Let me try this again. It's an offshoot of An Alternate History of the Netherlands and as the title suggest, it is about the Balkans. It's about the Balkan Revolution, the Balkan Union and the wars that plagued the Balkans in the later half of the 20th Century. As with much of my writing, the Before/After 1900 isn't so clear. The ultimate PoD to create the world occured before, however all of the action takes place after 1900 and that's why it's in that section.
I) Revolution
(19th Century - 1919)
The Great War (1913-16), the bloodiest war in the history of man, saw the deaths of millions of able bodied men as well as pushed two decrepit empires to their breaking points and beyond. It is highly unlikely the Balkan Revolution would have met with the same level of success had the Austrian and Ottoman Empires not bled themselves white. Both sides lost well over one million soldiers each to the bloodshed and gridlock that was the Balkan Front. The Revolution forever altered the face of Europe, presented the most drastic shift of borders in centuries. Out of the ashes of two decaying empires came the grand experiment in communism.
The causes of the Balkan Revolution were many and spanned the decades preceding the Great War. Chief among the causes was the partition of the Balkan Peninsula and all of its nationalities between the Austrians and Ottoman Turks. Nationalism and Pan-Slavic sentiments alone would have inevitably led towards a round of uprising in the 20th Century to match those that struck both empires in the mid-19th. Hundreds of thousands were killed in the failed rebellions and millions more fled as the Habsburgs and Osmanis enacted a terrible retribution.
In the 1820s, revolution struck at the Spanish Empire. In the course of a year, the Spanish monarchy was abolished and the Iberian Peninsula transformed into a republic, not that different from the petty states of Italy. Liberal revolution spread north of the Pyrenees into France, forcing the Bourbons to flee to Quebec while the short-lived French Republic tried to remake France in Spain’s image. The Republic ultimately reverted to a Constitutional Monarchy on the Dutch and British design, with a new royal family sitting in Versailles.
The first such rebellion attempting to emulate the success of the Spanish Revolution struck in Greece in 1845. For the summer of that year, cities such as Athens and Thebes basked in the glow of liberty. So successful for the initial rebellion that delegates met in Athens to declare their independence from the Ottoman Empire. Their declaration proved to be premature. By October 1845, the Ottoman Army crushed the rebellions, apprehended the leaders and put the city of Thebes to the torch.
A similar rebellion struck Serbia in 1878, with a less lofty goal. They sought for autonomy, the final say in their internal affairs. Their rebellion as less well organized than the Greeks and failed to capture any important city. The small towns the rebels held were quickly recaptured, the rebels executed and towns depopulated either through massacres or forced relocations to distant corners of the empire, namely throughout the Islamic portion of the Ottoman Empire and forcefully converted to Islam.
Several more, smaller bush fires infected the Christian portion of the Ottoman Empire. For three centuries, the bulk of Orthodox Christianity was held under the boot of the Turks. Though some people, namely the Bosniaks and Albanians did convert, the majority clung to their old ways. These people were subject to the Jizya as well as other discriminatory practices. Their sons were subject to conscription into the Ottoman Army and some were seized outright, enslaved by the Sultan and placed in the Turk’s elite corps, the Janissaries.
Austria faced its share of ethnic rebellions. The largest of these occurred in Hungary during the 1860s. From 1861-64, the Austrians and Hungarians waged a protracted war, displacing more than a million Hungarians. The uprisings could not have occurred at a worst time for the Hungarians. After years of negotiation in Vienna, the Emperor was poised to make Hungary a separate kingdom with a Habsburg sitting on its throne. The Austro-Hungarian Empire, as it would have been called, was quickly aborted in the Hungarians’ attempt at full independence.
Following the uprisings, the Ottomans sought to spread uniformity across their empire. Oddly enough, and despite Serbian claims, the Ottomans largely left the Orthodox, and smaller Catholic communities to their own devices. They were still obligated to pay taxes and surrender their sons to the army but they retained their own customs and language. The goal of the reforms was to standardize the set of laws spanning the empire as well as imposing Turkish as the sole official language. Public schools, where they existed, were forbidden to teach in any other language. It was hoped that a common language would unite the various ethnicities into a single whole. Attempts to reform the army were not as successful as the Turkish Army and its various local militias resisted the Sultan’s attempts at change.
North of the Danube, the Austrian Empire found itself even less united than the Turks. Its cohesion was so low that units in the Austrian Army were formed along ethnic lines. Regiments were raised in the provinces and the soldiers within often had more loyalty to the regiment and their homelands than to Vienna. There was no equivalent of the Janissaries in this fractious state. The lack of unity plagued Austrian during the wars of the 19th Century. The problem grew worse when the Great War started.
Outside of German Austria the majority of the empire’s population were impoverished non-Germans, ruined by high taxation rates. In almost all aspects of life, non-German ethnicities were treated decidedly as subject populations subordinate to the ruling race. Only ethnic Germans could acts as civil servants or hold high ranks within the armed forces. Most of the land outside of Austria Proper was owned by German settlers who used the Magyars, Croats and Slovaks as serf labor.
When Marx and Valois first developed their political and economic theory, they predicted revolution would strike in the industrial west. At the time when each lived, the plight of the industrial worker was quite miserable. Over the decades it changed, especially in the Dutch and English speaking words. The working class eventually managed to elevate themselves to the property owning middle-class, especially in the Brazilian Empire, and were less inclined to surrender their hard-earned gains in the cause of worker solidarity.
Though industrialization barely took hold in the Balkans by the turn of the 20th Century, ruthless suppression of the peasantry caused many took look longingly at the doctrine of social and economic equality. Most ethnicities in the Balkans suffered from mass inequality with the plight only marginally more bearable for thus under the Sultan. They at least could act as civil servants within their own communities. The doctrine of equality and a classless society appealed to many people in the Balkans, though it was only widely read in the small cadre of educated middle-class.
During the Great War, these subject populations found themselves forced to take up arms to fight and die for their rulers in Vienna and Constantinople, occasionally against their fellow ethnicities on the opposite side of the Danube. For the first year of the war, the Ottoman Empire sat on the sidelines, watching and waiting. As Austrian and Russo-Sweden fought each other, the Sultan bided his time while his foes weakened each other.
The Turks entered the fry on September 7, 1914, against both combatants, turning the Balkan Front into a three-way struggle with the natives caught in the middle. The peasants under Austrian and Turkish rule were swept up in conscription, fighting in their homeland to decide which foreigner would rule over them. The Serbs suffered the greatest. With populations on both side of the Danube, Serb often fought Serb in the name of Habsburg or Osmani. The suffering was not in vain, for through training and combat, future revolutionaries gained valuable skills.
Austria wasted little time in overrunning much of Serbia by the start of 1915. The Ottoman Empire was poorly equipped and unready for war. Aside from the Janissary Corps, the Turks had little in the way of modern weaponry. A few units, raised in Albania and Macedonia, still used muzzle-loading rifles. Machine guns were few and far between. Most in use by the Turkish Army were captured from the Austrians. As they fought against the Entente and Central Powers, the Ottoman Empire found itself relying upon its own limited industrial base to supply its armies.
Its entry into the Great War was caused by an absolutist ruler who believed his two battered and weakened foes would be easy targets for land grabs. They were far from pushovers, especially the Swedes. Much of the Caucasus ended the war in Russo-Swedish control. The Turks had more success against Austria. The city of Belgrade found itself fought over three times during the war. The Ottomans exploited a Swedish offensive in Galicia, using the diversion to push back to the Danube, retaking a battered Belgrade.
The bloodletting along the Danube did neither empire any good. Yet it proved ultimately beneficial to the future rulers of the Balkans. Like the Spanish Revolution nearly ninety years before, the Balkan Revolution was not formulated by the masses of peasantry but rather by the well-educated middle class. In many of the educated circles, the doctrines of Marx and Valois were all the rage. It was seen as fashionable for a Serb doctor or Slovene lawyer to read Das Kapital. It led many to envision transforming the two empires into a socialist federation of equal.
Some of the nationalities preferred to break away, striking out to re-establish the old ways. They were in the minority. If history taught them anything it was that when Balkan peoples stood alone, they were targets for empires looking for easy conquest. Separate underground societies kept in touch with each other, tracking each others movements as well as planning a joint effort. Dominating most of these societies were Marxists.
I) Revolution
(19th Century - 1919)
The Great War (1913-16), the bloodiest war in the history of man, saw the deaths of millions of able bodied men as well as pushed two decrepit empires to their breaking points and beyond. It is highly unlikely the Balkan Revolution would have met with the same level of success had the Austrian and Ottoman Empires not bled themselves white. Both sides lost well over one million soldiers each to the bloodshed and gridlock that was the Balkan Front. The Revolution forever altered the face of Europe, presented the most drastic shift of borders in centuries. Out of the ashes of two decaying empires came the grand experiment in communism.
The causes of the Balkan Revolution were many and spanned the decades preceding the Great War. Chief among the causes was the partition of the Balkan Peninsula and all of its nationalities between the Austrians and Ottoman Turks. Nationalism and Pan-Slavic sentiments alone would have inevitably led towards a round of uprising in the 20th Century to match those that struck both empires in the mid-19th. Hundreds of thousands were killed in the failed rebellions and millions more fled as the Habsburgs and Osmanis enacted a terrible retribution.
In the 1820s, revolution struck at the Spanish Empire. In the course of a year, the Spanish monarchy was abolished and the Iberian Peninsula transformed into a republic, not that different from the petty states of Italy. Liberal revolution spread north of the Pyrenees into France, forcing the Bourbons to flee to Quebec while the short-lived French Republic tried to remake France in Spain’s image. The Republic ultimately reverted to a Constitutional Monarchy on the Dutch and British design, with a new royal family sitting in Versailles.
The first such rebellion attempting to emulate the success of the Spanish Revolution struck in Greece in 1845. For the summer of that year, cities such as Athens and Thebes basked in the glow of liberty. So successful for the initial rebellion that delegates met in Athens to declare their independence from the Ottoman Empire. Their declaration proved to be premature. By October 1845, the Ottoman Army crushed the rebellions, apprehended the leaders and put the city of Thebes to the torch.
A similar rebellion struck Serbia in 1878, with a less lofty goal. They sought for autonomy, the final say in their internal affairs. Their rebellion as less well organized than the Greeks and failed to capture any important city. The small towns the rebels held were quickly recaptured, the rebels executed and towns depopulated either through massacres or forced relocations to distant corners of the empire, namely throughout the Islamic portion of the Ottoman Empire and forcefully converted to Islam.
Several more, smaller bush fires infected the Christian portion of the Ottoman Empire. For three centuries, the bulk of Orthodox Christianity was held under the boot of the Turks. Though some people, namely the Bosniaks and Albanians did convert, the majority clung to their old ways. These people were subject to the Jizya as well as other discriminatory practices. Their sons were subject to conscription into the Ottoman Army and some were seized outright, enslaved by the Sultan and placed in the Turk’s elite corps, the Janissaries.
Austria faced its share of ethnic rebellions. The largest of these occurred in Hungary during the 1860s. From 1861-64, the Austrians and Hungarians waged a protracted war, displacing more than a million Hungarians. The uprisings could not have occurred at a worst time for the Hungarians. After years of negotiation in Vienna, the Emperor was poised to make Hungary a separate kingdom with a Habsburg sitting on its throne. The Austro-Hungarian Empire, as it would have been called, was quickly aborted in the Hungarians’ attempt at full independence.
Following the uprisings, the Ottomans sought to spread uniformity across their empire. Oddly enough, and despite Serbian claims, the Ottomans largely left the Orthodox, and smaller Catholic communities to their own devices. They were still obligated to pay taxes and surrender their sons to the army but they retained their own customs and language. The goal of the reforms was to standardize the set of laws spanning the empire as well as imposing Turkish as the sole official language. Public schools, where they existed, were forbidden to teach in any other language. It was hoped that a common language would unite the various ethnicities into a single whole. Attempts to reform the army were not as successful as the Turkish Army and its various local militias resisted the Sultan’s attempts at change.
North of the Danube, the Austrian Empire found itself even less united than the Turks. Its cohesion was so low that units in the Austrian Army were formed along ethnic lines. Regiments were raised in the provinces and the soldiers within often had more loyalty to the regiment and their homelands than to Vienna. There was no equivalent of the Janissaries in this fractious state. The lack of unity plagued Austrian during the wars of the 19th Century. The problem grew worse when the Great War started.
Outside of German Austria the majority of the empire’s population were impoverished non-Germans, ruined by high taxation rates. In almost all aspects of life, non-German ethnicities were treated decidedly as subject populations subordinate to the ruling race. Only ethnic Germans could acts as civil servants or hold high ranks within the armed forces. Most of the land outside of Austria Proper was owned by German settlers who used the Magyars, Croats and Slovaks as serf labor.
When Marx and Valois first developed their political and economic theory, they predicted revolution would strike in the industrial west. At the time when each lived, the plight of the industrial worker was quite miserable. Over the decades it changed, especially in the Dutch and English speaking words. The working class eventually managed to elevate themselves to the property owning middle-class, especially in the Brazilian Empire, and were less inclined to surrender their hard-earned gains in the cause of worker solidarity.
Though industrialization barely took hold in the Balkans by the turn of the 20th Century, ruthless suppression of the peasantry caused many took look longingly at the doctrine of social and economic equality. Most ethnicities in the Balkans suffered from mass inequality with the plight only marginally more bearable for thus under the Sultan. They at least could act as civil servants within their own communities. The doctrine of equality and a classless society appealed to many people in the Balkans, though it was only widely read in the small cadre of educated middle-class.
During the Great War, these subject populations found themselves forced to take up arms to fight and die for their rulers in Vienna and Constantinople, occasionally against their fellow ethnicities on the opposite side of the Danube. For the first year of the war, the Ottoman Empire sat on the sidelines, watching and waiting. As Austrian and Russo-Sweden fought each other, the Sultan bided his time while his foes weakened each other.
The Turks entered the fry on September 7, 1914, against both combatants, turning the Balkan Front into a three-way struggle with the natives caught in the middle. The peasants under Austrian and Turkish rule were swept up in conscription, fighting in their homeland to decide which foreigner would rule over them. The Serbs suffered the greatest. With populations on both side of the Danube, Serb often fought Serb in the name of Habsburg or Osmani. The suffering was not in vain, for through training and combat, future revolutionaries gained valuable skills.
Austria wasted little time in overrunning much of Serbia by the start of 1915. The Ottoman Empire was poorly equipped and unready for war. Aside from the Janissary Corps, the Turks had little in the way of modern weaponry. A few units, raised in Albania and Macedonia, still used muzzle-loading rifles. Machine guns were few and far between. Most in use by the Turkish Army were captured from the Austrians. As they fought against the Entente and Central Powers, the Ottoman Empire found itself relying upon its own limited industrial base to supply its armies.
Its entry into the Great War was caused by an absolutist ruler who believed his two battered and weakened foes would be easy targets for land grabs. They were far from pushovers, especially the Swedes. Much of the Caucasus ended the war in Russo-Swedish control. The Turks had more success against Austria. The city of Belgrade found itself fought over three times during the war. The Ottomans exploited a Swedish offensive in Galicia, using the diversion to push back to the Danube, retaking a battered Belgrade.
The bloodletting along the Danube did neither empire any good. Yet it proved ultimately beneficial to the future rulers of the Balkans. Like the Spanish Revolution nearly ninety years before, the Balkan Revolution was not formulated by the masses of peasantry but rather by the well-educated middle class. In many of the educated circles, the doctrines of Marx and Valois were all the rage. It was seen as fashionable for a Serb doctor or Slovene lawyer to read Das Kapital. It led many to envision transforming the two empires into a socialist federation of equal.
Some of the nationalities preferred to break away, striking out to re-establish the old ways. They were in the minority. If history taught them anything it was that when Balkan peoples stood alone, they were targets for empires looking for easy conquest. Separate underground societies kept in touch with each other, tracking each others movements as well as planning a joint effort. Dominating most of these societies were Marxists.