From The Streets of Detroit: America's Auto Powerhouse

The Mann I love this TL but I've got some questions.

1)Does DeLorean get involved in any type motorsports.
2)Is Texas World Speedway still on NASCAR and IndyCar schedules.
3)Are Ontario Motor Speedway and Nazareth Speedway still around in this TL.
4) Is Watkins Glen still purchase by Corning Enterprises and International Speedway Corporation.
5)Will Pontiac make a return to NASCAR under Magna in the future.
6)How are series like the World Challenge, Trans-Am, and Continental Challenge doing.
7)How times a year does NASCAR turn right.
8) Are Dale Earnhardt, Adam Petty, Alan Kulwicki, Davey Allison, and Rob Moroso still alivve.
 
TheMann said:
Carbon-fiber chassis haven't happened on a wide scale just yet
What are the chances of the U.S. military financing that, for aviation use?
TheMann said:
It didn't take long for the "microcars" to become fairly popular in the crowded streets of Europe
Does this offer opportunities for kei cars?:cool::cool::cool:
TheMann said:
An attempt at passing a major bailout of American banks
Why doesn't anybody consider simply winding them up?:confused::confused::confused::confused: And was there still no thought of helping the people who got screwed by the mortgage crooks?:mad:
TheMann said:
Unwilling to pass the bank bailouts without real financial industry reform
Good on him.:cool::cool:
TheMann said:
Huntsman announced that he would seek the re-enactment of the provisions of the Glass-Steagal Act, as well as massively restrict the expansion of financial derivatives products and order the breaking up of the six largest banks. Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, U.S. Bancorp and PNC Financial Services were ordered dismantled using antitrust legislation
:cool::cool::cool::cool::cool::cool:
TheMann said:
GM did its deal with Canadian auto parts behemoth Magna International, which was ably supported by Canada's larger banks (most of which came out of the recession almost unscathed) and the Canadian and Ontario governments. Pontiac and Oldsmobile were transferred to the Magna Automobile Corporation on June 1, 2011
:cool::cool::cool: Thank you.:):) We haven't done this well since McLaughlin & Rockne.:)
TheMann said:
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
So the Pres Ahmadinnerjacket jokes still work?:p:cool:
TheMann said:
Magna's push to become one of the now-Big Five went well, with them using both brands - Pontiac in the lower-priced markets, Oldsmobile in the higher-price ones - and doing a deal with Fiat for Magna's dealers to sell their cars in North America.
:cool: Again.:)
The Oncoming Storm said:
Lotus 79, Sex On Wheels!
You mean frying pan on wheels.:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
The Mann I love this TL but I've got some questions.

1)Does DeLorean get involved in any type motorsports.

Yes. The DeLorean M15 is the first GT2 class champion in IMSA in 1994 and wins the GT2 class at Le Mans in 1996. The DMC-12 sees a number of racing efforts in IMSA in the 1980s, and aside from one surprise class win at Daytona in 1985, is largely unsuccessful. It's a very regular competitor, though, and its good handling and excellent horsepower mean its a regular SCCA and NASA competitor to the present day.

2)Is Texas World Speedway still on NASCAR and IndyCar schedules.

NASCAR no, Indycar yes. TWS was rebuilt for the racing in the late 1980s, taking advantage of population growth in College Station and not too long later the completion of the Texas TGV and its allowing of race fans in Houston and Dallas-Forth Worth to come and watch. Texas Motor Speedway steals the NASCAR event from TWS in 1996, which leads TWS after a number of attempts to get NASCAR back to tune the place for Indycars in 1998-99, with lower banking and a wider racing surface. TWS in this world is one of the "2500-mile Trophy" events, with the other 500-mile races on the calendar (Indianapolis, Michigan, Pocono and California). All five of those events pay $1 million or more to win (Indy pays $2.75 million to the winner ITTL 2012) and are the races that start three-wide. TMS here is NASCAR-only, and Indycar will get its second Texas race in 2013 at the newly-built Circuit of the Americas near Austin. :cool:

3)Are Ontario Motor Speedway and Nazareth Speedway still around in this TL.

Ontario no, Nazareth yes. Ontario was torn down to become a housing development in 1986, which is part of the reason why Riverside was saved - lots of Southern California race fans were sickened by the prospect of losing any more of their history. Nazareth no longer hosts Indycar races (last one was there in 2005), but does run NASCAR trucks and lots of lower-level races, and is the regular testing ground for both Team Penske and Andretti Autosport, based in Reading and Nazareth, PA, respectively.

4) Is Watkins Glen still purchase by Corning Enterprises and International Speedway Corporation.

Nope. Dan Gurney bought it out of bankruptcy in 1981. NASCAR returns there in 1985, Indycar in 1988. The World Sports Car and World Touring Car Championships ran there in 1990-92.

5)Will Pontiac make a return to NASCAR under Magna in the future.

Most definitely, particularly once NASCAR's Cup Series comes to Canada. ;)

6)How are series like the World Challenge, Trans-Am, and Continental Challenge doing.

World Challenge is today known as the North American Touring Car Championship and North American Sports Car World Challenge, and are bigger series in their own right. The NATCC brought in BTCC-style Super Touring Rules and a two-class system in 1997, splitting from the World Challenge for a while. The World Challenge was working with IMSA for a while but breaks back off with its own rules for 2000. World Challenge is open to cars that would normally not be legal in IMSA, such as the Nissan GT-R, AMC AMX2, Gumpert Apollo and Honda NSX.

The NATCC has been a two-class series ever since 1997, with the two classes in 2012 being named Global Touring Car (GTC) and Sport Sedan (SS). The GTC is pretty identical to British Touring Car Championship Rules (the two series have a long history of working together) and SS is for bigger American sedans, with the first entrants being guys racing the Chrysler 300M and Lincoln LS in 2001. SS cars tend to be faster in a straight line but slower in the corners than the GTC cars. The BTCC began allowing the SS cars in their series in 2007, and Matt Neal won the BTCC championship in a SS-spec Rover SD4 in 2009. :cool:

7)How times a year does NASCAR turn right.

In 2012, five - Watkins Glen, Riverside, Sears Point, Road Atlanta and Road America. In 2013, Pacific Raceways, Montreal and Mosport will make it eight.

8) Are Dale Earnhardt, Adam Petty, Alan Kulwicki, Davey Allison, and Rob Moroso still alivve.

Earnhardt and Moroso yes. Petty, Kulwicki and Allison, no. Petty's death in an accident led to the much-expanded focus on safety in NASCAR. Earnhardt added to his impressive NASCAR CV with a class win at Le Mans with Corvette Racing in 2002, Dale Jr., Ron Fellows and Johnny O'Connell, and retired from NASCAR with honors in 2006. That doesn't mean he stopped being involved in racing, mind you, and at the longer endurance races, you can almost always see Earnhardt there. He really enjoys the Corvette GT cars, and he's really good at it. :)

Moroso's life nearly ended in the 1990 crash that IOTL killed him, but while he survived, NASCAR suspended him for it and he couldn't get a ride after that. After a year trying to find a NASCAR ride he gave up and went looking elsewhere. Tony George took him on as an Indy Lights driver for his new Vision Racing Team in 1993, and after spending the 1995 Indy Lights season locked in a battle with Greg Moore, Moroso moved into George's Indycar operation for 1996. Tony George's Vision Racing team in 1996 - Tony George, Robbie Stanley and Robert Moroso - got laughed at early on, but that laughing didn't last long. Stewart very narrowly lost the 1996 Indycar rookie of the year title to Moore and the Vision guys (like everyone else) had no answer to Alex Zanardi and Chip Ganassi in 1997, but for 1998 were on form and kicking. Stewart was champion, Moroso finished fourth in the championship (Zanardi and Al Unser Jr. between him and Stewart) and won the United States 500 and Stanley finished sixth in the title race. Moroso ran his second Daytona 500 in 2000 and nearly won it, losing the lead with two laps to go to eventual winner Mark Martin.
 
Part 12: The Small Car Revolution, Diesel Power, Hybrid Theory, The Big City of Detroit and the Need For Speed

After the chaos of the late 2000s and early 2010s subsided, it was clear that the sudden (and massive investment) by the Iranians in American banks in 2011 and 2012 had kicked loose a massive new sense of confidence, as the $350 Billion shaken loose by Iran's investment had in itself snowballed. America pulled hard out of its recession, and while that easily sealed President Huntsman's re-election it also had the effect of giving the Republicans the Senate - but the Democrats took back the House in 2012 for the first time since 1994, a turnabout that didn't make things easy for the Republicans, but "Statesman Huntsman" found himself able to work with Democrats and Republicans alike, though a sizeable number of GOP stalwarts continued to be angry over Huntsman's push for financial industry regulation in 2009 and 2010. The Democratic positions on many social issues in America didn't help the Republican cause - but Huntsman, himself a social moderate, tried to focus his presidency on economic and foreign policy issues and was, by and large, successful at doing so.

In Detroit - and indeed now Chicago and Toronto - the world of cars had been changed both by the recession and by concerns about energy prices and global warming. Sales of smaller cars from Asia, Europe and Detroit had all skyrocketed as a percentage of the automakers' total sales, and that trend had moved to North America, a fact that the Detroit makers were now quite aware of. Small cars had indeed moved up the scale, to the point that value - which had once been Detroit's big selling point for such cars - was now rarely mentioned in marketing. All of the contemporary small cars - the AMC Stratus, Chevrolet Cruze and Spark, Ford Focus, Fiesta and Puma, Dodge Dart and Pontiac Sunfire, as well as the small cars from Europe sold through Europe, notably the Peugeot 307, Citroen C4 (both sold through various Chrysler dealerships), Renault Clio (sold by AMC dealers) and Fiat 500 (sold by Magna in Pontiac/Oldsmobile dealers) were all very good small cars, all of which tried to aim for solid quality, excellent fuel economy, great handling, quick performance and top-notch equipment levels, with the tiny 500 being the champ for economy, the Sunfire and Clio being the winners for handling, the C4 for equipment levels and design ingenuity, the bombproof Cruze for durability and build quality. Even after the recession was over, the sales of many of these excellent small cars remained strong, and what surprised many was history's turnabout. What had helped the Japanese and Koreans into the American marketplace was durable and fuel-efficient small cars at a time when Detroit's machines were massive beasts with poor reliability. Now, Detroit had turned that on its head in a way - the cars from Detroit were widely seen as being more exciting and stronger in construction than those from Asia.

Within this, Detroit's small car wars heated up in a variety of ways, namely on rally circuits. Having dominated the WRC for years with the C4 WRC, Chrysler PSA moved to promoting the launch of their Dodge brand in Europe though the use of a WRC variant of the Dodge Dart, which moved to use many of the staff and drivers of the Citroen effort. Citroen fans initially cried foul until it became clear that the barnstorming C4 WRCs would all be sold to privateer entrants and that they would continue to get factory support. Combined with the 2013 arrival of the Chevrolet Cruze SSX and Mini Cooper WRC to the championship alongside the existing Ford, Subaru and Volkswagen efforts led to a wild 2013 WRC season, where five-time champ Sebastien Loeb, now at the wheel of a Dodge, fell narrowly to Ford Petter Solberg, though this was in part due to American rallyist Ken Block's awesome driving in the last two rallies in Spain and Canada. The rally wars also extended to North America, where the NASA ProRally circuit did not allow factory-entered teams but allowed manufacturers to support their products, which saw Chevrolet claim the Pro Rally title in their first season of competition, thanks again to Block - though this time he blew his chances and Ford's by a spectacular crash at the final rally in Michigan's Upper Peninsula, handing the title to Chevrolet pilot Antoine L'Estage.

On the streets, all of the Detroit small cars (and their captive import counterparts) spawned fun car versions of various levels. GM's awesome Cruze SSX, with its 355-horsepower turbocharged four-cylinder engine, seven-speed twin-clutch gearbox, carbon-fiber bodywork, remote reservoir shocks and four wheel drive, was the performance monster of the bunch, capable of 0-60 mph times of 4.3 seconds and a top speed of 165 mph. Ford's Focus RS matched its 0-60 time but not its horsepower (320) or top speed (158 mph). Both stood with price tags of roughly $35,000, while both had numerous siblings further down the range with rather smaller price tags. The Fiat 500 Abarth, with its 165-horsepower turbocharged engine, was like the tiny missile of yore, as was the Mini Cooper S. The small cars of this category were a revolution to many who had shifted down during the recession or had bought these cars as a rival to a larger SUV or pickup truck, and in not a few cases people used to driving two-ton trucks or SUVs got behind the wheel of a smaller fun car and never looked back.

"It was not always a benefit to have small cars sell instead of bigger cars, trucks and SUVs where there was more profit to be had for each vehicle, but the business was in selling cars and while the bean counters weren't happy, it was quite notable that when many customers got behind the wheel of a car that was fun to drive they didn't care about how big it was any more. Some always did care, of course, but it was clear that Detroit knew that if one is gonna spend at least twenty thousand dollars on a car, they wanted it not just to get them to work and be able to take their kids to school and pick up the groceries, but they also wanted it to put a smile on their face. Detroit had for years been doing to do just this, as had the Europeans, but Japan was slow to respond and the Koreans, Malaysians and other Asians slower still. They paid for that misjudgement, having to make back market share in a sector that they had once been the class of the field in."
-- Sam Mitani, in an interview with EVO America, 2015

chevroletcruzedusk01.jpg


The 2013 Chevrolet Cruze SSX

3262fordfocusrs.jpg


The 2013 Ford Focus RS

2013renaultclio01.jpg


A 2013 Renault Clio Sport

Noting the problems with the sales of big trucks and the by now almost-universal availability of ultra-low-sulfur diesel, Detroit's efforts in diesel engines, having started in the 1990s, reached for new heights in the 2010s, taking advantage of the fact that diesel engines can get better fuel mileage than a gasoline engine of the same size, even if it gets less performance to an extent. The most powerful truck engines from General Motors, Ford and Chrysler by this point were diesels which had over 800 foot-pounds of torque and could burn rubber into the middle of next week. The other advantage of these new diesels was the ability to use smaller diesels in the smaller trucks and SUVs, getting more than adequate power while improving fuel consumption further.

Another major step forward for this was the introduction by Pioneer Petroleum and Ashland Marathon in June 2014 of biodiesel for sale at normal gas stations the two brands owned, with their biodiesel being produced via algaculture facilities in Florida, Alabama, Missisippi, Louisiana and Texas. The oddball approach had been funded heavily by the state governments of several of those states, aiming to reduce America's importing of oil from other nations - America imported from 9.5 million barrels of oil a day in 2013. It was widely figured that the use of biofuels could reduce this, and Texas Governor Rick Perry, the biggest single supporter of the project in government, stated that it could potentially allow America to "fuel itself." Whether it was true or not, the biodiesel that was sold by these companies was claimed to be usable in all conditions and in any make or model of car with a diesel engine - though Chrysler and AMC both advised that their diesel cars not use biodiesel fuels unless they had components for the cars fitted which reduced the fuel's effect on the vehicle's fuel systems. These components, however, could be installed at Chrysler and AMC dealerships for a nominal fee and were quite frequently taken up by consumers.

With wide French expertise in diesel engines, it was little surprise that such engines in small cars first showed up in smaller cars from Chrysler and AMC, those usually using the French automakers' diesel engines. These clean diesels had surprising power outs in many cases - the Peugeot-Citroen DW series engines, which saw service in their cars as well as the Dodge Dart and Avenger, Chrysler PT Cruiser and 200 and the Ram Hunter pickup truck, could be had with up to 135 horsepower, which wouldn't have been a terrible output in a gas-powered car, but when combined with the engine's 230 foot-pounds of torque gave quite good performance even in the compact pickup Ram Hunter. The smaller diesels did not outsell the gasoline versions in any case, but the automakers did consider them a good addition - and sales of the vehicles were more than strong enough to justify the selling of them in any case.

Hybrids, which had been pioneered by Toyota, Honda and GM almost simultaneously in the 1990s, exploded across the model range in the 2000s. Honda's first-generation Insight was a sales flop compared to the Toyota Prius and Chevrolet Volt (which within a year of its model year 1998 introduction in the United States had started being sold in Europe and Australia, with other markets soon following), and Honda pulled out all the stops. Quite openly ripping off GM's idea of an all-electric car with a gas engine for power when the batteries were flat, Honda's second-generation Insight hit the road in 2009, with a Miller-cycle 1250cc engine originally designed as an engine for a gas-powered generator. It beat the Volt and Prius' fuel mileage numbers and was cheaper than the Volt, but the Insight didn't have the Volt's sure-footed feel or the mechanical durability of its Japanese rival. Nevertheless, the second generation Insight was soon punching back for Honda against the other hybrid makers. Honda followed this up with the 2011 CR-Z, a small sports car reminiscent of Honda's famous CR-X sports coupe of the 1980s.

These were just the tip of the iceberg, of course, as hybrids grew from nearly every automaker out there, all seeking to improve the fuel efficiency and reduce the carbon dioxide emissions of their vehicles. Detroit was not immune to this, of course - GM, if anything, was one of its biggest proponents, with hybrid versions of everything from the Chevrolet Cruze to the massive GMC Suburban full-size SUV. The Global Hybrid Co-operation System, developed by General Motors, Chrysler-PSA, Daimler and Gurney Austin Rover, was the entry into the big cars for hybrid technology, with the system using a specialized transmission with two 110-horsepower electric motors in the transmission, using multiple planetary gearsets in an automatic transmission to improve the fuel efficiency at low and medium speeds of a larger vehicle. Used at first almost exclusively in larger SUVs and pickup trucks, the system worked so well that its first customer for use outside of its developers was Rolls-Royce, which began buying the system for its large cars in 2010. It was soon available across most of the larger car product lines for GM, as well as Chrysler's rear-wheel-drive 300 and Charger models as well as their trucks, with the Range Rover and several Mercedes-Benz vehicles following in 2009 and 2010.

mugenhondacrzhybrid2.jpg


Honda's CR-Z sports coupe, with modifications by in-house tuner Mugen


vauxhallampera1.jpg


A Vauxhall Ampera on a street in London, England

rangeroverevoque.jpg


A Range Rover Evoque sports SUV, equipped with the AHS2 Two-Mode Hybrid System

"If you had once said that you could have a car with four hundred horsepower that gets thirty-five miles to the gallon on the highway, somebody would have laughed at you. If you had told someone else that you could have a luxury SUV that gets over thirty miles to the gallon, scoffing would have been the results. But with these machines, you have a four-word answer to those people. Stop Laughing. It's Real."
-- Dr. Mark Wallett, Vice-President of Powertrain Engineering, General Motors, in a speech at the 2013 Detroit International Auto Show

"Imagine that. A Toorak Tractor that a green nut won't set on fire. Who'd have thought that?"
-- Charlie Cox on Top Gear Australia, 2011

As the 2010s went on, there was more problems with afflicted the United States - but one of the biggest problems, that of aging populations, was one which effected most of the developed world, while other nations had more massively-sloped population pryamids than the United States, the demographics of the United States was such that immigration was the only thing stopping a population decline by the late 2010s, a fact that had massive effects on society in general, and one of the notables for the car industry was the growth of the inner sections of many major American cities, which indeed in a number of cases - including Detroit - was seeing something of a baby boom. The cities which had focused much resources and efforts on improving their inner city landscapes in earlier times, a list which included New York, Chicago, Boston, Dallas, Indianapolis, Detroit, Seattle and San Francisco, saw substantial gentrification in the 2010s as older people, many of whom had lived in the suburbs all their lives, began to move back into the major cities themselves, seeking more compact neighborhoods and living spaces which allowed them to spend more time enjoying themselves and less time traveling, a fact which was in a way not helpful to automobile manufacturers but one which they had seen coming for quite a while.

The city of Detroit, by contrast, had seen much change over the decades. Absolute employment in the city's auto industries had fallen since the peaks of the 1970s, but that had been replaced by many other jobs across numerous fields. Detroit had grown a solid middle class of inner city residents in the 1960s and 1970s, and by the 1980s these people were fueling economic growth in the city - and as the boomers became older and more of them became empty nesters, the downtown neighborhoods of the city became more and more appealing to them, a move driven by billions of dollars in gentrification efforts. By 2010, that move had led to a surge in population in Detroit to the point that the city had passed its 1950 population peak of 1.85 million in 1997 and kept on going, reaching the two million mark in 2001 and being estimated by 2015 at 2.64 million. Indeed, while several of the cities outside of Detroit were starting to struggle with finances during the great recession, Detroit itself was flying high - and even in the middle of the Great Recession of the late 2000s, Detroit's wealthy car nuts began one of the biggest of redevelopment efforts.

The Coleman Young Airport, built before WWII but not having seen any commercial service since 2000, was bought from the City of Detroit in 2007 by racing mogul (and big-time car dealer) Roger Penske with the goal of turning it into a testing facility and headquarters for his race teams. But that idea lasted mere months before Penske got an offer from the organizers of the Grand Prix of Detroit about turning the lightly-used airport into a real racing circuit suitable for Formula One competition - well aware that F1's contract with the Grand Prix of Detroit ended in 2010 and that F1 boss Damon Hill was looking for a permanent circuit to run the USGP on and that there were several other tracks looking for a crack at the USGP East. The deal was simple - turn the Coleman A Young Airport into a top-class race circuit, and well get the F1 USGP here. Penske took the deal in March 2008, and despite the financial problems the great recession caused, the money flowed and the work got done on a grand scale - as befitting a major race track project in the city that was the home of the American auto industry.

The disused airport (and an adjacent school for aircraft mechanics, which was moved to a new location at the track builders' expense) became a 4.1-mile, 25-turn road race course known for its high-speed corners. Despite being mostly flat (elevation changes were built in a few places using earth movers and excavation equipment) the track was a wild one, and the wide-open nature of the airport facility wasn't lost on the track developers, who cited grandstands and VIP facilities in locations which allowed for expansive views of the track. Penske still moved his race team operations here, and one of the others involved was sports car maker Vector Automotive, which when it began a rebirth in 2007 cited one of its test facilities next to the airport, figuring correctly that it would one day be a race track. The Detroit automakers had no problems with supporting the idea, namely because it would also surely one day be a test track for many of their cars for the road - again, not a bad assumption.

The F1GP didn't initially go to Detroit - the last downtown Detroit GP was in 2010, where then the circuit moved back to Watkins Glen, where it had been home to for two decades. Despite this, the track's opening in July 2011 saw rounds of the Indycar World Series, World Touring Car Championship / North American Touring Car Championship and the first-ever North American round of the European Truck Racing Championship. The track's failure to get an F1 race off the bat didn't phase them - and indeed, the track, lovingly named Detroit Race City by its owners and just Race City by local fans, became ground zero for car nuts in the region. Such was the impact it had that when the track's owners proposed a 24-hour touring car race at Race City, local residents' objections were quite muted - this in an area of a city which was rapidly redeveloping. After an intense battle over who should host the GP after Watkins Glen's five-year contract was up in 2015, Penske and the Race City owners came to a deal with Watkins Glen owner Dan Gurney - they would alternate the race, with even number year races at Detroit and odd-numbered year races at Watkins Glen.

432393270411rentrkstruc.jpg


Markus Ostreich's Renault Magnum and Paul Kenton's MAN lead the first truck race at Race City in 2011

Detroit's growth was added to by a peculiar factor which was starting to show in numerous North American cities by the late 2010s - a baby boom. The growth in school enrollment in Detroit grew faster that the population did, a fact that by the late 2010s was also visible in over a dozen major North American cities. This, especially considering the gentrification of many of these cities, said that there was indeed likely to be a move back into the major cities for the American population, a signal that the post-WWII era of massive suburban growth may well be over.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps I missed it, but which folly did DaimlerBenz Follow in Absence of its Chrysler involvement?

Daimler-Benz and Chrysler were never involved with each other here, and instead Daimler has tried to build good smaller Mercedes-Benz models in an attempt to increase their sales, as well as selling heavy trucks and commercial vehicles in the United States in greater numbers. Mercedes still tries out the Maybach brand, but it doesn't get far against Rolls-Royce, Bentley and the big cars from Mercedes itself, as well as Jaguar, BMW, Cadillac, Lincoln, Lexus and Audi.

How is the development of self-driving ("automatic") cars and intelligent highways in TTL? Still under DARPA?

Yes, but it also catches major problems with public opinion being against the idea of self-driving cars, as well as regulators and to an extent the automakers being against it.
 
Mann, your timelines are awesome. Are you gonna do one on U.S. Airlines next? Something related to deregulation, which allows Pan Am to operate on Domestic Routes without having to purchase another airline? That would be fun.
 
Interesting bits re: Detroit and small-car boom.

You mention a baby-boom which surprises me. Have we concluded all of our ME adventures and demobilized our military enough for a baby boom to occur?

Have Pres Huntsman, Congress or Corporate America done anything to make workplaces more family-friendly, subsidizing child-care, paid maternity leaves, much more emphasis on flex-time/job-sharing/ PT work?
Also lightening the burden of student loan debt so folks can have families earlier
might be a good idea.

IMO would be really nice if a baby boom-let happens. Social Security would be in much better shape. More people would feel like investing in the future rather feathering their current nest and so forth.
 
You mention a baby-boom which surprises me. Have we concluded all of our ME adventures and demobilized our military enough for a baby boom to occur?

Yes. The last troops from the Middle East came home in 2014, and the United States has largely buried the hatchet with Iran, which is helping us push the Saudis to be nicer people. ITTL Iraq was never invaded, and the signature foreign policy achievement of the Obama Administration is going to be a deal between Israel, Egypt and the Palestinians to give the Palestinians a real homeland of their own, while also resolutely ensuring Israel's security. The Arab Spring happens, but its not a huge problem to the United States and has few economic effects on the country, and while people like Mohammed Morsi aren't great, they do represent the will of the people, and part of Obama's push for better relations in the Arab world, including the peace deal, will be done with an eye towards that part of the world having rather better relations with the United States.

The baby boom has largely been confined to a number of major cities (New York, Chicago, Detroit, Indianapolis, San Francisco, Seattle, Philadelphia, Boston, Atlanta, Washington, Charlotte, Columbus, Salt Lake City) while other cities (Phoenix, San Antonio, New Orleans, Jacksonville, Tampa, Las Vegas) are growing because of immigration. A few places (Miami, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, Los Angeles) are getting major growth from both sources, which is double-timing their population and economic growth, but in all cases the cities themselves are aware of the benefits of more compact neighborhoods, and thus mass transit development and redevelopment efforts in these cities is happening very, very rapidly at the moment. The boom is also quite real in the parts of the United States which are economically prospering, particularly the West Coast and parts of the Midwest (MN, WI, IA, IL, MI, IN, MO and OH), but its also coming to be true in Florida, Texas and some other places in the South, as well as in New England.

It should also be pointed out that high-speed rail systems are fully operational in Texas and the Northeast. The Northeast Corridor now runs from Boston to Richmond and Norfolk, with an extension from Richmond to Raleigh and Charlotte being under construction. Similar systems are under construction in the Midwest and California. Canada is also building such a system, and the Michigan Central Terminal began to be rebuilt in 2015 specifically to be a center for HSTs and regional trains. The Canadian Detroit-Quebec City HSR includes a new bridge across the Detroit River and their part of the rebuild at Michigan Central.

Have Pres Huntsman, Congress or Corporate America done anything to make workplaces more family-friendly, subsidizing child-care, paid maternity leaves, much more emphasis on flex-time/job-sharing/ PT work?

Most such work falls on the Democrats to propose, though Huntsman usually doesn't object to such ideas. Most unionized business have paid maternity leave, a growing number of white-collar businesses and divisions of companies have flex-time and work at home programs and several states (including California, New York, Michigan, Illinois, New Jersey and Florida) have set up or are working on subsidized child-care programs. Many other aspects are being done by companies themselves, and a number of insurance providers have specialized benefit plans and programs aimed at small business owners providing such benefits to their employees. The social view of the mid-2010s is that the boomer generation has had one hell of a run, and now its time to enjoy life and make sure that those that follow them don't have to spend their working lives cleaning up past mistakes.

It should also be pointed out that Huntsman rammed through a comprehensive immigration reform bill in 2011 to give illegal immigrants a pathway to citizenship, and his advocacy of this helped him take the Hispanic vote from the Richardson / Biden Democratic ticket in 2012. By 2020, over ten million illegal immigrants will be on various stages of their pathway to citizenship, and people like Jan Brewer and Tom Tancredo have been keeping their mouths shut on such things for a long time. It's also worth pointing out that while Huntsman and much of his party are not gay marriage supporters, by 2020 gay marriage is legal in 28 of the 50 states, Don't Ask Don't Tell never happened (Clinton shit-canned restrictions of gays in the military on his first day in office in 1996) and its a rare occurrence when you hear of anti-gay protesters. Fred Phelps doesn't get any media attention and hasn't in a while. :)

Also lightening the burden of student loan debt so folks can have families earlier might be a good idea.

I would imagine that by now that student loan interest rates will have fallen considerably, that the government will be running it directly rather than using banks as middlemen and Pell Grant amounts will be up quite a lot. I've had the thought of directly subsidizing institutions of higher education, but in America that would be a hurculean task.

IMO would be really nice if a baby boom-let happens. Social Security would be in much better shape. More people would feel like investing in the future rather feathering their current nest and so forth.

Social Security is already solvent for a long time to come - the upper limit here on contributions was raised from $106,000 to $275,000 by Congress in February 2009 in an attempt to help solve the problems of Social Security running losses because of the Great Recession. As far as people investing in the future, I handled that one above - Aside from 2008-2011, America's federal government has run surpluses every year since 1994. The US federal debt here was not run up insanely by the Iraq War or monster tax cuts or crappy economic policy, and as a result the debt of the US Federal Government here is less than 40% of GDP as of 2016. The financial system is in much better shape, and it was made better still after Europe started charging financial transaction taxes in 2013 (The US hasn't got one) and many of Wall Street's excesses were curbed by the legislation changes after the Great Recession. More than anything, the Presidency of Jon Huntsman is going to be known for very good economic policy, and as a result the candidacy of Barack Obama has to be known for having confidence in the future because of said good economic policy. Huntsman will sit pretty high on the list of Presidents in terms of competency.
 
Part 13: The New American City, Trucks For That City, Toyota Guns For The Young, The New Magna and The First Black President

By the mid-2010s, economic growth was back in full swing in the United States, and more than ever before the focus was on the cities themselves. While many aspects of American life still centered on the wide-open countryside common in many parts of the United States, by 2016 82 percent of the United States' 321 million people lived in a urban areas, and what was by far the largest concentration of this was the Northeast Region. The fact that more people lived in these cities than ever before had all sorts of societal effects, many of them good but some not so, with one problem being the fact that real estate prices in several major American cities were swelling from merely expensive to ruinous, though in some cities the response to that one was to have more homes on one property, and the best way of doing that was to build up.

The prosperity and dense cities was having an effect on what cars people bought, a fact that all of Detroit knew and so did its rivals from abroad. It was also a sign of the times in that people wanted more fun cars, many of them having ways of getting to work not involving their cars and braving traffic. Others still needed to get around and carry people but wanted something easier to use on a day to day basis than the large trucks and SUVs often used as family haulers or business vehicles. As American cities began to move back towards the center cores, a result of a trend that had begun in the 2000s against the major downsides of suburbia. Trading a large home on a quiet street with a big backyard for a bustling city center condo may not seem appealing on the surface, but many of the people taking most advantage of the move back into American cities played things rather differently, namely in that they wanted people to still have places for their kids to play, and many of the cities that saw said boom also saw developers building condo complexes and apartment towers specifically to accommodate said families, with larger rooms in the buildings to accommodate families and in many cases the buildings being specificially designed to be able to be modified with knock-out walls and other features to allow them to be changed to suit various demands.

Chrysler's extensive connections with PSA and Reynard and AMC's connections with Renault allowed them to be fairly far-sighted in this. Even beyond the small cars they offered like the Dodge Dart and Chrysler PT Cruiser and AMC Stratus, the small cars from Europe in the form of the Peugeot 207, Citroen C3 and Renault Twingo were also good sellers, and the newest versions of the Reynard Chaser were also a good car to have for the urban environment. These were good things for Chrysler to have, as by this point Ford's small Fiesta and Chevrolet's smaller Sonic were the best of the "microcars", even smaller than the small cars in the form of the Chevrolet Cruze and Ford Focus. But what Ford had in mind next surprised many. Knowing that said environments were also troublesome for large work vehicles, and American vehicles in said category have long been based on full-size pickup trucks, Ford brought to North America the Courier small pickup and Transit Connect smaller van, and ended the production in 2014 of the old school Ford Econoline big van in favor of the global Ford Transit. The Transit and Transit Connect had been expected for some time, but the Bantam was a surprise, namely because of its small size - it was only four inches longer than the Focus hatchback. Despite this, Ford's claim of the Courier being the best small truck for the urban delivery man was a pretty logical claim, as the Courier was designed to handle a 1500-pound load in its bed and have enough power to move it there.

Chevrolet answered Ford's challenge in the small truck market within a year and in the same way, bringing its Chevrolet Montana truck north to the United States. Both Ford and Chevrolet got around the "Chicken Tax" by choosing to have the vehicles shipped in CKD form and then have them assembled in the United States, a fact that in GM's case led to a reprieve for GM's ancient plant in Tarrytown, New York, which stayed open to assemble the Montana and the later Astro Van, the latter being a direct rival to the Ford Transit.

fordtransitcustom201316.jpg


The 2014 Ford Transit

2011chevroletmontana001.jpg


The 2015 Chevrolet Montana


"Nobody expected to see the little trucks succeed, as Americans still tend to like their big vehicles, but the dealers said to us quite bluntly that many of their customers who owned businesses bought a Courier or a Transit Connect as an alternative to a big E-Series or even the Transit, and the people who bought the Courier often did so because they wanted a small, efficient truck that wasn't a fish out of a water in a major city. That's why the Ranger came back, too. Lots of truck buyers still wanted F-150s, of course, but the whole idea was to make it so that whatever your truck need, Ford had a vehicle that was right for that need."
-- Alan Mulally, CEO of Ford Motor Company, interviewed by EVO America, 2015

"It should have been so obvious as to be idiotic to sell smaller trucks, yet it took a while for customers and the automakers to catch on. It had been one of the areas where the import makers were making big headway......and then the Courier and Montana caught them by surprise. One can only imagine that somebody at Toyota had thought of that, because Toyota was suddenly aware of a need for a smaller pickup than the Tacoma in the lineup."
-- Greg Bennett, writing in Autoweek Magazine, May 2015

While all that was happening, Chrysler was doing a reorganization. Having trimmed the Plymouth brand in the 2000s, the new plan was for Dodge to be Chrysler's everyday car brand, with Chrysler moving upmarket and all of the trucks named Ram after the long-time name of the full-size truck. Chrysler had long been the dominant player in the minivan field (a field that Ford and GM had abandoned in the 2000s as a result of sluggish sales, and whose primary competition was from AMC, Nissan, Toyota and Volkswagen), but they could see by 2013 that their van designs were getting dated, especially lacking in style. Volkswagen's Microbus, which had entered production at their plants in Emden, Germany and Westmoreland, PA in 2007, had become a style success as well as a commercial one, besting the rather-plain Chrysler and Toyota offerings and the more radically-styled and designed Nissan Quest and AMC Espace. Chrysler, content with the knowledge that sales of the Caravan and Chrysler Town and Country were still strong, took its time to develop its shot back, which hit the road in 2013.

89dc9b800585ff0625e5fd6.jpg


The Chrysler 700C concept car of 2011, which became the 2013 Chrysler Town and Country


Chrysler stunned everybody with the Town and Country, which was designed as the VIP's roomy transportation, while the closely-related Dodge Grand Caravan and the cargo-version Ram C/V were fairly similar in design, though much more spartan than the luxurious Town and Country. All Chrysler variants used four-wheel-drive with the AHS3 hybrid system, outfitted with a turbocharged four-cylinder engine, Pentastar V6 or Chrysler turbodiesel V6. The aluminum-chassis vehicle was Chrysler's first vehicle with composite bodywork, and the interior was a luxurious one to say the least.

The van catapulted Chrysler back into the minivan business just as it started becoming clear to demographers that a baby boom was underway in the United States, and the stylish Chrysler was a much better-driving car than the Microbus and better inside than the others. It would indeed be said later on that Chrysler's spending the time and effort to do its new van properly would be money well-spent. It came to be a major success for the company and a cash cow that would be a big help to Chrysler's operations.

Despite the level of continuous improvement that was now coming out of Detroit, years of hammering away at the American market with a single-minded, almost-obsessive focus was paying off for one of the Japanese makers, namely Toyota. Their Lexus luxury car brand was doing reasonably well, but Toyota had tried to market cars that were solid and reliable machines for people who wanted the most reliable machine possible. This had led to the cars being engineered and built to the highest standards, but by the dawn of the 2010s it was clear that the tactic wasn't working, simply because that with so many models of such high quality, the Toyota cars simply didn't have the standout designs of their American competition or the frugal performance of the Europeans, and were more expensive than their Korean and Malaysian rivals. Toyota decided that with said boom coming into play that they would go for the fan driver market, with that rollout starting in 2012 with the launch of the Toyota FT-86 sports coupe and the RSC off-roader.

The FT-86, priced at just $22,500 new, was meant to be a small sports coupe that young people could buy and enjoy, taking much of its homage from the legendary Corolla AE86 of the 1980s, often called one of the first import tuner cars. The RSC, whose price tag began at $28,000, was the more aggressive and radical design, powered by a 3.5-liter V6 and featuring full-time four-wheel-drive, built with a tough suspension designed to be driven hard off-road and a design in the interior meant to be for those who spent a lot of time enjoying the great outdoors. The RSC's three-seat design was unique in itself, and the car's interior design and nice little touches, such as the on-board first aid kit (an idea Nissan had originally thought of with the 2001 Xterra), on-board air compressor for filling tires and refrigerated compartments for drinks, made sure it got attention. Toyota added to the appeal of the RSC by running racing versions and having RSC's given to the winners of various events at the 2012 X-Games, trying to cultivate an image.

toyotarscruggedsportcou.jpg


The 2012 Toyota RSC off-road sport coupe

As Toyota launched the RSC, it was putting the final touches on a pair of range-toppers, the Lexus LFA sportscar and the Toyota Katana sports car, two very different cars. The LFA, a front-engined GT car powered by a wailing V10 and with a price tag of $310,000, was a limited-edition car meant to be the king of the mountain. The Katana, by contrast, was meant to sit above the $35,000 Supra Mark V. A mid-engined, rear-wheel drive car with an aluminum-alloy chassis and bodywork, the Katana made headlines for its three-abreast seating and hybrid drivetrain, using a hybrid design fairly similar to that used on a lot of SUVs, with two electric motors driving a planetary gearset off of the transaxle at the back. Costing $64,000, Toyota marketed the Katana at the sort of buyer who would buy a Corvette or a Viper. (The fact that both of those had new models for 2013-14 may not have been helpful to Toyota, but they didn't seem to care.) The Katana's gas engine was a the Lexus IS-F engine, a 5.0-liter V8. The gas engine's 417 horsepower, combined with the 124 horsepower from the electric motors, meant that the Katana was plenty capable of running with the Corvette and Viper - and perhaps even more shocking, the Katana was a visual treat and an audible one, with many commentators saying the Katana sounded like it had a Detroit V8 in its back.

The Katana came out the same year as Toyota brought out the XV50 Camry and the Avalon NS4, their answer to the mid-sized and full-sized car models from anywhere in the world. The XV50 Camry was an evolution of the previous model but had been designed inside and underneath to be a much more exciting car to drive and own. The Avalon NS4 was even more mad, armed with distinctive styling and a number of neat new features, including collision radar on all sides of the vehicle, cameras replacing wing mirrors and a solar panel on the roof to keep the battery charged. The NS4's styling very much divided tastes, but there was no doubt that the vehicle was a stunningly well-engineered and technologically advanced one.

toyotavoltaconcept01.jpg


The 2013 Toyota Katana XSC


toyotans4pluginhybridco.jpg


The 2014 Toyota Avalon NS4

"Toyota had marketed itself before as a company which makes fun cars to drive and the best machines possible to live with every day, but aside from the Celica and the Supra Mark V, which are admittedly great fun to drive, what else was there? Nothing but one bland box after another....and yet, here comes the new Camry and the pointy-nosed Avalon, and we're supposed to think differently about these. Yeah, right, we figured. And then we drove them. Toyota, next time we make such judgement, you can slap us."
-- Eddie Alterman, writing in Car and Driver, February 2014

Perhaps the most surprising factor of the Japanese car makers' attempts at making inroads into the North American market had been the fact that after decades of trying to supply the market mostly from Japan, Toyota led the way in building new facilities in the United States to supply the market in America, recognizing the problems that shipping from Japan could potentially cause.

Toyota had begun making cars in the United States in 1986 at a plant in Georgetown, Kentucky, but the 2000s boom for Toyota saw them get around the "Chicken Tax" by building a brand-new facility in Princeton, Indiana, with it opening in May 2000, in time to produce the 2001 Tacoma and Tundra trucks. Toyota followed that up by buying the Fremont, California, facility they had shared for years with General Motors as part of the NUMMI project. But by the 2000s, Toyota had to admit that it was easier for their logistics to make more vehicles in the United States, and it began making engines in Huntsville, Alabama, in 2003, as well as massively expanding its Canadian operations at Cambridge, Ontario. But with the introduction of their new models in the late 2000s, Toyota USA went further, with expansions at Georgetown and Fremont and new facilities at Huntington, West Virginia, Knoxville, Kentucky, San Antonio and Austin, Texas and Compton, California. By 2016, Toyota was producing 750,000 vehicles as year in the United States, putting them in fifth place among American automakers.

New into the auto business in the 2000s was Canadian auto parts Magna, whose purchase of Pontiac and Oldsmobile and taking over of some 620 GM Franchises in the United States and 120 in Canada was a major deal, and Magna's 2010s were taken up by the redesign of numerous vehicles, with the new owners aiming to make Pontiac into a North American BMW and Oldsmobile into a luxury car brand, while Magna also revived the Asuna name for its light truck and crossover offerings, which kicked off with its first new vehicle design in 2013, the Asuna Aztek. The Pontiac Aztek, reviled in the early 2000s as being ugly and underengineered, came out as new machine under Magna, and their work showed. The Pontiac, Oldsmobile and Asuna new models came flying out in 2014 and 2015 as well, with Magna contracting racing car maker Riley and Scott to make the Pontiac Fiero sports car for a new 2015 launch and developing new rear-wheel-drive versions of the Grand Prix mid-sized sedan and the Bonneville full-size sedan, which debuted in 2014 and 2016 respectively. The Canadian firm's billions to purchase the brands and then their spending billions more on R&D was heavily supported by the Canadian government, which was undoubtedly why Magna was able to make the investments....but the investments paid off, as Magna sold 565,400 vehicles in North America in 2016, a good number to say the least. That was good enough for sixth place in North America (with GM, Ford, Chrysler, AMC and Toyota ahead) and more than enough to make considerable profits, and the company scored a big set of brownie points with the Canadian government in 2016 when they made the decision to team up with MTU Freidrichshafen to make a new set of diesel locomotives in response to a contract by Canadian National Railways in 2014 - this coming after Caterpillar's inglorious shutdown of the former GM locomotive plant in London, Ontario. The decision pretty much assured the MTU-Magna locomotive contract for CN, though Chrysler-owned American Locomotive Company, through its Montreal Locomotive Works division, also got a portion of the order - to the rage of Caterpillar, who sued Magna over the arrangement.

sedanmarkersketch2bykry.jpg

A great work by Kryoth on DeviantArt

An early sketch of the 2015 Pontiac Sunfire

As the 2016 election approached, the moderate policies and decisiveness when needed of the Huntsman administration was sufficient that America had come powering hard out of recession, and by 2016 consumer confidence in the United States was sky-high. Republican President Huntsman and the Republican-led Senate contrasted with the Democratic Congress, but there were few debates on what to do for the future of the country's economy, which was humming right along. Both major parties flew into 2016 with ideas of what to do for the future, and the primaries for the two parties were lively to say the least. Vice-President Susan Collins won the Republican nomination, though she had to fight off right-wing challenges from Texas Governor Rick Perry and libertarian Ron Paul, as well as a left-side challenge from Rhode Island Governor Lincoln Chafee, to win that nomination. She picked Florida Senator Marco Rubio as her Vice-President. The Democrats were even more wild, as Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer, Vermont Governor Howard Dean, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Congresswoman Kirsten Gillibrand of New York and several Senators - Barack Obama of Illinois, Russ Feingold and Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, Hillary Clinton of New York and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota all fought for it. It didn't take long for the best to rise to the front, as the Democratic primaries soon narrowed to Obama, Clinton, Dean and Schweitzer, with soon the others chasing down cabinet positions and influence with their chose candidates. After Gilibrand and Feingold withdrew from the race in late January, the real fight began between the four remaining candidates, with the youthful and well-speaking Senator Obama competing against the more conservative and more famous Senator Clinton. Supports from Dean's camp soon were drifting into Obama's camp, and after Super Tuesday Dean pulled out, with most of his delegates going to Obama. Dean's move saw Obama stack up an enormous lead over Clinton, but not a clinching one, but in late March, Schweitzer did a deal with Obama to be his Vice-President in return for his support - a deal that put Senator Obama over the top and clinched the nomination for him. The Democratic National Convention, held on August 16-19 in Indianapolis, saw Obama and Schweitzer confirmed as the nominees, and more famously, both Senator Obama and Governor Schweitzer came out swinging, loudly saying that America was a shared idea, a shared dream and a belief that was shared by all Americans, and that it needed a Democratic President to help find the changes in society that were boiling underneath the surface.

The 2016 election saw few candidates ever attacking the outgoing President, and Huntsman largely stayed out of the fray, though he was quite open in his support for Vice-President Collins to take his job. Both candidates spent more time explaining their policies than attacking others, with both making great claims. Collins picked Florida Senator Marco Rubio to be her running mate, hoping to retain the majority of the Hispanic vote that Huntsman had secured in 2012 - but the choice of Rubio as Collins' running mate caused a problem on the Republican right, which was not at all pleased that it was two moderates running to President and Vice-President, a problem that manifested itself in grumbling within the GOP base, though they stayed united to take on Obama and Schweitzer. The first debate, however, was where the election started falling apart for the Republicans, as Obama's excellent oratory skills demolished Collins in the debate, though she fought the second debate to a draw. The country's economic progress and a growing series of socially liberal movements, including the legalization of gay marriage in eleven states (including California, Michigan, Illinois and Pennsylvania) and legalization of marijuana in eight states (also including California and Pennsylvania) led to considerable turnout at polls for both sides, but more favoring the Democrats. A late surge by the Republicans made the final result close, but the Obama/Schweitzer ticket won out over the Collins/Rubio one, with the electoral college going 288-250 in Obama's favor. The biggest surprise of the campaign, however, came the evening after the election, as Collins and Rubio personally traveled to Obama's campaign headquarters in Chicago to congratulate Obama and Schweitzer on their victory, a fact which drove the Republican right insane but was seen by most as a genuinely conciliatory measure.

"Senator Obama is going to be our next President, as the American people chose him to be. He ran an excellent campaign just as we did, and the American people made their decision. I wish him the best of luck, as whatever our differences, he is now going to be the President of the United States, and his success will be for the benefit of all of us. That doesn't mean we won't be back to unseat him in 2020, but for the next four years, Mr. President, good luck and may God shine on your efforts."
-- Vice-President Susan Collins, in her concession speech at her campaign headquarters in Dallas, Texas, November 8, 2016

"If anything, what we've seen here this week shows that we really have come full circle, and America has shown sufficient maturity that the nation which gave the world the Jim Crow laws has now elected a black man to be its President. More to the point, Senator Barack Obama and Governor Brian Schweitzer defeated a woman, Vice-President Susan Collins, and a Hispanic man, Senator Marco Rubio, for the job and both sides spent as much time explaining their hopes for the future and trying to address voters ' concerns as slagging each other. It's a sign of good in this world, and while Vice-President Collins and Senator Rubio have been defeated, they could and should hold their heads very high indeed. There is no one who should not be proud of themselves, only some prouder than others of their accomplishments. The better angels of our nature can smile at the 2016 campaign."
-- MSNBC anchor Keith Olbermann, speaking in a special comment on his show on November 10, 2016

The other results were more surprising still. California saw no less than four eye-widening proposition results - Proposition 25 reformed Proposition 13 and removed the limit on property taxes for municipalities, Proposition 8 legalized gay marriage in the state, Proposition 34 abolished the death penalty in California and Proposition 46 legalized marijuana, though the last one still needed support from Washington for it to come into effect. Of the eight states looking to legalize marijuana, five - California, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Washington and New Mexico - voted in favor of it. Ten states voted to allow gay marriages, with Kentucky being the lone state to not choose to legalize it. (And that loss was only by a hair.) The Republicans got hammered in the Senate, losing their majority, while the Democrats lost five seats in the House but kept their majority, making all three branches of the government controlled by one party for the first time since 1996 - and for the Democrats, it was the first time they had controlled all three branches since 1978, and part of that had been the aftermath of Watergate. It was indeed a big day for Democrats and American liberals in general, and it was a sign of the confidence in the future. Jon Huntsman Jr, the 45th President of the United States, would retire back to his native Utah with all of the honors a very good man deserved....
 
Last edited:
Part 14: The Power of a Tesla, Dreamers, Turbine Trains, Indian Cars in America, Lincoln's Mad LS and The Return of the Roadmaster

General Motors advancement of hybrid technology and electric cars in the 2000s, starting with the revolutionary GM EV1 and Chevrolet Volt in the 1990s and the advancement of better hybrids in the first decade of the 21st Century led to more hope for advancement of the advanced car genre. In the early 2010s, however, all of the Detroit world got a taste of that....but it didn't come from them, much to their distate.

Magna was the largest new North American car maker of the early 21st Century, but 2007 also saw the establishment of two other American-based car makers in the green car world. The first was Fisker Automotive, based in Irvine, California, started by famed car designer Henrik Fisker, and the second was Tesla Motors, founded by South African dot-com billionaire Elon Musk. Both recruited a number of good directors, designers and engineers from the North American and European automakers, and both had wild designs in store to introduce to the automotive world and big dreams for the future - though the dreams were more grounded in reality than many had figured.

Fisker Automotive was set up in 2007 in Irvine, California, to build a new series of luxury cars, starting with the Karma luxury sedan and the Karma Surf station wagon. The Fisker Karma was similar in engineering to other gas-electric hybrids, being driven entirely by electric power but with a smaller gasoline engine to generate power when the vehicle's battery pack was run down. The car was originally powered by the General Motors Ecotec engine, but that got a curveball in 2011 when American Motors bought out Williams International and made an investment in Fisker Automotive, and Williams, seeing business for its jet engines declining, made an unsolicited offer to engineer a pair of very small gas turbine engines for the Karma, offering to make for a major increase in efficiency. Fisker accepted the offer, but switched to the use of 2.0-liter Renault powerplants after the AMC buy-in so as to not alienate General Motors. The Williams project worked surprisingly well, though it required a considerable front-end re-engineering to allow the required airflow for the turbines into the front of the car, and it was said that turbine Karmas have such airflow out of the vents on the leading edge of the windshield that they do not need windshield wipers. (They do have them, though.) The Karma II began production in 2014 in both sedan and Karma Surf versions, and the turbine-engined cars were matched with a new carbon-fiber body and other weight reduction efforts, both of which had a marked effect on the car's performance and its fuel efficiency. The Karma originally began production at Valmet Automotive in Finland in 2009, but from April 2011, the Karma began production at the former GM plant at Wilmington, Delaware after re-tooling the facility. The Karma II was complemented the year after by the Fisker Sunset convertible and in 2017 by the Atlantic luxury sedan. The Karma II dropped in weight from 5,300 lbs to 4,650, and the new engines went from 204 horsepower to 286, enough to massively improve the electrical generating capacity of the car by 60% despite very little fuel economy penalty - and the car came with dealer options to switch it from gasoline fuel to ethanol or biodiesel if the customer wished, and Fisker in 2018 showed off a version of the Karma Surf running on liquid hydrogen. The Karma made its mark quite clearly - by 2018, they were selling over 20,000 units a year of the car, of which over half were exported.

But Fisker's success, as good as it was, had nothing compared to the other newcomer, Tesla Motors. Despite an early altercation with Fisker, Tesla quickly established themselves in a rather different way. Tesla soon established that they would only build all-electric cars, even after early rumors of hybrids, and their first work, the Tesla Roadster, was based (very loosely) on a Lotus Elise chassis and had design assistance from General Motors, while at the same time Daimler and Toyota bought batteries from them and worked with them on battery technology. The first generation Tesla Roadster was introduced in September 2007 and sold out its anticipated 4000-car production run in April 2011 - just in time for the new machine from Tesla to hit the road, that being the Model S sedan.

The Roadster had broken the credibility barrier, but the Model S, introduced in September of 2011 and with the first units delivered in April 2012. The Model S was a handsomely-styled four-door luxury sedan meant to compete against cars like the Cadillac CTS, BMW 5-Series, Mercedes-Benz E-Class and the new-for-2013 Chrysler Imperial. Available with three different battery pack capacities and different drivetrains, the Model S was also equipped with state-of-the-art charging and electrical systems and first-class interiors and was capable of incredible performance - Motor Trend's Model S test put a 0-60 figure of just 4.4 seconds, fast even by sports car standards. The car's most striking feature other than the performance was its "Tesla Supercharger" feature, a DC charging system which was capable of recharging half of the battery pack, giving one 150 miles of range, in just 30 minutes. Tesla backed up the introduction of the Supercharger system by building a number of charging stations at various places around the United States, with the GPS system in the car telling owners where the one was if it was needed, and made it clear that the network was free for Tesla owners. Tesla also made it clear in early 2013 that they were working with other companies on better-still charging technology, and that all Tesla cars on the road could be modified to use the Superchargers.

The Karma was a solid seller, but it was soon clear that the Model S was a better one. Starting at a price of $58,000 and going up to a maximum, everything-including-the-kitchen-sink price of $107,000, the Model S was positioned as real rival to the established luxury car market - and it scored immediately, most notably with many of the country's famous elites. Sigourney Weaver, James Cameron, Tom Hanks, David Letterman and Tommy Lee Jones were among the first batch of Model S owners - and Sigourney Weaver took great pride in a April 2013 TV interview in pointing out that she had an EV1, a Volt, a Karma, a Roadster and a Model S, which led Jay Leno to comment back to her "so, firemen can't fight a fire at your house, then?" The Model S was by mid-2013 being made at a rate of 600 a week at Tesla's facility in Fremont, California, and Tesla stunned a great many people by opening up a second plant for production of the second generation Roadster in 2015 - they did that by building an all-new facility in the lower-income Los Angeles suburb of Inglewood and offering first crack at the assembly line jobs to local residents. This proved better than many had expected - the wages paid at the plant were far above normal, and as a result the workers, in many cases not used to well-paying manufacturing jobs, took to their new jobs as well as most and better than many. (The decision to do this also earned Musk a variety of civic awards and the Key to the City from the Mayor of Los Angeles.) Tesla soon expanded its lineup to include an SUV, the Model X, which was also made on the lines at Fremont. Tesla's sales soared to easily make them the #6 of American automakers by 2020, by that point selling nearly 200,000 vehicles a year.

"Tesla Motors is an example of the spirit of innovation that has always driven this nation and are what will make our world a better place, and cars like the Model S are the sort of innovation that should make us all proud."
-- Governor Jerry Brown of California, on a campaign stop at the Fremont Tesla Plant, August 2014

"Fisker is the sort of firm that this company was born from, a bunch of brilliant guys with a dream, who have worked as hard as a man can to advance their dreams and the world of cars at the same time. Investing in Fisker may be one of the best decisions American Motors makes, and speaking as a Karma owner, I am very proud to be here now."
-- American Motors President Mitt Romney, at the press conference to announce AMC's investment in Fisker Automotive, July 2011

"The mere fact that the Tesla Model S exists at all is a testament to innovation and entrepreneurship, the very qualities that made the American automobile industry the largest, richest and most powerful in the world. That the 11 judges unanimously voted the first vehicle designed from the wheels up by a fledgling automaker the 2013 Motor Trend Car of the Year should be cause for celebration. Henry, Billy, Walter, George, you have a guy named Elon who has joined your club."
-- Motor Trend magazine, stating their opinion of the Tesla Model S in naming it their 2013 Car of the Year, November 2012

teslamodelsa.jpg


The 2013 Tesla Model S

fiskerkarma5.jpg


The 2014 Fisker Karma II

"What amazes me is the fact that there are people whining about the government providing money to help get Tesla and Fisker going, stating that electric cars are a dead end that will never work. You know, that's what people said about gasoline cars once upon a time. It's what they said about air travel, nuclear energy, television, mobile phones and the internet, too. But somebody dreamed and decided to try it, just to see if they could. Somebody might also want to point out that that is human nature, and if the founding fathers they revere so much hadn't dreamed, this country would never have happened."
-- Bernie Sanders, Senator from Vermont, speaking against a bill to freeze loans to Fisker Automotive on the floor of the United States Senate, May 2013

Fisker and Tesla joined a steadily-growing number of smaller American automakers with a dream. DeLorean had been in the business for many years, having introduced their smaller (and cheaper) MR17 sports car in 1997 and then their awesome MR21 supercar in 2002. Steve Saleen, known for years for tuning Ford products into much faster cars, had entered the business of making cars on his own in 2003 with his Saleen S7 supercar, and while the S7 was not a huge success, selling only 205 units, the less-pricey S5S Raptor, which first saw the road in 2008, was a much bigger one. Vector Automotive, which had had two failed attempts at sports cars in the 1980s and 1990s, returned to the fray in 2007, but development of their WX8 design stalled, only to have a new car come back to life in 2011 thanks to new investors and go into production in 2013, the new car being known as the Vector R22. Warren Mosler's incredible Mosler MT900 was also out there, though by the 2010s it was getting somewhat long in the tooth - mind you, the MT900, which combined a 450-horsepower V8 engine with a curb weight of 2300 pounds, was no slouch in the performance department.

There was a few things similar between the dreamers - namely, every one of the cars above used a variant of a Detroit engine, with the Saleen using a supercharged Ford V8 while both DeLorean and Vector went with Chevrolet power. None of the cars were cheap by any stretch - the MR17 cost about $55,000, and it was cheap compared to the others - but they all found enough owners to make the projects worthwhile, and just like numerous sports car builders in other nations, the companies themselves all aimed to provide both a great experience driving but also tried to make the cars reliable - a job which most of the makers got fairly good at. The connections to Detroit didn't make it any harder - GM, Ford and American Motors had no real difficulties selling parts to the small car makers and providing technical assistance. It was good business for them, and there was little to be feared from companies which might make a thousand cars in a good year like Saleen or Vector or Mosler. But what the companies were able to do, however, was creating a bunch more of the sort of machines that would make grown men giddy, and for the car nuts running most of the firms, that made it all worthwhile to them.

Outside of the car world, America's growing wealth, rising fuel costs and airport congestion and debates over climate change made for the 21st Century being good to American railroads - not that the freight railroads needed a lot of help, of course, but by 2015 the high-speed train systems in the Northeast Corridor, Texas and Florida had proven themselves indispensable to those states, and so when Amtrak's Fast Midwest project began operation in 2013, much was expected of it. The first lines ran from Chicago to Detroit (via Fort Wayne), Indianapolis and Milwaukee, with the St. Louis line becoming operational in September 2014 and extensions to Cleveland, Columbus (both via Fort Wayne, which became a system hub) and Minneapolis (via Green Bay) by 2017. The system did well from the start, with the Detroit-Chicago route by 2016 being crowded to the point that Amtrak was having to couple two trains together to get sufficient space for passengers. It didn't hurt that Detroit's massive Michigan Central Terminal finished its $650 million redevelopment in 2018, and Canada's high-speed line from Detroit to Quebec City began operations later that year. Amtrak, however, faced numerous calls through the times to upgrade its services across many areas and municipalities, a problem that had become painfully obvious in the vote-rich Midwest and parts of the Northeast. The NEC by this point stretched from Charlotte and Norfolk to Boston, but they faced the additional problem of lines to places like Atlantic City, Harrisburg, Albany, Worcester, Dover and Roanoke which had considerable demand for travel, but simply hadn't the demand to justify the costs of full-on HSR lines.

Amtrak got around this problem thanks to a little help from Bombardier, the Canadian firm having worked on the same problem in Canada faced by VIA rail. Their solution was fairly simple - use the Acela platform design and fit it with a pair of Pratt and Whitney Canada PT6A-67 gas turbines, as well as two General Motors Duramax diesel engines for auxillary power. The idea was that the diesels would get the trains moving before the turbines, which had atrocious fuel efficiency at low speeds, would kick in to provide extra power. The use of high-end generators and superconducting wiring in the power cars allowed the trains to be quite similar in most ways to the existing cantenary-powered high-speed trains. It was a good solution to the problem at hand - and testing proved that the Acela Turbines were capable of speeds of up to 186 mph, as fast as any of the cantenary-powered versions. These test results convinced Amtrak to go to bat and fight with the FRA over some of the operating rules, as well as begin plans to make the necessary upgrades to lines to allow smaller cities to be served by the fast trains.

America's strong car market was an appealing one for so many that new car models were pretty much always on the move. The American automakers themselves still controlled in the mid to late 2010s over 70% of the car market, but that didn't stop others from trying nonetheless. The 1980s had seen the Koreans come, then Perodua and Proton came into the American market in the 1990s and Reynard had introduced South Africa in 2004, but by the 2010s the newcomers were coming from India, namely the Tata and Mahindra companies, both of which had spent huge sums on improving their offerings in preparation to sell them in global markets. Both firms began rolling into US markets in 2015, with Tata focusing on their car lines (though they did sell the Safari SUV and Xenon pickup truck) and Mahindra focusing on light trucks. Despite the efforts, the Indians were aware of the Koreans having moved upmarket and the struggling efforts of Proton and Perodua, and so they aimed for the bottom at first, wanting to establish their cars as inexpensive, reliable vehicles first before moving up the food chain. This didn't mean the vehicles were particularly spartan or low-tech, it just meant that they would cost less.

The Indians got a foothold fairly early, but they had problems of their own. As with the Malaysian (and the Koreans until the 2000s) makers, the cars simply hadn't been designed and built to the standards American car buyers demanded, and reliability problems didn't help some of the later cars. Both companies were quick to work on that, but it didn't take long for the Indians to realize the same thing that all of the other imports had - North America is its own market with its own requirements, and you need to build cars to suit those environments. The Indians learned this quicker than the Koreans and Malaysians had, and within three years of the first launches the first launches Mahindra and Tata had their first designed-for-America vehicles, the Mahindra Warrior and Tata Ascension, out in the American marketplace, though still built in India and using Indian-owned dealerships, though the Indians soon became apparent of the flaws in this system as well.

mahindraxuv500w8awd9256.jpg


A Mahindra XUV500, introduced into the US in 2015


tatasafari.jpg


A Tata Safari SUV


Among the North American makers, things were changing there as well, with Chrysler, American Motors and Magna trying to shove their way up to the level of General Motors and Ford, though by now advancements in design and manufacturing technology and platform sharing allowed many cars to be built on the same platform, and one of the old marketing tricks of the Detroit makers had by then very much taken hold in Europe, and it showed in the explosion in the number of cars in the ranges of many European automakers in the 2000s and 2010s - Renault, for example, had seen its car lines swell from six models in 1990 to eleven in 2010, and that didn't count the new vans or SUVs. Stronger European emissions laws in the 1990s brought them into line with the American laws on the subject, and while the 2010s started with the age of the crossover, AMC, Chrysler and Magna - along with their partners in Renault, Peugeot-Citroen and Fiat - gunned hard to try and match the mighty behemoths in Ford and General Motors. By the late 2010s, this had resulted in some enormous lineups on offer to buy even from the smaller makers, and the problems of the past of the smaller automakers being unable to match the might of GM and Ford seemed to be gone forever, thanks to the Transatlantic connections.

With this, Japan's massively-increased competition and the continuously-improving Germans and Koreans, both GM and Ford were pushing hard on research and development and advanced design, both realizing that now more than ever if they wanted to maintain their big shares of the American automobile market they had to appeal to a lot of people in a lot of different markets, and staying ahead meant pushing the envelope.

Ford had started doing that by setting up a radical re-designing of Lincoln, with its new Zephyr and LS sport sedans, the Continental full-size sedan, Aviator crossover SUV and the mammoth Navigator full-size SUV - and Ford, after years of comments about the cars being basically up-badged versions of their more pedestrian Ford models, began in 2011 with the task of having Lincoln have its own assembly plants, turning over their plants at Wixom, MI, Louisville, KY and Avon Lake, OH, to exclusively produce Lincoln vehicles, and then began evolving the designs of them. The Zephyr, while it remains on the same chassis as the Ford Mondeo and Fusion, got well-engineered full-time all-wheel-drive as standard equipment, and the others soon had modified versions of their own chassis. But where Ford went nuts, however, was with the LS.

The new LS, which launched for 2014, was built with one goal in mind - to send the sport sedans from BMW, Audi, Cadillac, Infiniti and anyone else running for the hills. A choice of V6s ranging in power from 310 to 475 horsepower did the propulsion, and race-car like double-wishbone suspension with computer-controlled fully-active suspension, as well as ceramic brakes, fast steering and with adjustable assistance levels and sticky tires on all models, made for a car that drove and handled like no other Lincoln - or for that matter, pretty much anything that had ever come out of Detroit. The LS wasn't a cheap car, but it was a sign of things to come from Lincoln, and the vehicles soon got a reputation for excellent assembly quality, surprisingly-good fuel efficiency and excellent ride quality in addition to its performance and world-class handling. GM was sent scrambling to make the Cadillac CTS match up with its shocking rival from Dearborn, and the LS soon had even Jaguar, BMW and Mercedes-Benz taking a few lessons.

"We've seen one Lincoln concept after another that's had our tongues wagging, and we know that they can make a good sports sedan because Ford is very, very good at such things. But for years its been one gussied-up Ford after another, so why should this new LS, despite its Batmobile bodywork, be any different? That's what we thought, too. And then we drove it. And drove it some more. And drove the hell out of it, marveling in Beemer-busting cornering, steering feel so good you know what flavor of soda was in the can you ran over and style that BMW and Audi couldn't match if they wanted to. Trust us, folks, if Cadillac's transformation wasn't enough to scare Germany's autobahners, this had better make them pay attention. Welcome back, Lincoln. We missed you."
-- Motor Trend, talking about the 2014 Lincoln LS Millenium, which finished as runner-up in their 2014 car of the year contest to the C7 Corvette

"Not since the Navigator has Lincoln made something which could stun us all like this. We know Ford's working on lots of new Lincoln designs and has given them their own assembly plants, but Jesus, we didn't expect this at all. A Lincoln that looks like a car for Darth Vader, goes faster than most sports cars and corners like a slot car, while still riding great and being great to ride in? We had to do a few extra drives to prove it to ourselves, too."
-- EVO America in its review of the Lincoln LS, October 2013

lincolnmkfconcept92.jpg

A model of the 2014 Lincoln LS Millenium

While Ford was giving Lincoln a new reason to live, GM was working hard at Buick. Buick had really sank in the United States to the point that by 2015 the average age of its buyers was over 60, a fairly sizable market at the time but one which had no real future with the baby boomers starting to die off. Buick's salvation had been their success abroad, particularly in China, where it had been the most successful luxury car brand in the country, and in India, where it was also growing rapidly. GM was milking that for all it was worth, but they were also aware that with Cadillac moving into the sport sedan / performance car world and with Magna aiming their new Pontiac and Oldsmobile models at that same market, GM had to do something about Buick, and with Lexus, Chrysler (and its Imperial sub-brand) and others going for the same market, they needed an answer to it.

The answer started with the import of designs from Opel and Vauxhall in Germany, where GM began using the Opel Insignia as a Buick Regal in 2011, after launching it in China in 2007, southeast Asia in 2008 and India in 2009. The Buick LaCrosse and Cadillac Seville, both launched in 2013, shared the same platform (and assembly plants) though they had quite different bodywork, suspension tuning, engines and interiors. But where GM did its crazy move was in bringing back the Roadmaster wagon, it first being shown next to the LaCrosse and Seville at the 2013 North American International Auto Show at Cobo Hall in Detroit. Built on the new Chevrolet Caprice chassis, itself also used by the Australian VF-series Holden Commodore, the Roadmaster concept was a full-on homeage to the past, complete with portholes (the LaCrosse and Regal had these, too), woodgrain trim and whitewall tires, though the car also had a nearly full-length glass roof and was quite huge, with a 122.5-inch wheelbase and an overall length of 210 inches, powered in the concept by GM's 6.2-liter LT1 Corvette engine and driving the rear wheels.

The response to the Roadmaster stunned GM, with it being decided within six months to make it come to life for real - though it has to be said that part of the push was the announcement at the same auto show that Magna would be selling a wagon version of the Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme which they would call the Custom Cruiser. The production car left the wood trim behind (though it was available as an optional extra), but was designed as a family hauler with style and performance, with the smallest engine offered being GM's 3.6-liter High Feature V6, while the Corvette V8 was an option, as was the VM Motori turbodiesel V6 and Duramax turbodiesel V8, but even more shocking was the fact that the Roadmaster would be able to use Cadillac's newly-developed 7.2-liter V12 as an option as well. The Roadmaster also paid homage to the past in that while dealer cars would be available, buyers would be encouraged to work with the salesman and design their car exactly as they wanted it, providing a very long list of options, features, trim choices, paint choices and design pieces to do their car exactly to their specifications.

roadmasterbeachwagoncon.jpg


The 2013 Buick Roadmaster Concept

"You remember when a few years ago we said we thought GM should make a new Roadmaster? Well, they listened to us. No, seriously, they actually listened to us, and here it is!"
-- Rutledge Wood of Top Gear USA, introducing a 2015 Buick Roadmaster onto the show, June 2015

"GM's marketing brilliance in this one is hard to overstate. Lots of people age 40 or older probably remember riding around in the family station wagon, long before the age of minivans and SUVs and crossovers, and while many things could describe those experiences, cool would not be one of them. But now, here comes GM, managing to say with a straight face that the cool option now for a family hauler is no less than a full-size station wagon. But dammit, it does actually work, and the idea of having the customers design cars exactly to their specification is a good idea, and the thought of a family hauler with available Corvette V8 or Cadillac V12 power is, well, cool."
-- Sam Mitani, talking about the Roadmaster to the Detroit Free Press, April 2015

"Go back and read that again. A two and a half ton, eighteen and a half foot long seven-seat family wagon, and it goes from zero to sixty in five seconds flat. And then think about the fact that we got twenty-seven miles to the gallon in it. Five seconds to sixty. twenty-seven miles per gallon. In an enormous family station wagon. 'Bloody hell' about covers it."
-- Car and Driver in their review of the Buick Roadmaster, July 2015

The fast and furious developments of the automobile world, fueled by five companies which had a combined yearly revenue of nearly $800 Billion worldwide, continued unabated into the 2010s and into the 2020s, driving forward into a different future, one which was leading to greater and greater things for those who loved personal transportation....
 
Last edited:
Really loving the direction of the TL. Since you've gone so hard for electric cars and hybrids becoming the new standard some questions come to mind:
  • How has the US energy policy evolved 1980-present?
  • Has the search for alternative energies gone as far or much further with more automotive innovation?
  • Is there any bleed-over where automotive innovation has sparked a renaissance or at lest some fundamental rethinking of mass-transit and freight-moving as well?
 
Love it. Your timelines are epic, TheMann. Have questions about labor policy in the United States. Can you please give the specific differences between TTL and OTL? And also, do you have union members sit on the boards of companies ITTL, like they do in Germany? Also, tell me more about the Detroit of TTL. How big is the skyline? As big as Miami IOTL? Chicago IOTL? Houston IOTL? It wouldn't be that hard to bring it back, but it won't be easy as pie either.
 
Top