Nascar and Indycar are equals v2.0

I'm rebooting this timeline. There will be two POD one for Nascar and one for Indycar. POD for Nascar is Petty Enterprises and Kyle Petty. Kyle Petty would run two full seasons (79,80) in the ARCA series before moving to cup full-time in 1981 with 7-Eleven as the sponsor. Kyle Petty wining 5 races in two years in the ARCA series. POD for Indycar is Tony Hulman does not died of heart failure in October of 1977 he lives 6 more years. In the 6 years he buys both Ontario Motor Speedway(1979) and Watkins Glen(1981). Ontario Motor Speedway would become the second biggest race on the Indycar after Indianapolis. Ontario along with Indianapolis and Pocono would become part of than Indycar Triple Crown. Watkins Glen under Hulman track would be closed for the 1982 racing season would reopen in 1983. The track would see an Nascar cup race added in 1984. https://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=202461
 
Last edited:
With Tony Hulman purchased of the failing Ontario Motor Speedway in 1979 begin a new era in American motorsports. The Hulman family would begin to built an track ownership empire adding Watkins Glen in 81 and Riverside in 83. The United States Grand Prix would return to Watkins Glen after two seasons in 1983. In 1984 United States Grand Prix West is moved from Long Beach to Ontario. The Long Beach Grand Prix would be added to the CART schedule in 1984. The CART schedule would grow from 12 races in 1980 to 17 by 1989. CART schedule 1989 1)Phoenix 2)Long Beach 3)Indianapolis 4)Milwaukee Mile 5)Detroit 6)Portland 7)Cleveland 8)Watkins Glen 9)Exhibition Place 10)Ontario 11)Riverside 12)Michigan 13)Pocono 14)Mid-Ohio 15)Road America 16)Nazareth 17)Mazda.
 
Interesting call on Hulman buying Ontario. That would piss off Bill France Jr. something awful, because it would probably assure the Indycar Series dominance in Southern California. I do wonder though how him and CART would get along, and whether they would do a deal to allow CART and USAC to run a joint series (like they did in 1979) or fight each other. Head says they'd fight, heart says they wouldn't. Pocono would be a tough one to buy, because the Mattoli family, which built Pocono, would probably not want to sell it, even to a guy with as high a profile as Tony Hulman.

The USGP West at Ontario would happen for '85. (Las Vegas would have '83 and '84 for sure, and we're also assuming that the '84 USGP in Dallas is the abysmal failure it was IOTL.) Does this assume that Watkins Glen keeps the USGP East? The track would need major, major upgrades by the early 1980s to pull that off, and the rising influence of CART means that bar you being able to make motor racing far more popular in the US, two GPs, a high-flying IMSA and a powerful Indycar series are gonna have trouble co-existing.
 
Interesting call on Hulman buying Ontario. That would piss off Bill France Jr. something awful, because it would probably assure the Indycar Series dominance in Southern California. I do wonder though how him and CART would get along, and whether they would do a deal to allow CART and USAC to run a joint series (like they did in 1979) or fight each other. Head says they'd fight, heart says they wouldn't. Pocono would be a tough one to buy, because the Mattoli family, which built Pocono, would probably not want to sell it, even to a guy with as high a profile as Tony Hulman.

The USGP West at Ontario would happen for '85. (Las Vegas would have '83 and '84 for sure, and we're also assuming that the '84 USGP in Dallas is the abysmal failure it was IOTL.) Does this assume that Watkins Glen keeps the USGP East? The track would need major, major upgrades by the early 1980s to pull that off, and the rising influence of CART means that bar you being able to make motor racing far more popular in the US, two GPs, a high-flying IMSA and a powerful Indycar series are gonna have trouble co-existing.

Ontario would become home to a new 8 hour IMSA race in 1983. The 6 Hours of Watkins Glen becomes part the IMSA schedule in 1984. International Speedway Corporation(ISC) would buy Darlington Raceway in 1982 Nashville International Raceway in 1984. Under ISC Nashville would become a fully modern race track. In 1985 with the Hulman family now owning Indianapolis, Ontario, Watkins Glen, and Riverside the family forms Hulman Motorsports to run the four tracks. Along with the CART races at the four track Hulman Motorsports host both US GPs and two NASCAR races(Ontario and Riverside). With ISC outbid by Hulman for Watkins Glen ISC would turn to buying Bridgehampton Race Circuit on Long Island in 1982. Bridgehampton Race Circuit under ISC would become an world-class track.

On the racing side of thing two Nascar teams would stay strong in this TL Petty Enterprises and DiGard Motorsports. Kyle Petty would run three full seasons in the ARCA series(79,80,81) winning 5 races in 3 years. Kyle Petty join the Cup series full time in 1982 with 7-eleven on the car. Petty Enterprises gets an boost in 1984 when Mike Curb sponsors both Petty cars as secondary sponsor. Kyle Petty would win 6 times in the 80's with 5 top 10 runs in the points. DiGard Motorsports still signs Ricky Rudd to replace Darrell Waltrip in 1981 Ricky Rudd drive the number #88 from 1981 to 1983. DiGard added a second car in 1982 with Bobby Allison in the #22 car.

By the end of the 80's CART, NASCAR, and IMSA were becoming as mainstream as the NFL, MLB, and NBA, is. In 1989 CART runs 17 races with 10 road courses and 7 Ovals. NASCAR runs 30 races with 4 road courses(Bridgehampton, Riverside, Sears Point, and Watkins Glen). The IMSA runs 21 races.
 
Ontario would become home to a new 8 hour IMSA race in 1983. The 6 Hours of Watkins Glen becomes part the IMSA schedule in 1984.

Good calls, but you'd still have to work out Watkins Glen's safety problems. It needs more runoff and the armco replaced, badly, if you want to run more F1 there. That can be done, but is expensive.

International Speedway Corporation(ISC) would buy Darlington Raceway in 1982 Nashville International Raceway in 1984. Under ISC Nashville would become a fully modern race track.

You'd have to rebuild it. Nashville was at the time banked at 35 degrees, which is nuts on a 3/5 mile oval. (Bristol is a bit crazy to race on, too.) You'd have to rebuild the site if you want to run NASCAR races beyond 1984 there.

In 1985 with the Hulman family now owning Indianapolis, Ontario, Watkins Glen, and Riverside the family forms Hulman Motorsports to run the four tracks.

Indianapolis would be kept separate from the other tracks. You can be assured of that. I can see Hulman Motorsports (Better name for it would be Indycar, Incorporated - the Hulman family owned that name decades before the IRL sought to use it.) being a big supporter of Indycar, but that would absolutely require a deal that both CART and Hulman could get behind. That might be tough.

Along with the CART races at the four track Hulman Motorsports host both US GPs and two NASCAR races(Ontario and Riverside). With ISC outbid by Hulman for Watkins Glen ISC would turn to buying Bridgehampton Race Circuit on Long Island in 1982. Bridgehampton Race Circuit under ISC would become an world-class track.

Keeping Bridgehampton alive and holding professional events would be a big change to this TL. There are ten million people with two hours of Bridgehampton, and New York has always been a very tough nut to crack as far as a motorsports market is concerned. Bridgehampton as a major facility by the end of the 1980s makes it quite feasible that Indycars, Formula One and NASCAR would all want a piece of it. The combination of Watkins Glen, New Hampshire (which got an Indycar event for 1991, and played host to one of the greatest driver-on-driver battles in history between Nigel Mansell and Paul Tracy in 1993) and Bridgehampton, Indycar could lock up the northeast pretty tight. Mr. Hulman would be a pretty happy man, but you'd still have to fix the divisions with CART.

By the end of the 80's CART, NASCAR, and IMSA were becoming as mainstream as the NFL, MLB, and NBA, is. In 1989 CART runs 17 races with 10 road courses and 7 Ovals. NASCAR runs 30 races with 4 road courses(Bridgehampton, Riverside, Sears Point, and Watkins Glen). The IMSA runs 21 races.

Two points to this one. Firstly, 21 races is bananas for IMSA. Sixteen or seventeen would be about all they can handle. No car racing series will ever run with the NFL for popularity, but being near Major League Baseball or the NBA would be a godsend to all three series. All three grew dramatically in budgets, profile and sophistication in the 1980s, with poor leadership chucking it away for both IMSA and CART. Fix that, and you'd make America, rather than Europe, the place where young drivers go for opportunities. If you really wanna blast this one off, focus there. Get an agreement between IMSA and the ACO (which runs the 24 Hours of Le Mans) on rules for the post-Group C era (after 1993) and get a real deal between CART and USAC (Hulman perhaps brokering the deal?) and you'd be nice and set.

There will be a big question for this in the early 90s - where do Tony Stewart and Jeff Gordon get to? Both headed first for Indycars, and eventually moved on to NASCAR. NASCAR would hurt rather badly in the 90s if they didn't have Gordon to show up the good 'ol boys. You might have Emerson Fittipaldi, A.J. Foyt and Rick Mears have longer careers, too.
 
Good calls, but you'd still have to work out Watkins Glen's safety problems. It needs more runoff and the armco replaced, badly, if you want to run more F1 there. That can be done, but is expensive.

Watkins Glen would be closed for 18 months for a full upgrade.

You'd have to rebuild it. Nashville was at the time banked at 35 degrees, which is nuts on a 3/5 mile oval. (Bristol is a bit crazy to race on, too.) You'd have to rebuild the site if you want to run NASCAR races beyond 1984 there.

Yes, Nashville would be rebuild like Richmond was but keeping the 35 degrees banking.



Indianapolis would be kept separate from the other tracks. You can be assured of that. I can see Hulman Motorsports (Better name for it would be Indycar, Incorporated - the Hulman family owned that name decades before the IRL sought to use it.) being a big supporter of Indycar, but that would absolutely require a deal that both CART and Hulman could get behind. That might be tough.

Agree that Indianapolis would stay separate. Do need a better name than Hulman Motorsports.


Keeping Bridgehampton alive and holding professional events would be a big change to this TL. There are ten million people with two hours of Bridgehampton, and New York has always been a very tough nut to crack as far as a motorsports market is concerned. Bridgehampton as a major facility by the end of the 1980s makes it quite feasible that Indycars, Formula One and NASCAR would all want a piece of it. The combination of Watkins Glen, New Hampshire (which got an Indycar event for 1991, and played host to one of the greatest driver-on-driver battles in history between Nigel Mansell and Paul Tracy in 1993) and Bridgehampton, Indycar could lock up the northeast pretty tight. Mr. Hulman would be a pretty happy man, but you'd still have to fix the divisions with CART.

Bridgehampton would host NASCAR and IMSA races until 1994 when CART race is added as part of the deal to being NASCAR to Indy. Bridgehampton is under ISC ownership.

Two points to this one. Firstly, 21 races is bananas for IMSA. Sixteen or seventeen would be about all they can handle. No car racing series will ever run with the NFL for popularity, but being near Major League Baseball or the NBA would be a godsend to all three series. All three grew dramatically in budgets, profile and sophistication in the 1980s, with poor leadership chucking it away for both IMSA and CART. Fix that, and you'd make America, rather than Europe, the place where young drivers go for opportunities. If you really wanna blast this one off, focus there. Get an agreement between IMSA and the ACO (which runs the 24 Hours of Le Mans) on rules for the post-Group C era (after 1993) and get a real deal between CART and USAC (Hulman perhaps brokering the deal?) and you'd be nice and set.

There will be a big question for this in the early 90s - where do Tony Stewart and Jeff Gordon get to? Both headed first for Indycars, and eventually moved on to NASCAR. NASCAR would hurt rather badly in the 90s if they didn't have Gordon to show up the good 'ol boys. You might have Emerson Fittipaldi, A.J. Foyt and Rick Mears have longer careers, too.

I'll cut the number of races for IMSA. Auto racing is not as popular as America's big three team sports but they are how mainstream parts of American culture.

Tony Stewart would run his whole career in Indycar. Jeff Gordon would move to NASCAR in 2003. I don't know what to do with Tim Richmond have him stay in open wheel or move to stock cars.
 
I like this timeline. Good to see more racing fans getting in it :)


1. Where does Dan Gurney's White Paper play into this? It was a founding document of CART, and in OTL it was written in 1979, after Mr. Hulman died.

How does Mr. Hulman react to this?

2. Television -- How does do the television go down, given Indianapolis' relationship with ABC. The growth of NASCAR and CBS as partners...and how do we factor for the rise of ESPN in this?

3. The Eccelstone effect: How would Old Man Hulman deal with Bernard, given Eccelstone's continually difficult demands balanced with his want for an American market?

4. How does this effect the rules, especially in terms of chassis, engines, tires, etc? Hulman and USAC hated the influx of the pure-bred racing engines, yet in the 1980s you saw a lot of that development.

5. "Your grandfather liked Roger Penske. He did business with Roger Penske, but he didn't trust Roger Penske." -- How does Tony Hulman deal with Penske in the 1980s...when Penske went from being racer businessman, to businessman racer?
 
Watkins Glen would be closed for 18 months for a full upgrade.

And a helluva lot of money. The track would need all of the armco replaced, bigger runoff in the esses and after the bus stop, gravel traps, new grandstands and other facilities, and probably a complete repave (which it hasn't gotten since the early 1970s). Mr. Hulman has a big bill ahead of him.

Yes, Nashville would be rebuild like Richmond was but keeping the 35 degrees banking.

A tri-oval like Richmond with 35 degrees of banking would be even more insane than the original. If you are gonna keep that size of banking, better to build it like the later Nashville Superspeedway was, one and a third miles. Otherwise, go for shorter banking and have old-school short track racing on the track.

Agree that Indianapolis would stay separate. Do need a better name than Hulman Motorsports.

I would say go with the Indycar Incorporated name.

Bridgehampton would host NASCAR and IMSA races until 1994 when CART race is added as part of the deal to being NASCAR to Indy. Bridgehampton is under ISC ownership.

Good idea, that. Might be an idea to have a big event for IMSA at Bridgehampton after its re-opening, a combined IMSA/World Sportscar Championship round or something like that. At the time, Indycar was racing at the Meadowlands, so I'd imagine they would jump to Bridgehampton about 1987-88 or so.

I'll cut the number of races for IMSA. Auto racing is not as popular as America's big three team sports but they are how mainstream parts of American culture.

IMSA with 16-18 rounds and CART with 18-20 would be about ideal. As for them being bigger, NASCAR's current revenue and ratings are in the same ballpark per event as the NBA. Having all three series manage to draw up six-figure crowd counts and 3.0-4.0 TV ratings on major networks would put all three in fabulous shape going forward.

Tony Stewart would run his whole career in Indycar.

Woohoo. :D Smoke better bag himself an Indy 500 at some point, too. In my "He Came From Indianapolis" TL, I had Stewart fill in for an injured driver for the 1995 Indy 500, haul ass, and as a consequence of that and his dominant USAC performance move into the Indycar Series for 1996. Three Indy 500s (1998, 2000 and 2008), two championships (1998, 2007) and over 50 race wins later, Stewart retires with honors at the end of the 2013 season.

Jeff Gordon would move to NASCAR in 2003. I don't know what to do with Tim Richmond have him stay in open wheel or move to stock cars.

With a few adjustments to history, you could have a 1996 Indycar field with Mario, Michael and Jeff Andretti, Emerson Fittipaldi, Aryton Senna, Rick Mears, Tim Richmond, Jeff Gordon, Tony Stewart, Alex Zanardi, Greg Moore, Paul Tracy, Nigel Mansell, Bobby Rahal, Jimmy Vasser, Bryan Herta, Robby Gordon, Danny Sullivan, Al Unser Jr. and A.J. Foyt. My man, for an Indycar nut, that's like seeing every badass driver of several eras in one race. It doesn't get better than that! :D
 
I like this timeline. Good to see more racing fans getting in it :)

I've been going to Indycar races since the first Toronto Molson Indy in 1986, and my Indycar events log is over 30 races long, including two Indy 500s. I'm an addict. :D

1. Where does Dan Gurney's White Paper play into this? It was a founding document of CART, and in OTL it was written in 1979, after Mr. Hulman died.

How does Mr. Hulman react to this?

That's a good question, and one which would need to be answered. Hulman initially would probably not be impressed in the slightest, but if Gurney, Penske and the founders of CART kept their heads and negotiated it out with Hulman, they'd probably be able to reach an agreement. CART was initially wanting to be the series' promoters in partnership with USAC, but USAC was forced by the Indianapolis Motor Speedway management to play hardball. They lost the fight, and CART became the series operators as well as promoters. It could have gone very differently.

2. Television -- How does do the television go down, given Indianapolis' relationship with ABC. The growth of NASCAR and CBS as partners...and how do we factor for the rise of ESPN in this?

ESPN's growth is inevitable, but the question there is how much racing can ESPN cover. Screvier is aiming for all three to be popular series, so ESPN could easily have problems jamming all of the races in. Perhaps a Speed Channel comes in the late 80s or early 90s for North American racing to have a home, with ABC running it. USAC does a deal with IMSA, and some NASCAR lower events migrate. By the mid-90s, over half the events for both series would be on the big networks, with ABC Sports stocking up with the events of the Indycar and IMSA series, and the remainders going to ESPN or the Speed Channel.

3. The Eccelstone effect: How would Old Man Hulman deal with Bernard, given Eccelstone's continually difficult demands balanced with his want for an American market?

Considering the number of poorly-attended events (Detroit, Phoenix, Las Vegas) and absolute screwups (Dallas), I suspect Ecclestone will push Hulman, Tony will tell Bernie to kiss off. The USGPs bounce around in the late 80s between the aforementioned facilities, before finding their way back to Ontario or Riverside for the USGP West and Watkins Glen for USGP East in 1991ish. If the F1 management is smart, they might just do a full North American tour, starting in Canada (Montreal, Mont-Tremblant or Mosport), go to USGP East (Watkins Glen), on to USGP West (Riverside) and finish off in Mexico (Mexico City). This would be set up for 1991 or 1992.

4. How does this effect the rules, especially in terms of chassis, engines, tires, etc? Hulman and USAC hated the influx of the pure-bred racing engines, yet in the 1980s you saw a lot of that development.

That's inevitable, unless USAC is going to try to deliberately turn back the clock, which CART won't like. CART's in-house development programs got a little crazy in the late 80s, but technological development is going to move on, whether Hulman likes it or not. USAC's decision to ban rear-engine sprint cars was a decision that came to haunt the Indycar Series. Hulman is no fool, and I suspect that he'll make a play for wider-open engine rules in the mid-80s, with a stock-block formula as part of it. Now, that could give us the Penske's Ilmor-Mercedes monster motors a decade early, but there might be a silver lining to that.

5. "Your grandfather liked Roger Penske. He did business with Roger Penske, but he didn't trust Roger Penske." -- How does Tony Hulman deal with Penske in the 1980s...when Penske went from being racer businessman, to businessman racer?

Another good question. Penske is a guy and one of the best businessmen out there, and he's somebody that Hulman would listen to. But Hulman's best defense there might be getting some of his buddies into CART as team owners, or perhaps becoming one himself. (Tony George was an amateur racer, and not a bad one, in the late 80s. Perhaps his grandson is the first driver? Or runs grandpa's team?)
 
I've been going to Indycar races since the first Toronto Molson Indy in 1986, and my Indycar events log is over 30 races long, including two Indy 500s. I'm an addict. :D


Never been to an Indycar race but been to 8 NASCAR races(Dover 2, New Hampshire 1, Pocono 3, and Watkins Glen 2). Do visit my local dirt track 4 or 5 times a year(Fonda Speedway).

A tri-oval like Richmond with 35 degrees of banking would be even more insane than the original. If you are gonna keep that size of banking, better to build it like the later Nashville Superspeedway was, one and a third miles. Otherwise, go for shorter banking and have old-school short track racing on the track.

Think I'm going to kept it an old-school short track. North Wilkesboro will also been kept on the NASCAR schedule but cut to one race.

IMSA with 16-18 rounds and CART with 18-20 would be about ideal. As for them being bigger, NASCAR's current revenue and ratings are in the same ballpark per event as the NBA. Having all three series manage to draw up six-figure crowd counts and 3.0-4.0 TV ratings on major networks would put all three in fabulous shape going forward.

NASCAR will limit to 28-30 races.

ESPN's growth is inevitable, but the question there is how much racing can ESPN cover. Screvier is aiming for all three to be popular series, so ESPN could easily have problems jamming all of the races in. Perhaps a Speed Channel comes in the late 80s or early 90s for North American racing to have a home, with ABC running it. USAC does a deal with IMSA, and some NASCAR lower events migrate. By the mid-90s, over half the events for both series would be on the big networks, with ABC Sports stocking up with the events of the Indycar and IMSA series, and the remainders going to ESPN or the Speed Channel.

Love the idea about Speed Channel earlier. Going with ABC covering Indycar and IMSA and CBS along with TNN covering NASCAR. With half Indycar and NASCAR on the big networks with ESPN, Speed Channel, and TNN covering the remain. Only a quarter of IMSA are cover by ABC with Speed Channel and ESPN covering the remain of the races by the mid 90's. Speed Channel would comes along a decade early in 1986 not 1996 this in OTL.
 
Ontario will host the USGP West from 1985-1993 before moving to Riverside in 1994. USGP will return to the Glen is 1985. F1 would develop strong fallowing in the United States strongest on both coast. F1 would an third GP somewhere in the south in the late 2000's.

IROC would develop into an showcase of American's best racers. With each spots each for Indycar, NASCAR, and IMSA drivers plus 3 open spots for another series to full the 12 car field. IROC races an 8 races schedule at Daytona, Indianapolis, Ontario, Darlington, Watkins Glen, Bridgehampton, Daytona Road Course, and Sebring.

Tim Richmond would leave for NASCAR in 1981 but would return to CART(Dan Gurney's team) in 1986 after failing to get an ride at Hendrick Motorsports(Bobby Hillin, Jr. gone the ride). Tim Richmond would win 26 races over the next 12 years and one championship in 1991. With his CART career over Richmond returns to NASCAR in 1999 winning 3 races before begin killed at the 2002 24 Hours of Daytona.

In 1989 Texas World Speedway was sold to Indycar Incorporated. By 1991 the track would host both CART and IMSA races. NASCAR would return in 1995. Texas Motor Speedway is still build would host both CART and NASCAR races.

By the late 90's most major tracks are own by one of four companies Indycar Incorporated, International Speedway Corporation(ISC), Penske Motorsports and Speedway Motorsports. Penske Motorsports would still merge with ISC in 2000(a year later than OTL). But only after a fail merger with Indycar Incorporated in 1998. In 2002 Nazareth Speedway would be sold to Indycar Incorporated by ISC.
 
1979 would begin huge changes to the world of American Motorports forever. Tony Hulman would buy the failing Ontario Motor Speedway in late 1979. Tony Hulman buying Ontario would only be the begin in 1981 he buy failing Watkins Glen. In mid-1981 he would form Indycar Incorporated to run both Ontario and Watkins Glen. Watkins Glen would be shutdown for 18 months for an full upgrade. Watkins Glen would reopen in 1983 as an world-class track. International Speedway Corporation (ISC) would buy Bridgehampton Race Circuit on Long Island in 1982. Bridgehampton Race Circuit under ISC would become an world-class track. ISC would also buy Darlington Raceway in 1982 and Nashville International Raceway in 1984. Under ISC Nashville would become a fully modern race track. Indycar Incorporated would add Riverside in 1983.

The United States Grand Prix would return to the Glen in 1989 after running in Detroit from 1982 to 1988. F1 signed an 10 year agree with Indycar Incorporated for the Watkins Glen race. United States Grand Prix West would move from Long Beach to Dallas in 1984 before moving to Ontario in 1985. Ontario would host the race up to 1994. In 1995 Riverside would replace Ontario. ISC would fight hard when the Watkins Glen contract was up to get the USGP at Bridgehampton ISC won.

Edit: Next up updates on CART, NASCAR, amd IMSA for the years 1980 to 1989.
 
Last edited:
" In 1995 Riverside would replace Ontario.

Riverside doesn't become condos? Alright!!!!!!!!!

Now the $64 million question.. How does Riverside pay for all the bells and whistles that Bernie and Max will want?

"Considering the number of poorly-attended events (Detroit)"

Phoenix was poorly-attended, Vegas was a joke.
But Detroit was well-ran, well-attended (I went to two Detroit GPs and F1 owned the city, even when the Pistons were in the middle of an NBA Finals), the teams liked Detroit, the drivers liked it..The reason why Detroit went away was Mr. Eccelstone. He wanted a glamour city, and Detroit isn't a glamour town, even with the Ren Cen and the waterfront by the start-finish line. Motown just ain't Monte Carlo.

But many people in F1 saw Detroit the way they saw Adelaide. It wasn't the glamour town, but it was a well-organized event that was a pleasure to go to in a place where people truly welcomed the circus.

"Tim Richmond would leave for NASCAR in 1981 but would return to CART(Dan Gurney's team) in 1986 after failing to get an ride at Hendrick Motorsports(Bobby Hillin, Jr. gone the ride).

Either Bobby Hillin's that damn good or Rick Hendrick needs to stick to selling cars in downtown Charlotte. Tim Richmond was one of most spell-blinding talents I've ever seen.
But apparently in this timeline, he wasn't engaging in all-out skirt shooting.

"with a stock-block formula as part of it. Now, that could give us the Penske's Ilmor-Mercedes monster motors a decade early, but there might be a silver lining to that."

Does that mean Mercedes will end their self-imposed exile from racing? GOOD!
But I don't see the 209i sneaking through the cracks early, especially with the CART/USAC drama being white hot in the 1980s.

"With a few adjustments to history, you could have a 1996 Indycar field with Mario, Michael and Jeff Andretti, Emerson Fittipaldi, Aryton Senna, Rick Mears, Tim Richmond, Jeff Gordon, Tony Stewart, Alex Zanardi, Greg Moore, Paul Tracy, Nigel Mansell, Bobby Rahal, Jimmy Vasser, Bryan Herta, Robby Gordon, Danny Sullivan, Al Unser Jr. and A.J. Foyt.

A 1996 Indianapolis 500 with this kind of star power in it? HOT DAMN! Back home again, in Indiana! And its all very plausible. Especially If Senna made good on his threat to drive for Penske in 1994. He did test for the team..and that could have led to a serious influx of F1 drivers who were sick of the medieval politics of Grand Prix racing.
That is one thing I like about this timeline, the possible concept of North American-based racing truly stepping out as a bold alternative to Bernie Eccelstone.

An 80s era Speed Channel..Possible, but not likely. Cable TV is still in kneepants, in terms of television homes. A majority of the nation wasn't wired for Cable until around 1987, you are still a good 5-10 years away from niche channels forming.

But, if you are getting MLB/NBA-style regular season ratings, you can bet motorsports is something the major networks would want more of. And again...there is ESPN, and remember we are talking about an ESPN that also still very much in kneepants.

Consider ESPNs offering OTL circa 1987 or 1988. This was a typical weekend for ESPN. They'd have the IMSA race, the Trans Am race and an edition of SpeedWeek on Saturday. Then Sunday morning you'd have the Formula 1 race, then the NASCAR race and/or the IndyCar race, and this is even with ESPN having an NBA package, the NFL Sunday night package (1986) and the NHL on ESPN. At the time, a 1980s Speed Channel probably wouldn't fly, yet...but at the time the racing fan's appetite was being satisfied by the options already in place.

Oh by the way, I wonder what Robin Miller would be writing about in this timeline. :)
 
Last edited:
NASCAR 1980's

The 80's would see the old guard retired. In there place would come drivers like Rusty Wallace, Geoff Bodine, Bill Elliott, Terry Labonte, Mark Martin, Kyle Petty, Ken Schrader, Sterling Marlin, Alan Kulwicki, Davey Allison, Ernie Irvan, and the greatest Dale Earnhardt. There 12 drivers plus Darrell Waltrip would become the face of NASCAR.

The 80's would see the rise of new teams would challenge the old guard. Hendrick Motorsports, Roush Racing, Melling Racing, Morgan-McClure Motorsports, and Robert Yates Racing. Of the old guard only teams remain competitive today DiGard Motorsports, Junior Johnson & Associates and Petty Enterprises.

The biggest change to the schedule would the added of three road courses(Bridgehampton, Sears Point, and Watkins Glen). Riverside and Ontario were cut to one race to make room. Cutting races would become common in NASCAR in the 90's and 00's(2010 schedule of 30 races).
 
Ontario will host the USGP West from 1985-1993 before moving to Riverside in 1994. USGP will return to the Glen is 1985. F1 would develop strong fallowing in the United States strongest on both coast. F1 would an third GP somewhere in the south in the late 2000's.

I can't see the United States having three Grand Prix races, but Riverside and Watkine Glen, suitably set up, would be good tracks for the Formula One circuits. Riverside would need massive upgrades to host Formula One events, but so would Watkins Glen, so that's possible. If you are going to go with the third F1 event, I would suggest accelerating that proposal for a new track in Austin, Texas. Dallas' lone GP had a good layout and substantial crowd, but the event was ruined by 107-degree heat, the track crumbling beneath the cars and crappy organizers. Texas might actually work well for this.

IROC would develop into an showcase of American's best racers. With each spots each for Indycar, NASCAR, and IMSA drivers plus 3 open spots for another series to full the 12 car field. IROC races an 8 races schedule at Daytona, Indianapolis, Ontario, Darlington, Watkins Glen, Bridgehampton, Daytona Road Course, and Sebring.

Only three? Honestly, I'd go for five from Indycar, NASCAR and IMSA, and ten other worthy candidates. I'd be aiming for a six and six event setup for that - Riverside, Watkins Glen, Road Atlanta, Road America, Mid-Ohio and Sebring for the road races, with Daytona, Darlington, Indianapolis, Ontario, Michigan and New Hampshire for the ovals.

Tim Richmond would leave for NASCAR in 1981 but would return to CART(Dan Gurney's team) in 1986 after failing to get an ride at Hendrick Motorsports(Bobby Hillin, Jr. gone the ride).

Gurney's team was gone in 1986, so you changed history in two ways. But Richmond was one of the best talents of his generation, rightly deserving a spot with Michael Andretti, Bobby Rahal, Al Unser Jr., Robby Gordon, Danny Sullivan, Scott Pruett and Scott Brayton as the young guns of Indycars in the 1980s. (Buddy Lazier, Stan Fox and Davey Hamilton might well have been able to earn one of these spots, too, if they had decent rides.)

Tim Richmond would win 26 races over the next 12 years and one championship in 1991. With his CART career over Richmond returns to NASCAR in 1999 winning 3 races before begin killed at the 2002 24 Hours of Daytona.

Why do stories about Tim always end in him dying? :( I am guessing that you are remembering the driver killed in that freak accident at Daytona in 2002 when you point that out.

In 1989 Texas World Speedway was sold to Indycar Incorporated. By 1991 the track would host both CART and IMSA races. NASCAR would return in 1995. Texas Motor Speedway is still build would host both CART and NASCAR races.

Texas World Speedway. makes Texas Motor Speedway a non-starter. No point in building it, if you have a facility almost right in the middle between Dallas, Houston and San Antonio. You'd be better IMO to have Indycar Inc. buy TWS in 1984ish and have it return to the schedule for 1986, with NASCAR back for 1988.

By the late 90's most major tracks are own by one of four companies Indycar Incorporated, International Speedway Corporation(ISC), Penske Motorsports and Speedway Motorsports. Penske Motorsports would still merge with ISC in 2000(a year later than OTL). But only after a fail merger with Indycar Incorporated in 1998. In 2002 Nazareth Speedway would be sold to Indycar Incorporated by ISC.

Nazareth staying alive instead of dying on account of ISC is a good thing, if you ask me. I don't think that Hulman wouldn't take up Penske's circuits if the opportunity came, and with this much more prosperous Indycar series, Penske may elect to keep the tracks to expand his own operations. Also, part of the reason he sold out was to cover the costs of building California Speedway in Fontana. With Riverside flying high and Ontario still there, California Speedway will never be built. I would imagine that with three Indycar events in the LA basin (Long Beach, Riverside and Ontario) that NASCAR will only go with one event and leave that market to IMSA and Indycars.
 
Riverside doesn't become condos? Alright!!!!!!!!!

Yeah, I love that too. The irony is that the mall built there is mostly empty now. I wonder if anybody has had the idea of tearing it down and building a new racetrack there? :D

Now the $64 million question.. How does Riverside pay for all the bells and whistles that Bernie and Max will want?

Hulman's deep pockets, I would suspect. I'm guessing that after the failures in Las Vegas, Dallas and Phoenix, Bernie might be a little more willing to cut a deal, especially since Hulman would be a very successful promoter by then. Los Angeles is a massive market, and if F1 and Indycars can lock it up (they are the top racers out there right now IOTL) then the track will be able to really pack it in. There are twelve million people within one hundred miles of Riverside, surely you can get a good crowd from that.


Phoenix was poorly-attended, Vegas was a joke.
But Detroit was well-ran, well-attended (I went to two Detroit GPs and F1 owned the city, even when the Pistons were in the middle of an NBA Finals), the teams liked Detroit, the drivers liked it..The reason why Detroit went away was Mr. Eccelstone. He wanted a glamour city, and Detroit isn't a glamour town, even with the Ren Cen and the waterfront by the start-finish line. Motown just ain't Monte Carlo.

But many people in F1 saw Detroit the way they saw Adelaide. It wasn't the glamour town, but it was a well-organized event that was a pleasure to go to in a place where people truly welcomed the circus.

Detroit is a car town to the bone, which is why I find it sad that its fallen as far as it has. I also hope that one day its back to its old form, or at least some semblance of it. Today its starting to hold their heads high a little more, and that's overdue if you ask me. The circuit was a bit Mickey Mouse, but that could be fixed. (In my Indycar TL, Belle Isle lost the event back to Renaissance Center after it began being rebuilt in 1996, and stayed for good. Aryton Senna's first Indycar win in that TL was that first race back on the streets of Detroit in 1996.)

Either Bobby Hillin's that damn good or Rick Hendrick needs to stick to selling cars in downtown Charlotte. Tim Richmond was one of most spell-blinding talents I've ever seen.
But apparently in this timeline, he wasn't engaging in all-out skirt shooting.

Even the best team owners make some seriously stupid driver pickups. (Roger Penske at one point employed Tarso Marques in CART. Yes, really.) Hendrick would seriously regret losing Richmond to Indycars. Him and Dan Gurney would be a great fit, too. And yes, he ought to have stopped the skirt chasing.

Does that mean Mercedes will end their self-imposed exile from racing? GOOD!
But I don't see the 209i sneaking through the cracks early, especially with the CART/USAC drama being white hot in the 1980s.

The reason the Penske-Ilmor 209 came to be was an adjustment to the rules. USAC's formula for Indy allowed 209ci stock-blocks, but they had to be pushrod motors. This was done to allow the big-boost Buicks and Chevrolets to run in the 1980s. What happened is that Michael Greenfield showed up with a racing 209ci engine with pushrods in 1993, and USAC allowed him to run. Lots of blown engines later, he didn't run, but Penske found that out, and in the long tradition of him pushing the rulebook, worked with Ilmor and M-B to make the 209i. I can see such a stunt being adapted at Indy in 1983-84, Penske taking advantage of it, and the 209i arrives in 1985 or 1986. They own that year's race (perhaps have it be 1985 for Danny Sullivan keeps his Indy 500 win), and the other teams go bananas. The rules are adjusted for 1987 to allow the big-bangers to stay, but with the smaller 161ci engines getting a lot more boost, and knowing Hulman's affinity for the big engines, he pushes through a bigger NA engine formula, and people show up at Indy in 1987 with 427ci big-block V8s for power. The bigger boost might see the Miller-Drake design from the mid-70s work better, as it was a dog at lower boost levels.

A 1996 Indianapolis 500 with this kind of star power in it? HOT DAMN! Back home again, in Indiana! And its all very plausible. Especially If Senna made good on his threat to drive for Penske in 1994. He did test for the team..and that could have led to a serious influx of F1 drivers who were sick of the medieval politics of Grand Prix racing.

In my Indycar TL, I had Senna survive his crash at Imola in 1994, recover to run the last few rounds of 1994 and dice with Schumacher for the 1995 F1 championship. But Ecclestone's using Senna's recovery to get attention, as he surely would, enrages Senna. Emmo sees what an opportunity it is, and Penske signs Aryton to the 1996 "Superteam", made up of Ayrton Senna, Emerson Fittipaldi, Al Unser Jr. and Paul Tracy. Senna ran the 1996-1999 Indycar seasons, before returning to F1 for one last season in 2000 for Williams before retiring. In the process, Senna racks up 14 wins, 35 top-10s and 27 poles, and never finishes worse than sixth in the championship, and Emmo's last Indycar win, at Rio de Janiero in 1998, is a 1-2-3-4 for the Brazilians, made up of Emmo, Senna, Tony Kanaan and Andre Ribiero, and is regarded as one of the most-remembered moments in Brazilian sports history.

Mansell in my TL leaves McLaren's F1 squad in a huff midway through 1995 and finds his F1 career unceremoniously over. Humbled by that, he takes over from the injured Michael Andretti for the second half of the 1995 Indycar season. He does very well, winning a race and regularly scoring points. After making up with the Andrettis, Mansell runs the full seasons in 1996 and 1997, before heading back to England and a British Touring Car Championship ride at the request of his family in 1998. Mansell returns as the arrogant fool and leaves as an English gentleman, and goes home with honors. Mansell retires from racing after winning the 2001 BTCC title.

That is one thing I like about this timeline, the possible concept of North American-based racing truly stepping out as a bold alternative to Bernie Eccelstone.

I'm not writing this, but if I was, I'd be making a deal between Hulman and CART that they can live with, which leads to the schedule expanding to about 22 events by the end of the 1980s, keeping ovals and expanding road courses. The new engines I mentioned above arrive in 1987, and Richmond scores the first win by a non-turbocharged Indycar in 16 years at Long Beach. By 1990, Chevrolet, Buick and Ford Cosworth are joined in the series by Porsche, Mercedes-Benz and Judd. Alfa Romeo arrives for 1991 but is an abysmal failures and yanks at the end of 1992. Honda arrives in 1993 but struggles at first, but they switch to the 161ci high-boost engine formula and starts winning.

As for Bernie, he's an excellent promoter and a smart guy, but a douchebag most of the time. Tony Hulman could be a douchebag, but didn't tend to be that way as Bernie is. If North American motorsport is this popular, you can bet that the top of the ladder (NASCAR, Indycars and IMSA) is the very best teams and drivers, and the levels below it (Indy Lights, NASCAR Busch, SCCA World Challenge, Trans-Am, et cetera) would be well supported and full of talented guys as well. The thought of it is salivating for this racing nut. My first Indy 500 was 1996, and while the event was fabulous, the field was ho-hum at best - that was the first year for the IRL, and thus the stars were not there. (Though hearing of the pace-lap wreck at the United States 500 at Michigan the same day caused most of the bloody grandstand to burst out laughing.) In this world, my first 500 would have had a field including the Andrettis, Little Al, Rahal, Foyt, Mears, Emmo, Senna, Mansell, Richmond, Gordon, Stewart, Tracy, Zanardi, Moore, Vasser, Sullivan, Herta....they might have to grow the field beyond 33 starters in this world just to get all the worthies in the field. :cool:

Oh by the way, I wonder what Robin Miller would be writing about in this timeline. :)

OK, that proves that you are very much a real diehard racing nut. :cool:

As for Miller, I'm thinking that Miller might continue his driving duties as a midget racer, and thus become good friends with Fox (a fellow Midget addict). Robin picks up mechanical knowledge along the way, and writes for the Indianapolis Star as well as being a driver on the weekends. He makes on attempt at qualifying for the 500 as a driver in the early 80s, but doesn't make it. He stays a writer to the present day, and eventually gets hired by ABC/ESPN as an analyst and pit reporter. (Him and Jack Arute would be effing priceless, though you'll probably wanna let Jack handle A.J. Foyt. Tex hates Miller.)
 
"they might have to grow the field beyond 33 starters in this world just to get all the worthies in the field.

NO! NO! NO! The Indianapolis 500 field should be the 33 fastest, and only the 33 fastest. No provisionals. No mulligans.

Besides, imagine how wild Bump Day would be!
 
Top