Possibly, but I do not know how much likely it will be as here Bedford will be dead before the date of his OTL remarriage to Jacquetta, depriving England of one of his most able military leaders and of a direct link to Burgundy earlier than OTL so is possible who things there will go more or less as OTL. Also is unlikely who Philip will be happy with the first reaction of the English Court to Anne’s elopement and secret remarriage (is not like he will be thrilled for that, but still...)
First her mother is much richer than OTL, second if Elizabeth’s match to March happen under suggestion of her uncle/cousin (who would be most interested in such match) they will also contribuite to her dowry. Third Elizabeth’s father is a nobody but she has no reason for being unpopular here: she is marrying the heir of the Duke of York, not a King and she is doing that as niece of the Duke of Burgundy. Keep in mind who Elizabeth’s brothers also had made good matches, and who the Nevilles need to kept their contempt for Richard Woodville for themselves here (also Rivers will be already an Earl at the time of his daughter’s wedding)
OK, the idea is that Anne, surviving, parallels John's OTL widow Jacquetta by marrying Richard Woodville. The OTL marriage was unlikely (widowed royal Duchess marries commoner!), but it happened, so the ATL marriage could happen.
Anne was a full fledged princess, the legitimate daughter of the Duke of Burgundy or Bedford would have NOT married her. Anne would likely remain close to her full brother, Lancastrian or not (and in OTL before everything had gone to hell Richard and Jacquetta were a lot closer to York than Somerset). Now is Burgundy who is searching ties with England and the Yorks in particular: Charles the Bold, who is nephew of Anne, wanted marry Anne of York, but was prevented by an agreement who forced him to marry in France. He has no sister, so offering his English cousin as bride to March would be a good replacement (also keep in mind who at this point Richard Woodville was already elevated to the Earldom so the girl is not so low ranking on her father’s side).
Bedford dying in '33 means York's regent of France, with all the powers associated, so he'll get there earlier. OTL York succeeding Bedford was essentially regarded as "same dude here with a different name", so with York over there earlier I can't see the whole situation fudging.
Right... I managed to confuse her with Duke Philip's bastard daughter Anne (her niece).
Woodville was created Baron in 1448; he was not created Earl until 1466, after Elizabeth's marriage to Edward IV. The baronage came
OTL, ATL things would be different as Anne’s higher status would suggest to the King or his regents an earlier elevation of her husband to the peerage (as Baron Rivers or Baron Woodville) and raising to an Earldom the English brother-in law of the Duke of Burgundy for his military success would be a good political move once Burgundy started to get again closer to England.
I think perhaps there are bigger butterflies here in the 1430s than you're suggesting. Anne was reportedly Philip's favorite sister, and so I suspect his reaction would be much stronger than simple unhappiness at a lowly remarriage. It may strain or break the English alliance sooner, and that of course could upend the career of York in ATL.
If Anne and her brother ever reconcile after the marriage fallout, I have to imagine that the Woodvilles would remain pro-Lancaster as they were in OTL -- at least until York won. Beyond Woodville's OTL connections to the Lancastrians, Burgundy needed a strong England to play off France in their decades-long three-way diplomatic games. Crushing a rebellion was in Burgundy's interest, and so that would have to be a concern for Anne.
OTL, Woodville got his earldom as the King's father-in-law. ITTL, he's the King's late uncle's widow's second husband.
You seem to be certain that Philip has some kind of high regard for Woodville, just because Woodville married his sister. Medieval and Renaissance history is replete with in-laws who loathed one another.
Possibly. But it would have to be a negotiated family alliance, with immense political implications. IMO, Philip would not take sides in English politics with a quasi-rebel. And not a Woodville girl.
See above.
Not blood ties, marital ties - which were not particularly binding in that era. And an alliance?
You find so unlikely who Anne’s remarriage would be accepted by her brother once she is pregnant and do not regret it at all? Also York was NOT a semi-rebel for most of the time BEFORE everything had gone to hell and Burgundy was clearly interested in a marital alliance with them (around 1453-1454 Charles the Bold had sought a match with Anne of York, but was forced to renounce to it as he was forced by a treaty to choose a French bride. Is so implausible who having an English cousin of a good age to be matched with March, he would suggest that match (OTL only the younger daughters of the Duke of Bourbon were of the right age for March, but the Duke of Burgundy and the Duke of Bourbon do not had a good relationship and Charles’ own match with Isabella was the consequence of a truce)
The point is who once Henry VI married Marguerite, shifting towards France, Burgundy started to get close to the Yorks.
When Mary Tudor married Charles Brandon without permission, Henry VIII's privy council wanted him imprisoned or executed, even though Brandon was a duke and his good friend. Henry let them off with an enormous fine. IMO, Philip would be deeply offended, and would want the presumptuous Woodville imprisoned or executed, and Anne sent home. (He'd probably want her sent home when Bedford dies.) The moderating factor could be that he hasn't seen Anne for ten years; she's left the family. But that would mean he is merely indifferent about the marriage; he won't like it or Woodville at all.
1457 is after:
That was when Henry first went mad and York had become Protector. In 1457, York was definitely on the outside looking in. For Philip to contract a marriage alliance with York at this time would mean taking sides against Henry and the ruling court faction.
I'm not sure I'm following you here. I'm not saying that an Edward-ATL Elizabeth wedding is unreasonable, but just that I think you're overemphasizing the impact this marriage would have on Burgundy and on Richard Woodville. Marriage often did not matter when it came to choosing sides in the WOTR -- see, for instance, Anne of York and Exeter.
Charles was already forced to marry a French bride by the treaty of Arras and his father was unwilling to break it so persuaded his son to marry a daughter of Bourbon. Also York was a royal Duke and the English equivalent of the first Prince of blood and the head of the anti-French faction so sponsoring a match between his sister’s daughter and York’s heir would likely satisfy Charles‘ wish to ties with England without damaging anything. York was still Lord Protector and in full power when Charles married Isabella of Bourbon.
