a years-long diplomatic policy in which Gian Galeazzo would play the two sides off one another to protect his own interests in northern Italy. As part of this, he would arrange for his cousin, Lucia, to wed Edward V's half-brother, John Holland, in 1386, then for his daughter, Valentina, to wed Charles VI's brother, Louis, in 1387.

    The target of Armagnac's scheme was not Milan, though. It was Foix. Just two years after signing a peace, Armagnac was preparing to reopen the war and retake the positions he had ceded in Comminges. This was a matter of honor for Armagnac, as his wife was suo jure countess of Comminges. He had a surprising ally in this: Foix's only legitimate son and heir, Gaston.

    Gaston's treachery was exposed when Armagnac's routier scheme collapsed and he fled Foix. The routiers would continue to plague southern France into Charles VI's majority. Armagnac would again try to buy out their positions in the early 1390s, leading to the Roussillon War with Aragon.

    Downfall
    On 3 November 1388, Charles VI presided over a great council at the archbishop's palace in Reims. It was a hastily-arranged meeting, but attendance was high, given that a large number of lords had turned out for the Guelders campaign and then followed the king straight to Reims. In his opening remarks, Charles declared an end to the regency.

    The news seemed to surprise the uncles, as the duke of Berry asked the king to discuss the matter further when they returned to Paris. It seemed much less of a surprise to others present, as the event was quite well choreographed. The location was highly symbolic, as the king had been crowned there eight years earlier, and a number of lawyers had come from Paris to join the king at Reims on his return from the Guelders campaign. Pierre Aycelin de Montaigut, cardinal-bishop of Laon, who was a close ally of Pope Clement VII of Avignon, was on hand. Richard Picque, archbishop of Reims, endorsed the king's decision with a speech too well composed to have been impromptu. The king offered Burgundy and Berry platitudes for their years of service. The uncles had been outmaneuvered. Their government was over.

    The loss of the regency was a major blow to Burgundy, whose collections from the royal treasury in the 1380s was equal to the combined revenues of all his southern territories—the two Burgundies and Nevers—over that same period. After his downfall, he left Paris for Dijon. Berry finally returned south to resume his post as governor of Languedoc. Charles sought their advice on occasion, but they became just two voices among the many gathered in great councils.

    King Charles VI
    Charles acted quickly to turn the page on the government of the uncles. Royal offices were immediately downsized, as scores of positions created to provide salaries for Burgundy and Berry's followers were eliminated. Runaway expenditures were reined in, as hundreds of pensions awarded to the dukes' supporters were canceled. Corrupt staff unaffiliated with the dukes, but who had used their rule as an opportunity to line their own pockets, were put on trial. Incompetent administrators of the royal demesne, who had allowed collection of fees and rents to fall behind, were removed from office.

    Favorites
    The purge of ducal supporters brought the leading lights of King Charles V's government back to power. The late king's close friend and long-serving chamberlain, Bureau de La Rivière, came to be at Charles VI's side almost constantly. Jean le Mercier, a lowborn notary ennobled by Charles V, became head of Charles VI's household. Jean de Montagu, rumored to have been a bastard son of Charles V, was made treasurer. One of Charles V's most talented tax officials, Nicolas du Bosc, bishop of Bayeux, returned to oversee the reform of government finances. These men and others close to the king were mockingly referred to as "the little people" or the "marmousets" by the members of the upper nobility.

    The leading figure in royal government was now Olivier V de Clisson, constable of France, who had likely organized the uncles' downfall in the first place. Burgundy and Berry had hated Clisson for years, but their support for the duke of Brittany during the crisis of 1387 had put Clisson's life in jeopardy. Clisson was one of Charles's favorites and likely the only man close enough to the king with the political skill to so quietly orchestrate the counter-coup at Reims.

    Unlike Burgundy and Berry, Charles's maternal uncle, Louis II, duke of Bourbon, did not fall from grace when the government of the uncles was dissolved. Bourbon had been a part of the regency under both Anjou and Burgundy, but had avoided getting caught up in their ambitions. He had instead focused on military matters and the education of the young king. Bourbon was one of the finest knights in France and he ensured that Charles had a strong martial upbringing. He spent more time with the king than Anjou, Berry or Burgundy and was the king's favorite uncle. After Charles declared his majority, his councilors called Bourbon "the good duke."

    A new generation of French nobles surrounded Charles VI. Among them were Jean, count of Nevers, one of the king's cousins and the eldest son and heir of the duke of Burgundy. Two of Burgundy's former protégés, Charles the Noble, who had succeeded his father as King Charles III of Navarre in 1387, and Waleran III, count of Saint-Pol, were as well. Their presence did not help Burgundy's interests, though. Charles VI was rarely involved in government business, which he left to the marmousets. Instead, he and his young friends busied themselves drinking, feasting, jousting, and whoring. His cousins Henri of Bar, eldest son and heir of the duke of Bar, and Pierre of Navarre, younger brother of Charles III, were among the most debaucherous members of the king's court. The king's brother, Louis, was its second star, though. Charles and Louis had been raised in the same household for their whole lives until Charles's majority and were extremely close.

    The young French court also included a number of noble women. Charles's queen, Isabeau of Bavaria, set an extravagant standard by which all others were measured. Charles III's wife, the lively and whimsical Elizabeth of Lancaster, quickly became one of the French king's favorite women at court. When Elizabeth bore a son, named Charles, in 1387, there were whispers that Charles VI was the child's true father, not Charles III. Another Englishwoman, Maud Holland, countess of Saint-Pol, was honored by Charles as the most beautiful woman at a tournament in 1389, when his own wife was pregnant and away from court.

    Charles was enormously generous toward his friends. One of his first acts after assuming his majority was to raise his beloved brother, Louis, from the relatively poor dukedom of Touraine to the wealthier dukedom of Orléans. In 1389, the king allowed Charles III to return to Pamplona without ransom, despite his having technically been a prisoner of the French crown since 1383.

    Policy
    Charles VI's declaration of his majority may have seen the return of his father's advisors, but he was his own man and a very different sort of king. He was athletic and strong, where his father was sickly throughout his life. He was an impressive horseman who rode in tournaments and dreamed about winning glory in battle, where his father was more comfortable planning campaigns in council meetings. Charles VI looked like the ideal medieval king in most every way, but what his father had lacked in physical prowess he had more than made up for in extraordinary drive, focus, and intelligence. On these measures, Charles VI fell far short. He was careless and lazy, often sleeping to midday after long, raucous nights. He lost interest in things easily and struggled to understand complex issues. Charles V worked directly with his council on almost every issue, but the marmousets were largely left to their own devices under Charles VI.

    Charles V and Charles VI differed most strikingly when it came to matters of war with England. Charles V had reopened the war in 1369 with the goal of throwing the English off the continent, but he was pragmatic enough to consider compromise when it suited him. He had dedicated practically his whole reign to this war, but Charles VI had little interest in it. Charles VI was thirsting for war, but had dreamt only of crusade since King Levon V of Armenia had appeared at the French court in 1385. Levon, who lost his kingdom to the Mamluk conquests of the mid 1370s, had dazzled Charles with stories from the east and impressed upon Charles a sense of the divine responsibilities he had a Christian king. Charles imagined himself ending the schism in the church, restoring Levon to his throne, freeing the emperor in Constantinople from the constant harassment of the Turks, and even restoring the kingdom of Jerusalem. As Charles VI came into his own in 1388 and 1389, though, the only war he had to fight was with England. In this conflict, he was on the back foot, as his distant cousin across the Channel was already on the move. The two sides would have their greatest direct confrontation in more than three decades just a year after Charles declared his majority.
     
    Last edited:
    Battle of Carcassonne
  • Battle of Carcassonne
    The Battle of Carcassonne was fought on 3 October 1389 between an Anglo-Gascon army led by Henry of Bolingbroke, 3rd earl of Derby, and a French force under the command of Louis II, duke of Bourbon. The battle was forced after the English raided deep into French territory and were then cut off from Gascony by Bourbon. The encounter was a turning point in the Caroline War and one of the greatest showdowns in the Hundred Years War.

    Background
    English monarchs had held lands and titles in the kingdom of France since the Norman Conquest, making them vassals of the French crown since 1066. This created an awkward feudal dynamic in which English kings were often the most powerful figures in France, but subordinate to the kings of France, while they were also equals to the kings of France as kings in their own right. At their height in the 12th century, the English controlled roughly the western half of France, but lost the duchy of Normandy and the counties of Anjou, Maine, Touraine and Poitou in the early 13th century, keeping only the duchy of Gascony and part of the duchy of Aquitaine. They lost much of the rest of Aquitaine and part of Gascony in wars in the late 13th and early 14th centuries. Gascony was thus at the center of the Hundred Years War from the war's start in 1337.

    English victory in the Edwardian War led to the 1360 Treaty of Brétigny, which enormously expanded their position in southwestern France. They quickly lost these gains when the Caroline War broke out in 1369, with the French reconquering most everything by 1375, when a truce was agreed for two years. A new French offensive in 1377 fell short of completing the reconquest. In the early 1380s, the dysfunction that followed the death of King Charles V of France allowed the English to go on the offensive and take control of Saintonge. They were unable to follow up on that success, though, and another truce was agreed in 1383, lasting until 1385.

    Hostilities between England and France were renewed in 1385, but fighting in and around Gascony was a local affair, as the French twice tried and failed to invade mainland England rather than continue the war in the south. The region only received attention from the English in late 1386, when King Edward V of England appointed his cousin, Henry of Bolingbroke, 3rd earl of Derby, lord lieutenant of Aquitaine in the Coronation Parliament.

    Part of Bolingbroke's brief was to bring King Charles II of Navarre into a new alliance with England, but Bolingbroke arrived shortly after the king's gruesome death. Bolingbroke was then left to his own devices, as England was preoccupied by war in the Low Countries and with Scotland. His top priority through 1387 and 1388 was keeping the routier companies from selling their allegiance to Jean III, count of Armagnac, the lieutenant governor of Languedoc. Armagnac was fundraising to raise an army and dogging routier captains to sign up with him, similar to what he had done in the months leading up to Gaston's Rebellion. Fearing that Gascony had become the target of Armagnac's ambition, Bolingbroke spent the better part of two years bribing and charming the routiers to maintain their English sympathies.

    Prelude
    Scottish hostility over the summer of 1388 forced Edward V to call off an expedition to the Low Countries, which the English had been planning for more than a year. The news reached Bordeaux in late August. Bolingbroke, who had been making the case for a southern campaign in letters and through Gascon representatives for at least a year by this time, set sail for London at once.

    On 10 September 1388, Edward V issued summons for a parliament after having completed a three-week punitive campaign to Scotland. It assembled six weeks later, on 22 October, in Cambridge. The scale of the English victory at Newcastle wowed the assembly, but reports that the king's continental alliances were falling apart sowed doubts about the war with France. Since the beginning of the year, an alliance with the duke of Brittany had been made and already betrayed, the king of Bohemia had proven useless, the duke of Guelders was looking to make peace with French-allied Brabant, and the king of Naples, who was Edward's father-in-law, had died in Provence. The king and parliament had worked remarkably well together since Edward had declared his majority in late 1384, and tax revenue had flowed freely in the years since. Now, though, questions arose as to how exactly the war could be won. Bolingbroke was eager to offer his own opinion in the Lords, and Aquitaine finally rose to the top of the royal agenda.

    On 3 November, King Charles VI of France convened a great council at Reims and dissolved the regency that had been leading the kingdom in his name, taking personal control of the royal government. The young king brought many of his father's councilors back to power, then left them to their own devices. Charles did not directly involve himself in the administration of affairs, and his opinions were easily influenced by those in his trust, but there were matters that were dear to him personally and that he pushed onto the agenda. At the top of the list were the schism in the church and the advances of the Ottoman Turks in the Balkans. Charles had comparatively little interest in the war with England, which made him open to a negotiated peace. His new council encouraged his instincts in this area and a new round of talks was organized.

    Anglo-French meetings had become regular events at the small village of Leulinghem over the course of the 1380s, but conference after conference had run aground on the same intractable set of issues. The English expected negotiations that opened there in late December 1388 to be more of the same, but instead found the French open to discussing a host of issues that had long been off-limits. English ambassadors had to ask to recess in January 1389 to seek new orders from their king. Edward was presiding over a great council at Westminster, planning to personally lead the expedition to Aquitaine, when the embassy returned from the continent. Edward put his campaign plans on hold, as it seemed that a diplomatic breakthrough was at hand. Talks continued through the winter, but hit a snag in the spring.

    Charles loved the grandeur of kingship and celebrated his emancipation from his uncles with a series of feasts and festivals, at which he lavished his friends and family. First, he raised his brother, Louis, from the relatively poor dukedom of Touraine to the far greater dukedom of Orléans. Then, he restored his cousin, King Charles III of Navarre, to the counties of Évreux and Longueville, and gave Charles III his freedom after spending nearly six years as a noble prisoner in Paris. In the early spring, the French king personally knighted his other cousin, Louis II, duke of Anjou, and pledged to lead an army into Italy to help realize Louis's claims to the kingdom of Naples and end the schism. This pledge brought talks between England and France to an abrupt end, as the new King Ladislao of Naples, who Louis was looking to depose, was Edward's brother-in-law. English ambassadors stormed out of Leulinghem in protest.

    On 4 May 1389, Edward issued orders for an army to muster at Southampton. Plans for the king to lead the campaign himself were abandoned and the size of the army was cut by more than half to help speed along the embarkation, hoping to make up for time wasted at Leulinghem. Bolingbroke, as lord lieutenant of Aquitaine, was given the honor of command. He sent word to Bordeaux that preparations be made for his arrival. Meanwhile, Charles VI took steps to stamp royal authority on the south of France.

    On 18 May, Charles informed his uncle, Jean, duke of Berry, who was governor of Languedoc, that a new royal commission was being set up to evaluate the work of the governorship. It was a terrifying prospect for the duke, whose interest in the office was entirely in the funds it provided him. Languedoc had only been a piggy bank to him, its funds going toward the construction and reconstruction of Berry's own castles and palaces or the purchase of expensive art and literature. Charles planned to make his first appearance in Languedoc that fall so that he could hear the commission's findings in person. It was no secret what it would recommend to the king, though, as several administrative and military reforms were ordered before the end of the month. The king went over Berry's head to fire the count of Armagnac, who was the nephew of the duke's late wife, from the lieutenant governorship and put Louis of Sancerre, marshal of France, in the role instead. Another of the king's uncles, Louis II, duke of Bourbon, became lieutenant of the marches, a new position that took control of the front with Gascony away from Berry entirely. One of the king's favorites, Enguerrand VII, lord of Coucy, took over the war effort in Limousin. Coucy led an aggressive campaign against Geoffroy Tête-Noire, one of the most terrifying routier captains in France, and captured the Breton mercenary in July. Charles issued an edict declaring the routiers outlaws, not enemy combatants, and a terrible example was made of Tête-Noire. He was horrifically tortured, then executed. His head was mounted outside the walls of Ventadour, a castle he had once controlled, as were those of two of his nephews who had fought under him. The routiers could no longer expect to simply ransom themselves and then return to raiding and pillaging the French countryside.

    An English army about 2,000 strong set sail from Southampton on 20 July. Its roster of captains was a mix of the king's young brothers-in-arms, as he called members of the Order of the Bath, and England's most experienced veterans. These included John de Mowbray, 1st earl of Nottingham, Sir Ralph Stafford, heir to the earldom of Stafford, Sir Ralph Neville, heir to the earldom of Cumberland, John Devereux, 1st baron Devereux, Sir Bernard Brocas, and Sir Thomas Trivet. They landed in Bordeaux 11 days later.

    Chevauchée
    The army that arrived in Gascony on 31 July was mostly English, but had a large Welsh contingent. It was mostly made up of archers, with only between 500 and 600 of the men being fully-kitted men-at-arms. A day after their arrival, 1 August, Bolingbroke convened a war council of the army's captains, important Anglo-Gascon lords, and routiers who had come to support the campaign. Their plan was to sweep through Agenais, which had been hotly contested since the early 1380s, and lay waste to the count of Armagnac's lands south of the Garonne before raiding Languedoc. It would demonstrate the might of the English just ahead of Charles VI's arrival in the region.

    In addition to the 2,000 men from England and Wales, Bolingbroke and the local lords drew at least 1,000 more from across Gascony and 2,000 routiers came to fight for the English. The routiers were not only lured by the promise of plunder, but the French crown's aggressive and effective campaign against Geoffroy Tête-Noire had practically driven the mercenaries into Bolingbroke's arms. Two weeks were spent unloading horses and stores from the English ships and, on 15 August, Bolingbroke marched out from Bordeaux with more than 5,000 men at his back.

    The Anglo-Gascon army entered Agenais unopposed. The French had conquered the county in 1374, but it had become the focus of fighting between local lords following the English consolidation of Gascony in the late 1370s and reconquest of Saintonge in the early 1380s. Agenais was completely devastated by the local war. Its decline can be seen in the account books of the bishops of Agen. Beginning in 1383, notes of non-payment of rents from tenants who had "utterly abandoned" their land began to appear, as did non-payments resulting from lands that were "charred and ruined," "devastated by war," or "wasted by the English." A truce between the kings of England and France between 1383 and 1385 had no effect on the local war, where raids and reprisals continued unabated. Local French lords were unable to resist a force the size of the one Bolingbroke led in summer 1389, though. Small and poorly-defended positions were quickly abandoned. Bolingbroke passed by larger and better-defended places, either taking bribes to leave them unmolested or destroying all the surrounding land. The Gascon routier captain Armand of Caumont controlled several river crossings in the area. His support for Bolingbroke's campaign in 1389 allowed the English to cross the various rivers in Agenais and enter the lands of Armagnac with ease.

    On 23 August, the Anglo-Gascon army entered Armagnac. Bolingbroke divided his forces three ways and spread them out along a 30-mile front. Armagnac had acted quickly to defend his own territory, emptying the countryside of food and people. He had reinforced all his own castles and principal towns. Left with nothing to plunder, the English satisfied themselves by burning every farm and village in their path. The columns of smoke could be seen for miles in every direction.

    On 3 September, the English passed through the western reaches of Armagnac and into Languedoc. The land here was wide open to them. Armagnac, no longer lieutenant governor, did not bother himself with the defense of the region. The new lieutenant governor, Sancerre, would have done, but was bogged down fighting with the routiers in Angoumois, where he had focused most of his energies since the English reconquest of Saintonge years earlier. Leaderless, the people of Languedoc were exposed to attack. Towns were sacked, their leaders taken for ransom, and wealth stolen. Bolingbroke continued on to Toulouse, arranging his army outside the city's walls as if he were preparing an assault. It was a bluff. It worked, though. Toulouse had strong walls, but was unprepared for a siege. It lacked the supplies to tide it over until outside help could arrive and its leaders were not willing to gamble with their lives. Instead, townsmen coughed up 40,000 écus (£20,000) to buy a truce with the English.

    Bolingbroke moved east from Toulouse, toward Béziers, determined to strike further into French territory than even the Black Prince had in his famed 1355 campaign.

    French counterattack
    On 17 August, the king of France hosted a lavish wedding for his brother, Louis, duke of Orléans, at the royal castle of Melun, southeast of Paris. Orléans was marrying Valentina Visconti, the daughter of the lord of Milan. The two had been betrothed in 1387, but the lord of Milan was reluctant to see his only surviving child off to France before he had a son to secure the succession. The duke of Burgundy, who was Charles and Orléans's uncle and also regent of France until 1388, did not object to a delay since the girl's dowry was to include the county of Vertus in Champagne, a region in which Burgundy had his own competing interests. The lord of Milan finally had a son around the same time Burgundy's regency had been toppled, allowing Charles to finalize the marriage. He organized a terrific celebration, but it was ruined by news of Bolingbroke's chevauchée, which reached Melun in the midst of the revelry.

    Charles took the news of the English campaign badly. He had seen his own wedding spoiled in 1385, when the rebels of Ghent and their English auxiliaries captured the town of Damme, disrupting French plans to invade England that summer. Now the English were spoiling not just his brother's wedding, but his fall tour of Languedoc too. Charles wanted to lead the response himself, but his councilors were able to convince him that it would take too long to raise an army worthy of his command. The task was given to the king's uncle, the duke of Bourbon, instead. Orléans, an ambitious young man, joined Bourbon to get his first taste of war.

    Bourbon quickly raised 600 knights from his own lands and called upon every man-at-arms that the crown could spare from Orléans to Poitiers. The lord of Coucy and marshal of France were ordered to end their campaigns in Limousin and Angoumois, respectively, and rendezvous with Bourbon in Auvergne. Local lords were called upon with great urgency. Armagnac brought 1,500 men to Bourbon's side. As many as 3,000 were raised by the other barons combined. The count of Foix pledged to bring 2,000, but ultimately never joined the campaign. All combined, Bourbon had an estimated 10,000 men when he crossed the Tarn.

    On 20 September, Bolingbroke moved away from Béziers, which was too well protected by high walls and wide ditches to seriously threaten. He instead turned toward Carcassonne, one of the wealthiest cities in the south of France. The English discovered a French scouting party as they approached Carcassonne on 30 September. They ambushed and interrogated the outriders, learning that Bourbon's army sat only about 16 miles west, at Prouille. Bolingbroke, whose men were still stretched out along a 30-mile front to raid the land, called the Anglo-Gascon army together at once.

    Bolingbroke met with his captains early on the morning of 1 October. They saw no good option. Bourbon's position at Prouille cut off their most direct route to Bordeaux and they deemed it too dangerous to return the way they had come, through Armagnac and Agenais, as it had far too many river crossings against which the French could pin them. Their only other way home was south, along the Pyrenees, but this promised slow movement over rough terrain, which would also have little food to forage. This left them with only one option: choosing a site and offering battle. A messenger was sent to Bourbon's camp later that day.

    Bourbon was one of the most renowned knights in France. He had struggled with the Fabian strategy that his brother-in-law, King Charles V of France, had deployed against the English in the 1370s and relished the chance to meet his enemy on the field. He sent his answer to Bolingbroke the following morning.

    On 2 October, the English moved into the hills southwest of Carcassonne. Sir Bernard Brocas, who was a veteran of Crécy, Poitiers, and Nájera, helped to identify the position and oversaw preparations for battle. Barricades were formed with carts laden with booty, pits and trenches were dug to hamper the French advance, and stakes driven into the ground to protect the archers. Put together, the defenses formed a bottleneck that the English hoped would blunt the enemy's numerical advantage. The French drew up in battle formation no more than three miles away. More messages were exchanged, but neither Bourbon nor Bolingbroke had any real interest in a truce and both armies settled in for an uneasy night's sleep. Indeed, the English had already arrayed for battle and slept in defensive positions.

    Battle
    The English army had three main divisions, each a mix of archers and men-at-arms, plus a reserve force of around 800 men. All but the reserve fought dismounted. The English left was commanded by the earl of Nottingham, who was supported by the energetic and experienced Sir Thomas Trivet, who had seen action at the 1380 Battle of Estella and had served the English in Gascony for more than a decade. The center was led by Bolingbroke, who was supported by Brocas. Archambaud of Grailly, captal de Buch, who led the English and Navarrese to victory at Estella, took the right. The reserve was left to Sir Ralph Neville.

    The French army was roused shortly before dawn on the morning of 3 October. Its men were arrayed for battle and marched to about a quarter-mile from the English position. Bourbon had organized the men into three divisions. The vanguard was led by Sancerre, the marshal of France. The king's brother, Orléans, officially led the second division, but the lord of Coucy, who was a veteran of countless campaigns, was effectively the prince's chaperone. Bourbon himself led the final division.

    Bourbon devised the plan of attack. He had studied the French failures of the Edwardian War and ordered the first division to fight dismounted, as cavalry charges against English longbowmen had too often been the downfall of the French in battle. The most well-armored men in the army were put under Sancerre's command and were to march uphill on foot, flanked by crossbowmen from nearby Carcassonne. The attack was meant to disperse the English archers. This would allow for cavalry charges by the second and third divisions to crush the dismounted Engishmen before they could retreat.

    Sancerre was a brave man. He would have known that the English longbowmen were capable of inflicting heavy casualties upon the French vanguard, despite their heavy armor. The longbowmen had a greater rate of fire and the English position gave them both a range that the French crossbowmen could not match when firing uphill and the time to aim their shots, which was a luxury that the advancing French would not enjoy. Sancerre thus needed his men to move quickly.

    The French trumpets sounded by midmorning and Sancerre advanced. The sky turned dark as they came within 1,000 feet of the English, a storm of arrows blotting out the sun. Their progress was not quick. The weight of their armor, the slope of the hill, the ditches dug by the English, the barrage of arrows beating against them—they slowed French movement to a crawl. The men-at-arms had fine armor, but even this had weak points. The crossbowmen had even less protection and were massacred. The screams of dying men filled the air and terror swept across the French line, which became disorganized as the men moved around the trenches dug into the ground and stepped over the dead. Still, Sancerre pressed on.

    Nottingham recalled the archers on the English left, as the French first reached the front line there. The fighting was intense, but the lack of French cavalry allowed the longbowmen to redeploy outside of their defensive positions without fear of being ridden down. The French were already exhausted by the march uphill and dispirited by the slaughter that had come with it. The new onslaught of English arrows broke them and they began to retreat. In a sign of just how disorganized the French advance had become, Nottingham had already won the initial exchange on the English left before fighting had begun on the right. Nottingham held his men in formation as the attack began on the center and right, though, as he feared that he would be massacred by a French cavalry charge if he moved to help Bolingbroke or Grailley.

    Action came later on the English center and right, but it was far more serious when it did. Sancerre was at the front line by this time and held his men-at-arms in sustained fighting for some time. English archers rushed in with side arms as a fierce melee developed on the right. The French inflicted very heavy casualties on the English and were on the cusp of breaking the English line when Sancerre fell. The marshal's death shattered the morale of the French fighting on the front line and the assault suddenly ground to a halt. The English rallied and the survivors of Sancerre's division ran for their lives.

    The commanders of the second and third French divisions could not have known how close Sancerre had come to victory. French captains rushed messages to one another, but Orléans was arrogant and bold. In a rush for glory, he ordered a charge as soon as he saw the first division had begun to retreat. He did not wait for the order to reach Coucy, who was at the other end of the line.

    Orléans's cavalry charge had to deal not only with the obstacles that Sancerre's infantry advance had, but also with the fact that the hill was now littered with dead bodies and crowded with retreating Frenchmen. The cocksure prince ordered that the fleeing men be run down for their cowardice. A storm of arrows rained down on his men soon after he did. Panicked horses threw their riders to their deaths or fled in terror. The scene soon repeated itself, as Coucy followed with the rest of the division. It was a disaster.

    Five hundred yards away from the action, Bourbon ordered his men to prepare an assault. Accounts differ as to whether the duke still thought the battle could be won or whether he was simply looking to save his nephew. Either way, dissension in the ranks kept him from taking action. Several of the Franco-Gascon lords serving under him fled the field when they received word that Bourbon wanted to attack, not willing to throw their lives away on a suicide run. Armagnac urged Bourbon to reconsider a third assault. Heated, the duke declared Armagnac a coward, to which Armagnac proclaimed Bourbon a fool and withdrew his men as well. Bourbon was left with too few men to mount an effective charge. He watched his nephew fight from a distance, cursed the cravens who had abandoned him, and then he too retired.

    The English ground down Coucy and Orléans's men for more than an hour before it became clear to them that the French third division was melting away across the field. No longer threatened by another charge, Bolingbroke ordered Neville to bring the reserve in for an attack on the French on the right flank. Neville smashed into Orleans's men and triggered a chaotic retreat. Bolingbroke ordered the baron Devereux to take a large contingent of dismounted men back to their horses and ride down the retreating French. The lord of Coucy dispatched 10 knights to find the duke of Orléans and get him to safety, but they failed. Both Orléans and Coucy were among the estimated 1,600 prisoners taken by the English. They were lucky not to be among the 3,000 Frenchmen dead on the field that day.

    Aftermath
    The English held their hilltop position through the day, aware that a sizable number of Frenchmen had not taken part in the battle and fearing that Bourbon may yet regroup and launch another attack. They settled in for the night once it was clear that the threat had passed, needing the time to tend to the wounded and negotiate the parole of their prisoners.

    Bolingbroke agreed to pay 25,000 francs (£4,167) to the knight who had taken Orléans in battle and paid another 10,000 francs (£1,667) for Coucy. He allowed the rest to be paroled by their captors, assuming that they could negotiate a fair sum for their release, as the number of prisoners was far too great to move them all to Bordeaux. It is impossible to calculate the total receipts from all prisoners ransomed after the battle, as paroles were negotiated on a case-by-case basis between captors and captives, but historians estimate that at least 600,000 francs (£100,000) were paid to the victorious Anglo-Gascons by the various French who were captured on the field. This does not include the fortunes that were made from stripping the dead of their fine armor, weaponry, and other belongings.

    On 4 October, the English set out for Bordeaux. Their progress was slow, as their carts were overflowing with treasure and they had to bring along scores of prisoners who had not yet been able to secure their parole. Messengers reached the city in a matter of days. One reported directly to the mayor while the other set sail for London. The Anglo-Gascon army was welcomed into the city with great fanfare on 28 October. Two weeks later, Bolingbroke was called home by the king. He set sail with his two high-profile prisoners as soon as possible, eager to make the voyage before the Bay of Biscay was gripped by its famously treacherous winter weather. A caretaker administration was established and Bolingbroke secured passage on a merchantman scheduled to depart just days after his orders arrived.

    Sir John Trailly, seneschal of Aquitaine, assumed control of English operations. The treasury in Bordeaux was flush with cash following the summer campaign, as tens of thousands of francs had been extracted from cities like Toulouse and French lords in Agenais. It was more than enough to keep the garrisons along the front with France paid, allowing Trailey to establish Fronsac as a base for forward operations and launch attacks into Angoumois and Périgord. Agenais was ripped apart by violence as its local lords again went to war. Anglo-Gascon lords had made major inroads in the area since the early 1380s, but two of England's most powerful partisans—Grailly and Florimont of Lesparre, lord of Lesparre—fell out over the sharing of paroles of prisoners from Carcassonne. Their discord kept the English from effectively coordinating attacks on French lords in the area and froze the situation in Agenais.

    English response
    Bolingbroke landed at Plymouth on 19 November and moved toward London at once. Edward V rode west to meet his cousin at Reading. It was a mark of extraordinary honor that the king would go to meet him instead of the other way around. They traveled together to the capital, Orléans and Coucy in tow.

    Edward paid Bolingbroke £20,000 for Orléans and Coucy. It was Coucy's second stint as an English royal prisoner, having been one of 40 noble hostages given to England to secure the release of King Jean II of France in the 1360s. Coucy married Isabella, the daughter of King Edward III of England, during his first captivity. He was subsequently showered with gifts and lands. He would get no such treatment now, as Coucy's wife had passed years earlier. His daughter, Philippa of Coucy, countess of Oxford, had lived in England since 1376, and she was close with her cousin, the king, but her father was almost a stranger to her. As a result, Philippa visited him at the Savoy Palace, which was his gilded prison, but made no real effort to help secure his release. Coucy was ultimately ransomed for 100,000 francs (£16,667) in 1390. Orléans's price would take a great deal more negotiation, as the duke became a bargaining chip in a series of talks to finally bring the war to an end.

    A great council met at Westminster in January 1390. Edward's uncle, the duke of Gloucester, argued for a new assault on France that summer. Not for the first time, the king pushed back his uncle's hawkishness. He was, and always had been, more interested in peace than war with fellow Christians. Contradictory reports of an Ottoman campaign against the Serbs had reached the west. The sultan had been killed in battle, but so had the prince of Serbia. The exiled King Levon V of Armenia, who had lost his kingdom to the Mamluks in the mid 1370s and lived as a guest of the French king since the mid 1380s, had arrived in England at Christmas 1389 in the hope of reconciling England and France. It was Levon's second such mission and he was just as persuasive in 1389 as he had been years earlier. To Gloucester's dismay, Edward informed the council that he was authorizing an embassy to negotiate a two-year truce.

    French response
    Charles VI received word of the French defeat at Carcassonne within a day or two of the battle, though he would not learn the fate of his brother, Orléans, until 10 October. The whole direction of the government changed when he did. He canceled plans to attend the coronation of his cousin, the duke of Anjou, as king of Naples. The king's tour of Languedoc, which was supposed to follow the coronation in Avignon, was canceled too. Charles stayed near Paris so that he could better follow events as they unfolded.

    The French king's decision to remain in the Île-de-France was kept from his wife, Isabeau of Bavaria, who was heavily pregnant. She was not informed of the battle or of Orléans's capture. The young couple had produced only a daughter and a short-lived son by 1389, which made Orléans heir presumptive to the throne, and there were fears that the news would cause the queen undue stress. Hopes for a son were high, as it would displace Orléans in the line of succession and weaken England's diplomatic advantage. These hopes were dashed on 9 November, when a girl, named Isabelle, was born.

    Peace with England shot to the top of the French agenda after the birth of the princess. There was no real support for continuing the war. The king was obsessed with war, but he dreamt only of crusade. His chief councilors, the marmousets, had drawn up a financial reform plan that required ending the massive war expenditures. The king's powerful uncle, the duke of Burgundy, who had been a leading war hawk in the mid 1380s, now favored a diplomatic resolution to the conflict. Every leading church official in France had condemned the violence, and their denunciations of war between Christians grew more severe by the day. Hopes for a new conference were low, as the French believed that Edward V would push his advantage in the south after Carcassonne. To their surprise, he welcomed talks.

    On 3 March 1390, the English and French met once more at Leulinghem. Talks picked up where they had left off a year earlier. Both sides were keen to secure a longer-term truce and ensure that it was enforced in trouble spots, chiefly the march of Gascony. The legal status of the routier companies thus became a major sticking point. The English could not guarantee the good behavior of the companies, who fought independently, but who could be counted on to support English operations when it benefited them. A compromise was reached in which the routiers would be allowed to determine their own status. On 18 March, a three-month suspension of hostilities along the lines as the 1383-85 truce was agreed. In this time, the routiers would have the opportunity to draw up written declarations of their support for Edward as king of France, and thus fall under the protection of a future, longer truce, so long as they could abide by its terms. Those who chose to fight on as independent companies would be declared bandits by both England and France, and neither side would act to protect these from the other. The routiers who chose to remain free companies may still grow rich from pillaging the countryside, but doing so was now more dangerous than it had ever been before, as France was committed to their eradication.

    On 18 June, three months to the day after the short ceasefire was agreed, a two-year truce was sealed. It included every routier captain who had declared their allegiance for Edward, formally bringing dozens of positions great and small under English control. Those who did not sign on became targets for French commanders in the area, who began rooting out the companies with a new zeal. Even more importantly, the truce included a schedule for future meetings in hopes of brokering a permanent peace. Now that the young kings of England and France, neither of whom wanted to continue the fighting, were in control of events, there was a sense that the conflict could at last be resolved. An announcement that the queen of England was with child further boosted the confidence of the English, who now dreamt of sealing a permanent peace by wedding a prince of Wales to the French princess Isabelle. They were to be disappointed when, on 14 November 1390, Queen Giovanna gave birth to a girl, named Joan. Negotiations for a lasting peace continued without talk of a royal marriage. The war would resume in 1392, when after months of tensions resulting from the War of the Fuxéen Succession, talks collapsed after an assassination attempt was made on one of the French king's favorites.

    Impact
    The truce negotiated by the English and French in the aftermath of the Battle of Carcassonne had a ripple effect that spread out across western Europe and beyond. The first and most direct consequence of the truce was the collapse of the duke of Anjou's cause in Naples. The war for the Neapolitan throne was primarily an outgrowth of the Western Schism. Pope Clement VII of Avignon was desperate to take control of Naples, which he saw as necessary for conquering Rome and thus reuniting the church. By 1390, though, Clement had already funded two failed crusades to Italy, at enormous expense. The pope had been counting on French men and materials, as well as 300,000 francs pledged by the French king, to help support a third campaign, but the loss of the king's brother and heir at Carcassonne had put the French crown on the line for Orléans's ransom and it could no longer afford an Italian adventure. Once again, the Angevin cause was left entirely to Clement, who postponed his 1390 plans and then began talks with the king of Aragon in search of outside support, but this too had difficulties.

    The break of hostilities between England and France, combined with France's renewed effort to eradicate the routiers, breathed new life into an old scheme from the count of Armagnac—buying the companies out of their positions. Armagnac had attempted this twice before, abandoning the first when he lost interest in Gaston's Rebellion and stymied in the second by Bolingbroke's efforts in the years before Carcassonne. Now, the free companies who had passed on English overlordship were feeling the full power of the French crown bearing down on them. Perhaps regretting their decision to not formally join the English cause, many of these companies now signed on with Armagnac, who then declared himself king of Majorca and announced plans to invade Aragon with his new mercenary army. This set off the Roussillon War.

    Armagnac's quixotic campaign to Aragon was only part of the violence that England and France began to export now that the two countries were not fighting one another. On 20 March 1390, only two days after the English and French had agreed to a short truce so that they could begin reclassifying the routiers, Levon V proposed that Charles VI and Edward V launch a joint crusade. It was far too early for any discussion of a campaign led by the two kings, but Levon's call to arms caught the imagination of the duke of Bourbon, who proposed leading a lower-ranking mission to demonstrate the goodwill between England and France. Ambassadors from the merchant republic of Genoa were already seeking support against Muslim pirates who operated out of Mahdia in North Africa. An Anglo-French crusade to conquer or destroy the city would spiritually unite the two kingdoms. It was an immediate sensation. It initially drew the support of both kings, but the project fell apart when Bolingbroke's name appeared on the list of men who were seeking safe conduct to Marseilles, from where the crusade was being launched. The king of France petulantly refused to permit the man who had captured his brother to travel through France. It shattered the goodwill nature of the mission and the English contingent dropped out.

    English interest in crusade did not end with Mahdia, though. Bolingbroke and others who had planned to participate in the campaign simply looked elsewhere for adventure. They had two options. The first was Prussia, which had long been a destination for English crusaders. The second was Portugal, where a crusade against the sultanate of Morocco was being prepared. In this, the most lasting legacy of the peace that followed the Battle of Carcassonne was not the decline in the violence that had torn apart southern France over two decades, but the exportation of that violence to the rest of the world, and in particular, beyond the borders of western Christendom. A revival of the crusading movement had been underway for some time by 1390, but the long war between England and France, which had drawn in Brittany, Castile, Flanders, Guelders, Naples, Portugal, and Scotland at different times, had kept the nobility of western Europe too preoccupied to venture too far abroad. That now began to change.
     
    Family tree: England, pt. 1: Children of Edward III
  • King Edward III of England married Philippa of Hainaut in 1328, had issue:
    • Edward IV of England (1330-1377) married Joan, suo jure 4th countess of Kent, had issue
    • Isabella of Woodstock (1332-1382) marred Enguerrand VII, lord of Coucy, had issue
    • Joan of England (1333-1348) betrothed to King Pedro of Castile, but died before marriage
    • William of Hatfield (1336-1337)
    • Lionel of Antwerp, duke of Clarence (1338-1368) married (1) Elizabeth de Burgh, suo jure 4th countess of Ulster, had issue, and (2) Violante Visconti, no issue
    • John of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster (born 1340) married (1) Blanche of Lancaster, suo jure 5th countess of Lancaster, had issue, and (2) Constanza of Castile, had issue
    • Edmund of Langley, 1st duke of Aumale (born 1341) married Isabella of Castile, had issue
    • Blanche of the Tower (1342-1342)
    • Mary of Waltham (1344-1361) married Jean IV, duke of Brittany, no issue
    • Margaret of Windsor (1346-1361) married John Hastings, 2nd earl of Pembroke, no issue
    • William of Windsor (1348-1348)
    • Thomas of Woodstock, 1st duke of Gloucester (born 1355) married Eleanor de Bohun, suo jure 7th countess of Essex, had issue

    Note: Family trees will be current as of the most recent update. Bold represents characters still alive as of that update. Trees will be updated them as new articles are posted to reflect births, deaths, marriages, etc. so they can be referred to as needed. (Most recent tree update: "Battle of Carcassonne," i.e., ca. ATL 1390.)
     
    Last edited:
    Family tree: England, pt. 2: Grandchildren of Edward III
  • England
    King Edward IV of England married Joan, suo jure 4th countess of Kent, in 1361, had issue:
    • Edward V of England (born 1365) married Giovanna of Naples, had issue
    • Richard of Bordeaux, duke of Clarence (born 1367) married Anna of Bohemia
    By his marriage to Joan, Edward IV also became stepfather to her children by Sir Thomas Holland:
    • Thomas Holland, 5th earl of Kent (born 1350) married Alice Fitzalan, had issue
    • John Holland, 1st earl of Huntingdon (born 1352) married Lucia Visconti, had issue
    • Maud Holland (born 1355) married (1) Sir Hugh Courtenay, heir to the earldom of Devon, no issue, and (2) Waleran III, count of Saint-Pol, had issue
    • Joan Holland (1356-1384) married John IV, duke of Brittany, no issue
    By his mistress Edith Willesford, Edward IV had illegitimate issue:
    • Sir Roger de Clarendon (born 1350)

    Coucy
    Isabella of Woodstock married Enguerrand VII, lord of Coucy, in 1365, had issue:
    • Marie of Coucy (born 1366) married Henri of Bar, heir to the dukedom of Bar, had issue
    • Philippa of Coucy (born 1367) married Robert de Vere, 9th earl of Oxford

    Clarence
    Lionel of Antwerp, duke of Clarence, married (1) Elizabeth de Burgh, suo jure 4th countess of Ulster, in 1352, had issue:
    • Philippa of Clarence (1355-1382), suo jure 5th countess of Ulster, married Edmund Mortimer, 3rd earl of March, and had issue
    Lionel of Antwerp, duke of Clarence, married (2) Violante Visconti in 1368, no issue


    Lancaster
    John of Gaunt, 1st duke of Lancaster, married (1) Blanche of Lancaster, suo jure 5th countess of Lancaster, in 1359, had issue:
    • Philippa of Lancaster (born 1360) married King João I of Portugal * , had issue
    • John of Lancaster (1362-1364)
    • Elizabeth of Lancaster (born 1363) married King Charles III of Navarre, had issue
    • Edward of Lancaster (1365-1365)
    • John of Lancaster (1366-1366)
    • Henry of Bolingbroke, 3rd earl of Derby, (born 1367) married Mary de Bohun, suo jure 3rd countess of Northampton, had issue
    • Isabel of Lancaster (1368-1368)
    * = ATL King João I of Portugal is João de Castro, the questionably-legitimate son of King Pedro I of Portugal by his mistress/secret wife Inês de Castro. He is not João de Avis, the definitely-illegitimate son of King Pedro I of Portugal by his mistress Teresa Lourenço, who was OTL King João I and Philippa's OTL husband

    John of Gaunt, 1st duke of Lancaster, married (2) Constanza of Castile in 1371, had issue:
    • Catherine of Lancaster (born 1373) married Gastón of Medinaceli, prince of Asturias, had issue
    • John of Lancaster (1374–1375)
    • John of Santiago (1382-1384)
    By his mistress Katherine Swynford (née de Roet), John of Gaunt, 1st duke of Lancaster, had illegitimate issue:
    • John Beaufort (born 1373)
    • Henry Beaufort (born 1375
    • Thomas Beaufort (born 1377)
    • Joan Beaufort (born 1379)
    By his mistress Marie de St. Hilaire, John of Gaunt, 1st duke of Lancaster, had illegitimate issue:
    • Blanche (born 1359) married Sir Thomas Morieux, no issue

    Aumale
    Edmund of Langley, 1st duke of Aumale, married Isabella of Castile in 1372, had issue:
    • Edward of Norwich (born 1373) betrothed to Joan Holland
    • Constance of Aumale (born 1374)

    Gloucester
    Thomas of Woodstock, 1st duke of Gloucester, married Eleanor de Bohun, suo jure 7th countess of Essex, in 1380, had issue:
    • Humphrey of Gloucester (born 1382) betrothed to Elizabeth Berkeley, heiress of Thomas Berkeley, 5th baron Berkeley, and Margaret Lisle, suo jure 3rd baroness Lisle
    • Anne of Gloucester (born 1383) betrothed to John Hastings, 3rd earl of Pembroke
    • Joan of Gloucester (born 1384)
    • Isabel of Gloucester (born 1385)

    Note: Family trees will be current as of the most recent update. Bold represents characters still alive as of that update. Trees will be updated them as new articles are posted to reflect births, deaths, marriages, etc. so they can be referred to as needed. (Most recent tree update: "Battle of Carcassonne," i.e., ca. ATL 1390.)
     
    Last edited:
    Family tree: England, pt. 3: Great-grandchildren of Edward III
  • England (grandchildren of Edward IV)
    King Edward V of England married Giovanna of Naples, daughter of King Carlo III of Naples, in 1385, had issue:
    • Joan of the Tower (born 1390)

    Holland (step-grandchildren of Edward IV)
    Thomas Holland, 5th earl of Kent, married Alice Fitzalan, daughter of Richard Fitzalan, 3rd earl of Arundel, in 1364, had issue:
    • Alice Holland * (born 1370) married John de Mowbray, 1st earl of Nottingham, had issue
      • Elizabeth de Mowbray (born 1388)
      • John de Mowbray (born 1391)
    • Thomas Holland (born 1372)
    • John Holland (born 1374)
    • Richard Holland (born 1376)
    • Joan Holland (born 1380) betrothed to Edward of Norwich, heir to the duchy of Aumale
    • Edmund Holland (born 1382)
    • Margaret Holland (born 1385)
    • Eleanor Holland * (born 1386)
    • Bridget Holland (born 1387)
    • Elizabeth Holland (born 1388)
    * = ATL Thomas Holland and Alice Fitzalan have the same family as in OTL, but in OTL they gave two of their daughters the name "Alianore/Eleanor." I am changing the eldest of these daughters' names to "Alice" to avoid confusion.


    John Holland, 1st earl of Huntingdon, married Lucia Visconti, cousin of Gian Galeazzo Visconti, lord of Milan , in 1386, had issue:
    • Edward Holland (born 1388)
    • Beatrice Holland (born 1389)
    By his mistress Isabella of Castile, duchess of Aumale, John Holland, 1st earl of Huntingdon, had illegitimate issue:
    • Richard of Conisburgh, bastard of Huntingdon (born 1385)

    Maud Holland married Waleran III, count of Saint-Pol, in 1380, had issue:
    • Jeanne of Saint-Pol (born 1382)

    Coucy (grandchildren of Isabella of England)
    Marie of Coucy married Henri of Bar, heir to the dukedom of Bar, in 1384, had issue:
    • Enguerrand of Bar (born 1387)
    • Robert of Bar (born 1390)

    Mortimer (grandchildren of Lionel of Antwerp)
    Philippa of Clarence, suo jure 5th countess of Ulster, married Edmund Mortimer, 3rd earl of March, in 1369, had issue:
    • Elizabeth Mortimer (born 1371) married Henry "Hotspur" Percy, 2nd earl of Northumberland
    • Roger Mortimer (born 1374), betrothed to Alice Fitzalan, daughter of Richard Fitzalan, 4th earl of Arundel
    • Philippa Mortimer (born 1375) betrothed to Thomas Despenser, 2nd baron Despenser
    • Edmund Mortimer (born 1376)

    Lancaster (grandchildren of John of Gaunt)
    Philippa of Lancaster married King João I of Portugal * , had issue:
    • Afonso of Portugal (born 1385)
    • Duarte of Portugal (born 1388)
    • Pedro of Portugal (1390-1391)
    * = ATL King João I of Portugal is João de Castro, the questionably-legitimate son of King Pedro I of Portugal by his mistress/secret wife Inês de Castro. He is not João de Avis, the definitely-illegitimate son of King Pedro I of Portugal by his mistress Teresa Lourenço, who was OTL King João I and Philippa's OTL husband

    Elizabeth of Lancaster married King Charles III of Navarre, had issue
    • Jeanne of Navarre (1384-1384)
    • Charles, prince of Viana (born 1387)
    • Blanche of Navarre (born 1388)

    Henry of Bolingbroke, 3rd earl of Derby, married Mary de Bohun, suo jure 3rd countess of Northampton, had issue
    • Henry of Monmouth (born 1386)
    • Thomas of Lancaster (born 1387)
    • John of Lancaster (born 1389)
    • Humphrey of Lancaster (born 1390)
    Catherine of Lancaster married Gastón of Medinaceli, prince of Asturias, had issue
    • Luis of Asturias (born 1391)

    Note: Family trees will be current as of the most recent update. Bold represents characters still alive as of that update. Trees will be updated them as new articles are posted to reflect births, deaths, marriages, etc. so they can be referred to as needed. (Most recent tree update: "Battle of Carcassonne," i.e., ca. ATL 1390.)
     
    Last edited:
    Family tree: France, pt. 1: Children of Jean II
  • King Jean II of France married (1) Bonne of Luxembourg, had issue:
    • Blanche (1336-1336)
    • Charles V of France (1338-1380) married Jeanne of Bourbon, had issue
    • Catherine (1338-1338)
    • Louis I, duke of Anjou, (1339-1384) married Marie of Blois, had issue
    • Jean, duke of Berry, (born 1340) married Jeanne of Armagnac, had issue
    • Philippe II, duke of Burgundy (born 1342) married Marguerite of Flanders, suo jure countess of Flanders, had issue
    • Jeanne (1343-1373) married King Charles II of Navarre, had issue
    • Marie (born 1344) married Robert I, duke of Bar, had issue
    • Agnès (1345-1349)
    • Marguerite (1347-1352)
    • Isabelle (1348-1372) married Gian Galeazzo Visconti, lord of Milan, had issue
    King Jean II of France married (2) Jeanne I, suo jure countess of Auvergne , had issue:
    • Blanche (1350-1350)
    • Catherine (1352-1352)
    • an unnamed son (1354-1354)

    Note: Family trees will be current as of the most recent update. Bold represents characters still alive as of that update. Trees will be updated them as new articles are posted to reflect births, deaths, marriages, etc. so they can be referred to as needed. (Most recent tree update: "Battle of Carcassonne," i.e., ca. ATL 1390.)
     
    Last edited:
    Family tree: France, pt. 2: Grandchildren of Jean II
  • France
    King Charles V of France married Jeanne of Bourbon in 1350, had issue:
    • Jeanne (1357-1360)
    • Bonne (1360-1360)
    • Jean (1366-1366)
    • Charles VI of France (born 1368) married Isabeau of Bavaria, had issue
    • Marie (1370-1377)
    • Louis, duke of Orléans, (born 1372) married Valentina Visconti, suo jure countess of Vertus
    • Isabelle (1373-1378)
    • Catherine (1378-1388) betrothed to Jean of Berry, heir to the duchy of Berry, but died before marriage

    Anjou
    Louis I, duke of Anjou married Marie of Blois in 1360, had issue:
    • Marie of Anjou (1370-1383)
    • Louis II of Anjou (born 1377)
    • Charles of Anjou (born 1380)

    Berry
    Jean, duke of Berry married Jeanne of Armagnac, had issue:
    • Bonne of Berry (born 1367) married Amédée VII, count of Savoy, had issue
    • Charles of Berry (1371-1383), betrothed to Marie, suo jure lady of Sully, but died before marriage
    • Jeanne of Berry (1373-1375)
    • Béatrix of Berry (1374-1374)
    • Marie of Berry (born 1375)
    • Jean of Berry (born 1375) betrothed to (1) Catherine of France, and (2) Jeanne of Auvergne, suo jure countess of Auvergne
    • Louis of Berry (1383-1383)

    Burgundy
    Philippe II, duke of Burgundy married Marguerite of Flanders, suo jure countess of Flanders, Artois, Burgundy, Nevers, and Rethel in 1369, had issue:
    • Jean (born 1371) married Margarete of Bavaria
    • Charles (1372-1373)
    • Marguerite (born 1375) married Wilhelm of Bavaria, heir to the counties of Hainaut, Holland and Zeeland
    • Catherine (born 1378)
    • Bonne (born 1379)
    • Antoine (born 1384)
    • Marie (born 1386)
    • Philippe (born 1389)

    Navarre
    Jeanne married King Charles II of Navarre in 1352, had issue:
    • Charles III of Navarre (born 1361) married (1) Leonor de Trastámara, annulled, and (2) Elizabeth of Lancaster, had issue
    • Philippe (1363-1363)
    • Marie (born 1365) marred Jean IV, duke of Brittany, had issue
    • Pierre, count of Mortain, (born 1366)
    • Isabelle (1367-1376)
    • Blanche (1368-1382)
    • Jeanne (born 1370)
    • Bonne (1373-1383)

    Bar
    Marie married Robert I, duke of Bar, in 1364, had issue:
    • Henri of Bar (born 1362) married Marie of Coucy, had issue
    • Yolande of Bar (born 1365) married King Joan I of Aragon, had issue
    • Philippe of Bar (born 1372) married Yolande of Enghien
    • Charles of Bar (born 1373)
    • Marie of Bar (born 1374) married Guillaume II, marquis of Namur
    • Bonne of Bar (born 1375)
    • Édouard of Bar (born 1377)
    • Jeanne of Bar (born 1378)
    • Louis of Bar (born 1379)
    • Jean of Bar (born 1380)

    Visconti
    Isabelle married Gian Galeazzo Visconti, lord of Milan, in had issue
    • Gian Galeazzo Visconti (1366-1376)
    • Azzone Visconti (1368-1380)
    • Valentina Visconti, suo jure countess of Vertus, (born 1371) married Louis, duke of Orléans
    • Carlo Visconti (1372-1374)

    Note: Family trees will be current as of the most recent update. Bold represents characters still alive as of that update. Trees will be updated them as new articles are posted to reflect births, deaths, marriages, etc. so they can be referred to as needed. (Most recent tree update: "Battle of Carcassonne," i.e., ca. ATL 1390.)
     
    Last edited:
    Family tree: France, pt. 3: Great-grandchildren of Jean II
  • France (grandchildren of King Charles V of France)
    King Charles VI of France (born 1368) married Isabeau of Bavaria, daughter of Stephan III, duke of Bavaria-Ingolstadt, had issue:
    • Charles, dauphin of France (1386-1386)
    • Jeanne of France (1388-1390)
    • Isabelle of France (born 1389)

    Savoy (grandchildren of Jean, duke of Berry)
    Bonne of Berry married Amédée VII, count of Savoy, in 1381, had issue:
    • Amédée of Savoy (born 1383)
    • Bonne of Savoy (born 1388)

    Navarre (grandchildren of Jeanne of France)
    King Charles III of Navarre married Elizabeth of Lancaster, daughter of John of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster, had issue:
    • Jeanne of Navarre (1384-1384)
    • Charles, prince of Viana (born 1387)
    • Blanche of Navarre (born 1388)
    By his mistress Marie de Pacy, King Charles III of Navarre had illegitimate issue:
    • Lionel de Navarre (born 1386)

    Bar (grandchildren of Marie of France)
    Henri of Bar married Marie of Coucy, daughter of Enguerrand VII, lord of Coucy, in 1384, had issue:
    • Enguerrand of Bar (born 1387)
    • Robert of Bar (born 1390)

    Yolande of Bar married King Joan I of Aragon, had issue:
    • Jaume, duke of Girona (1382-1388)
    • Violant of Aragon (born 1384)
    • Ferran, duke of Girona (1389-1389)
    Note: Family trees will be current as of the most recent update. Bold represents characters still alive as of that update. Trees will be updated them as new articles are posted to reflect births, deaths, marriages, etc. so they can be referred to as needed. (Most recent tree update: "Battle of Carcassonne," i.e., ca. ATL 1390.)
     
    Last edited:
    Top